Democrats are spinning plates to explain away Joe Biden’s failures.

The lies have become more and more absurd as the narrative shifts in real time.

And The New York Times’ solution to America’s out-of-control debt will drive you insane.

President Joe Biden’s excessive spending during the pandemic helped trigger the worst inflationary crisis in 40 years.

Biden and other Democrats have repeatedly pushed the lie that government spending does not create inflation.

They can say the magic words all they want, but it does not change the facts.

In light of a Congressional fight over increasing the debt ceiling, the Left is attempting to downplay the problem of debt.

Left-wing Keynesian economists have bought into Modern Monetary Theory – the fairy tale notion that there are no consequences for government running up huge levels of debt.

The countless number of countries that have suffered from hyperinflation as a result of massive amounts of debt would beg to differ.

Just because America has not yet collapsed under the weight of $31 trillion in debt does not mean that bad fiscal policy has no consequences.

And The New York Times argues that the problem of debt can simply be fixed by raising taxes.

Binyamin Applebaum wrote in The Times that America “is borrowing too much but not because it is spending too much. The real crisis is the need to collect more money in taxes.”

This is always the refrain from Democrats.

First, increasing taxes does not guarantee increased tax revenue because when taxes get too high, industry and innovation are tamped down, and GDP suffers.

For example, when former President Donald Trump cut corporate taxes from 35% to 21%, the economy exploded and many corporations that had left the country chose to repatriate.

Times economist Paul Krugman was forced to eat crow after he claimed that the days of 3% economic growth were long gone.

“Americans don’t want large spending cuts,” Applebaum claimed. “The vast majority of federal spending is supported by most Americans. About 63 cents of every federal dollar goes to mandatory programs, the largest of which, Social Security and Medicare, are wildly popular.”

This is partially true – Americans want spending cuts, but they are unwilling to cut specific programs because they have been propagandized into believing that society would collapse without them.

For instance, Social Security is insolvent.

Few are willing to eliminate, or even reform, Social Security because they don’t realize how much money they’re losing by not being in control of their own money.

Democrat policies rely on economic illiteracy.

Democrats love to pretend they’re rooting for the underdog.

But they just proved they’re really in love with criminals.

And these self-proclaimed “journalists’” racist attacks on this Texas Congresswoman will leave you absolutely floored.

The first woman born in Mexico has been elected as a United States Congresswoman.

That sounds like something the Left would cheer for.

But Rep. Mayra Flores (R-TX) has the corporate-controlled media tied in knots.

Rep. Flores is part of a new wave of Hispanics switching parties as it becomes increasingly obvious that Democrats have completely lost sight of anything resembling traditional American values.

While Democrats are obsessed with pushing their weird sexually confused agenda and grooming children, an increasing number of Americans are distancing themselves from what is an obviously morally bankrupt political movement.

That ethical choice is earning them all kinds of ire from the Left.

Minority politicians are finding themselves under especially vicious attacks as the Left takes their unwavering support — no matter how illogical — for granted.

Now, Rep. Flores is fighting back after The New York Times took a swipe at her, claiming the Congresswoman is a dangerous “right-wing extremist.”

“Representative Mayra Flores is one of three Republican Latinas vying to transform South Texas politics by shunning moderates and often embracing the extreme,” The Times’ Jennifer Medina wrote.

Rep. Flores’ sins include her “right-wing views on immigration, the 2020 election, and abortion.”

The fact that Flores is married to a Border Patrol Agent and believes that illegal aliens should be entering the United States legally has leftists coming unglued.

Rep. Flores responded to The New York Times hit piece by pointing out their deeply racist attitude toward anyone who opposes their radical agenda.

“I was born in Burgos, Tamaulipas, Mexico, and raised with strong Conservative values to always put God and Family first,” Flores told Fox News. “I have received only hate from the liberal media and constantly [been] told by the left to go back to Mexico. They don’t support us immigrants, they only use us for political power and don’t care about our well-being.”

“I am here now and I won’t allow them to continue taking advantage of my people,” she continued. “The NYT knows nothing about me or our culture.”

The Left has been lecturing Republicans on embracing “diversity” for decades.

But it turns out they are the most intolerant group of people on Earth.

And The New York Times is proving itself to be an organization filled with racists, who are all for criminals crossing the border unchecked, but they can’t stand honest citizens standing up for their families and communities.

Pants on Fire News will keep you up-to-date on any developments to this ongoing story.

Democrats cannot stand the Second Amendment.

Some have even gone so far as to claim that it should be abolished.

And The New York Times made total fools of themselves with this “toxic gun control” hatchet job.

Democrats have been out to destroy Americans’ Second Amendment rights for decades.

As always, Democrats have seized on recent shootings to chip away at the Second Amendment.

Many left-wing publications have argued for one form of gun control or another, including outright abolishing the Second Amendment.

One of those gun-grabbing institutions is, of course, The New York Times.

The so-called “paper of record” recently went after “toxic gun culture” surrounding AR-15 rifles, but ignorantly used shotgun shells in the article’s image.

The AR-15 has become a talisman for some right-wing politicians and voters. “That’s a particularly disturbing trend at a time when violent political rhetoric and actual political violence in the United States are rising,” writes the editorial board. https://t.co/xLqthLEkSA

— New York Times Opinion (@nytopinion) December 10, 2022

“The New York Times appeared to have inadvertently used the wrong photo while referring to AR-15s, as many Twitter users pointed out over the weekend,” Fox News reported. “The paper’s editorial board published an op-ed on Saturday titled ‘America’s Toxic Gun Culture,’ claiming that the prevalence of AR-15s among ‘right-wing’ figures is causing a rise in political violence.”

“However, as many social media users pointed out, the photo used in the article showed rows of shotgun shells, ammo that would not be used in AR-15s which are typically chambered in .223 and/or 5.56,” the report continued.

The photo underscores a huge problem with gun-grabbing Democrats – they don’t actually know anything about firearms.

But of course, as far as the radical Left is concerned, that ignorance is somehow a badge of honor.

“The AR-15 has also become a potent talisman for right-wing politicians and many of their voters,” The New York Times wrote. “That’s a particularly disturbing trend at a time when violent political rhetoric and actual political violence in the United States are rising.”

The AR-15 has been a popular rifle for decades, but that has nothing to do with the gun being a “talisman.”

Not long ago, The New York Times called for the end of gun rights in America as we know it.

“The truth that no one wants to tell — the one that opponents of gun safety laws understand and the reason so many of them resist new laws — is that no one law or single package of laws will be enough to solve America’s gun violence problem,” New York Times columnist Charles Blow wrote. “The solution will have to be a nonstop parade of laws, with new ones passed as they are deemed necessary, ad infinitum.”

Blow wants to add laws “ad infinitum” until the Second Amendment is obsolete.

That is the Democrat position, but not many are honest enough to come out and say it.