Connect with us

Media Bias

Bill Clinton was sweating bullets after one video implicated him in an ugly sex scandal

Published

on

Bill Clinton’s past continues to haunt the Democrat Party.

Democrats may not be able to escape the fallout from this bombshell.

That’s because Bill Clinton was sweating bullets after one video implicated him in an ugly sex scandal.

James O’Keefe and Project Veritas dropped another explosive hidden camera exposé.

An undercover source at ABC caught anchor Amy Robach on a hot mic complaining the network spiked her Epstein story three years due to corporate pressure and a lobbying campaign from the British Royal family.

Robach explained that one of Epstein’s accusers – Virginia Roberts – that claimed to be the underage sex slave for British Royal Family member Prince Andrew went on the record with her story and provided corroboration that implicated not only Prince Andrew, but Bill Clinton as well.

Townhall reports:

… It was unbelievable what we had. Clinton — we had everything. I tried for three years to get it out, to no avail,” Robach continued. “And now it’s all coming out and it’s like ‘these new revelations.’ And I freaking had on all of it. I’m so pissed right now like every day I get more and more pissed. Because I’m just like ‘oh my god, we…what what we had was unreal’. Other women backing it up… Brad Edwards the Attorney, three years ago, saying like like there will come a day where we will realize Jeffrey Epstein was the most prolific pedophile this country has ever known. I had it all three years ago.”

Robach quickly scrambled to perform damage control claiming no one pressured her to stop reporting on Epstein.

But the video footage speaks for itself.

The corporate media covered up for Epstein’s alleged crimes because it would have damaged powerful liberals like Bill Clinton.

You can watch the Project Veritas footage below.

We will keep you up-to-date on any new developments in this ongoing story.

Continue Reading
17 Comments

17 Comments

  1. Pj

    November 6, 2019 at 4:31 pm

    Bill wasn’t sweating nothing. Hillary has killed off so many people. Do you think she won’t do again? That reporter better watch her back. Between her nazi bosses and Hillary she doesn’t have a chance to live .

    • Christine M Glass

      November 6, 2019 at 5:15 pm

      I agree. She may end up Seth Rich’d.

      • Ron P

        November 6, 2019 at 9:45 pm

        Uh oh ! She and SLICK WILLY have blood on their hands from Seth Rich ! And maybe with this ONE too.

        • John M

          November 6, 2019 at 11:59 pm

          They crucified Fox News for even suggesting a connection with Rich and the Clintons. I’ll admit they (the Clintons) were put on notice after that one. But Epstein would have driven in the last nail into their coffin.

    • Lee

      November 6, 2019 at 5:49 pm

      READ BETWEEN THE LINES PEOPLE
      BILL Clinton (WAS!!)
      sweating bullets
      But He’s Not Sweating Bullets
      Now ?
      If That Is The Case
      Why Isn’t He ??
      Is Someone Covering His Ass & Covering Shit Up As Usual ?

      • Debbie Downer

        November 6, 2019 at 9:02 pm

        Epstein was murdered. That’s why Billy isn’t sweating bullets anymore.
        When you make your living blackmailing people you paint a target on your back.
        Epstein will be remembered as the most prolific pedophile in history.
        He had too many clients that had too much to lose. He had to be taken out.

      • Ron

        November 6, 2019 at 9:47 pm

        I would not doubt it for for a minute !

      • Hurley Henson

        November 7, 2019 at 7:30 pm

        Of course Lee, it is the FBI. Ole Bill has paid the FBI very well over the years to stay off his back.

    • Lee

      November 6, 2019 at 5:49 pm

      READ BETWEEN THE LINES PEOPLE
      BILL Clinton (WAS!!)
      sweating bullets
      But He’s Not Sweating Bullets
      Now ?
      If That Is The Case
      Why Isn’t He ??
      Is Someone Covering His Ass & Covering Shit Up As Usual ?

  2. Dan Winright

    November 6, 2019 at 4:54 pm

    Bill Clinton is ok with that. At his age its good to get the blood flowing

  3. Jim1937

    November 6, 2019 at 5:09 pm

    He would look good with Hillary pulling a Jeffry Epstein on him!

  4. Steve Scoutaris

    November 6, 2019 at 5:21 pm

    Who murdered Epstein? The suicide story is obviously BS.
    Will we ever find out?

    • John M

      November 7, 2019 at 12:01 am

      Or John Kennedy?

  5. Richard L Cousins

    November 6, 2019 at 8:38 pm

    Prosecutor in Epstein case was Acosta. He was told to go easy on Epstein and that Epstein was a FBI informant, this is the key. Who was this ???? Must have been someone high up. Shure had Acosta attention. Again, WHO??? Truth known, probably hiding him out on some Pedophile Island with hundreds of young girls. Bet Epstein and B. J. Bill are playing spend the bottle and pass the pussy.

  6. rabbit

    November 7, 2019 at 12:07 pm

    Bill should be sweating. He made several trips without security details to the Island so there would be no witnesses!!!! OPPS! he forgot that the pilots log all passengers that were flown into the island. Bill you look good in that Blue dress that epstein had habding on the wall, you sick fuk

  7. Hurley Henson

    November 7, 2019 at 7:28 pm

    Ms. Robach, you had better put on bullet proof material from the top of yuh our head to the bottom of your feet. Just think of Epstein. They will do you the same thing they did to him. Of course there will be no cameras working properly, security guards will be asleep, nobody will check out the noises you will make before taking your last breath and the bought and paid for coroner will rule it a suicide even if you they have tons of forensic evidence that says otherwise. Believe me, your days are numbered and the Clintons has already talked to their people that will kill you. They don’t do that by telephone for fear that somebody might be listening in.

    • Abeng

      November 8, 2019 at 12:26 am

      Do you think one of these days the said paid killers would talk? I believe in the saying…truth always comes to light. But when????

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Media Bias

What the media did to Stacey Abrams is the smoking gun exposing an anti-Trump scheme

Published

on

By

Stacey Abrams became a Democrat hero overnight by refusing to concede in her race for governor in Georgia.

She is now one of the top players in the entire Democrat Party.

And what the media just did to her is the smoking gun exposing an anti-Trump scheme.

The mainstream media continues to prove how biased they are.

But it is not often as clear as the recent situation relating to Kentucky Governor Matt Bevin, who waited nine days to concede after losing re-election.

NPR came out stating that Bevin’s decision to wait before conceding “erode[s] confidence in democracy.”

But in the case of Abrams, they continue to praise her, and ten days after her loss, where she still refused to outright concede, they lauded her “fiery speech” while citing all her claims without any of their own commentary.

NewsBusters reports:

Nine days after the election, Kentucky Gov. Matt Bevin conceded defeat on Thursday. A year after her defeat, Georgia’s Stacey Abrams maintains she was robbed. Ashe Schow at the Daily Wire pointed out this week that NPR has a very different standard on this score for Republicans and Democrats.

Last Sunday, NPR tweeted this about Bevin:

Without providing evidence, Kentucky Gov. Matt Bevin questioned the election’s legitimacy. And he isn’t the first politician to do so. Elections specialists worry that unsubstantiated claims about voter fraud erode confidence in democracy.”

NPR’s online story was headlined “Skeptics Urge Bevin To Show Proof Of Fraud Claims, Warning Of Corrosive Effects.”

Ten days after she lost in Georgia and (sort of) admitted she lost, NPR’s tweet had a different sound:

In a fiery speech, Abrams insisted this was no normal concession, decrying what she called the “deliberate and intentional” voter suppression by Kemp that she believes led to this result in the Georgia governor’s race.

This shows just how much the mainstream media hates Trump.

Even NPR, which receives federal funding, has an entirely different tone when it comes to Republicans than when it comes to Democrats.

Do you think the media is biased against Trump?

Let us know your thoughts in the comment section below.

Continue Reading

Media Bias

Fox News left viewers stunned with what this host said about impeachment

Published

on

By

Fox News continues to be at war with itself and President Trump.

Hosts are picking sides and some are lining up with Adam Schiff and the Democrats.

And Fox News just left viewers stunned with what this host said about impeachment.

Donald Trump whacked “Fox News Sunday” host Chris Wallace as “nasty” after Wallace’s combative interview with House Minority Whip Steve Scalise.

Wallace misrepresented what important witnesses testified too and passed off Democrat Party talking points as facts.

But despite this biased, poor, and factually challenged performance by Wallace, Fox News Channel’s Neil Cavuto offered a ringing endorsement of Wallace and attacked the President for challenging the media’s biased coverage.

Mediaite reports:

“What makes something fake news?” Cavuto asked his audience on Your World Monday afternoon. “I would assume if the news being reported is fake or wrong and the person reporting that news knows it is fake or wrong, that is bad.”

But what if the news being reported is accurate, the facts are good they just sound bad? My colleague Chris Wallace has discovered again the president doesn’t distinguish,” he continued. Over the weekend, Trump lashed out at Wallace for giving a tough interview to House Minority Whip Steve Scalise on Fox News Sunday, whom Wallace called out for mischaracterizing testimony.

“Passions run deep these days, but facts should run deeper. Even if those very facts can elicit wildly different reaction, some insisting they exonerate the resident and others adamant say they all but indict the president,” Cavuto continued, calling it a “pity” that Trump apparently didn’t care about Wallace grilling Democratic Rep. Jim Himes.

“You are not the first president to say the media has it out for you. No less than press darling John F. Kennedy himself had his moments with the media,” Cavuto said. “We can’t please all. The best we can do as journalists is to be fair to all, including you, Mr. President. That’s not fake doing that, what is fake is not doing that, what is fake is saying Fox never used to do that. Mr. President, we have always done that.”

Ever since Jane Mayer of the New Yorker published an article attacking Fox News as “state TV” the network has bent over backwards to appease its liberal critics.

Instead of reporting the facts on impeachment and letting the viewers decide, Fox News chose to copy CNN and MSNBC by having supposed “straight news” hosts like Wallace shill for the Democrats’ impeachment inquiry.

Cavuto’s monologue shows Wallace is not some rogue host going out on a limb by himself.

There is now a coordinated effort at Fox News to boost the Democrats’ impeachment inquiry.

We will keep you up-to-date on any new developments in this ongoing story.

Continue Reading

Media Bias

Fox News host made the biggest mistake of his career with this lie about impeachment

Published

on

By

Americans continue to wonder about what is going on at Fox News.

The network’s “straight news” coverage on impeachment shifted dramatically.

And now this Fox News host made the biggest mistake of his career with this lie about impeachment.

Fox News Sunday host Chris Wallace is one of the faces of Fox’s news division.

But when impeachment picked up steam, Wallace began to parrot Adam Schiff’s talking points and pass them off as “news.”

That continued in an interview with House Republican Whip Steve Scalise when Wallace attacked Scalise for calling the individuals that appeared before the Democrats’ impeachment witch hunt as “Schiff’s witnesses.”

The Daily Beat reports:

Wallace, however, pointed out that a dozen people listened in on the now-infamous July 25 call between Trump and Zelensky, noting that many of them became immediately upset that Trump pressed Zelensky on investigating a Ukrainian gas firm that Vice President’s Joe Biden’s son worked for.

“Those were [House Intelligence Committee Chair Adam] Schiff’s witnesses,” Scalise insisted.

“No, sir, they are career foreign service officers and these are people who worked in the Trump administration,” Wallace retorted, adding that an aide to Vice President Mike Pence recently testified that Trump’s call was “inappropriate.”

“You had Tim Morrison, who was on the NSC staff, who said that he—alarm bells immediately went off for him,” the Fox News host continued. “Alexander Vindman immediately went to see—these are all people, you say they are Schiff’s witnesses—they all were working in the Trump administration.”

Scalise’s statement was 100 percent accurate.

Those witnesses – Bill Taylor, George Kent, and Maria Yovonovitch – were all called by Adam Schiff and the Democrats.

Those three falsely presented themselves as nonpartisan foreign service officers when it was obvious to anyone they were a cabal of power hungry Deep State agents whose loyalty is not to the United States, but to a globalist agenda that puts other country’s interests ahead of the United States.

We will keep you up-to-date on any changes.

Continue Reading

Sign Up For FREE Alerts

Loading...

Poll of the Day

  • The failing New York Times released yet another hit piece on Justice Brett Kavanaugh re-hashing debunked smears.



    The Times failed to mention the alleged victim didn't recall the supposed "incident." In response, President Trump called for “the resignation of everybody at The New York Times involved in the Kavanaugh smear story.”

Trending