Connect with us

Censorship

This New York Times reporter just got slammed over his lies about Donald Trump and this important issue

Published

on

Media bias today is so blatant, even The New York Times’ supposed “conservative” columnists spew a steady hatred of President Trump.

And they take every opportunity to attack the President, especially on some of the more controversial policies.

But one New York Times reporter just got slammed over his blatant lies about Donald Trump and this important issue.

David Brooks is considered by some to be one of The New York Times’ most fair and impartial columnists.

The columnist, who it is claimed is one of few “conservatives” in the far left-wing publication, proved his anti-Trump bias when he claimed on PBS that the President’s descriptions of crimes committed by illegal aliens were “bogus.”

In a discussion on the President’s State of the Union address, Brooks said, “He had some of the stuff he has always had, which is these bogus stories of crimes that immigrants have committed.”

Of course, the first problem with that is the people Brooks is referring to are not immigrants. They are illegal aliens. The fact that Brooks refuses to call them what they are shows his true alignment with the Left.

But, it got even worse for Brooks when the Department of Homeland Security decided to set him straight and correct his lie.

“Hi, @nytdavidbrooks,” DHS spokeswoman Heather Swift wrote in a Twitter post Monday, “Saw your interview, where you said POTUS had ‘bogus stories of crimes that immigrants have committed.’ Not true. Let me introduce you to a few. I’m sad to say there are many, many tragic stories of lives destroyed and lost due to crimes by illegal aliens.”

Swift then continued her tweet by discussing the case of Reeaz Khan, an illegal alien from Guyana charged with the Jan. 6 murder and sexual assault of a 92-year-old woman in the New York City borough of Queens. Khan had been arrested after allegedly beating up his father in November, and ICE had requested his deportation in an official order to the New York City police.



The New York City Police Department “denied” it had received the request but ICE actually posted it on Twitter to prove it!

And that fact is, the NYPD has a documented history of ignoring ICE detainers and Homeland Security on these matters due to the policies of Mayor Bill DeBlasio.

In fact, no one is arguing that the victim, a woman named Maria Fuentes, was not sexually assaulted and killed, no matter what Brooks might say.

In fact the guilty party, Khan, admitted to the crime.

That was one of the cases President Trump specifically mentioned in his State of the Union speech and, a case that Brooks’ own newspaper covered. So the question is why would Brooks even try to claim that was a “bogus” case?

But there was more ammo. The DHS spokesman added in a couple more cases for good measure, proving beyond a shadow of a doubt the President’s contention that there is a real problem in this country with illegal immigrants and violent crime.



Usually violent criminals like this would be kept behind bars, but here in America, in a few rogue sanctuary cities, they are set free to rape and kill again and again.

Once again a liberal “journalist” has used his so-called “conservative” credentials to make unfounded claims against President Trump.

Share your thoughts about the Fake News Media with Pants on Fire News in the comments below.

16 Comments

16 Comments

  1. WhiteFalcon

    February 16, 2020 at 4:21 pm

    Never trust the NYT. They are FAKE NEWS through and through. They are good only to line the bottom your bird cage.

  2. Jack Miller

    February 16, 2020 at 4:52 pm

    David Brooks – Just another Hack – Another Sheep in Wolves Clothing – BEWARE

  3. Stan g

    February 16, 2020 at 4:59 pm

    Sadly, until a family member of the MSM is brutalized, raped or killed by an illegal, they will not recognize our laws or sovereignty. If the immigration system is that bad, then Congress needs to have a discussion (what a concept) and agree on new laws that protect OUR CUTIZENS and allow for reasonable LEGAL immigration. Many nations want to know what you can contribute and that you will not be a drain on our society. Lets start there.
    And No BS about our ancestors, they lived under different circumstances

  4. moosegringo

    February 16, 2020 at 5:27 pm

    It’s time for Americans to start suing politicians who are disrespecting our laws. Bring civil and collusion charges against Cuomo and DiBlahBlah. Sue them for millions and maybe some things will change.

  5. Jay

    February 16, 2020 at 6:31 pm

    Hey Jack, I think you meant, “Wolf in sheep clothing. Having said that. I remember an Eastwood movie called,”Hang ’em High.” As bad as illegal entry into the USA is, I think that when Illegals are found guilty of a violent crime they should be left hanging at the border, Maybe then some would have second thoughts about illegally entering our country to continue their criminal acts.

  6. Pingback: Exaple of fake media | clintcounts

  7. David S

    February 16, 2020 at 10:44 pm

    The NYT’s will never allow facts to get in the way of their bias. There are NO conservatives at the NYT’s because no self – respecting honorable journalist would allow themselves to be soiled associating with that rag. It is no longer the Gray Lady, but the Harlot of New York. They sold their souls long ago!

  8. Sharon

    February 16, 2020 at 11:45 pm

    As I recall, David Brooks USED to be fairly conservative, or at least moderate. That certainly has changed. I also recall him, maybe a couple of years ago, practically crying to Judy Woodruff on PBS that he had lost all his conservative friends because his politics had changed. I also agree with David S’s comments about the NYT!

  9. Mikey

    February 17, 2020 at 12:26 am

    Come on people …. report facts, not your useless Hollywood like opinions.If news producers don’t start getting wiser nobody will be viewing their crap. I no longer watch the news shows for exactly this reason …… They are crap.

  10. Ernst

    February 17, 2020 at 8:05 am

    David Brooks is one the most hypocritical, dishonest persons in media. Calling himself “conservative” is absolutely dishonest and disingenuous. He is as conservative as Charles Schumer. In fact, he almost always aligns with Schumer on every issue. Brooks and the New York Times are two peas in a stinking, dishonest pod.

  11. Jimed

    February 17, 2020 at 11:48 am

    Newspaper subscriptions are down all over the country. Many newspaper companies are going out of business. Could the reason be their continual fake news reporting has finally caught up with them?

  12. Gary

    February 17, 2020 at 4:33 pm

    News is no longer an honorable profession with dedicated individuals reporting facts to the general public. It has evolved into a opinions games where facts are the least of their concerns. All about gaining favor with the corrupt political mobs that want to control everything!

  13. Lorraine E Blazich

    February 18, 2020 at 3:22 am

    We will always need newspapers so that they can be used in an appropriate fashion. I always use unread newspapers to line the bottom of my bird cages and on the floor around the cages. That is the best use for newspapers.

  14. Paul

    February 19, 2020 at 3:28 am

    I pray that some of these victims family sue the hell out of the city and stater for not following the law. Then sue the mayor, governor, confessman and senators. Maybe that would stop this Mickey Mouse crap. If anyone votes for the Democratic ticket this fall is mentally ill.

  15. Jack

    March 9, 2020 at 2:19 pm

    Just one libtard hack from a very long list… What’s wrong with these people?

  16. Spike

    March 10, 2020 at 3:46 pm

    Unbelievable! Does David Brooks have no caring for the folks in his “own town”?? What is wrong with Americans of this ILK? – they hate the president so much that they will sacrifice the lives and safety of their neighbors in order to oppose him!! Mr. Brooks should have a lot of trouble looking at the man in the mirror!!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Censorship

You won’t believe what The View wants to do to Tucker Carlson and Tulsi Gabbard

Published

on

The war in Ukraine has sparked a global crisis with many devastating consequences.

Worse yet, the war propaganda coming from the so-called “mainstream” media is appalling.

And you won’t believe what The View wants to do to Tucker Carlson and Tulsi Gabbard.

The Democrat Media Complex and the warmongers of both parties are itching for escalation in the war in Ukraine.

On the Left, Congressman Eric Swalwell floated the idea of expelling Russian students from the country.

Neoconservatives on the Right like Adam Kinzinger – whose Congressional district was gerrymandered out of existence by Illinois Democrats – wants a no-fly zone over Ukraine, and Senator Lindsey Graham called for someone in the Russian government to assassinate Vladimir Putin.

People who are calling for peace and don’t want to see brinkmanship with a nuclear power, and people who are pushing back against dangerous war propaganda have been labeled “collaborators,” and even “traitors.”

Such is the case with Fox News host Tucker Carlson and former Hawaii Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard.

That’s why the harpies on The View want Carlson and Gabbard investigated and arrested by the Department of Justice.

So-called “Republican” Ana Navarro, who hasn’t espoused a real conservative opinion in a decade, argued, “I think DOJ (Department of Justice) in the same way it is setting up a task force to investigate oligarchs, should look into people who are Russian propagandists and shilling for Putin.”

The establishment is so hot for war, combating propaganda and resisting American involvement is somehow tantamount to “shilling for Putin.”

Whoopi Goldberg got in on the act and said, “They used to arrest people for doing stuff like this. If they thought you were colluding with a Russian agent. If they thought you were putting out information or taking information and handing over to Russia. They used to actually investigate stuff like this.”

Goldberg’s statement is mind-blowing considering she was highly critical of the Hollywood blacklist of the past.

There were communists in the State Department, media, entertainment, and academia that were actually collaborating with the Soviet Union, and the Left believed the McCarthy Era was the worst thing that ever happened in America.

It’s impossible to oppose McCarthyism and call for Carlson and Gabbard to be investigated and arrested.

There is no way that the panelists of The View would have been on board with arresting people who opposed the Vietnam War.

Carlson, who has the top rated show in cable news, is probably the strongest anti-war voice on television.

And Gabbard, a former Army reserve officer, became persona non grata for her anti-war positions.

The ladies of The View and the Left more broadly are exposing themselves to be authoritarians.

Pants on Fire Official Polling

Continue Reading

Censorship

One journalist’s lawsuit could end Big Tech censoring conservatives

Published

on

Social media companies suppressing conservative speech is getting out of hand.

Now someone is fighting back.

And one journalist’s lawsuit could end Big Tech censoring conservatives.

Twitter banned former New York Times reporter Alex Berenson for supposedly spreading “misinformation” about the coronavirus vaccine.

Berenson’s “crime” was posting that the COVID vaccine did not stop transmission of the virus.

In Berenson’s lawsuit, the former New York Times reporter argues that his comments were objectively true.

Berenson also cites California law, which defines common carriers as a platform that “offers to the public to carry persons, property, or messages.”

This argument could prove vital as Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas hinted in an April opinion that Big Tech companies fall under the definition of a common carrier like the phone or mail company, which would limit the ability of Big Tech to censor speech.

Berenson also argued that Twitter acted as an agent of the government to censor his speech, citing Twitter banning Berenson shortly after Joe Biden called on Big Tech companies to censor “misinformation” about the coronavirus.

“The extraordinarily close nexus between the July 2021 statements by senior executive branch officials—including President Biden himself—calling for censorship by such companies and Twitter’s corresponding immediate actions against Mr. Berenson,” the lawsuit added.

There is already established case law that the government cannot pressure private companies to carry out actions that would be unconstitutional if the government performed them.

That argument – as well as the common carrier contention – lays out two legal paths for Berenson to argue his case and potentially find a receptive audience at the Supreme Court.

Conservatives waited for years for a manner in which to secure legal recourse to Big Tech’s ideologically motivated censorship.

Thanks to Berenson’s lawsuit and Big Tech’s overreach, they may have finally found a silver bullet.

Pants on Fire News will keep you up-to-date on any new developments in this ongoing story.

Continue Reading

Censorship

Big Tech is trying to censor one undeniable truth about the COVID vaccine

Published

on

Social media censorship is out of control.

Ever since the beginning of the coronavirus pandemic, Big Tech began banning users for posting true information.

And now Big Tech is trying to censor one undeniable truth about the COVID vaccine.

According to a new policy implemented by Twitter, the social media platform can now impose penalties up to a permanent suspension for posting that a vaccinated individual can spread COVID.

“When Tweets include misleading information about Covid-19, we may place a label on those tweets that includes corrective information about that claim,” Twitter’s policy reads. “We may apply labels to Tweets that contain, for example . . . false or misleading claims that people who have received the vaccine can spread or shed the virus (or symptoms, or immunity) to unvaccinated people.”

At the start of the pandemic, social media platforms banned users for posting that the virus likely escaped from a lab in Wuhan, China.

Now Twitter is threatening to ban anyone for posting truthful information about vaccinated individuals still being able to spread COVID.

Twitter’s new policy runs contrary to Centers for Disease Control guidelines that state that “risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection in fully vaccinated people cannot be completely eliminated as long as there is continued community transmission of the virus.”

In addition, Nature.com reported on a study published in October, which showed that fully vaccinated individuals possessed a lower risk of spreading COVID, but that spread was still possible and the vaccine’s protection against spread waned over time.

“The authors found that although the vaccines did offer some protection against infection and onward transmission, Delta dampened that effect. A person who was fully vaccinated and then had a ‘breakthrough’ Delta infection was almost twice as likely to pass on the virus as someone who was infected with Alpha. And that was on top of the higher risk of having a breakthrough infection caused by Delta than one caused by Alpha,” Nature.com reported.

One reason so many people do not trust either the vaccines or the authorities promising the vaccines are safe and effective is because no one allows an honest discussion of the vaccines.

Any hint that the vaccines may not be 100% perfect is labeled as misinformation, a conspiracy theory or “anti-vaxx.”

But Twitter censoring people for posting an honest fact that vaccinated people – while at lower risk – can still spread the coronavirus leaves people with the impression that elite institutions have something to hide.

Pants on Fire News will keep you up-to-date on any new developments in this ongoing story.

Continue Reading

Sign Up For FREE Alerts

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Trending