Connect with us

Uncategorized

This radical left-wing journalist’s fantasies about a conservative’s death will make your stomach turn

Published

on

Democrats are stewing in a cauldron of rage.

And they have convinced themselves that they are justified in being as nasty as possible.

Now this radical left-wing journalist’s fantasies about a conservative’s death will make your stomach turn.

The Supreme Court’s ruling in the Dobbs decision overturned Roe V. Wade, making abortion a state issue again – and Democrats have not handled it well.

Since the decision, abortion zealots have protested outside the homes of conservative Supreme Court Justices, harrassed and threatened their families in public, and firebombed crisis pregnancy centers and churches around the country.

One deranged lefist even attempted to assassinate Justice Brett Kavanaugh.

Now, a writer for the leftist rag Vox has penned a fake obituary for Justice Samuel Alito, in which he fantasizes about the Justice’s death.

“Justice Samuel Alito, who died on XXXX, was not devoid of any positive traits,” Vox’ Ian Millhiser tweeted. “He was a skilled attorney and a highly effective advocate for conservative causes… Had he spent his career as a litigator, he would almost certainly be remembered as one of the Republican Party’s leading Supreme Court practitioners… The problem is that Justice Alito was, indeed, one of the Republican Party’s leading Supreme Court advocates — but he embraced this role while he was a sitting justice.”

As expected, Millhiser was universally ripped for the ghoulish tweet, and like the coward he is, he quickly deleted it.

But the Internet never forgets.

It never even crossed Millhiser’s mind that his tweet was despicable in any way.

That’s what happens when left-wing radicals like himself have been conditioned by Democrats and their Fake News allies for decades to believe that virtually any behavior aimed toward the Right is justified and virtuous.

Neo-Marxist scholar Herbert Marcuse popularized the idea of being intolerant toward right-wing movements in a 1965 essay entitled, “Repressive Tolerance.”

He argued that leftists must not be tolerant of the “intolerant,” also known as anyone the Left disagrees with.

That idea has metastasized in the culture, and now self-proclaimed “journalists” find it totally acceptable to daydream about the death of a conservative Supreme Court Justice.

This is why culture is so vitally important.

If the culture becomes accepting of political violence, society will quickly unravel.

The Left have made the problem so much worse by arguing that speech is violence, but actual violence is not violence so long as it’s directed toward the Right.

The corporate-controlled press barely batted an eye when a would-be assassin tried to murder Justice Kavanaugh inside his family home.

If someone even tangentially connected to the Right had been arrested outside the home of Justice Sonia Sotomayor, The New York Times and others would still lead with it as a front page headline months later.

The obvious asymmetry in standards has been terrible for the country, and devastating for the reputation of the so-called “mainstream” media.

Fake News

The New York Times’ infuriating excuse for one company’s exploitation of children will have you seeing red

Published

on

Donald Trump once said that the Fake News Media is the enemy of the American people.

The past six years have proven him correct.

And The New York Times’ infuriating excuse for one company’s exploitation of children will have you seeing red.

For some bizarre reason, the Left go into defense mode whenever conservatives point out obvious pedophilia and grooming behavior.

It should be easy to unite politically against pedophilia, but the Left would instead rather accuse right-wingers of being “conspiracy theorists” or “threats to democracy.”

And this is after Jeffrey Epstein died under the most mysterious of circumstances while being held in custody for sex trafficking of young girls.

The corporate-controlled press swooped in to defend fashion house Balenciaga after the company released a disgusting ad campaign featuring young kids holding teddy bears in bondage gear.

ABC News reported that the photo included “what appears to be an excerpt from the U.S. Supreme Court opinion on United States vs. Williams (2008), which upheld part of a federal child pornography law.”

Balenciaga received so much backlash, the company scrubbed its Instagram page with over 14 million followers.

Yet, The New York Times found it appropriate to provide some damage control for the company.

The Times ran a piece entitled, “When High Fashion and QAnon Collide: Two new Balenciaga campaigns ignited a firestorm that traveled from the internet to Fox News, fueled by allegations that the brand condoned child exploitation.”

The Left always mention “QAnon” when they want to diffuse allegations of pedophilia.

Again, this is after the Jeffrey Epstein saga, knowing that he ran with powerful people, like Prince Andrew and former President Bill Clinton.

Clinton was literally photographed getting a massage from one of Epstein’s girls.

“The internet is full of trolls,” The Times wrote. “Why did this controversy take off? As online criticism of the campaigns spread, the story was picked up across right-leaning media outlets, including The New York Post and the prime time Fox News show ‘Tucker Carlson Tonight.’ The show has helped to publicize and mainstream QAnon, the internet conspiracy theory that ‘a group of Satan-worshiping elites who run a child sex ring are trying to control our politics and media.’”

This is a mind-blowing response from The Times.

The paper’s angle is that conservatives fabricated the entire controversy, not that Balenciaga ran a sickening ad campaign and was forced to apologize for it.

If Democrats want to brand Republicans as the “anti-pedophile” Party, that is a label the GOP will likely gladly accept.

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

This NBC reporter tried to slam Tucker Carlson but ended up stepping on a rake

Published

on

Self-proclaimed “journalists” have a vendetta against Tucker Carlson and Fox News.

If the Left had their way, Fox News would be regulated out of existence.

And this NBC reporter tried to slam Carlson but ended up stepping on a rake.

The election of former President Donald Trump in 2016 changed the entire Fake News Media landscape.

For the first time in contemporary American politics, an outsider was able to circumvent the corporate-controlled media monopoly and get elected using social media.

Since then, the establishment elites have attempted to rein in Big Tech, and free speech in general, which is why so many journalists and politicians who have questioned the Left’s narrative have been demonized.

The Left want to brand them as “hateful,” thus justifying censorship.

And NBC News’ Kat Tenbarge did exactly that when she went after Fox News’ Tucker Carlson, and the citizen journalist behind the social media account Libs of TikTok.

On Twitter, Libs of TikTok has amassed a huge following by posting unedited clips of left-wing radicals espousing their insane beliefs in videos they uploaded to TikTok for the world to see.

Tenbarge tried to suggest that Carlson and Libs of TikTok were bringing harm to the LGBTQ community, but she ended up making a bizarre, unintended argument.

“Tucker Carlson, Libs of TikTok, etc. create a stream of content blaming trans and queer people for child grooming, but rarely or never feature actual victims of child grooming,” Tenbarge wrote. “If they did, they’d have to reckon with the fact that many survivors are queer and trans themselves. I’ve interviewed survivors of [child sexual assault] and grooming, and several of them were trans and non-binary. Even more identified as gay, bi, or pan. All of them supported LGBTQ people. Religious conservatives would hate them and damn them to hell. They don’t really care.”

Tenbarge made the common left-wing mistake of linking LGBTQ people to child grooming.

Conservatives are against pedophilia regardless of the perpetrator or victim, but the Left tries to play these power games that backfire.

Tenbarge’s argument suggests that child sexual assault victims were either groomed into an LGBTQ identity, or they were targeted by predators because of their LGBTQ identity.

Either way, she was definitely not making the point she thought she was making.

Tenbarge suggests that Republicans are somehow out to get LGBTQ people, but the group Gays Against Groomers has been a fierce critic of teachers – regardless of so-called “gender identity” – speaking to young children about sexuality and other sexually explicit subjects.

Tellingingly, the Twitter account for Gays Against Groomers was banned until Elon Musk took control of the company.

For some strange reason, the Left are defending groomers to “own” conservatives.

Continue Reading

Fake News

Elon Musk set off these so-called journalists—and the word explosion is ridiculous

Published

on

It turns out that if there’s one thing the Fake News Media can’t handle it’s freedom of speech.

When Elon Musk took over Twitter he seriously set off the corporate-controlled press.

And the word explosion is ridiculous.

The corporate-controlled media is suddenly fascinated with the inner workings of social media platform, Twitter.

From the way they’ve been ranting and raving, you’d think it was their money, not Elon Musk’s $44 billion on the line.

In fact, The New York Times is so obsessed, they recently decided to treat readers to a 2,500 word diatribe on why Elon Musk basically sucks at life, and is more or less destroying the world with his takeover of Twitter.

In an article entitled, “Two Weeks of Chaos: Inside Elon Musk’s Takeover of Twitter,” a committee of some four left-wing reporters pooled their collective indignation to unload on the world’s richest man, who recently committed the unpardonable sin of voting for a Republican.

Even though Twitter is losing a jaw-dropping $4 million per day, the self-proclaimed “journalists” focused much of their energy on the supposed trauma of employees facing job cuts — as if it’s Elon Musk’s fault that Twitter’s prior management ran the company into the ground.

“The fallout has often been excruciating, according to 36 current and former Twitter employees and people close to the company, as well as internal documents and workplace chat logs,” the writers claimed,” The New York Times’ piece read. “Some top executives were summarily fired by email. One engineering manager, upon being told to cut hundreds of workers, vomited into a trash can. Others slept in the office as they worked grueling schedules to meet Mr. Musk’s orders.”

But one particularly whiney complaint exposed how much work Musk has ahead of him if he’s ever going to clean up the deeply corrupt organization.

“Mr. Musk plans to begin making employees pay for lunch — which had been free — at the company cafeteria,” The Times’ report continued.

Twitter user Andrew Wortman shared the article and complained that Musk, “Fired ¾ of the employees. Now he’s planning to starve the rest of them. He’s failure incarnate.”

Then, @nichegamer retweeted that post suggesting that Twitter employees learn to cook.

Musk replied to that comment revealing a shocking surprise about the employees’ “free lunch” inside Twitter’s accounting books.

“Especially bizarre given that almost no one came to the office,” Musk pointed out. “Estimate cost per lunch served in past 12 months is >$400.”

The corporate-controlled press’ desperate bid to demonize Elon Musk when they never bothered to scrutinize Twitter’s inner workings in the past is almost guaranteed to have originated from the “Chief Twit’s” stated commitment to free speech.

Musk’s purchase of Twitter came after he slammed the platform in March for an algorithmic bias against conservatives.

“Given that Twitter serves as the de facto public town square, failing to adhere to free speech principles fundamentally undermines democracy,” Musk wrote at the time. “Free speech is essential to a functioning democracy.”

After making a $44 billion bid to buy Twitter, Musk nearly backed out after discovering what a dumpster fire he was about to acquire.

After plenty of legal wrangling, he ultimately ended up closing on the deal but has warned employees that if the current recession continues to deepen, the social media platform could end up going bankrupt unless drastic changes are made.

Apparently, Fake News Media outlets, like The New York Times, are feeling threatened by Elon Musk’s focus on free speech.

With an estimated total equity of only about $1.54 billion, The New York Times might want to start playing it safer before the world’s richest man decides to become their boss as well.

Pants on Fire News will keep you up-to-date on any developments to this ongoing story.

Continue Reading

Sign Up For FREE Alerts

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Trending