Donald Trump was called crazy when he said the deep state colluded against him.

Then he was proven right.

Now Democrat-controlled media figures got exposed in one shocking anti-Trump conspiracy.

Donald Trump told people that the FBI spied on his 2016 presidential campaign.

The claim was immediately dismissed, but it was proven true.

Ever since then, the deep state along with the corporate-controlled media have worked against him.

Secret meetings

And POLITICO just confirmed that a cadre of anti-Trump legal experts have been holding weekly meetings in order to figure out ways to take down Trump.

The Zoom meetings include host Norman Eisen, a senior Obama administration official, and Jeffrey Toobin, both CNN legal analysts.

Also in attendance are Bill Kristol, son of neoconservative godfather Irving Kristol, and former Nixon administration White House counsel John Dean, who has made a living for the past 50 years by denouncing Republican scandals as “worse than Watergate.”

Legal scholar Laurence Tribe and former federal prosecutor Andrew Weismann also attend, as does Lincoln Project co-founder George Conway.

POLITICO reported that “[s]ometimes there is a special guest, like the Jan. 6 committee staffers (who recalled briefing the group). One Friday last May, after E. Jean Carroll defeated Trump in the first of her two defamation cases to go to trial, her lawyer Roberta Kaplan joined as a guest to talk for roughly half an hour about her strategy for beating Trump in court.”

Conway was the one who urged Carroll to sue Trump for sexual assault (New York temporarily changed the law to allow for suits outside the statute of limitations), and her court case was bankrolled by Democrat megadonor and LinkedIn co-founder Reid Hoffman.

POLITICO added that “some members of the group were understandably anxious about its publication. Trump has claimed that there is a legal conspiracy against him, and there is a risk that news of a group such as this could give Trump and his allies an attractive target.”

Where would Trump ever get an idea like that?

This is not the first time that the press boasted about a conspiracy to stop Trump.

The “cabal”

After the 2020 election, Time published a piece from Molly Ball titled, “The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign That Saved the 2020 Election.”

In the piece, Ball wrote glowingly of “a well-funded cabal of powerful people, ranging across industries and ideologies, working together behind the scenes to influence perceptions, change rules and laws, steer media coverage and control the flow of information.”

Trump is such a threat that establishment players are openly projecting their conspiratorial efforts to stop him.

Polls show that the American people are fed up with Joe Biden.

Even the press is getting annoyed with him.

And Biden got skewered by the Democrat-controlled media for one statement.

Columbia University has fallen.

Far-left protesters have essentially taken over the school.

Frustrated with Joe Biden’s handling of the war in Gaza, the left-wing outrage mob has essentially been allowed to set up autonomous zones and daisy-chain lines to obstruct the free movement of people.

In response to the chaos, Columbia went to remote learning for the rest of the term.

When Biden was asked about the protests, his response was interesting.

Columbia protests

A reporter asked, “Do you condemn the antisemitic protests on college campuses?”

Biden replied, “I condemn the antisemitic protests. That’s why I’ve set up a program to deal with that. I also condemn those who don’t understand what’s going on with the Palestinians and their — how they’re being —”

“Should the Columbia University President resign?” asked a reporter.

Biden said, “I didn’t know that.  I’ll — I’ll have to find out more about it.”

Biden essentially said there were very fine people on both sides, which is what Donald Trump got pilloried for in the aftermath of Charlottesville.

This sure sounds like he’s ACTUALLY saying there are very fine people on both sides. https://t.co/yaOHsEyGMA

— Clay Travis (@ClayTravis) April 22, 2024

The press was upset, but Biden has not gotten the same level of venom as Trump.

Remember when White House reporters demanded answers to the *meaning* of statements like this during the other guys admin.

— Jon Nicosia (@NewsPolitics) April 22, 2024

5

Media lies persist

Perhaps the most infuriating aspect of the double standard is that the “very fine people” narrative was a hoax.

Trump specifically said he was not talking about the racists chanting, “The Jews will not replace us!” Trump said to a hostile press corps, “Was George Washington a slave owner? So, will George Washington now lose his status? Are we going to take down – excuse me. Are we going to take down, are we going to take down statues to George Washington? How about Thomas Jefferson? What do you think of Thomas Jefferson? You like him? Okay, good. Are we going to take down his statue? He was a major slave owner. Are we going to take down his statue? You know what? It’s fine, you’re changing history, you’re changing culture, and you had people – and I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists, because they should be condemned totally – but you had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and white nationalists, okay? And the press has treated them absolutely unfairly. Now, in the other group also, you had some fine people, but you also had troublemakers and you see them come with the black outfits and with the helmets and with the baseball bats – you had a lot of bad people in the other group too.”

Trump never said it, but Biden used the lie as the basis for his 2020 presidential campaign.

Radical leftists have gradually taken over many institutions.

That has created a distorted reality that affects how people vote.

And a state-run media outlet promoted one message that will have you gnashing your teeth.

People cannot make good decisions if they are getting bad information.

That is the problem with state-run media organizations like NPR and PBS.

Both are taxpayer-funded and are supposed to be neutral, but like so many institutions, they have been captured by the Left.

Longtime NPR senior reporter Uri Berliner resigned from the outfit after 25 years because he was punished for writing an op-ed that exposed NPR’s far-left bias.

But PBS is just as bad.

The unhoused

The channel recently platformed an expert on the unhoused, which is the latest propaganda term for homeless people.

Host John Yang asked Cornell professor Charley Willison, “[T]he Supreme Court hears arguments about whether laws limiting homeless encampments in public places are unconstitutional because they punish people for being homeless. The case is about laws in Grants Pass, Oregon, a city of about 40,000 in the state southwest corner, but the outcome could reshape policies nationwide for years to come. . .What’s your take on that?”

Willison responded, “[W]hat this case is really getting at is a deep tension that American cities face when thinking about how to respond to homelessness across the country, but especially in West Coast cities that have very limited shelter capacity, and are also in the midst of a housing crisis.”

Right off the bat, she is lying.

The root cause

Homelessness is not a housing issue; it’s a mental health and substance abuse issue.

Leftist activists intentionally conflate the two issues.

Also, there is shelter space available, but the people on the street are almost exclusively addicts with mental health challenges.

They want to stay on the street so they can score drugs easier, and they do not want to deal with curfews, drug tests, and employment requirements in subsidized housing.

And the far-left activists do not want them to have any conditions for having their own apartments.

Willison continued, “And these two tensions that I’d like to emphasize are that cities generally use much more punitive policies these criminalization approaches that are at the heart of Johnson v. Grants Pass to effectively punish people who are experiencing homelessness for behaviors that are associated with the realities of homelessness. Now, importantly, the use of these punitive policies actually facilitate cycles of homelessness and does not effectively end homelessness. While the alternative addressing homelessness through the use of more housing, as well as housing paired with access to social and medical services, does successfully end homelessness.”

Cities like San Francisco have poured hundreds of millions of dollars into the homelessness crisis, and it has only gotten worse.

The reason why is because leftists refuse to acknowledge the underlying issues.

They think the problem can be fixed with free housing and free stuff.

That is fundamentally flawed, and all of the data prove this.