Connect with us

Media Bias

This top Democrat went on TV and compared Trump to something unthinkable

Published

on

The Democrats have ratcheted up their divisive rhetoric since the Capitol Hill riot.

Politicians and pundits have battled for the most incendiary superlative to attack all Republicans and conservatives.

And this top Democrat went on TV and compared Trump to something unthinkable.

The disgusting attack on the Capitol provided the perfect excuse for Democrats to cudgel their ideological opponents.

However, California congressman Eric Swalwell crossed the line when he compared Donald Trump to Osama Bin Laden.

During an interview Judy Woodruff on PBS NewsHour, made the unhinged analogy:

“Well, Osama Bin Laden did not enter U.S. soil on September 11th, but it was widely acknowledged that he was responsible for inspiring the attack on our country. And the president, with his words, using the word ‘fight’ . . . that is hate speech that inspired and radicalized people to storm the capital.”

That is both asinine and a dangerous precedent to set for hate speech and incitement to violence.

Bin Laden declared war on the United States and orchestrated a terrorist attack that killed thousands of Americans.

It’s reckless to compare that to a speech from Trump.

On top of that, new evidence suggests the attack on the Capitol was not spontaneous; bad actors had been planning the breach for as long as a month, so Trump couldn’t have incited the assault.

Woodruff offered zero pushback and allowed Swalwell to temper his words, but instead he doubled down:

“I’m comparing the words of an individual who would incite and radicalize somebody, as Osama Bin Laden did, to what President Trump did. You don’t actually have to commit the violence yourself, but if you call others to violence, that itself is a crime.”

The so-called “mainstream” media have allowed dishonest Democrats to get away with this kind of sickening rhetoric for years, and it’s only gotten worse under the Trump administration.

Suggesting that using a tepid political word like “fight” equals incitement is absurd, especially when Nancy Pelosi called for “uprisings” and Maxine Waters told a mob of constituents to “push back” on Trump cabinet members in the public square.

Bernie Sanders said Republicans were trying to kill Americans with their healthcare proposal, and one of his supporters shot up Republican Congressmen practicing for a baseball game.

That is not the standard for incitement to violence.

By Swalwell’s own standard, he used incitement when he called the sitting president of the United States a Russian “agent” without any evidence.

Meanwhile, the corporate press hasn’t asked Swalwell, a member of the House Intelligence Committee, about his years-long relationship with a Chinese spy who has since fled the country.

The Democrat Media Complex has taken a match to its credibility.

Pants on Fire Official Polling

Media Bias

The media’s reaction to this shocking threat against Brett Kavanaugh will leave you red with rage

Published

on

Democrats have allowed the radical Left to run wild.

The radicals are getting more and more extreme.

And the media’s reaction to this shocking threat against Brett Kavanaugh will leave you red with rage.

Democrats got what they wanted after a Supreme Court leak of a draft opinion from Justice Samuel Alito.

The draft opinion signaled the overturning of Roe V. Wade, and Democrats predictably melted down.

They wanted chaos in the streets and leftist mobs protesting outside the homes of Supreme Court justices, which is a federal crime.

But the Democrats’ calls for protesting outside the homes of conservative justices just took a terrifying turn.

A deranged leftist drove from California to Maryland with the explicit intent of assassinating Brett Kavanaugh.

The would-be assassin, armed with a knife and a gun, realized he would not be able to bypass security, and called the police on himself.

Perhaps, the most disturbing aspect of the story is the Democrat Media Complex’s complete lack of interest in the story.

For example, the story is already off the front page of The New York Times.

If a deranged right-winger got arrested near the home of Justice Sonia Sotomayor, there would be press coverage from wall to wall.

Worse yet, few on the Left are telling the radicals to tone down the rhetoric and illegal protesting.

In fact, a pro-abortion extremist group called Ruth Sent Us threatened Kavanaugh’s wife and their daughters.

Not only that, but the lunatic found Kavanaugh’s house thanks to a map provided by Ruth Sent Us.

Reporter Mollie Hemingway explained, “Pro-abortion group that posts directions to Kavanaugh’s home — man arrested today said he used online map to find it — also targeting his young daughters’ school. This escalation and threat against the children must be stopped. Horrific.”

The same Democrats that were encouraging people to show up at Kavanaugh’s house have conveniently gone silent.

These are also the same people that call Donald Trump an “insurrectionist” for telling his supporters to “peacefully and patriotically” protest on January 6th.

The Left are encouraging their shock troops to illegally protest outside the homes of Supreme Court justices.

In 2020, Chuck Schumer said, “Inside the walls of this court, the Supreme Court is hearing arguments, as you know, for the first major abortion rights cases since Justice Kavanaugh and Justice Gorsuch came to the bench…I want to tell you, Gorsuch, I want to tell you, Kavanaugh, you have released the whirlwind and you will pay the price. You won’t know what hit you if you go forward with these awful decisions.”

Maybe this is what Schumer was talking about.

Pants on Fire Official Polling

Continue Reading

Media Bias

The word police at the Associated Press are now shockingly censoring one word

Published

on

The Left always tries to control language.

It’s one of the only ways they can sell their radical ideas.

Now the word police at the Associated Press are shockingly censoring one word.

The horrific mass shooting in Buffalo has managed to knock abortion out of the headlines.

The Fake News Media is going all-in on the white supremacist attack in order to pin the responsibility on Republicans.

It’s an absurd argument, but the Democrats are shameless.

In fact, they’re even manipulating language.

The Associated Press Stylebook does not want the killer’s 180-page ramblings to be classified as a manifesto.

The AP wrote on Twitter, “We don’t use the term manifesto in reference to a racist diatribe. It glorifies racist hatred. Other terms such as diatribe, screed or writings can work instead.”

However, centrist feminist Christina Hoff Sommers quickly corrected the AP.

Sommers wrote, “You are confused. Hitler’s Mein Kampf & rantings of the Unabomber are routinely referred to as “manifestos.” For example: Encyclopedia  Britannica. “Mein Kampf, (German: “My Struggle”) political manifesto written by Adolf Hitler.”

Perhaps the Left don’t want to dirty up the word manifesto because of their fondness for Karl Marx’s “Communist Manifesto.”

Marx’s evil ideas have festered for nearly 200 years, eating away at society and poisoning a new generation of impressionable minds.

In fact, the Buffalo shooter wrote in his manifesto that he used to be a communist, but currently identifies as “mild-moderate authoritarian left.”

The shooter also wore the black sun insignia, a symbol sometimes used by the neo-Nazi Azov Battalion of Ukraine.

He also said that one of his main inspirations was the Christchurch shooter in New Zealand, who had trained with Azov prior to committing his despicable massacre at a mosque.

Both the Buffalo shooter and the Christchurch shooter claimed to be radical environmentalists.

All of these facts are inconvenient for the Left because they tacitly support the Azov Battalion in Ukraine, and they’re trying to blame the shooting on Fox News, even though he explicitly said in the manifesto that he hated Fox.

Democrats are trying to control the narrative, and that starts with controlling language.

Unfortunately for them, they no longer have a monopoly on the dissemination of information.

Pants on Fire Official Polling

Continue Reading

Media Bias

New journalistic standard proves the Democrats are complete liars on one issue

Published

on

The ideas of the Left are utterly incoherent.

Yet, Democrats willfully go along with all of the crazy ideas.

And one new journalistic standard proves the Democrats are complete liars on one issue.

The Democrats are hopping mad over the abortion issue, which was rekindled after a Supreme Court leak of a draft opinion from Samuel Alito that suggests the overturning of Roe V. Wade.

The new battle over abortion has brought women’s issues front and center for the Left, but there is a glaring omission in their progressive rhetoric.

Suddenly, transgender men and nonsense terms like “birth people” are no longer part of the conversation.

The Associated Press Style Guide tried to clean up this obvious contradiction by issuing a new update.

The AP Style Guide update read, “Phrasing like pregnant people or people who seek an abortion seeks to include people who have those experiences but do not identify as women, such as some transgender men and some nonbinary people. Such phrasing should be confined to stories that specifically address the experiences of people who do not identify as women.” 

In other words, it is okay to “erase” trans men and dispatch with idiotic terms like “pregnant persons” and “people who give birth.”

Democrats don’t want any distractions from their over-the-top pro-abortion zealotry.

The style guide update is a clear example of how Democrats will manipulate language in any way they can to achieve political power.

For example, in light of the 2020 Reign of Terror, the AP Style Guide suggested that outlets capitalize “black” when describing people of African descent.

The out-of-the-blue update made no sense other than to somehow contribute to the cultural “reparations” in the aftermath of George Floyd’s death.

Democrats are now trotting out the “my body, my choice” line that they abandoned during the peak of COVID hysteria when they were forcing people to take an experimental vaccine.

It’s quite stunning to witness the mental gymnastics of the Left when killing babies is at stake. 

They have already renewed talks of packing the Supreme Court.

Luckily for them, Merriam Webster added a new definition of “court-packing” to dovetail with the newfangled Democrat definition of simply restoring ideological balance to the court.

That is utter nonsense.

The Democrats want the Supreme Court to remain a liberal super-legislature that will codify into law the agenda they can’t pass through Congress.

The Left have destroyed their credibility by torturing logic to such a hideous extent.

Pants on Fire Official Polling

Continue Reading

Sign Up For FREE Alerts

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Trending