Connect with us

Fake News

You won’t believe who The New York Times said was really responsible for 9/11



The Fake News Media has lied and covered up about 9/11 for years.

They worked to downplay the real culprits behind the terror attacks that murdered 3,000 innocent Americans.

And you won’t believe who The New York Times said was really responsible for 9/11.

Because of political correctness, the Left has a blind spot for radical Islamic terrorism.

Liberals refuse to even say the phrase.

That was apparent in a tweet from The New York Times about an article in the paper remembering the 19th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks.

The Times claimed “airplanes took aim and brought down the World Trade Center – as if the airplanes took off and crashed into the twin towers of their own free will.

The New York Times tweeted and then deleted a comment Wednesday about the 9/11 attacks that suggested airplanes, not terrorists, were responsible for killing almost 3,000 people.

The article is about “remembering those lost 18 years ago on 9/11,” when terrorists overtook multiple planes and crashed them into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. Another plane crashed into a Pennsylvania field after citizens on board tried to take down the terrorists.

“18 years have passed since airplanes took aim and brought down the World Trade Center,” the NYT original tweet read. Terrorists were responsible for the 9/11 attacks, not airplanes.

The tweet was deleted shortly after, and the NYT wrote that the tweet and story had been “edited for clarity.” The article was changed shortly after to reflect that terrorists were responsible for killing almost 3,000 people.

After a massive public outrage, The Times deleted tweet and replaced it with one that reads “18 years after nearly 3,000 people were lost, families of those killed in the terror attacks will gather at the 9/11 memorial. There will be a moment of silence at 8:46 a.m., then the names of the dead — one by one — will be recited.”

But even still this revision fails to identify what kind of terrorists launched the attacks.

18 years later and The New York Times still cannot bring itself to use the phrase “Islamic terrorism.”

We will keep you up-to-date on any new developments in this ongoing story,

Continue Reading


  1. Thomas Sanders

    September 12, 2019 at 3:53 pm

    The media has reported that the act of violence committed against America was perpetrated by “Radical Muslims”. We do know that jet fuel burns at 1/4 of the temp required to bend and melt the steel ‘i’ beams. We also know that what were apparently soldiers dressed in black utilities without identifying insignias were present in the towers prior to the disaster. It is likely the act of violence was committed solely to usher in the police state and mass surveillance that we now consider to be part of our daily lives. Furthermore, the “Patriot Act” a device to eliminate our rights, our freedoms and our voices and to broaden the powers of law enforcement and government intrusion. We may never know the truth.

    • Steve Scoutaris

      September 12, 2019 at 3:59 pm

      We also know it wasn’t airplanes that decided to kill people. It was Muslims.
      Inanimate objects don’t kill people, and that includes guns. People kill people.

      • Ken

        September 12, 2019 at 5:05 pm

        Another reason to get rid of jets as called for in their Green new deal!

      • Braveryder

        September 14, 2019 at 2:50 am

        Thank you for your absolutely correct comment. I am amazed that the liberals can’t see the light of day. Maybe it’s because their head is where it is.

    • Tim Woolsey

      September 12, 2019 at 6:35 pm

      I know the truth-Radical Islamic Muslim terrorists committed this horrible act in NYC, DC, and in a field in Pennsylvania. It was an act of cowardice by gutless terrorists. NEVER FORGET!

    • Dennis L Ruffin

      September 12, 2019 at 8:32 pm

      Little tommy; off your meds, again?

    • Virginia

      September 13, 2019 at 10:11 pm

      We know a missile hit the Pentagon and we know that FDNY said they heard “bombs” going off in the building(s). And the icing on the cake was when Larry Silverstein said, “I told them to PULL IT.” That’s a term used when demolishing a building. Susan Lindauer worked for the CIA, saw what they were doing and tried to warn the government – they put her in prison.
      Some of the Many Things Most Americans Never Heard About 9/11

    • jth

      September 16, 2019 at 10:29 pm

      You are living proof that humans are the biggest mistake God ever made in creation. If a lefty told you to eat $hit because it was good for you, you would and must have because you are full of it. Get some exlax.

      • Will T

        September 17, 2019 at 3:40 am

        jth, I take such theories with a grain of salt myself, but just wanted to say that some of you are far too trusting, especially of government.


    September 12, 2019 at 4:03 pm

    If these so called News Sources can’t print or tell the TRUTH then they should be put out of business ! They have been selling a pack of LIES for years ! To not blame or charge those responsible for Terrorists Activity is INSANE !

    I have not subscribed to any Magazine or News Print for decades because of the Printed Bull Squirt ! Save a bunch of trees and put an end to these LIARS !

    I have not viewed the News on TV except for weather reports and those are suspect for all they do is GUESS ! A real weather person would take a moment to look at the sky before they opens their mouth !

  3. Timothy Yorgan

    September 12, 2019 at 4:30 pm

    Most conservatives believe the 9/11 event was just that, a “planned” false flag event, no different than Kennedy’s assassination was called, “the event.” It goes back to a remark made by Pres. Franklin Delano Roosevelt, “In politics, nothing happens by accident. If it happens, you can bet it was planned that way.” That wasn’t a casual lament of some kind, but a statement of what he knew to be a melancholy fact and any further divulging may have been life threatening for him from the people he talked about in another quote, “We must especially beware of that small group of selfish men who would clip the wings of the American Eagle in order to feather there own nests.” That was just ambiguous enough to ‘red pill’ those in the know, but not enough to cause the satanic globalists to outright kill him. The “event” of 9/11 was an outside / inside job and too fantastic for the average citizen to accept and those who are warning of it are quickly labeled as a crack-pot, conspiratorial nut-job. Evil men work in the darkness of our ignorance and like George H W Bush once said, “If the people were to ever find out what we have done, we would be chased down the streets and lynched.” Whether that’s a true quote or not, is up for grabs, but in view of the fervor to suppress it by those in Satan’s camp, who regularly lie to us..I would say it’s true and a partial reference to 9/11.

    • Warren A Hall

      September 13, 2019 at 12:29 am

      What an absolute canard! I have NEVER read nor spoken to a conservative who believes 9/11 was a “false flag”. With all of the real-time news and public transmissions of the time, it takes a considerable degree of mental instability to believe such nonsense.

  4. Steve Scoutaris

    September 12, 2019 at 4:50 pm

    Except all the hijackers were Arab and some of them were al-Qaeda members. Nobody will ever prove any of the conspiracy theories, and I’ve noticed an equal split between conservatives and progressives in believing the conspiracy theories. I’m a conservative and so are all my friends. None of them, including myself, believe that men-in-black planted explosives in the buildings or used thermite. My wife believes it though.

    • Ann

      September 12, 2019 at 6:31 pm

      Believe your wife!!! Tower 7 had explosives planted also!!! A fire inside would not have caused that building to collapse, much less collapsed the way it did. Even the planes alone couldn’t have caused that kind of damage!!!

      • Steve Scoutaris

        September 12, 2019 at 6:43 pm

        Call me naive but I just can’t see our government working with al-Qaeda and bin laden to kill 1000s of innocent people. For what? If they knew the planes couldn’t do the job alone why use them in the first place? Why not just let the explosives do the job? None of the conspiracy theories make any sense to me, and I’ve had plenty of discussions with people about them. Just can’t wrap my head around it.

  5. Nunyer Binnis

    September 12, 2019 at 5:20 pm

    The NYT is toilet paper I wouldn’t use on YOUR butt.

    • Dennis L Ruffin

      September 12, 2019 at 8:36 pm

      I lined my parakeet’s bird cage with a complimentary copy of the N.Y.(S)limes so the birds could give it the attention it deserves.

  6. Timothy Toroian

    September 12, 2019 at 5:27 pm

    Do they know who is responsible for turning the Times into a valueless POG?? Newspeople should have something similar to the Bar Association so when one of them does something really dumb they can be decertified. Publicly!!!

  7. Karen

    September 12, 2019 at 5:30 pm

    Robert Mueller helped Saudi Arabians get out of America days after 9-11.AND THAT ROTTEN TRAITOR IS STILL FREE AND BETRAYING AMERICA .

  8. Donald Visconti

    September 12, 2019 at 5:40 pm

    I can’t understand how the left defends Muslims, in the way they treat women! I have never been pro feminist, but respect women and don’t want them treated with disrespect.

    • Donald Visconti

      September 12, 2019 at 5:42 pm

      Excuse me; I may have previously posted this sentiment. It is a strong feeling for me!

    • Steve Scoutaris

      September 12, 2019 at 5:53 pm

      Because the left doesn’t really care about Muslims or women, or gay people, or illegal aliens, or black people. The left only cares about power and they use everyone as pawns. Remember the phrase, “the enemy of my enemy is my friend”. Muslims are the enemy of Israel and Christians, and the left HATES both.

  9. Moe

    September 12, 2019 at 5:46 pm

    What sacks of shit work at NYTimes, under the present editor in Chief the newspaper once world renown, is nothing more than wasted paper and what they print is as good as used toilet paper all bias ignorant bull crap.

  10. DonRS

    September 12, 2019 at 6:59 pm

    Just like guns wake up one day and say to themselves, “Who should we shoot, today!” Then they go out, select a target, then pull their trigger!

    What MINDLESSNESS must reign supreme at the NYT, along with their readers!!

  11. Bruce

    September 13, 2019 at 12:50 pm

    2 things; first of all there is NO such thing as “Radical Muslims” that is a myth that people believe and the media propagates! SE any nation or peoples who are OBLIGATED to LIE for Allah, see Sharia Law #1 and also required s their “DUTY” to commit JIHAD against all Non-Muslims. Sharia Law #2 as well as Sura 5:33-36 Second of all, Muslims areNOT radical, this is their normal! This is how they act when they desire to take over any nation. They are “COWARDS” remember Desert Storm, surrender en masse. they don’t fight when they don’t have numerical or govt etc superiority! They just integrate into a nation, they do what Muslims do, POPULATE like rabbits, take over city offical positions, city councils, (See Michigan) then theyinfiltrate state and federal levels and then when they have numerical superiority they usethe laws of the host nation to change the laws to Sharia Law etc (HAVE YOU EVER READ this “DAMNED” Law(s) There are 38 of these laws and #’s 23-37 are anti-woman!) I KNOW Islam and I KNOW Muslims, they are LIARS and Killers by “THEIR” own laws! NO Mulsims at NO time SEE Public Law 414 1952 Under Harry Truman! Why isn’t this law being upheld!

  12. Bruce

    September 13, 2019 at 1:03 pm

    NYT, they said: the planes killed 3k people right? that is the same analogy they use to get gun control, GUNS kill people, it’s not the people that pull the trigger, it is the GUNS! Guns they just can’t stay on the shelf or in the case they just keep getting up and off the shelves, loading themselves and killing people! There is about as much common sense as would fill the left eye of a Blind spider! Here, if someone, anyone, believes this non-sense! This in just ONE More reason why I hate the Media, and haven’t taken a News paper in over 30 years and do NOT watch the nightly, or any, news! I’d rather get more info from Curly, Larry and Moe!

  13. Bill

    September 13, 2019 at 2:06 pm

    Why do you think we wouldn’t believe who the New York Times claims is responsible for 9/11? If it is something crazy and unbelievable I do believe the Times will say it. I trust any story they pri about as far as I can throw an old worn out symbol of the Democratic party.

  14. Edelmira Espinosa

    September 13, 2019 at 10:57 pm

    Didn’t Bin Lading take responsibility for the attacks, didn’t the prisoner from Guantanamo confess they were responsible for the attacks aren’t those people from those religions the most despicable inhuman and the worse C…in the whole wide world, then what’s the problem, now the left democrats put one of their offprints in the in the government and suddenly they want to blame someone else, it is outrageous…


    September 14, 2019 at 12:36 am

    close down the Communist Paper THE NEW YORK TIMES-

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Fake News

Judge Andrew Napolitano’s advice to Kavanaugh could end The New York Times




The New York Times is in hot water after being forced to retract outright lies relating to Justice Brett Kavanaugh.

Beyond simply losing credibility, the paper could end up in serious trouble.

And Judge Andrew Napolitano gave Kavanaugh advice that could end The New York Times.

During a recent “Fox & Friends” segment, network legal analyst Judge Andrew Napolitano questioned whether Justice Brett Kavanaugh could sue The New York Times.

Napolitano claims that, if The Times knowingly posted false information, as it appears they may have, then Kavanaugh has a serious case.

After all, they did publish a story detailing a new sexual misconduct allegation and then quickly retracted the most serious parts of it.

Breitbart reports:

Tuesday on Fox News Channel’s “Fox & Friends,” network legal analyst Andrew Napolitano posed the question asking if Supreme Court Associate Justice Brett Kavanaugh could sue The New York Times if an essay it published alleging he engaged in sexual misconduct was knowingly false.

Napolitano said if the circumstances were correct, he would have a case. However, he predicted it would not happen.

“Here’s an interesting one: Can Justice Kavanaugh sue The New York Times?” Napolitano said. “We know the standard is actual malice. Actual malice means did The New York Times publish something they knew was false, or did they publish it in reckless disregard to whether it was true or false? Is leaving out of the article the true statement that the victim does not recall this alleged event reckless disregard for the truth? He may actually have a case there. However, this is not going to happen. He doesn’t want to sue The New York Times. That’s going to open up pandora’s box for him.”

If Kavanaugh is able to prove they knowingly lied about him in order to push harmful allegations, it will forever tarnish The New York Times.

This entire debacle has already destroyed much of the credibility they had left.

A lawsuit could be what ultimately destroys them for good.

Should Justice Brett Kavanaugh sue The New York Times?

Let us know your thoughts in the comment section below.

Continue Reading

Fake News

CNN’s Chris Cuomo just accused Christian Trump supporters of something awful




It’s no secret the Left doesn’t care much for Christians.

They especially don’t like it when they support President Donald Trump.

And CNN’s Chris Cuomo just accused Christian Trump supports of something awful.

One of the ways the mainstream media loves to attack Christians who support President Trump is pointing out the flaws of Trump.

They can’t grasp the idea that somebody with flaws in their past can change.

And CNN’s Chris Cuomo took that a step further, alleging that Christian Trump supporters “surrendered character for the courts,” essentially arguing they abandoned their principles in order to get somebody who would appoint conservative judges as President.

NewsBusters reports:

During a conversation on the Trump administration’s impact on the judicial branch Tuesday night, two CNN prime time hosts expressed disappointment about the administration’s progress in transforming the judiciary and slammed Christian conservatives for supporting President Trump in spite of his personal moral failings. At one point, he spewed, “They surrendered character for the courts. That’s what they did.”

The conversation on the judicial branch began during the final minute of Tuesday’s Cuomo Prime Time, where host Chris Cuomo pointed out that “the White House last week cheered as the number of confirmed judges on its watch crossed the 150 mark.” After complaining about the high number of “older white men” nominated by President Trump, Cuomo had to correct himself: “not older men, they’re younger men, which means they’re going to be there for a long time.”

While Cuomo appeared at least slightly put off by the demographics of the “faces of Trump’s bench,” he seemed more disturbed about the fact that “all are staunch conservatives and some woefully lack the acumen we would expect.”

The reality of the matter is that Christians, who overwhelmingly voted for Trump, saw somebody who would support their values and voted for him.

And since getting into office, Trump has proven he is the candidate for those who hold Christian values.

He is promoting pro-life and pro-family values from his position in the White House.

CNN is simply trying to browbeat Christians with anti-Trump propaganda so they do not vote for him in 2020.

Do you think that CNN hates Christians?

Let us know your thoughts in the comment section below.

Continue Reading

Fake News

Brett Kavanaugh is about to go to war with The View after the sick claim they made




The ladies on ABC’s The View are some of the vilest anti-Trump voices on television today.

There is no lie they won’t spread to harm President Trump.

And now Justice Brett Kavanaugh is about to go to war with them after the sick claim they made.

The View couldn’t wait to talk about former Trump campaign manager Corey Lewandowski’s testimony in front of the House Judiciary Committee.

But it wasn’t just Lewandowski they were focusing on.

In a strange twist, co-host Joy Behar went on a rant tying in Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh, comparing the two.

Discussing the respective testimonies of both the Trump-aligned figures, Behar claims that they are both worse than “murderers and pimps.”

NewsBusters reports:

Wednesday on The View, the panel roundly criticized former Trump campaign manager Corey Lewandowski’s testimony before the House Judiciary Committee Tuesday. As Democrats aggressively grilled Lewandowski, he refused to answer several questions and even slammed the media at one point. View co-host Joy Behar raged against both Lewandowski and Brett Kavanaugh’s testimonies during their respective hearings, as worse than “murderers and pimps.”

Every co-host ranted against Lewandowski but Behar had the nuttiest take. She admitted that listening to the hearing on the radio frustrated her, and reminded her of the Kavanaugh hearings. She declared “murderers and pimps” were “more respectful” than these two men behaved towards Democrats:

JOY BEHAR: I couldn’t stand watching it or listening to it on the radio hearing it, is the snarkiness of it. I’ve taught juvenile delinquents who were more respectful in a class room than this guy!

ABBY HUNTSMAN: I thought the same thing.

BEHAR: –Than Kavanaugh, remember Kavanaugh? And others who are in this administration who working for Trump. I have had kids who were murderers and pimps who behave better than this!

Behar’s attack crosses every line of decency.

But that’s where the Left is in the current era.

After all, they spent weeks claiming that insane, uncorroborated claims of sexual assault against Kavanaugh were undisputed facts.

They were hoping to prevent him from getting on the Supreme Court.

But as everybody now knows, they failed miserably.

Are you happy Justice Brett Kavanaugh is on the Supreme Court?

Let us know your thoughts in the comment section below.

Continue Reading

Sign Up For FREE Alerts


Poll of the Day

  • The failing New York Times released yet another hit piece on Justice Brett Kavanaugh re-hashing debunked smears.

    The Times failed to mention the alleged victim didn't recall the supposed "incident." In response, President Trump called for “the resignation of everybody at The New York Times involved in the Kavanaugh smear story.”