Connect with us

Censorship

The New York Times used one word to describe Joe Biden that no one could believe

Published

on

The scandal surrounding Tara Reade’s allegations of sexual assault grows worse by the day for Joe Biden.

Each day more evidence piles up that Reade is telling the truth.

And now The New York Times used one word to describe Joe Biden that no one could believe.

Joe Biden personally refuses to address Reade’s allegations.

But his campaign sent out talking points to surrogates in case fake news reporters ask them about Reade’s claims.

Buzzfeed reported that that the talking points instructed the Biden surrogates to claim that The New York Times investigated Reade’s allegations and concluded that they were false.

“Biden believes that all women have the right to be heard and to have their claims thoroughly reviewed,” Buzzfeed reported “In this case, a thorough review by The New York Times has led to the truth: this incident did not happen.”

This prompted a response from The New York Times calling the Biden talking points “inaccurate.”

The Times story – which executive editor Dean Baquet admitted the Biden campaign helped shape – merely said The Times could not find any other women who accused Biden of sexual assault although multiple others accused Biden of unwanted kissing, touching, and hugging.

There is little doubt that Reade’s allegations are credible and a growing problem for the Biden campaign.

How Biden handles them could very well decide the election.

Pants on Fire News will keep you up-to-date on any new developments in this ongoing story.

Continue Reading
11 Comments

11 Comments

  1. N.Y. Times Worms

    April 30, 2020 at 7:17 pm

    Ah, the obligatory hypocrisy. #metoo, the feminazis and MSM are all trying their darndest to protect the future groper-in-chief. If only they gave Judge Kavanaugh the same “benefit of the doubt”.
    The Times also had a KNOWN racist on staff and excused that little f-up.
    Sarah Jeong. If a White said the same things about ANY group, hell fire and brimstone!!!! Pathetic, hypocrite colon worms, all.

  2. Lyudmila Loeva

    April 30, 2020 at 7:22 pm

    Why does Joe Biden personally refuse to answer Reed’s accusations? Because The New York Times, the Biden campaign, executive editor Dean Bake and others know better than Biden how to properly respond to Biden’s sexual allegations.

  3. sharon

    April 30, 2020 at 8:41 pm

    Unfortunately this is old swampy Washington-on both sides. Would like Congress to close the fund that covers the sexual abuse charges that are levered it’s members. Oh yes, that fund was and is funded by taxpayer dollars. Would like an open records request on who and how much was paid to make the allegations go away on past and present congress members. We would be shocked at how prevalent this problem is and has been in Congress.

  4. JEFFREY WILKINS

    May 2, 2020 at 3:14 pm

    THE SEXUAL PREDATOR/PEDOPHILE JOE BIDEN HAS BEEN CAUGHT, LIKE A DEER IN THE HEADLIGHTS, AND NOW THEY’RE TRYING TO SAY IT DIDN’T HAPPEN… MUCH LIKE HUNTER BUDEN DIDN’T WORK FOR THE UKRANIANS & CHINESE, BUT THE WHOLE WORLD KNOWS THAT IT IS 100% TRUE… MUCH LIKE JOE BIDEN IS 100% GUILTY

  5. Bill

    May 2, 2020 at 3:36 pm

    I was almost certain the Times did not use words such as brilliant, capable, etc. to describe Biden. Then, I read their response to the ‘talking points’ Biden gave them and saw it was another sell out or white wash.

  6. Marlene deRonde

    May 2, 2020 at 3:47 pm

    The demoncRat party has many pedophiles.

  7. Wayne A. Waldack

    May 2, 2020 at 5:21 pm

    I do not believe that Joe Biden is or will be the intended 2020 Presidential Candidate for the Democratic Party. I believe that intended to use JB to dump Sen. Bernie Sanders and will now find a way to bring forth a more realistic or viable Candidate. Tulsi Gabbard was probably one of the best in demeaner, well spoken, most realistic of all the Democratic Candidates but she couldn’t even get five Electoral Votes.

  8. TOMMIE WALKER

    May 2, 2020 at 6:50 pm

    SMDH…..

  9. Dennis L Ruffin

    May 2, 2020 at 8:11 pm

    The senile pervert (Biden) strikes again. How sad………..

  10. Maggie

    May 2, 2020 at 8:12 pm

    Most men & many women lack the moral filter & self-control that prevents sexual misbehavior in our society, supposedly a Christian nation.

  11. Eddie A

    May 5, 2020 at 10:36 pm

    Where’s my reply? Is it you did not like the truth? How can you say that I am commenting to quick when there were others there already? Farce

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Censorship

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez announced one plan to take Fox News off the air

Published

on

Democrats are about to take total control of power in Washington, D.C.

How they intend to wield that authority has all hell breaking loose.

And Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez announced one plan to take Fox News off the air.

Liberals were victorious in the 2020 election in large part by controlling the flow of information to voters.

Social media companies censored negative stories about Joe Biden such as the bombshell report about the contents of Hunter Biden’s laptop.

Fake news outlets like CNN refused to cover the story falsely claiming it was Russian disinformation.

The tactic worked to perfection as voters did not have all the information necessary about Joe Biden to make an informed decision and Biden won the election based on the false picture Biden’s supporters in the press painted for the public.

Now Democrats intend to double down by creating government commissions to regulate the flow of “misinformation.”

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez announced the idea on a live stream.

“Several members of Congress, in some of my discussions, have brought up ‘media literacy,’ because that is a part of what happened here,” Ocasio-Cortez stated. “We’re going to need to figure out how we rein in our media environment, so that you can’t just spew disinformation and misinformation.”

“It’s one thing to have differing opinions,” said Ocasio-Cortez, “But it’s another thing entirely to just say things that are false. So that’s something we’re looking into.”

To Democrats in office and in the media “misinformation” now means any fact that contradicts the leftwing narrative and should thus be banned.

Ocasio-Cortez’s new Stalinist style news media truth commission is how Democrats will take social media censorship to the next level.

Her dream is to have government become the arbiter of truth and say any stories the Democrats don’t like is now “misinformation” and the outlets that published it should be sanctioned.

The number-one target for this effort is Fox News as Fox is the only so-called “mainstream” media outlet that doesn’t 100 percent operate as a Super PAC for the Democrat Party.

Pants on Fire News will keep you up-to-date on any new developments in this ongoing story.

Continue Reading

Censorship

Big Tech is going after one conservative with despicable slander

Published

on

The Democrat Media Complex flexed its muscle to propel Joe Biden to an election victory.

Countless outlets propped up Biden while relentlessly attacking right-wingers.

Now Big Tech is going after one conservative with despicable slander.

Canadian political commentator, author, and documentary filmmaker Lauren Southern – who’s described herself as a “conservatarian” – is being hammered by Big Tech.

She’s currently in a battle with the online encyclopedia website Wikipedia over numerous falsehoods in her bio, which has been locked from editing.

Southern submitted a defamation claim that the site has supposedly taken under advisement.

Libelous information on a Wikipedia page can have serious consequences.

For public figures, a Wiki page will likely be the first thing someone reads about them.

Southern’s page is littered with accusations of being “far-right” and “borderline white nationalist” without evidence or context.

According to Southern, the false accusations nearly cost her an interview with a subject for her upcoming documentary “Crossfire,” which analyzes different perspectives on the political strife that plagued 2020.

Leftists like to pretend that Wikipedia is entirely objective, but site co-founder Larry Sanger strongly disagrees.

He’s since left the site and wrote a blog post entitled “Wikipedia Is Badly Biased.”

Sanger cited several examples including one on the issue of abortion.

He wrote, “Wikipedia can be counted on to cover not just political figures, but political issues as well from a liberal-left point of view. No conservative would write, in an abortion article, ‘When properly done, abortion is one of the safest procedures in medicine,’ a claim that is questionable on its face, considering what an invasive, psychologically distressing, and sometimes lengthy procedure it can be even when done according to modern medical practices.”

If Southern is successful in getting her page edited, that will help fight back against Wikipedia’s black box editing standards.

The politicization of Wikipedia is just one plank used by the Democrat Media Complex to control the dissemination of information.

Pants on Fire Official Polling

Continue Reading

Censorship

Donald Trump left jaws on the ground with this defense of one Fox News host

Published

on

Bartiromo and Pompeo

Donald Trump has been feuding with Fox News ever since Election Night.

There are reports the President wants payback for Fox’s leftward drift.

But Donald Trump left jaws on the ground with this defense of one Fox News host.

This week, both the Los Angeles Times and the Washington Post published hit pieces attacking Fox News host Maria Bartiromo for her November interview with President Trump.

Fake news reporters were outraged that Bartiromo let the President make his case about voter fraud while pledging to perform her duties as a journalist and investigate the President’s claims.

In today’s media landscape, anyone who doesn’t scream in the President’s face that he is fascist liar one step of short of becoming the next Adolph Hitler is described as sycophant.

Bartiromo pushed back on both pieces claiming that her interview style as a journalist – and she was one of the top Wall Street reporters on TV for many years – was to let her subject have their say and let the audience decide.

After the smear stories ran in two of the house organs for the Democrat Party, President Trump defended Bartiromo on social media.

“Maria’s show and ratings are better than ever. They are trying to shame her into not telling the truth. Her audience would be gone, and she is far too smart for that. Rigged Election!” the President wrote.

Bartiromo thanked the President and blasted the fake news media as liars who spent three years peddling Russian collusion conspiracy theories.

“Thank you Mr @POTUS @realDonaldTrump still no honesty from this group about all the misinformation they sold to readers for 3 years. We will continue reporting & seeking truth,” Bartiromo responded.

In her interviews with The Times and The Post, Bartiromo said she was not a Trump defender, but fairly reporting on the Trump administration meant covering the fact that the Obama administration and the FBI colluded to frame President Trump as being a Russian spy as well as the fact that the fake news media went willingly along for the ride.

Pants on Fire News will keep you up-to-date on any new developments in this ongoing story.

Continue Reading

Sign Up For FREE Alerts

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Trending