Connect with us

Cat 2

Democrat-controlled media outlets are foaming at the mouth after Trump received support from one major group

Published

on

Permanent Washington is panicking over Joe Biden’s re-election prospects.

The establishment tried to boost Nikki Haley, but she fizzled.

Now, Democrat-controlled media outlets are furious that Trump is getting support from one major group.

Democrats and their media allies have attempted to make Donald Trump and all of his supporters toxic.

The Left has hit Trump and his associates with every slander in the book, everything from bigot to full-blown insurrectionist.

Making Trump radioactive

The intent is to poison the well and make support for Trump untenable, particularly among big-money donors.

Early in the 2024 primary, it worked.

Big-money donors were cozying up to other candidates, namely Nikki Haley.

But the Democrats’ overzealous lawfare has changed the calculus.

Now, big-money donors are freaking out over the fascistic behavior of the Democrats.

Wall Street and Silicon Valley investors are now giving Trump a second look, and corporate-controlled media outlets are freaking out.

POLITICO published a piece with the headline, “Never mind: Wall Street titans shake off qualms and embrace Trump. . .Many high-dollar donors had turned their backs on Trump after the stolen election lie and Jan. 6, but now have returned.”

The implication is clear.

Big-money donors should feel shame for supporting Trump.

POLITICO added that high-dollar donors are “setting aside those concerns, looking past qualms about his personality and willingness to bulldoze institutional norms and focusing instead on issues closer to the heart: how he might ease regulations, cut their taxes or flex U.S. power on the global stage.”

What POLITICO does not grasp is that investors are watching Democrats bulldoze institutional norms.

Unprecedented lawfare

For example, New York Attorney General Letitia James’ outrageous fraud lawsuit was a massive red flag, so much so that Governor Kathy Hochul had to assure businessmen that Trump was a unique case.

Then George Soros-backed Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg prosecuted Trump for falsifying business records in what legal scholar Alan Dershowitz called “the worst case I’ve seen in 60 years of law.”

Trump’s conviction in that case was a big eye-opener.

POLITICO quoted Hal Lambert, Point Bridge Capital founder, “I don’t know that anyone really believed he was a threat to democracy.”

And that’s the point.

The “threat to democracy” nonsense was media rhetoric used to make Trump unpalatable.

However, since Democrats had some semblance of moral authority, they squandered it with these petty and ridiculous cases against Trump.

Biden campaign spokesperson Ammar Moussa said, “Donald Trump is a self-obsessed convicted felon who would do anything to regain power — and if he does, has made clear he intends to rule as a dictator on day one. . .But for some billionaires none of that matters. They’ll prop up a convicted white-collar crook so long as Trump slashes their taxes.”

These shaming tactics are not going to work.

After the verdict in Bragg’s hush money case, liberal investor Shaun Maguire announced that he was donating $300,000 to Trump’s campaign and wrote, “I’ve spent hundreds of hours following the trials and researching the charges against Trump. This has been another radicalizing experience. I understand that normally when there’s smoke there’s fire, but in this case, I think when there’s smoke there’s lawfare.”

Democrats have gone over the deep end in their monomaniacal pursuit of Donald Trump.

*Pants on Fire News Official Polling*

Cat 2

Trump just called out the Fox News backstabber behind Tucker Carlson’s firing

Published

on

By

Donald Trump is in a strong position to reclaim the White House.

That is making the establishment very nervous.

And Trump just called out the Fox News backstabber behind Tucker Carlson’s firing.

It’s been over a year since Fox News fired Tucker Carlson when he had the top-rated show on cable television.

No reason was ever stated as to why he was let go, but it’s become quite clear that establishment Republicans took him out because he was too critical of funding the war in Ukraine.

McConnell spills the tea

After Congress was finally able to squeeze through another multi-billion-dollar funding package to Ukraine, Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-KY) was asked by a reporter why the bill took so long to come together.

McConnell answered, “I think the demonization of Ukraine began by Tucker Carlson, who in my opinion ended up where he should’ve been all along, which is interviewing [Russian President] Vladimir Putin. . .He had an enormous audience, which convinced a lot of rank-and-file Republicans that maybe this was a mistake.”

That is ultimately why Carlson was fired.

Lo and behold one of the Fox News board members is former House Speaker Paul Ryan, the epitome of a Swamp creature.

Ryan almost certainly helped turn the screws on Carlson behind the scenes.

Now Donald Trump is calling out Ryan for his duplicity.

Trump wrote on Truth Social, “Nobody can ever trust Fox News, and I am one of them, with the weak and ineffective RINO, Paul Ryan, on its Board of Directors. He’s a total lightweight, a failed and pathetic Speaker of the House, and a very disloyal person. Romney was bad, but Paul Ryan made him look worse. As a team, they never had a chance. Rupert and Lachlan, get that dog off your Board – You don’t need him. ALL YOU NEED IS TRUMP. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!”

Since leaving Fox News, Carlson has been successfully building his own platform, the Tucker Carlson Network.

He continues to be a staunch critic of the warmongers in the establishment.

Tucker’s evolving position on war

In his younger days, Carlson wrote for the bygone neoconservative outlet The Weekly Standard, which was founded by Bill Kristol.

But Carlson turned on the Iraq War and reckless interventionism overall when he traveled to Iraq.

He recounted a conversation he had with a general during dinner.

Carlson said, “I didn’t realize how corrupt and disgusting and feminized the officer class was and politicized, just repulsive people actually at the flag officer level. So we’re sitting at dinner and this general is telling me about, ‘I saw something really touching today. I saw we had this female officer, and she was killed. Her legs were blown off by an IED, and her husband was there.’”

The general believed that he was recounting a touching story, but Carlson was enraged.

Carson continued, “And, he, you know, they’ve got three kids back in Virginia. But he held her hand as she died. And this ultimate sacrifice for America. And I was like—what you’re, like, celebrating this? A girl got killed, a mother. I thought we fought wars to protect mothers and children. First of all, if you’re sending girls to fight your wars, you’re disgusting.”

This is the giant machine that people who oppose endless wars are fighting.

*Pants on Fire News Official Polling*
 

Continue Reading

Cat 2

“Eye Patch McCain” attended one event that will turn your stomach

Published

on

By

Donald Trump showed the country that the fake news media was the “enemy of the American people.”

He also exposed that many RINOs are working hand in glove with the Democrats who control the press.

And “Eye Patch McCain” attended one event that will turn your stomach.

Representative Dan Crenshaw (R-TX) seemed like a rising star inside the Republican Party when he came into office in 2018.

However, people learned that he was another establishment player, which landed him the nickname “Eye Patch McCain,” a reference to “maverick” John McCain.

Crenshaw has been squishy on several issues, perhaps most notably immigration.

He is also a huge warmonger.

Swampy event

And Crenshaw showed that he was a creature of the Washington, D.C. Swamp when he showed up to a media event bankrolled by far-left philanthropist Melinda Gates and others.

The event was for The Texas Tribune, which receives millions in funding from left-wing dark money groups.

The Daily Caller reported that “Republicans attending include Texas Reps. Dan Crenshaw, Tony Gonzales, and Michael McCaul, former Illinois Rep. Adam Kinzinger, former Wyoming Rep. Liz Cheney, political consultant Karl Rove, former Texas Gov. Rick Perry, Oklahoma Gov. Kevin Stitt and former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations John Bolton.”

Unsurprisingly, the GOP attendees were a Who’s Who of establishment Republicans.

When asked about their attendance by The Daily Caller, several responded that “they were attending the event to stand up for conservative beliefs against those with different viewpoints.”

Sure.

The GOP attendees are essentially in lockstep with Democrats on the issue of war and immigration, i.e. they all want more of it.

Gates wrote on social media, “I’ve never endorsed a presidential candidate before. But this year’s election stands to be so enormously consequential for women and families that, this time, I can’t stay quiet. Women deserve a leader who cares about the issues they face and is committed to protecting their safety, their health, their economic power, their reproductive rights, and their ability to freely and fully participate in a functioning democracy. In this election, the contrast couldn’t be greater, and the stakes couldn’t be higher. I will be voting for President Biden.”

If there was any confusion about what type of event it would be, Gates cleared that up with her endorsement of Biden.

Left-wing donations

Scott Walter, president of the Capital Research Center, called out the event for what it was.

Walter explained, “This is not an entity that it gives money to outside its own cells. This is something it creates again, the Hopewell fund, both channels money onto other lefty nonprofits, but also pops into existence groups that are really just, you know, internal to itself, right?”

Left-wing donors obviously expect something for their money.

Walter added, “Any conservative or Republican should understand that this is very much a Left-wing and, you know, overall partisan thing. There’s a reason those Left-wing donors, the Arnolds and Ford and Hopewell, there’s a reason they give money to this, and it’s to help the left, and anybody who goes should be very clear-eyed about that.”

If Republican voters are wondering why they keep losing even when they win elections, it’s because of bad leadership.

*Pants on Fire News Official Polling*
Continue Reading

Cat 2

Jeff Bezos regrets buying The Washington Post as one growing problem has conservatives rolling their eyes

Published

on

By

Amazon creator Jeff Bezos has become one of the richest men on the planet.

He’s made a concerted effort to get a foothold in mass media.

Now, Bezos is regretting buying The Washington Post because of one growing problem.

Billionaire Jeff Bezos is getting a lesson in leftism.

He was under the impression that when you bought a company, you controlled it.

But Bezos is discovering that, no, actually Left-wing activists inside the company control it.

He’s finding that out because leftists inside The Washington Post are in full-on revolt.

The Washington Post versus The Washington Post

The ouster of Executive Editor Sally Buzbee triggered a mutiny inside the newsroom.

William Lewis, who replaced Buzbee, told staff, “We are going to turn this thing around, but let’s not sugarcoat it. It needs turning around. . .We are losing large amounts of money. Your audience has halved in recent years. People are not reading your stuff. Right. I can’t sugarcoat it anymore.”

Needless to say, that did not go over well.

The Post has been in dire need of a shakeup due to poor financial performance.

The paper reported that “[i]n November 2022, only about 58 million people visited The Post’s digital platforms. And digital subscriptions, which peaked at 3 million in January 2021, fell to 2.7 million by the end of that year and have not rebounded.”

Lewis’ hard landing at the paper spurred four Washington Post reporters to write a hit piece on him.

They dredged up a story about Lewis being involved in the theft of an upcoming memoir written by former British Prime Minister Tony Blair.

The Post reported, “The suspect arrested by London police in 2010 was John Ford, a once-aspiring actor who has since admitted to an extensive career using deception and illegal means to obtain confidential information for Britain’s Sunday Times newspaper. Facing potential prosecution, Ford called a journalist he said he had collaborated with repeatedly — and trusted to come to his rescue. That journalist, according to draft book chapters Ford later wrote recounting his ordeal, was Robert Winnett, a Sunday Times veteran who is set to become editor of the Washington Post later this year.”

Scalp collected

The report had its desired effect because Winnett chose to stay at his position at the Daily Telegraph in London instead of joining Lewis.

It was clear that Lewis and whoever he picked would be marked men.

During his introduction to the newsroom, one staff member told Lewis, “The most cynical interpretation sort of feels like you chose two of your buddies to come in and help run The Post. And we now have four White men running three newsrooms.”

Legacy institutions like The New York Times and The Washington Post are now being led around by mid-level activist journalists.

The most “woke” person wins in these organizations.

This is what the Left have brought on themselves, and Bezos purchased these problems.

The job of trying to clean up The Post is going to be a massive headache.

*Pants on Fire News Official Polling*
Continue Reading

Sign Up For FREE Alerts

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Trending