Connect with us

Uncategorized

Don Lemon went into damage control mode after this massive humiliation threatened his career

Published

on

New leadership at CNN is shaking things up.

And some failing anchors have already been given their walking papers.

Now Don Lemon went into damage control mode after this massive humiliation threatened his career.

The merger of CNN parent company Warner Media and Discovery, Inc. to form the new Warner Bros. Discovery corporation has caused plenty of turmoil for the network’s left-wing extremists.

The corporate-controlled media outlet has been in flux ever since former network President Jeff Zucker was forced to resign in disgrace amidst a sex scandal with an employee.

New CEO Chris Licht has been given a directive by the new Warner Bros. Discovery board of directors to rehabilitate the network, moving from the left-wing propaganda outlet Zucker created to a legitimate news network that focuses on facts above all else.

That directive has already led to the firing of multiple left-wing extremist hacks, and Licht has warned that more could be out the door.

And based on Licht’s latest move, the next left-wing extremist out the door could be left-wing extremist talking head, Don Lemon.

Since Warner Bros. Discovery was formed, there has been rampant speculation that Lemon was one of the top CNN “talents” on the chopping block, as he has proven to care more about pushing leftist talking points above all else.

But while Lemon is still a CNN employee – at last check – he just received a major demotion, as his two-hour, primetime show on the network was just axed, relegating him to the morning shift.

As expected of a propagandist of his skill level, though, Lemon has attempted to spin the obviously embarrassing demotion as some major promotion he “couldn’t pass up.”

“I was presented with an opportunity that I can’t pass up at this network,” Lemon claimed. “We have a new boss who is a morning show impresario, and he wants a morning show that will kick off the editorial direction of the network every single day. And I’m honored that he asked me to do it. For all of those out there who are saying, ‘Oh, he moved me without my—’ he asked me and I said yes. I could have said, ‘No, this is my show. I have a contract for this show.’”

“I decided I would take him up on that and take this journey with him,” he continued. “By the way, this is not someone moving me and this is not someone saying, ‘You must move to the right, Don Lemon. You must not give so much of your perspective.’ None of that has happened. All of that is fodder for Twitter, which is not real. So stop it. I was not demoted, none of that. This is an opportunity. This is a promotion.”

But everyone with a functioning brain can easily discern that losing a two-hour primetime show of your own for a morning show you’ll only be a small part of is most certainly not a promotion.

Left-wing hack Brian Stelter was recently handed a pink slip and his show, Reliable Sources, was outright canceled after it routinely failed to pull in anywhere close to sufficient ratings.

It didn’t help that Stelter was a Zucker loyalist, who publicly criticized his new bosses.

For now, Lemon remains on board, but that could certainly change quickly under CNN’s new management.

Fake News

The New York Times’ infuriating excuse for one company’s exploitation of children will have you seeing red

Published

on

Donald Trump once said that the Fake News Media is the enemy of the American people.

The past six years have proven him correct.

And The New York Times’ infuriating excuse for one company’s exploitation of children will have you seeing red.

For some bizarre reason, the Left go into defense mode whenever conservatives point out obvious pedophilia and grooming behavior.

It should be easy to unite politically against pedophilia, but the Left would instead rather accuse right-wingers of being “conspiracy theorists” or “threats to democracy.”

And this is after Jeffrey Epstein died under the most mysterious of circumstances while being held in custody for sex trafficking of young girls.

The corporate-controlled press swooped in to defend fashion house Balenciaga after the company released a disgusting ad campaign featuring young kids holding teddy bears in bondage gear.

ABC News reported that the photo included “what appears to be an excerpt from the U.S. Supreme Court opinion on United States vs. Williams (2008), which upheld part of a federal child pornography law.”

Balenciaga received so much backlash, the company scrubbed its Instagram page with over 14 million followers.

Yet, The New York Times found it appropriate to provide some damage control for the company.

The Times ran a piece entitled, “When High Fashion and QAnon Collide: Two new Balenciaga campaigns ignited a firestorm that traveled from the internet to Fox News, fueled by allegations that the brand condoned child exploitation.”

The Left always mention “QAnon” when they want to diffuse allegations of pedophilia.

Again, this is after the Jeffrey Epstein saga, knowing that he ran with powerful people, like Prince Andrew and former President Bill Clinton.

Clinton was literally photographed getting a massage from one of Epstein’s girls.

“The internet is full of trolls,” The Times wrote. “Why did this controversy take off? As online criticism of the campaigns spread, the story was picked up across right-leaning media outlets, including The New York Post and the prime time Fox News show ‘Tucker Carlson Tonight.’ The show has helped to publicize and mainstream QAnon, the internet conspiracy theory that ‘a group of Satan-worshiping elites who run a child sex ring are trying to control our politics and media.’”

This is a mind-blowing response from The Times.

The paper’s angle is that conservatives fabricated the entire controversy, not that Balenciaga ran a sickening ad campaign and was forced to apologize for it.

If Democrats want to brand Republicans as the “anti-pedophile” Party, that is a label the GOP will likely gladly accept.

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

This NBC reporter tried to slam Tucker Carlson but ended up stepping on a rake

Published

on

Self-proclaimed “journalists” have a vendetta against Tucker Carlson and Fox News.

If the Left had their way, Fox News would be regulated out of existence.

And this NBC reporter tried to slam Carlson but ended up stepping on a rake.

The election of former President Donald Trump in 2016 changed the entire Fake News Media landscape.

For the first time in contemporary American politics, an outsider was able to circumvent the corporate-controlled media monopoly and get elected using social media.

Since then, the establishment elites have attempted to rein in Big Tech, and free speech in general, which is why so many journalists and politicians who have questioned the Left’s narrative have been demonized.

The Left want to brand them as “hateful,” thus justifying censorship.

And NBC News’ Kat Tenbarge did exactly that when she went after Fox News’ Tucker Carlson, and the citizen journalist behind the social media account Libs of TikTok.

On Twitter, Libs of TikTok has amassed a huge following by posting unedited clips of left-wing radicals espousing their insane beliefs in videos they uploaded to TikTok for the world to see.

Tenbarge tried to suggest that Carlson and Libs of TikTok were bringing harm to the LGBTQ community, but she ended up making a bizarre, unintended argument.

“Tucker Carlson, Libs of TikTok, etc. create a stream of content blaming trans and queer people for child grooming, but rarely or never feature actual victims of child grooming,” Tenbarge wrote. “If they did, they’d have to reckon with the fact that many survivors are queer and trans themselves. I’ve interviewed survivors of [child sexual assault] and grooming, and several of them were trans and non-binary. Even more identified as gay, bi, or pan. All of them supported LGBTQ people. Religious conservatives would hate them and damn them to hell. They don’t really care.”

Tenbarge made the common left-wing mistake of linking LGBTQ people to child grooming.

Conservatives are against pedophilia regardless of the perpetrator or victim, but the Left tries to play these power games that backfire.

Tenbarge’s argument suggests that child sexual assault victims were either groomed into an LGBTQ identity, or they were targeted by predators because of their LGBTQ identity.

Either way, she was definitely not making the point she thought she was making.

Tenbarge suggests that Republicans are somehow out to get LGBTQ people, but the group Gays Against Groomers has been a fierce critic of teachers – regardless of so-called “gender identity” – speaking to young children about sexuality and other sexually explicit subjects.

Tellingingly, the Twitter account for Gays Against Groomers was banned until Elon Musk took control of the company.

For some strange reason, the Left are defending groomers to “own” conservatives.

Continue Reading

Fake News

Elon Musk set off these so-called journalists—and the word explosion is ridiculous

Published

on

It turns out that if there’s one thing the Fake News Media can’t handle it’s freedom of speech.

When Elon Musk took over Twitter he seriously set off the corporate-controlled press.

And the word explosion is ridiculous.

The corporate-controlled media is suddenly fascinated with the inner workings of social media platform, Twitter.

From the way they’ve been ranting and raving, you’d think it was their money, not Elon Musk’s $44 billion on the line.

In fact, The New York Times is so obsessed, they recently decided to treat readers to a 2,500 word diatribe on why Elon Musk basically sucks at life, and is more or less destroying the world with his takeover of Twitter.

In an article entitled, “Two Weeks of Chaos: Inside Elon Musk’s Takeover of Twitter,” a committee of some four left-wing reporters pooled their collective indignation to unload on the world’s richest man, who recently committed the unpardonable sin of voting for a Republican.

Even though Twitter is losing a jaw-dropping $4 million per day, the self-proclaimed “journalists” focused much of their energy on the supposed trauma of employees facing job cuts — as if it’s Elon Musk’s fault that Twitter’s prior management ran the company into the ground.

“The fallout has often been excruciating, according to 36 current and former Twitter employees and people close to the company, as well as internal documents and workplace chat logs,” the writers claimed,” The New York Times’ piece read. “Some top executives were summarily fired by email. One engineering manager, upon being told to cut hundreds of workers, vomited into a trash can. Others slept in the office as they worked grueling schedules to meet Mr. Musk’s orders.”

But one particularly whiney complaint exposed how much work Musk has ahead of him if he’s ever going to clean up the deeply corrupt organization.

“Mr. Musk plans to begin making employees pay for lunch — which had been free — at the company cafeteria,” The Times’ report continued.

Twitter user Andrew Wortman shared the article and complained that Musk, “Fired ¾ of the employees. Now he’s planning to starve the rest of them. He’s failure incarnate.”

Then, @nichegamer retweeted that post suggesting that Twitter employees learn to cook.

Musk replied to that comment revealing a shocking surprise about the employees’ “free lunch” inside Twitter’s accounting books.

“Especially bizarre given that almost no one came to the office,” Musk pointed out. “Estimate cost per lunch served in past 12 months is >$400.”

The corporate-controlled press’ desperate bid to demonize Elon Musk when they never bothered to scrutinize Twitter’s inner workings in the past is almost guaranteed to have originated from the “Chief Twit’s” stated commitment to free speech.

Musk’s purchase of Twitter came after he slammed the platform in March for an algorithmic bias against conservatives.

“Given that Twitter serves as the de facto public town square, failing to adhere to free speech principles fundamentally undermines democracy,” Musk wrote at the time. “Free speech is essential to a functioning democracy.”

After making a $44 billion bid to buy Twitter, Musk nearly backed out after discovering what a dumpster fire he was about to acquire.

After plenty of legal wrangling, he ultimately ended up closing on the deal but has warned employees that if the current recession continues to deepen, the social media platform could end up going bankrupt unless drastic changes are made.

Apparently, Fake News Media outlets, like The New York Times, are feeling threatened by Elon Musk’s focus on free speech.

With an estimated total equity of only about $1.54 billion, The New York Times might want to start playing it safer before the world’s richest man decides to become their boss as well.

Pants on Fire News will keep you up-to-date on any developments to this ongoing story.

Continue Reading

Sign Up For FREE Alerts

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Trending