Connect with us

Fake News

This Fox News host is in major trouble because of one tweet

Published

on

Fox News has its fair share of enemies of the Left.

But no one at the network was prepared for the latest controversy to engulf it.

And now this host is in major trouble because of one tweet.

Trish Regan is a Fox Business Channel host who bills herself as pro-Trump.

Regan was in consideration for a primetime show on Fox News Channel when the network reshuffled their lineup after Megyn Kelly jumped ship.

That won’t be the case any longer.

Regan is in big trouble.

But this time it isn’t the Left protesting her or putting her career in jeopardy.

It is conservatives.

That is because, in the wake of the twin tragedies in El Paso and Dayton, Regan begged President Trump to ban guns and implement a national gun registration database scheme all through executive fiat.

Not even Barack Obama took such draconian steps when his plan to create a national gun registration scheme failed in Congress.

Fox News viewers could not believe a Fox Business Channel host would echo the talking points you would expect to hear on MSNBC or CNN.

Fox is number one in ratings because their hosts establish trust with the viewers.

Regan’s tweet shows she is just another coastal elitist who looks down on the cultural values of most Americans.

We will keep you up-to-date on any new developments in this ongoing story.

Continue Reading
30 Comments

30 Comments

  1. Robert Stone

    August 8, 2019 at 9:54 pm

    She is about as much of a President Trump fan as I am a obama fan. Unless I am being fooled by our current President, I believe that he believes in our Gun Rights.

  2. EVE

    August 9, 2019 at 1:10 am

    banning guns isn’t the answer. if the bad guys want a gun they’ll get one. however MAYBE registering assault weapons and having waiting periods long enough to do deeper background checks could help. also we the public need to be more aware and not be afraid to report someone we feel could pose a danger. it’s better to apologize than let another shooting happen.

  3. Art Smith

    August 9, 2019 at 2:01 am

    Trish is the same Fox News goofball who once asked on AIR: “ Who was Pocahontas”? She is s
    An uneducated millennial who has NO Grasp of politics! Vomit in her corn flakes!

  4. Ernst

    August 9, 2019 at 8:28 pm

    Trish Regan just exposed herself as a gun-grabbing leftist. Shameful when one’s true proclivities come out by accident. Trish Regan should go to CNN.

  5. J Mo

    August 9, 2019 at 10:16 pm

    Assualt rifles are already banned dummy.

  6. Donald

    August 9, 2019 at 10:28 pm

    Please the sons are libturd garbage, she will be getting that show soon, just as soon as Ingram leaves

  7. Marty

    August 9, 2019 at 10:33 pm

    She is hot, stupid but hot.

  8. Hedy

    August 9, 2019 at 10:43 pm

    Lot of these hot chicks are total bimbos.

  9. carol

    August 9, 2019 at 10:56 pm

    I stopped watching her when all she did night after night was cry for the people of Venuzala (spelling???) Perhaps she needs a light to go off somewhere in that little brain of hers to tell her that the people down there wouldn t be starving and desperate if they had guns to fight their corrupt government…so now she wants us unarmed just like they are!

  10. gary vogt

    August 9, 2019 at 11:14 pm

    This Trish is about a smart as a slug. She think’s she is cute but always looking away from the camera and must be talking to an imaginary smurf. I don’t expect her to last long.

  11. Mike Flanagan

    August 9, 2019 at 11:30 pm

    None of the things they want to enact would have stopped or prevented any of the Mass shootings.
    It took 8 decades for the Liberals to systematically remove GOD Prayer discipline respect common scene the Pledge of allegiance and replaced them with Homosexuality gay rights baby Killing community bathrooms and the devastation of the Black Family thru welfare and the Idea you can have kids to get a government check ect. All of which has caused society to deteriorate to the putrued vile hateful racist way it is today.

  12. Robert L. Kahlcke

    August 9, 2019 at 11:56 pm

    It’s time for Trish to be fired. FORTHWITH

  13. NoMoreMarxistsInDC

    August 10, 2019 at 12:12 am

    She is just following in Megan Kelly’s footsteps. Hot but stupid.

  14. martha ellenburg

    August 10, 2019 at 12:13 am

    Along with Shepard Smith!

  15. Jim1937

    August 10, 2019 at 1:07 am

    Do you even know what an assault weapon is? Hint: It ain’t a gun that just looks wicked!

  16. Gary

    August 10, 2019 at 1:27 am

    I’m not surprised….I believe she used to work for obomo

  17. Brad Smith

    August 10, 2019 at 1:49 am

    The word Assault Rifle again. If you you don’t know about Gun’s then STFU. There are very few single shot weapons available. Most every rifle/pistol has the ability to fire multiple rounds Semi automatically. You have to pull the trigger every time for the gun to fire. Fully automatic guns have been banned, I believe in all states. There are guns for hunting Big Game that hold the same amount of bullets (That is 10 in CA) that are far more deadly than a wimpy 223 caliber A.R. One example is a Mossberg short pump action 12 gauge. A shotgun does not fire a single bullet. It fires a bullet that contains dozens of smaller lead bullets. At 10 yards away it can blow a hole in a piece of half-inch plywood about 6 inches in diameter. The farther the grouping of small bullets go, the larger the diameter of damage is done by the group of bullets. Extremely effective in a cafeteria or in an enclosed building. There are larger caliber semi automatic weapons out there that are extremely Deadly. I used a 30.06 to hunt elk and bear. Those are extremely violent weapons. All I am saying is that The A.R. 15 or assault rifle has a bad image because it looks like a military machine gun. The problem isn’t the weapon. More than 80% of shootings are done with a handgun or pistol. If you have a parking problem. You don’t go and hire more meter maids to hand out more tickets. You fix the problem and build more parking lots. My opinion is that it starts with the background check. It should include more detail about the mental health of the person buying the weapon. 100% of the non-terrorist shooters was suffering with some form of mental illness. Usually some type of schizophrenia. I am in favor of more strict accountability before you can purchase a firearm. Whatever that is, I don’t know. But I’m sure professionals could figure it out. I also feel that video games give younger people The impression that you can kill a whole bunch of people on the screen and there aren’t any consequences. You could dissect this issue to death but I feel by keeping guns out of the hands of Crazy people is a good place to start.

  18. Stan Lee

    August 10, 2019 at 5:29 am

    Report is overly celebrating Trish’s demise. There is no demise, she’s fine. It’s Fox News’ present management which is too cowardly to stand upon principle. Fox News has one anchor, not on Fox Business like Trish, who is a source of contention on the Fox News channel and has a major time slot on Fox News, as opposed to its other channel,Fox Business.
    If you folks are attempting to gain interest over a less the major issue, you are hunting in the wrong places! The Leftist operations on TV are all in trouble, or was it only Fox who interests you?

  19. Lei

    August 10, 2019 at 4:03 pm

    Watch One America News.
    Fox is too liberal for me. And I am a minority female.
    She probably lives in a gated community or a high-rise building with guards.
    What about all the rural folks who would be sitting ducks if their guns are taken away.
    Or old people? MY GOD!
    Women have bought too many guns and are not going to let someone take away their security.

  20. Laurie

    August 10, 2019 at 4:43 pm

    There is a lot of delusion (or brainwashing) out there. Gun laws or gun fee zones don’t protect us. The bad guys will always be able to get guns! The answer to the violence is to have MORE guns in the community. If the law abiding gun owners carried all the time, the bad dudes would temper their behavior. They are really just cowards acting out. They would not act out in an area where there would probably be guns. They only act out when they KNOW that there won’t be guns….such as gun free zones. It is called deterrence – ‘the action of discouraging an action or event through instilling doubt or fear of the consequences’.

  21. N

    August 10, 2019 at 6:35 pm

    DS traitors are everywhere!The evil corrupted lib demoncrat Commie Nazi’s party & minions! RINOs(Lee,Moran,Murkowski,Portman,Toomey,Wicker,Blunt,Graham,Collins,Romney,Rubio,etc)they’re just as bad!Drain the rat infested Swp,Pres Trump!

  22. R.F. HORKA

    August 11, 2019 at 12:34 am

    VOTE RED & PRAY

  23. William Yarbrough

    August 12, 2019 at 8:15 pm

    AR does not stand for assault rifle; it is an abbreviation for the company/man who designed the gun. Assault is the action committed by the man behind the gun, knife, club, etc.

  24. Jim

    August 12, 2019 at 10:12 pm

    You are so right about him

  25. Donna Crafton

    August 12, 2019 at 11:21 pm

    And Juan Williams.

  26. Bill

    August 13, 2019 at 2:48 am

    I can’t believe she did this. I had respect for her for speaking up for Trump. Now it’s all gone. I’m so sorry.

  27. Vanessa

    August 13, 2019 at 7:39 pm

    He should be fired and moved to msnbc. He makes me want to puke. He kept tell people that nobody was coming to America and laughed and would say it was all a hoax. Well guess what?? They were coming and are still coming dumbo. He thinks he is so smart. I will turn off FOX when he comes on. Hopefully, more people will do the same thing.

  28. John

    August 15, 2019 at 3:10 am

    Depends where you are dopey.

  29. leonard Collings

    August 22, 2019 at 8:39 am

    Hammers kill more people in the United states than guns. Remember 911 when box cutters took down 4 aircraft. Do you plan to outlaw hammers and box cutters. Cars and trucks kill 45,000 people per year . do cars and trucks get banned as well.
    Ever think its the liberal society where kids can no longer be disciplined by schools and this just perpetuates unruly behavior into adult life. It’s the jerk behind the trigger.

  30. James P. Mallett

    August 26, 2019 at 1:13 am

    Instead of taking guns from responsible law abiding citizens, how about everyone carry a pistol. Maybe 15 shot.
    Who would dare pull their gun if they knew everyone else had some too?!! Only the crazy or extreamely brave. Either way, they’d be dead.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CNN

CNN’s Jake Tapper flat-out refused to correct AOC when she was caught in this outrageous lie

Published

on

Members of Congress used to be known for only lying to their constituents back home.

And the media was once known as “the arbiter of truth” and an institution of trust and respect.

But that has all changed and now CNN’s Jake Tapper flat-out refused to correct AOC when she was caught in this outrageous lie.

CNN’s Jake Tapper has gone from being considered by some as a respected, impartial journalist to just another left-wing hack who can lie and promote the Left’s with the best of them.

Tapper recently admitted that he allowed Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) to blatantly lie about President Trump during a recent interview.

AOC said during the interview, “The beds and the capacity that we need in this country. And we’re hearing it every step of the way from this administration. First, we were hearing that it’s a hoax, then we were hearing that everything was fine.”

This all stemmed from earlier false press reports claiming the President called coronavirus a hoax. The claims were quickly disproven and even corrected by most news outlets.

But clearly not by CNN.

Tapper later even admitted he knew it was a lie from AOC, but chose not to say anything.

“I thought about it, because the president did not call the virus a hoax.” Tapper said.

Tapper went further in trying to deflect from the Congresswoman’s lie by simply accusing the president of being a liar.

“I guess that’s the problem with a politician who lies so often. While I agree that Democrats are mischaracterizing what he said, what he did say was also false so it’s tough to justify taking the time for a fact check when it’s not taking a stand defining the truth,” Jake added.

So, in other words, because Tapper doesn’t like the president and personally believes Donald Trump lies often, he decided not to correct a blatant lie on his show.

This disregard for the truth is so widespread by the media now, Tapper’s decision didn’t receive much coverage.

There was a time not so long ago when ploys like this would have cost a reporter his job.

But we have moved far past that time in history.

The Trump era may go down in history as the time that journalism died its last death.

Share your thoughts about this story with Pants on Fire News in the comments below.

Continue Reading

Donald Trump

The New York Times is using the current crisis to attack Christians for this outrageous reason

Published

on

Most Americans are coming together to battle both the Chinese coronavirus and the economic fallout from forced business closings.

But the media has decided this crisis is a great time to attack the very country that first protected their freedom of the press.

And now The New York Times is using the current crisis to attack Christians for this outrageous reason.

The liberal mainstream media has been out of control for decades.

They have gone from reporting the news and providing vital information to being nothing more than a public relations company for the far Left.

Now the liberal mainstream media’s blatant disregard for truth, accuracy, and basic decency has reached new lows in the last four or five years.

It’s no wonder journalists have become among the least trusted segments of American society, joining lawyers, politicians, and infomercial spokesmen.

From CBS using fake video footage to promote an anti-Trump story on the coronavirus, to the Washington Post gleefully predicting Trump supporters would suffer the highest number of deaths from the virus, the media has reached new lows.

Now The New York Times has taken it even lower with a shocking claim that Christians are to blame for the Chinese coronavirus.

Last week, The Times published an op-ed placing the blame on the so-called “religious right” for President Trump’s supposedly delayed response to the Chinese coronavirus pandemic.

In the editorial, self-described “journalist” and author Katherine Stewart attempted to argue that the President’s “anti-science” evangelical voter base is influencing him too heavily, causing him to ignore scientists on issues like vaccines and, of course, climate change.

The op-ed was originally released with the title “The Road to Coronavirus Hell Was Paved by Evangelicals” but after massive backlash the liberal rag toned down the title to “The Religious Right’s Hostility to Science Is Crippling Our Coronavirus Response.”

Of course, both titles are vile and show the author’s (and the newspaper’s) violent bias against Christians.

Not to mention the author completely ignoring the fact that it is the Left’s anti-science views on life that have caused the slaughter of millions of children over the past few decades.

And it is the liberal anti-science views on gender that have led to the destruction of women’s sports and left thousands of scared, confused children facing mutilating surgeries.

What is most interesting about Stewart’s anti-Christian hit piece is that she focuses most of her vitriol on Christians who oppose the “Green New Deal” and other socialist attempts to take control by promoting fears of climate change.

Once again, the author ignores the fact that the same people claiming the earth will end in ten years have made those claims before.

In fact, some of these “scientists” have been predicting the end of the world since the 1970s.

And, the author conveniently leaves out the fact that as Donald Trump was first warning of the Chinese coronavirus in January, many “scientists” were claiming it couldn’t even be spread by human contact.

And when Trump placed a ban on travel from China to try and stop the spread, it was “scientists” who called him a racist and claimed a travel ban wasn’t needed.

Share your thoughts about this story with Pants on Fire News in the comments below.

Continue Reading

Donald Trump

The New York Times admitted one coronavirus error that had Trump grinning from ear to ear

Published

on

During the coronavirus outbreak the Fake News Media is not trying to inform the American people.

Instead, so-called “reporters” are seizing on the pandemic to launch another front in their war to destroy Donald Trump.

But now The New York Times admitted one coronavirus error that had Trump grinning from ear to ear.

During a March White House press briefing the President expressed his hope that the anti-malarial drug hydroxychloroquine would prove to be a game-changer as it showed promise in limited use in treating coronavirus patients.

While the evidence was anecdotal and more tests were clearly required, the President was offering the American people a ray of hope as the outbreak spread.

The New York Times – instead of reporting facts – attacked the President for falsely touting “unproven drugs.”

“At a long-winded White House briefing on Friday, President Trump enthusiastically and repeatedly promoted the promise of two long-used malaria drugs that are still unproven against the coronavirus, but being tested in clinical trials,” The Times wrote on March 20.

By April 1, The Times was singing a different tune reporting that “The malaria drug hydroxychloroquine helped to speed the recovery of a small number of patients who were mildly ill from the coronavirus, doctors in China reported this week.”

The Times also noted that the drug helped those with mild cases avoid a severe infection that could result in an ICU stay or having to go on a ventilator.

“Cough, fever and pneumonia went away faster, and the disease seemed less likely to turn severe in people who received hydroxychloroquine than in a comparison group not given the drug. The authors of the report said that the medication was promising, but that more research was needed to clarify how it might work in treating coronavirus disease and to determine the best way to use it,” The Times added.

While the study was limited there are extensive tests going on in New York with drugs and many Americans are hoping that there is more good news to be found.

Pants on Fire News will keep you up-to-date on any new developments in this ongoing story

Continue Reading

Sign Up For FREE Alerts

Loading...

Trending