Connect with us

The New York Times

The New York Times wants to jail Rush Limbaugh for something that will shock you

Published

on

Even as he ails with stage four lung cancer, the Left is working to destroy Rush Limbaugh.

He is their biggest enemy, as they can’t control him.

And The New York Times wants to jail Rush Limbaugh for something that will shock you.

For more than thirty years, Rush Limbaugh has dominated the talk radio airwaves.

While many have tried to compete with him, nobody has come close.

Many believe it was Rush Limbaugh’s radio show that paved the way for Donald Trump’s Presidency.

The America First message that Trump won on was first popularized by Limbaugh.

Over three decades on the radio, Rush truly became the voice of middle America, which is why the Left despises him.

Limbaugh has said he believes he is in his last days on earth, as his stage 4 lung cancer continues to get worse.

And even with him in such bad health, the Left continues to viciously attack him.

The New York Times took it to a new low in a Wednesday column that implies he was at least partially responsible for violence at the Capitol on January 6.

The article, titled “How Right-Wing Radio Stoked Anger Before the Capitol Siege,” has a sub-headline directly attacking both Limbaugh, and talk radio host Glenn Beck, writing, “Shows hosted by Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity and other talk radio stars promoted debunked claims of a stolen election and urged listeners to ‘fight back.’”

Alongside the headline, Limbaugh is featured prominently in the headline image, alongside Dan Bongino, Glenn Beck, and Mark Levin.

The article, which claims that there is no evidence of voter fraud, despite clear evidence existing, quotes Limbaugh and other talk radio hosts leading up to the Capitol violence.

It implies that it was them, with Limbaugh being the main focus of the article, who incited the violence.

The article reads at one part:

On Dec. 16, Mr. Limbaugh – the country’s No. 1 radio host, with an audience of about 15.5 million a week – told listeners that Mr. Biden “didn’t win this thing fair and square, and we are not going to be docile like we’ve been in the past, and go away and wait till the next election.”

“Seventy-four-plus million Americans are not going to shut up, and you tell them that their views don’t matter?” Mr. Limbaugh thundered. “You do not know what you’re creating. You do not know the enemy you are manufacturing.”

Inciting a riot is a criminal offense with serious penalties.

The article implies that Limbaugh, by bringing up concerns of voter fraud shared by tens of millions of Americans, incited the violence at the Capitol.

Pants on Fire Official Polling

The New York Times

The New York Times Shockingly Edited One Headline to Soften Joe Biden’s Grave Error

Published

on

The corporate press is fully an extension of the Left.

So-called mainstream outlets exist to attack Conservatives and prop up the Democrat establishment.

And The New York Times shockingly edited one headline to soften Joe Biden’s grave error.

Joe Biden’s horrendous handling of the Afghanistan withdrawal has collapsed his presidency.

His approval rating has dropped like a log as 13 service members died during a terrorist attack at the Kabul airport.

During the transfer ceremony of the fallen soldiers, Biden checked his watch multiple times, infuriating the Gold Star parents.

The corporate press tried to “debunk” the watch-checking story, but failed to do so after multiple family members confirmed it.

Now the press is trying to soften the edges on Biden invoking his dead son Beau when talking to the families of departed soldiers.

The parents there to claim their loved-ones’ remains say Biden’s incessant talk about his son Beau after the ceremony was off-putting.

You’d think he’d have the decency to let them discuss their deceased soldiers’ lives and grieve the loss of their own children.

Disgustingly, The New York Times edited a headline to downplay the exasperation these family members felt.

Despite the headline change, The Times did a poor job of capturing the frustration of the family members.

For example, The Washington Post at least let the family’s voices be heard.

When describing the sentiments of fallen Marine Rylee McCollums’s family, The Post wrote:

“The president brought up his son, Beau, according to her account, describing his son’s military service and subsequent death from cancer. It struck the family as scripted and shallow, a conversation that lasted only a couple of minutes in ‘total disregard to the loss of our Marine,’ [sister] Roice said.”

“Scripted and shallow” sums up the Biden presidency.

He’s routinely told who he’s supposed to call on during press conferences, and he’s so addled, he doesn’t even bother to keep those details to himself.

Can the so-called mainstream media’s protection of Biden continue at such shameless levels?

Pants on Fire News will keep you up-to-date on developments in this ongoing story.

Continue Reading

The New York Times

The New York Times is suddenly preaching a different message about the pandemic and the reason why is hilarious

Published

on

The establishment is pushing hard for everyone to get the COVID-19 vaccine.

People who have been vaccine-hesitant have been demonized in the harshest of terms.

But The New York Times is suddenly preaching a different message about the pandemic and the reason why is hilarious.

The corporate-controlled press is actively dividing the country in terms of vaccination status.

People who have chosen not to get the vaccine because they’ve already had COVID or for other reasons have been cast out as pariahs.

But now The New York Times is singing a different tune because black people in the city are not getting vaccinated at a high rate.

The Left stratifies everything by race, so they must tread softly on the issue of vaccines.

The Times reports:

“Young Black New Yorkers are especially reluctant to get vaccinated, even as the Delta variant is rapidly spreading among their ranks. City data shows that only 28 percent of Black New Yorkers ages 18 to 44 years are fully vaccinated . . .”

One of the facts known about COVID is that young people have a very low risk of dying from the virus.

It’s not unreasonable for people to eschew getting the vaccine because of potential vaccine injury or other unknown long-term side effects – there has been no longitudinal study on the vaccine.

The vaccines appear to reduce the possibility of serious COVID symptoms – at least temporarily – but the unnerving push to get everyone vaccinated is causing hesitancy.

The Times continued:

“One of the three vaccines – the single-shot Johnson & Johnson – had been directed to Black and Latino communities . . . But in April, the federal government ordered a brief suspension of the Johnson & Johnson vaccine after it was linked to blood clots in the brains of several women.

‘It reaffirmed my hesitance, it reaffirmed everything,” Ms. Shavuo-Goodwin, the graduate student and clinic manager, said.’”

The neo-Marxist ideology of Critical Race Theory says that any law that creates disparate impact between racial groups is inherently racist.

Therefore, by the Left’s own CRT principles, vaccine passports must be considered racist because they disproportionately affect black people.

The so-called “mainstream” media are twisting themselves in knots to blame Fox News-watching Republicans for vaccine hesitancy and COVID, but the facts keep getting in the way of their narrative.

Pants on Fire Official Polling

Continue Reading

The New York Times

A female New York Times reporter admitted something shocking about Andrew Cuomo

Published

on

New York Attorney General Letitia James’ report detailing how Andrew Cuomo sexually harassed 11 women sent shockwaves through the Democrat Party and American politics.

The press was thrown for a loop.

And now a female New York Times reporter admitted something shocking about Andrew Cuomo.

Attorney General James held a must-see press conference outlining the findings of her office’s investigation into the allegations against Governor Cuomo.

The results were bad news for Cuomo and the Democrat Party.

“Specifically, the investigation found that Gov. Andrew Cuomo sexually harassed current and former New York State employees by engaging in unwelcome and nonconsensual touching and making numerous offensive comments of a suggestive sexual nature, that created a hostile work environment for women,” James stated.

Left-wing New York Times reporter – and certified Trump-hater – Maggie Haberman reacted to the press conference by claiming the results of the investigation were worse than Democrat Party political pros and the media thought.

Critics wondered why Haberman admitted that the media’s thought process on the Cuomo allegations aligned perfectly with those in the Democrat Party’s professional class.

But for a year, the media lionized Cuomo to use his supposedly “standout” performance in managing the coronavirus pandemic in New York to criticize Donald Trump.

It was only after the 2020 election that the media finally got around to covering the story that Cuomo lied about the number of nursing home patients who died from the coronavirus and then covered it up.

This situation is not unique to Cuomo.

The media’s conventional wisdom on politicians always aligns perfectly with the dominant strain of thought in the Democrat Party.

But few openly admit it like Haberman did with the Cuomo situation.

Pants on Fire News will keep you up-to-date on any new developments in this ongoing story.

Continue Reading
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Trending