Connect with us

Donald Trump

Rush Limbaugh dropped a huge hint about the 2024 election that has liberals freaking out

Published

on

For decades, Rush Limbaugh has been in the ears of middle America.

His talk radio show is the biggest there has ever been.

And he just dropped a huge hint about the 2024 election that has liberals freaking out.

There have long been rumors about Rush Limbaugh jumping into the presidential election, especially with the Trump era making him more popular than ever, as Pants on Fire News has previously reported.

But he dropped his biggest hint proving he could easily jump into the race once President Trump finishes his second term.

During a recent speech in Miami, President Trump revealed that Limbaugh has renewed his deal for his radio show, specifically noting that it is a four year deal.

Four years from now, the presidential election will just be getting into full swing, giving him the perfect opportunity to jump into the race.

CNN reports:

“The Rush Limbaugh Show” will continue well into the new decade.

Limbaugh, whose contract was due to expire later this year, has renewed his deal, the syndication company Premiere Radio Networks confirmed to CNN Business.

Premiere is a division of the radio giant iHeartMedia. A spokeswoman said Limbaugh renewed a “long-term agreement” and declined to comment on any specific terms, like the length of the new deal.

But according to President Trump, it is a four-year deal.

CNN Business inquired about Limbaugh’s status after Trump blurted out the information at a rally in Miami on Friday.

The president was there to launch an “Evangelicals for Trump” coalition. After lodging his usual complaints about news outlets that challenge him, he turned to praise some of his biggest radio and TV boosters.

“We have great people,” Trump said. “Rush just signed another four-year contract. He just wants four more years, okay. Rush, Sean Hannity, Laura — a lot of great people — Tucker’s been great, ‘Fox & Friends,’ right?”

Trump went on, listing off other supporters in the media. But the Limbaugh shout-out was curious because the host and the syndicator had not announced a new deal yet.

President Trump and Limbaugh have been communicating very often lately.

The two were spotted having multiple private conversations at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort over the Christmas holiday.

Considering Trump was the first to reveal his new contract details, they obviously discussed that, and maybe much more about his future.

Would you vote for Rush Limbaugh if he ran for President?

Let us know your thoughts in the comment section below.

Continue Reading
10 Comments

10 Comments

  1. Michael Zagursky

    January 7, 2020 at 4:43 pm

    I’d vote for Rush a thousand times yes I would if “only he’d run”.

  2. Shuttle Guy

    January 7, 2020 at 11:34 pm

    hELL yES!

  3. W C Watley

    January 7, 2020 at 11:44 pm

    I would definitely consider him. He is an individual with common sense and much knowledge. I have followed him for more than 20 years. Like our present leader he would make a great president.

  4. Camille Gilliam

    January 7, 2020 at 11:55 pm

    I would also consider Rush. He tells the truth and makes sense.

  5. Laura Kallas

    January 8, 2020 at 2:49 am

    Me too! I would love it!

  6. Cecelia Henderson

    January 8, 2020 at 7:12 pm

    Of course a lot depends on who’s running, but yes, I would definitely consider Rush for President. He always seems to be a step ahead of the Politicians and he’s not so arrogant that he can’t admit a mistake.

  7. Karen

    January 16, 2020 at 1:51 am

    I would vote for Rush!!!! I hope this is true and comes to pass! We have a awesome great president and Rush would be a excellent follow up to President Trump!!!

  8. JoeyP

    January 17, 2020 at 1:30 am

    I would vote for Rush LONG before I would vote for a TREASONISTIC Traitor Democrat. But, he would have to be able to “weather” the onslaught of the constant BARRAGE of GARBAGE and Filth that POTUS Trump has endured – and POTUS TRUMP did this QUITE successfully. If he can, then he would make a Great President. These are NOT civil times as the Left Wing TRAITORS of LATE have been extremely RABID (some need to see PRISON time for TREASON and SEDITION). Team Trump and his allies 2020.

  9. Michael Wilkins

    February 4, 2020 at 1:04 am

    Michael Wilkins, from Houston, TX wishing you a healing remission & a speedy recovery. My family’s hearts & prayers go out to you. God speed.

  10. Larry

    February 5, 2020 at 12:45 am

    May God Bless Rush ! He is almost as Great as Our God – President Trump! POTUS Trump will show those damn Rats in this World ! We Love You Rush and We Love God! Please cure Rush and kill all those bad Demorats!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CNN

CNN’s Jake Tapper flat-out refused to correct AOC when she was caught in this outrageous lie

Published

on

Members of Congress used to be known for only lying to their constituents back home.

And the media was once known as “the arbiter of truth” and an institution of trust and respect.

But that has all changed and now CNN’s Jake Tapper flat-out refused to correct AOC when she was caught in this outrageous lie.

CNN’s Jake Tapper has gone from being considered by some as a respected, impartial journalist to just another left-wing hack who can lie and promote the Left’s with the best of them.

Tapper recently admitted that he allowed Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) to blatantly lie about President Trump during a recent interview.

AOC said during the interview, “The beds and the capacity that we need in this country. And we’re hearing it every step of the way from this administration. First, we were hearing that it’s a hoax, then we were hearing that everything was fine.”

This all stemmed from earlier false press reports claiming the President called coronavirus a hoax. The claims were quickly disproven and even corrected by most news outlets.

But clearly not by CNN.

Tapper later even admitted he knew it was a lie from AOC, but chose not to say anything.

“I thought about it, because the president did not call the virus a hoax.” Tapper said.

Tapper went further in trying to deflect from the Congresswoman’s lie by simply accusing the president of being a liar.

“I guess that’s the problem with a politician who lies so often. While I agree that Democrats are mischaracterizing what he said, what he did say was also false so it’s tough to justify taking the time for a fact check when it’s not taking a stand defining the truth,” Jake added.

So, in other words, because Tapper doesn’t like the president and personally believes Donald Trump lies often, he decided not to correct a blatant lie on his show.

This disregard for the truth is so widespread by the media now, Tapper’s decision didn’t receive much coverage.

There was a time not so long ago when ploys like this would have cost a reporter his job.

But we have moved far past that time in history.

The Trump era may go down in history as the time that journalism died its last death.

Share your thoughts about this story with Pants on Fire News in the comments below.

Continue Reading

Donald Trump

The New York Times is using the current crisis to attack Christians for this outrageous reason

Published

on

Most Americans are coming together to battle both the Chinese coronavirus and the economic fallout from forced business closings.

But the media has decided this crisis is a great time to attack the very country that first protected their freedom of the press.

And now The New York Times is using the current crisis to attack Christians for this outrageous reason.

The liberal mainstream media has been out of control for decades.

They have gone from reporting the news and providing vital information to being nothing more than a public relations company for the far Left.

Now the liberal mainstream media’s blatant disregard for truth, accuracy, and basic decency has reached new lows in the last four or five years.

It’s no wonder journalists have become among the least trusted segments of American society, joining lawyers, politicians, and infomercial spokesmen.

From CBS using fake video footage to promote an anti-Trump story on the coronavirus, to the Washington Post gleefully predicting Trump supporters would suffer the highest number of deaths from the virus, the media has reached new lows.

Now The New York Times has taken it even lower with a shocking claim that Christians are to blame for the Chinese coronavirus.

Last week, The Times published an op-ed placing the blame on the so-called “religious right” for President Trump’s supposedly delayed response to the Chinese coronavirus pandemic.

In the editorial, self-described “journalist” and author Katherine Stewart attempted to argue that the President’s “anti-science” evangelical voter base is influencing him too heavily, causing him to ignore scientists on issues like vaccines and, of course, climate change.

The op-ed was originally released with the title “The Road to Coronavirus Hell Was Paved by Evangelicals” but after massive backlash the liberal rag toned down the title to “The Religious Right’s Hostility to Science Is Crippling Our Coronavirus Response.”

Of course, both titles are vile and show the author’s (and the newspaper’s) violent bias against Christians.

Not to mention the author completely ignoring the fact that it is the Left’s anti-science views on life that have caused the slaughter of millions of children over the past few decades.

And it is the liberal anti-science views on gender that have led to the destruction of women’s sports and left thousands of scared, confused children facing mutilating surgeries.

What is most interesting about Stewart’s anti-Christian hit piece is that she focuses most of her vitriol on Christians who oppose the “Green New Deal” and other socialist attempts to take control by promoting fears of climate change.

Once again, the author ignores the fact that the same people claiming the earth will end in ten years have made those claims before.

In fact, some of these “scientists” have been predicting the end of the world since the 1970s.

And, the author conveniently leaves out the fact that as Donald Trump was first warning of the Chinese coronavirus in January, many “scientists” were claiming it couldn’t even be spread by human contact.

And when Trump placed a ban on travel from China to try and stop the spread, it was “scientists” who called him a racist and claimed a travel ban wasn’t needed.

Share your thoughts about this story with Pants on Fire News in the comments below.

Continue Reading

Donald Trump

The New York Times admitted one coronavirus error that had Trump grinning from ear to ear

Published

on

During the coronavirus outbreak the Fake News Media is not trying to inform the American people.

Instead, so-called “reporters” are seizing on the pandemic to launch another front in their war to destroy Donald Trump.

But now The New York Times admitted one coronavirus error that had Trump grinning from ear to ear.

During a March White House press briefing the President expressed his hope that the anti-malarial drug hydroxychloroquine would prove to be a game-changer as it showed promise in limited use in treating coronavirus patients.

While the evidence was anecdotal and more tests were clearly required, the President was offering the American people a ray of hope as the outbreak spread.

The New York Times – instead of reporting facts – attacked the President for falsely touting “unproven drugs.”

“At a long-winded White House briefing on Friday, President Trump enthusiastically and repeatedly promoted the promise of two long-used malaria drugs that are still unproven against the coronavirus, but being tested in clinical trials,” The Times wrote on March 20.

By April 1, The Times was singing a different tune reporting that “The malaria drug hydroxychloroquine helped to speed the recovery of a small number of patients who were mildly ill from the coronavirus, doctors in China reported this week.”

The Times also noted that the drug helped those with mild cases avoid a severe infection that could result in an ICU stay or having to go on a ventilator.

“Cough, fever and pneumonia went away faster, and the disease seemed less likely to turn severe in people who received hydroxychloroquine than in a comparison group not given the drug. The authors of the report said that the medication was promising, but that more research was needed to clarify how it might work in treating coronavirus disease and to determine the best way to use it,” The Times added.

While the study was limited there are extensive tests going on in New York with drugs and many Americans are hoping that there is more good news to be found.

Pants on Fire News will keep you up-to-date on any new developments in this ongoing story

Continue Reading

Sign Up For FREE Alerts

Loading...

Trending