Connect with us

Media Bias

Trump is about to go to war with The New York Times after they did one sick thing



The New York Times was once a respected publication that covered the news of the day.

But now they are nothing more than a fake news outlet.

And Trump is about to go to war with The New York Times after they did one sick thing.

The mainstream media has given up on even trying to make it seem like they are unbiased when it comes to President Trump.

Their entire news cycles are built by insane Left-wing extremists with an axe to grind against President Trump.

So when an outlet decides they are going to go against the trend and actually cover the president fairly, there is uproar from the Left.

That is exactly what happened to The New York Times, which was originally slated to run a story about Trump’s response to the El Paso shooting with the title “Trump Urges Unity vs. Racism.”

But following angry Leftists on Twitter, the paper changed the headline to read “Assailing Hate, But Not Guns.”

NewsBusters reports:

The New York Times went to press for Tuesday’s print edition with the banner headline “Trump Urges Unity Vs. Racism.” But that accurate summation of what President Trump said about the mass murders in El Paso and Dayton did not please the left on Twitter, which demanded “context” about Trump actually being a racist demagogue.

And the Times, which relies on the left for its readership, swiftly obeyed, showing repentance by admitting “The headline was bad” and changing it for the second morning edition (though many national versions arrived in driveways with the initial “offensive” headline intact).

Under the left-wing Twitter pressure, fostered by a tweet from polling expert Nate Silver, the paper swiftly updated the headline to a more Trump-skeptical headline “Assailing Hate, But Not Guns.”

The new headline is clearly meant to paint Trump in a more negative light.

In reality, his speech following the El Paso shooting was a strong condemnation of racism, and a call for unity.

So the original headline actually fit what the president said.

The new headline is simply a way to please the Left who believe that anything said about Trump must be negative.

Do you think The New York Times is fake news?

Let us know your thoughts in the comment section below.

Continue Reading


  1. Ayers Rick

    August 8, 2019 at 3:36 pm

    I wouldn’t wipe my but with the NYT if I was stuck if I was stuck in NYC with no TP for fear of soiling myself.

    • Gerry

      August 8, 2019 at 3:59 pm

      Took the words right out of my mouth. The nyt and 99% of the rest of the media outlets(they certainly aren’t news outlets) are not worth a pile of dog crap. Our President doesn’t need to do battle with these worthless rags — they will put themselves out of business. They are gutless and they are as phony as a 3 dollar bill. And you are exactly right — not worth wiping your butt with.

    • alicia cervera

      August 8, 2019 at 8:05 pm

      NYT is as FAKE can be. They never even reported on the Holocaust atrocities to the Jews being jews themselves! So, they are dishonest, omitting important news, flip flopping caving to the Leftist narrative, probably Soros is a big investor in them.. Who wants a newspaper who does that? They have no ETHICS NO SCRUPLES! That has consequences and their demise just like CNN’s is approaching in view. Not buying them.PERIOD!

    • Camille Gilliam

      August 10, 2019 at 7:33 pm

      Good one!

  2. William Dorich

    August 8, 2019 at 3:41 pm

    “All the news that’s fit to shit”
    Or is this “Advocacy Journalism” as CNN’s Ms. Amanpour bragged about in her coverage of the Bosnian Civil War in which thousands of Serbs were killed like fish in a barrel? A war in which Anthony Lewis of the NYT wrote: “Bosnian Serb broadcasts told viewers and listeners that Serbian fighters were being roasted alive on spits. For many, this was the only source of news, and they believed.”
    I wrote to Anthony Lewis and sent him and Foreign Editor Bernard Gwertsman 6 images of roasted Serb soldiers each victim identified in the photos taken by Japanese Photojournalist Yasunari Mizuguchi. I demanded a retraction and received total silence…These letters and images were sent by FedEx and were signed by both Lewis and Gwertzman.

    We Serbs know about “all the news that’s fit to print” and we also know what corrupt, dishonest assholes the Times staff is made up of…As a Serbian journalist and author of 6 books on Balkan history including my best selling book, Kosovo written in 1992, I sent the editorial staff more than 50 articles over two years written not by me, but by Dr. Alex Dragnich, former State Department representative in Belgrade after WWII, Professor of Balkan history at Vanderbilt University, author of 12 books on Balkan history and religion and recipient of the Thomas Jefferson Award for Distinguished Service at Vanderbilt…the Times refused to print a single one of those articles during the war, but published numerous articles by a Muslim professor at De Paul University, Mahmoud Cherif Bassiouni who suffered from a total lack of Balkan education and experience. “Fit to print”…what a crock of media bull shit!

  3. Monica Henry

    August 8, 2019 at 3:45 pm

    MSNBC, CNN, AL Sharpton Soo Dishonest and very fake NEWS And they’re soo Corrupt and Scam Bag,

  4. Stewart M Bestwick

    August 8, 2019 at 3:52 pm

    Have no use for the NYT! They used to be a great source of accuate information, but since they have turned about face on truth and professional journalism I don’t waste my money on that rag. My parrot doesn’t even like the NYT for his cage, he rip’s it to pieces, long ago, so I don’t waste the money. The editor and staff are all a joke to the word professional.

    • Gerry

      August 8, 2019 at 4:03 pm

      Good parrot, smart parrot !!!!

  5. Tom S.

    August 8, 2019 at 4:01 pm

    Thank you, William Dorich, for pointing out how egregiously The New York Times has continued “kowtowing” to the “left.” Their initial headline was actually correct, but pressure from those EVEN FURTHER to the “left” brought a change of the headline in the second edition that day !!! It proves that the naturally fitting headline which someone chose was later OVERRULED by someone else – perhaps in FEAR of repercussions !!!

  6. Mark

    August 8, 2019 at 4:05 pm

    If you are paying attention like a lot of people (of all color) are.
    The left thinks we are all stupid, “wrong”, I’m pretty sure it’s gonna be really really bad for those few democrats that aren’t insane like today’s politicians in the fake news. It is a shame, they could care less for we the people, power is all they want.
    Loved the UN saying that unless we curb carbon in the US they’ll be not enough food to feed the world, when the CO2 is what the plants Have to have.
    Also more food was great last year than any year

    • Rob

      August 8, 2019 at 5:13 pm


      Well said. But why confuse the Left with facts?

  7. John J

    August 8, 2019 at 4:07 pm

    Mr. Trump should be hard at work doing the people’s business; such as deporting 40+ million squatters who cost us billions per year and getting the wall built, his spokes people should be crushing shit like the NYT

    • Mark

      August 8, 2019 at 4:10 pm

      Spot on sir????

  8. Marc

    August 8, 2019 at 4:28 pm

    This former refugee from a communist hell renamed the New York newspaper as the NY Pravda.

    • snooky6677

      August 8, 2019 at 4:40 pm

      The New York Times is a washed-up news paper they don’t tell the truth they lie because the lefties don’t want them to tell the truth they want the American people to think that Trump is bad and the Democrats are good well guess what Democrats you’re all full of s*** just like this paper and again I would never even wipe my butt with your newspaper for fear of catching some kind of disease

  9. Bonnie Sears

    August 8, 2019 at 4:36 pm

    I hope President Trump sues the daylights and nightlife out of this crap publication, forcing it to close down!

  10. Douglas

    August 8, 2019 at 4:44 pm

    We need news outlet to print the news that is happing not some made up stores. It is bad that we They are not news outlets but they are just telling a story that is most lies not the truth.

  11. Richard Tremaine

    August 8, 2019 at 5:42 pm

    The media conglomerate should be broken up and sold off in bits and peaces to buyers who promise to print the truth and editorials not be written without opposing articles on the editorial pages.

  12. Dennis B Anderson

    August 8, 2019 at 6:15 pm

    It`s time for slander suits to shut down these propaganda rags.
    They are supposed to report the news not make up their own. They have forgotten the difference and it`s time it cost them their jobs.

  13. dennodogg

    August 9, 2019 at 1:35 am

    Attempted to forward this article to shlt faced book and it wouldn’t let me. Claims that Pants on Fire is deemed “offensive by others”.

  14. ric

    August 9, 2019 at 11:28 am


  15. N

    August 10, 2019 at 6:43 pm

    DS traitors are everywhere!The evil corrupted lib demoncrat Commie Nazi’s party & minions! RINOs(Lee,Moran,Murkowski,Portman,Toomey,Wicker,Blunt,Graham,Collins,Romney,Rubio,etc)they’re just as bad!Drain the rat infested Swp,Pres Trump!

  16. Wa\tchdog

    August 11, 2019 at 2:01 am

    ALWAYS NEGATIVE-VITRIOLIC. There is a dark force here.

  17. RIC Oswald

    August 14, 2019 at 11:54 pm


  18. R.F. HORKA

    August 17, 2019 at 4:12 pm


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Media Bias

A bombshell just dropped proving the mainstream media answers to Obama




Despite no longer being President, the mainstream media still loves to promote Barack Obama.

They often claim that Trump’s successes are actually due to him.

And a bombshell just dropped proving the mainstream media answers to Obama.

Everybody knows the media is biased against President Donald Trump.

But they just took that bias to new levels with a report from AFP that was used by a number of major news outlets, including NPR and Reuters.

The report claims that the U.S. still has over 100,000 children in migrant detention centers.

But the report is completely false, considering it references numbers from 2015, when Obama was President.

Instead of correcting this error, and pointing out it was Obama they should be attacking, they simply deleted the entire article.

The Washington Free Beacon reports:

On Wednesday several news outlets were forced to retract stories lamenting the number of migrant children detained by U.S. authorities after it emerged the pieces were based on Obama-era figures.

In a Tuesday press conference ahead of the release of the United Nations Global Study on Children Deprived of Liberty, independent expert Manfred Nowak told reporters that the United States “still [has] more than 100,000 children in migration-related detention.” Nowak also told AFP, “The total number currently detained is 103,000.”
That figure also formed the basis of articles from NPR and the wire service Reuters, whose version was then picked up by outlets such as NBC News, the New York Times, and HuffPost.

Democrats on the House Homeland Security Committee quickly seized upon the figures, tweeting, “These numbers are horrifying. The Trump administration’s child separation policy is cruel and shameful.”

But some immigration reporters and activists immediately cried foul.

“I… don’t think that number is accurate,” tweeted BuzzFeed’s Hamed Aleaziz.

“That’s not true,” tweeted Aaron Reichlin-Melnick, a lawyer at the American Immigration Council. “Currently, there are [around] 1,500 kids in family detention, plus [around] 5,000 kids in [Office of Refugee Resettlement] shelters… I am baffled at this claim.”

This is one of the most extreme cases of anti-Trump bias yet.

First they attack Trump for something he didn’t do, and then they remove the article as soon as it comes out that it was Obama who was responsible.

Do you think the media is unfair to President Trump?

Let us know your thoughts in the comment section below.

Continue Reading

Media Bias

Fox News just admitted they are in the anti-Trump resistance with just two words




Fox News is no longer the fair and balanced network it once was.

With a few notable exceptions, they are basically CNN with a different name.

And Fox News just admitted they are in the anti-Trump resistance with just two words.

If you aren’t watching Tucker Carlson, Sean Hannity, or one or two other fair voices on Fox News, the network is complete garbage.

They spend all their time now attacking President Trump.

And one of the worst offenders is Bret Baier.

He proved that following EU Ambassador Gordon Sondland’s testimony, claiming it was “very damaging” for President Trump.

Breitbart News reports:

On Wednesday’s broadcast of Fox News Channel’s special coverage of the House Intelligence Committee’s impeachment inquiry, network anchor Bret Baier discussed the testimony of EU Ambassador Gordon Sondland, which he described as “very damaging” for President Donald Trump’s defense.

Baier said, “Listen, on its face, it’s very damaging to some of the arguments the GOP has been making. I think it is going to be fascinating to see in cross-examination how they go. Remember back in October, President Trump called Ambassador Sondland, ‘a really good man and a great American.’ He is testifying now I think cleaning up for Gordon Sondland rather than President Trump.”

It seems like Baier didn’t even watch his testimony, because Sondland outright admits that Trump stated that he wanted no “quid pro quo” with Ukraine in order to get an investigation into Joe Biden and his son.

Baier likely watched CNN’s biased coverage of the testimony, rather than the testimony itself, which actually exonerates Trump.

President Trump pointed this out to a group of reporters stating that Sondland’s testimony “means it’s all over” for Schiff’s impeachment scheme.

But Baier apparently didn’t get that memo, and instead pushed far-Left propaganda.

Fox News seems to be hedging their bets on Trump being removed from office, or losing in 2020.

That isn’t surprising considering that former Speaker of the House Paul Ryan, who is on the board of Fox, reportedly told executives they need to begin planning for “post-Trump” America.

Do you still watch Fox News?

Let us know your thoughts in the comment section below.

Continue Reading

Media Bias

What the media did to Stacey Abrams is the smoking gun exposing an anti-Trump scheme




Stacey Abrams became a Democrat hero overnight by refusing to concede in her race for governor in Georgia.

She is now one of the top players in the entire Democrat Party.

And what the media just did to her is the smoking gun exposing an anti-Trump scheme.

The mainstream media continues to prove how biased they are.

But it is not often as clear as the recent situation relating to Kentucky Governor Matt Bevin, who waited nine days to concede after losing re-election.

NPR came out stating that Bevin’s decision to wait before conceding “erode[s] confidence in democracy.”

But in the case of Abrams, they continue to praise her, and ten days after her loss, where she still refused to outright concede, they lauded her “fiery speech” while citing all her claims without any of their own commentary.

NewsBusters reports:

Nine days after the election, Kentucky Gov. Matt Bevin conceded defeat on Thursday. A year after her defeat, Georgia’s Stacey Abrams maintains she was robbed. Ashe Schow at the Daily Wire pointed out this week that NPR has a very different standard on this score for Republicans and Democrats.

Last Sunday, NPR tweeted this about Bevin:

Without providing evidence, Kentucky Gov. Matt Bevin questioned the election’s legitimacy. And he isn’t the first politician to do so. Elections specialists worry that unsubstantiated claims about voter fraud erode confidence in democracy.”

NPR’s online story was headlined “Skeptics Urge Bevin To Show Proof Of Fraud Claims, Warning Of Corrosive Effects.”

Ten days after she lost in Georgia and (sort of) admitted she lost, NPR’s tweet had a different sound:

In a fiery speech, Abrams insisted this was no normal concession, decrying what she called the “deliberate and intentional” voter suppression by Kemp that she believes led to this result in the Georgia governor’s race.

This shows just how much the mainstream media hates Trump.

Even NPR, which receives federal funding, has an entirely different tone when it comes to Republicans than when it comes to Democrats.

Do you think the media is biased against Trump?

Let us know your thoughts in the comment section below.

Continue Reading

Sign Up For FREE Alerts


Poll of the Day

  • The failing New York Times released yet another hit piece on Justice Brett Kavanaugh re-hashing debunked smears.

    The Times failed to mention the alleged victim didn't recall the supposed "incident." In response, President Trump called for “the resignation of everybody at The New York Times involved in the Kavanaugh smear story.”