Connect with us

Corruption

Top Clinton adviser made one ridiculous statement about a Super Bowl controversy

Published

on

Democrats are in full-blown panic mode about the 2024 election.

They will need all their resources to drag Joe Biden across the finish line again.

And a top Bill Clinton adviser made one ridiculous statement about a Super Bowl controversy.

Super Bowl LVIII between the San Francisco 49ers and Kansas City Chiefs already has multiple fascinating storylines developing.

But the most absurd storylines involve Chiefs star Tight End Travis Kelce and pop superstar Taylor Swift, who have been dating for several months now.

Swift is a Democrat who supported former Tennessee Governor Phil Bredesen in his Senate race against Republican Marsha Blackburn; despite Swift’s endorsement, Bredesen was defeated by Blackburn by 11 points.

The New York Times reported that the Biden campaign wanted to recruit Swift to endorse him.

Longtime Bill Clinton adviser James Carville used that opportunity to slam Donald Trump, his supporters, and anyone who may not like Swift.

CNN anchor John Berman asked Carville, “If you’re Donald Trump or part of the far right and you’re having trouble with women voters, is there a worse strategy than attacking Taylor Swift?”

Carville responded, “I don’t think there’s anything strategic about this. I think most of these people are sexually inadequate and they go for all this crazy stuff. And I don’t think– and there’s nothing strategic about something that stupid. It’s just real stupidity to believe something like that. And she seems to me – I’m not very familiar with her generation – she seems like a really nice person, kind of well-raised and, you know, gives people that work for her like $100,000 bonuses. What’s there not to like about Ms. Swift? I have no idea. I didn’t get the memo.”

The Left are desperate to frame the controversy as some planned MAGA strategy.

Berman reiterated, “Do you think it’ll blow up in their face?”

Carville added, “I don’t know if their face is blown-uppable. But it’s massively entertaining to watch people this stupid go public. Honestly, John, I can’t get enough of it. I mean, come on. You can’t be that dumb, can you?”

Prior to the 2018 Bredesen-Blackburn showdown, Swift encouraged her fans to register to vote.

Studies showed that only between 8,000 and 35,000 people registered because of Swift.

*Pants on Fire News Official Polling*

Corruption

MSNBC’s Andrea Mitchell sets the Internet on fire after accusing Christians of this dumb idea

Published

on

By

Leftist ideas do not work.

The more they fail, the more the Left blame their political opponents.

And MSNBC’s Andrea Mitchell accused Christians of something too dumb for words.

One of the most destructive left-wing ideas is radical feminism.

Decades of women and girls have been fed lies about sex and gender that have bore severe consequences for society.

One such lie is that there are no biological differences between men and women.

Obviously, that is not true.

Rejection of biology

The starkest difference is that women can get pregnant, which has been a major factor in the development of cultures throughout human history.

But radical leftists have attempted to toss out all of human biology and anthropology to fit into the musing of militant feminists.

That contradiction came into focus in light of an Alabama case involving IVF.

Pro-life advocates have argued that frozen embryos—fertilized eggs—should be treated as human lives, thus unused embryos from IVF should not be destroyed.

The Alabama case led MSNBC host Andrea Mitchell and her guest, OBGYN Jennifer Lincoln, to conclude that evangelical Christians want women out of the workforce and barefoot and pregnant in the kitchen.

Mitchell said, “A lot of women are staying in the workplace longer and not having children, delaying marriage until their late 30s or 40s. For them, this can be very, very important, because that’s when infertility becomes more of an issue than women who were, you know, years ago, decades ago, marrying in their teens and 20s, early 20s. Second of all, there are people who have genetic issues, like BRCA1, who, even as college students, prophylactically have double mastectomies, have hysterectomies. So, they store their eggs for later in life when they’re going to meet a partner. Talk to me about the medical aspects of that.”

Lincoln responded, “Alabamans…should not have to be told to move or go somewhere else to start a family. That’s just not very American if you ask me and those who do not have the money to do so cannot do that and so they’re pursuing growing their family and may need to, as you said, use fertility treatments because they have delayed childbearing, which is part of this whole package of, you know, wanting to take these things away from, as you highlighted, the evangelical side, it’s the idea of getting women back in the home, you know, this idea of a nuclear family, not having women in the workplace, this is part of dismantling that.”

Attack on the family

This is Feminism 101.

It was the radical feminists that specifically said they wanted to destroy the nuclear family.

The Left have inverted the argument to the point where being a housewife and mother have been stigmatized.

For instance, feminist writer Simone de Beauvoir once said, “No woman should be authorized to stay at home to raise her children. Society should be totally different. Women should not have that choice, precisely because if there is such a choice, too many women will make that one.”

Leftists are blaming Christians for the average woman’s desire to be a mother.

*Pants on Fire News Official Polling*
Continue Reading

Corruption

MSNBC contributor tried to dunk on Christians and ended up humiliating herself

Published

on

By

The Left are always on the lookout for a new right-wing boogeyman.

They believe they have found one in Christian Nationalism.

And one MSNBC contributor tried to dunk on Christians and ended up humiliating herself.

Democrats’ new favorite scare tactic is to utter the phrase Christian Nationalism.

The term has a very loose definition, but commonly refers to a small percentage of people who believe that America should literally be a Christian theocracy with an ayatollah-like Christian prince who sits above the government.

Democrats have run wild with this interpretation of Christian Nationalism in an attempt to paint all Christians as theocrats, but it blew up in their faces on the set of MSNBC.

POLITICO reporter Heidi Przybyla showed that she did not quite understand the founding principles of America when she suggested that rights come from the Government.

Przybyla said, “[T]he thing that unites them as Christian nationalists, not Christians because Christian nationalists are very different, is that they believe that our rights as Aericans and as all human beings do not come from any Earthly authority. They don’t come from Congress, from the Supreme Court, they come from God.”

Needless to say, Przybyla got bombarded with messages explaining her huge error.

Her mistake was understandable because leftists believe in positive rights, i.e. the government tells people what they are allowed to do.

America was founded on negative rights, meaning that the government must outline specific prohibitions on freedom.

Przybyla tried to save face by saying she was taken out of context and that the full video explained her position.

But the extended clip was just as nonsensical.

Przybyla said, “The problem with that is that they are determining, men, are determining what God is telling them. In the past, that so-called ‘natural law,’ it is a pillar of Catholicism for instance, it has been used for good in social justice campaigns. Martin Luther King evoked it in talking about civil rights. But now you have an extremist element of conservative Christians, who say that this applies specifically to issues including abortion, gay marriage, and it is going much further than that as you see, for instance, with the ruling in Alabama, this week that judges connected to the dominionist faction, and talking about a lot of other issues including surrogacy, IVF, sex education in schools, there’s a lot in addition.”

Przybyla referred to “so-called natural law” and said that it could be “used for good.”

She undercut her own argument.

As the 2024 election draws closer, look out for more fearful warnings about Christian Nationalism from the Left.

*Pants on Fire News Official Polling*
Continue Reading

Corruption

Former Senator went on Joe Scarborough’s show and ranted at The New York Times for doing one thing to Biden

Published

on

By

Joe Biden needs all the help he can get.

The Democrat-controlled media are picking up the slack for him as they did in 2020.

And one former Senator went on Joe Scarborough’s show and ranted at The New York Times for doing one thing to Biden.

Republican Josh Hawley retired Claire McCaskill when he defeated her in the Missouri Senate race.

Since then, McCaskill has made appearances on television to stump for the Democrats, namely Joe Biden.

McCaskill recently appeared on MSNBC with Joe Scarborough and railed against The New York Times for having the gall to fact-check Biden.

Biden plays fast and loose with numbers

During the segment, Scarborough claimed that the economy was going swimmingly under Biden, but Donald Trump was distorting the truth.

Unfortunately for the Democrats, The Times disagreed with Biden’s assessment of his record.

The piece in question busted Biden for lying or leaving out important context.

For instance, Biden said that Trump was the first President since Herbert Hoover to leave office with more jobs lost than gained.

While that is technically true, Biden failed to mention the pandemic.

McCaskill responded to Scarborough, “Yeah, and you know, the irony is, if you travel around the world, which I’m fortunate enough to have a chance to do several times a year, you know what the rest of the world sees right now? They see America with the strongest economy. They see America with the most advanced technology. America’s universities still the brightest light on the horizon in terms of academics and research. They see American companies still exceeding in terms of their global reach. But you know what they look down their nose at? They look down their nose at Donald Trump being a leader. I mean, what everyone says when you travel, ‘well, you wouldn’t elect him again, would you? Hasn’t the country learned? You wouldn’t ever give this guy power again, would you? Tell us that he’s not going to be re-elected. Please, tell us you’ve learned your lesson.’”

Assuming anyone overseas actually said those things, McCaskill was talking to a fellow leftist whose country has also chosen policies of self-destruction and decay.

Now is not the time for the truth

McCaskill added, “So the only blemish on the great country of America worldwide is, in fact, Donald Trump and can I make a suggestion? I move that every newspaper in America quits doing any fact-checks on Joe Biden until they fact-check Donald Trump every morning on the front page. It is ridiculous that the New York Times fact-checked Joe Biden on something. I mean, he vomits lies, Trump vomits lies. Every day—over and over and over again and it’s just ridiculous that The New York Times is doing a fact-check on Biden while they let Trump—while they’re numb to the torrent of lies coming out of Trump’s mouth.”

Ironically, the publications fact-checked Trump all the time but suddenly stopped when Biden came into office.

It has become commonplace for the Left to attack The Times for allowing truth to dribble out occasionally.

They are offended that The New York Times would decide to publish something that portrays the Democrats in a bad light.

*Pants on Fire News Official Polling*
Continue Reading

Sign Up For FREE Alerts

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Trending