The failing New York Times is going after Tucker Carlson again.
The “paper of record” and other liberal outlets constantly take shots at him.
But Carlson had the perfect response to The New York Times’ latest pathetic hit piece against him.
The New York Times expended thousands and thousands of words on an interminable hit piece aimed at Tucker Carlson.
In the three-part screed, The Times argued that Carlson constantly railed against elites, as if somehow that’s beyond the pale of acceptable discourse.
And of course the paper smeared him as a “racist” any which way they could.
Carlson took it in stride and held up a copy of the paper with a big smile on his face.
Carlson also released a video in advance of the hit piece, explaining why the Left continue to come after him.
It’s bizarre that the Left attack Carlson for his stances on immigration and war.
Carlson believes in the “crazy” idea that a country should control its borders, and that endless wars abroad are bad.
Democrats would have agreed with these arguments 15 or 20 years ago.
In fact, they did.
Bill Clinton gave a hawkish immigration speech at the 1995 State of the Union, and got a standing ovation.
Democrats once argued that unfettered illegal immigration undercut American wages.
They have since abandoned that position as well as their anti-war stance from the George W. Bush era.
Now, Democrats couldn’t care less about Americans suffering from the loss of manufacturing and construction jobs, or Americans dying in foreign conflicts abroad.
They have recast George W. Bush as an avuncular figure because he criticized Donald Trump and once gave Michelle Obama a stick of gum.
Times author Nick Confessore also wrote, “As he honed his programming edge, the show drew more and more from the arcana of the far right, especially the conspiracy theory that an elite cabal bent on destroying Western civilization uses immigration and feminist ideas to disempower and replace the native-born.
The problem for Confessore is that prominent members of the Left openly say these things.
Univision lead anchor Jorge Ramos, Hollywood director Rob Reiner, and many other leftists have gleefully talked about the “browning of America.”
However, Hispanic Americans are not fond of Democratic economic and immigration policies, either as evidenced by heavy Latino communities in South Texas increasingly moving toward the Republican Party.
As for feminism, Mallory Millett, the conservative younger sister of renowned feminist Kate Millett, wrote about her experience at a 1969 feminist gathering hosted by her radical sister.
She recounted the eerie call-response chants from the crowd, writing:
“Why are we here today?” she asked.
“To make revolution,” they answered.
“What kind of revolution?” she replied.
“The Cultural Revolution,” they chanted.
“And how do we make Cultural Revolution?” she demanded.
“By destroying the American family!” they answered.
“How do we destroy the family?” she came back.
“By destroying the American Patriarch,” they cried exuberantly.
“And how do we destroy the American Patriarch?” she replied.
“By taking away his power!”
“How do we do that?”
“By destroying monogamy!” they shouted.
“How can we destroy monogamy?”
Their answer left me dumbstruck, breathless, disbelieving my ears. Was I on planet earth? Who were these people?
“By promoting promiscuity, eroticism, prostitution and homosexuality!” they resounded.
The Left have not changed over the past 50 years.
Their radical ideas have been mainstreamed into the culture, and people like Tucker Carlson call them out on a nightly basis.
That’s why they try to destroy him.
Pants on Fire Official Polling