Connect with us

Washington Post

The Supreme Court leak triggered The Washington Post to write one article that will leave you in stunned silence



Democrats claim to care about maintaining “democratic norms.”

But in reality, they’re dismantling norms with radical proposals like packing the Supreme Court.

And the recent Supreme Court leak triggered The Washington Post to write one article that will leave you in stunned silence.

For the first time in the Supreme Court’s history, someone inside the Court leaked a draft of an opinion well in advance of the Court issuing a ruling.

The leaked draft opinion, which was written by conservative Justice Samuel Alito, appeared to overturn Roe V. Wade.

The leaker, presumably a left-wing clerk, wanted to create a furor among the Left, and that’s precisely what happened.

Unhinged protesters have gathered outside the homes of conservative justices for weeks, and one even tried to assassinate Justice Brett Kavanaugh.

And leftist journalists have written one pro-abortion “think piece” after another, but The Washington Post took the cake, writing such an over-the-top defense of abortion that it ironically turned into a pro-life piece.

The Post’s Caroline Kitchener penned the piece detailing the life of 18-year-old Brooke Alexander, who did not get an abortion because of a recent law passed in Texas.

The teen ended up having twins, and The Post tried to report this as a harrowing, life-crushing development.

“Sometimes Brooke imagined her life if she hadn’t gotten pregnant, and if Texas hadn’t banned abortion just days after she decided that she wanted one,” Kitchener wrote for The Washington Post. “She would have been in school, rushing from class to her shift at Texas Roadhouse, eyes on a real estate license that would finally get her out of Corpus Christi.”

“She pictured an apartment in Austin and enough money for a trip to Hawaii, where she would swim with dolphins in water so clear she could see her toes,” she continued.

This sums up the materialist feminist view.

Instead of having kids, get a real estate license and an apartment, and perhaps take a trip to Hawaii one day.

Of course, The Post presents those modest goals as unattainable now that Brooke has twins, which is preposterous.

Kitchener also tried to demonize crisis pregnancy centers for “tricking” women into not killing their babies.

“As the ultrasound technician pressed the probe into her stomach, slathered with gel, Brooke willed the screen to show a fetus without a heartbeat,” Kitchener wrote. “The technician gasped. It was twins. And they were 12 weeks along. ‘Are you sure?’ Brooke said. ‘Oh, my God, oh, my God,’ [Brooke’s mother] recalled saying as she jumped up and down. ‘This is a miracle from the Lord. We are having these babies.’”

Again, leftists believe this development is a bad thing.

The piece also delivered the nail in the coffin to the pro-abortion argument.

“[Brooke] couldn’t stop staring at the pulsing yellow line on the ultrasound screen,” the piece continued. “She wondered: If her babies had heartbeats, as these women said they did, was aborting them murder? Eventually, [the case worker] turned to Brooke and asked whether she’d be keeping them. Brooke heard herself saying ‘yes.’”

Leftists desperately try to avoid pondering this question, but there was no getting around it.

The entire piece is an unintentional nod to the pro-life movement.

But Democrats are so ensconced in their ideology, they cannot see the cracks in their argument.

Pants on Fire Official Polling

Washington Post

The Washington Post was finally forced to reveal the horrifying actions the COVID regime took against Americans



It will take years to undo the damage of the pandemic.

As many predicted, the response was worse than the virus.

And The Washington Post was forced to report on the horrifying thing the COVID regime did.

Approved health experts and Democrat politicians milked COVID for as long as they could.

They didn’t want to give up the temporary power and control that allowed them to do almost anything.

Epidemiologists who argued in favor of focused protection over blanket lockdowns were drowned out, ignored, and even intentionally smeared in the corporate-controlled press.

But as it turns out, they were right.

School closures have done unimaginable damage to children’s educational development, and the truth is beginning to come out.

“The COVID-19 pandemic caused historic learning setbacks for America’s children, sparing no state or region as it erased decades of academic progress and widened racial disparities, according to results of a national test that provide the sharpest look yet at the scale of the crisis,” The Washington Post reported. “Across the country, math scores saw their largest decrease ever. Reading scores dropped to 1992 levels. Nearly four in 10 eighth graders failed to grasp basic math concepts. Not a single state saw a notable improvement in their average test scores, with some simply treading water at best.”

“Those are the findings from the National Assessment of Educational Progress — known as the “nation’s report card” — which tested hundreds of thousands of fourth and eighth graders across the country this year,” the report continued. “It was the first time the test had been given since 2019, and it’s seen as the first nationally representative study of the pandemic’s impact on learning.”

Hindsight is 20/20, but physicians and educators were screaming from the mountaintops back in 2020 that this would happen if schools were closed for extended periods of time.

But the corrupt left-wing teachers’ unions were interested in keeping schools closed as leverage for political ambitions.

Meanwhile, teachers and school board members who advocated for lockdowns were caught enrolling their own kids in private schools that remained open.

Perhaps the most infuriating part about the developmental loss is all the lies put forward by the American Association of Pediatrics.

The AAP disregarded decades of educational psychology and claimed, “Babies and young children study faces, so you may worry that having masked caregivers would harm children’s language development. There are no studies to support this concern. Young children will use other clues like gestures and tone of voice.”

The so-called “experts” said that wearing masks all day would not affect the development of young children, which was obviously utter nonsense.

“It’s no surprise that children are behind,” The Post added. “The pandemic upended everyday life and left millions learning from home for months or more. The results released Monday reveal the depth of those setbacks and the size of the challenge schools face as they help students catch up.”

“Many parents may not understand just how far behind their children are academically,” the report continued. “A spring survey by the national nonprofit Learning Heroes found the majority of parents believed their children were performing at or above their grade level in math and reading.”

Parents were lied to, and now their children are suffering the consequences.

The leaders of the COVID regime must be held accountable for the damage they’ve inflicted.

Continue Reading

Donald Trump

A journalism legend claims he lost his credentials with one whiny complaint about Donald Trump



Self-proclaimed “journalists” literally have the power to shape history.

Now a journalism legend who once took down a U.S. President claims he lost his credentials.

And you’ll be flabbergasted with his whiny complaint about Donald Trump.

When 79-year-old Bob Woodward was a young journalist just getting his start, he launched his career at The Washington Post.

Back in 1972, Woodward managed to score an inside source from the FBI – which he dubbed “Deep Throat” – willing to divulge the details of the Watergate scandal.

When that source, Mark Felt, finally passed away in 2008, Woodward talked to NPR about some of his source’s motives for coming forward.

“I think also part of it was the lawbreaking,” Woodward said. “Probably the most important thing that Mark Felt told me was simply that Watergate was not isolated — that it was a part of a series of secret activities to spy on Democrats, sabotage their campaigns. And also that was a mindset, which was the Nixon mindset of ‘We are above the law; we are not accountable to anyone.’ And I think Felt was willing to guide us.”

Woodward and his writing partner, Carl Bernstein, pursued every bit of information so doggedly that former President Richard Nixon ended up resigning.

That result cemented Woodward as a journalism legend, known for ferreting out scandal and holding politicians accountable.

But over the past few years, it’s become abundantly obvious his approach is purely partisan.

When Hillary Clinton used her own email server as Secretary of State, hacked then-candidate Donald Trump’s servers, and created the Russiagate hoax, she got a pass.

When poll workers were caught on video shuffling mysterious boxes and luggage into ballot counting areas in 2020, they also got a pass.

After passing up on those two gems, you’d think Hunter Biden’s sketchy deals with communists — all who happen to have ties with China’s spy agency — worth about $31 million, would prove irresistible.

Instead, Woodward is tying himself in knots over his inability to make Donald Trump look bad enough.

Now, Woodward is claiming he got “entangled in the disorder of Trump’s Presidency.”

He’s releasing part of the audio and transcripts from his 20 interviews with the former President, complaining that the former President is so mean he can’t adequately express it on paper.

“I was struck by how Trump pounded in my ears in a way the printed page cannot capture,” Woodward wrote, noting that this was the first time he has personally released “the raw interviews or full transcripts” in his career,” Mediaite reported. “He believed that ‘these interviews offer an unvarnished portrait of Trump’ that people needed to see (and hear) because he realized “Trump is an unparalleled danger.”

Dangerous how, you may ask – well, Woodward doesn’t have anything substantive to offer other than being insulted by the truth Trump wasn’t afraid to lob his way.

“You’re probably going to screw me. Because, you know, that’s the way it goes,” Trump told Woodward. “Look, [George W.] Bush sat with you for hours and you screwed him. But the difference was, I ain’t no Bush.”

The problem for leftists, like Bob Woodward, is that they can’t dig up anything truly awful on Trump compared to the ugly side shows they’re trying to shut down on Democrats’ side of the fence.

Pants on Fire News will keep you up-to-date on any developments to this ongoing story.

Continue Reading

Media Bias

Joe Biden turned red with rage after this Democrat operative made a stunning admission about the Midterms



Democrats are bracing for impact in the upcoming Midterms.

Their closing pitch to voters is not resonating.

And Joe Biden turned red with rage after this Democrat operative made a stunning admission about the Midterms.

Democrats have determined that their path to victory is to call half the country “Republican extremists,” censor dissenting opinions, and preach “woke” politics.

But long-time Democrat operative James Carville believes that his Party is flirting with disaster.

“I’ll make this prediction right now,” former Democrat National Committee chairman Howard Dean said. “We’ll pick up two to three in the Senate and pick up the House. We will pick up seats in the House and not lose them.”

Carville did not entirely share Dean’s optimism.

“I agree with you if we execute an obvious strategy that is right in front of us,” Carville said. “But if we keep this kind of NPR foundation strategy of identity Left politics, we’re going to lose. If we pick up the banner and say, they have a plan, and this is their plan.”

“You didn’t believe them when they told you they would overturn Roe,” he continued. “Guess what? They did. You better believe them when they tell you they want to get rid of Social Security and Medicare because they do. And I will agree with the Governor if these Democrats have the discipline and the common sense to drive these issues home.”

“How do you define the NPR politics?” MSNBC’s Ari Melber asked.

“I defined it in the spring of 2021 when I wrote a piece in The Wall Street Journal saying the Democrats need to own the crime issue, or the crime issue will own you,” Carville explained. “Well, people said, well, you can’t do that because there will be a big backlash. Okay, you didn’t own it, and guess what? It’s a big problem for Democrats. I’m telling the same elite coastal people forget everything.”

“We are going to advertise and push the fact that they want to throw people off Medicare and Social Security, and they want to shut the government down to do it,” he continued. “That’s how you win. We should have grabbed the crime issue back in the spring of 2021, but we got to listen to these foundation NPR types, which is always a disaster.”

Of course, the Democrat talking point that Republicans are going to cut or eliminate any part of the social safety net, whether it’s Social Security, Medicare, or anything else, has been completely debunked.

Even left-wing “fact checkers,” like those at The Washington Post, have admitted that it’s a total lie.

Regardless, it’s clear that James Carville hasn’t gotten the memo that the Democrat Party is now the party of the exact left-wing identity politics he claims to oppose.

Working class voters are trending toward the Republican Party because Democrats are embracing more insane ideas that do not help the average American.

Continue Reading

Sign Up For FREE Alerts

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.