Connect with us


The New York Times’ latest abortion narrative is so vile it’ll put knots in your stomach



The Left have gone extreme on one issue after another.

And their cultural propaganda machine is attempting to normalize these modes of thought.

Now The New York Times wrote one piece about the Supreme Court’s big decision that will put a knot in your stomach.

Democrats have fully embraced the most radical position imaginable on abortion.

“Safe, legal, and rare” has been replaced by “#ShoutYourAbortion.”

And their radicalism has accelerated in the aftermath of the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v. Wade and sent the abortion question back to the states.

Now, the deranged radicals at The New York Times are trying to make abortion more palatable to the masses by reducing the stigma around it.

The paper essentially argued that there should be no moral difference whatsoever between an abortion and a miscarriage.

“The line between abortion and pregnancy loss has always been blurry,” The Times wrote. “But over the past few decades, the anti-abortion movement has forged a cultural bright line between the two experiences, promoting dueling narratives of ‘bad’ mothers who voluntarily cause fetal death versus ‘good’ mothers who grieve unpreventable pregnancy loss.”

However, there is a massive difference between unexpectedly losing a child to a miscarriage, and actively killing a child with an abortion.

The Times later acknowledges that the pro-abortion zealots may have gone too far in attempting emotionally detach grief from abortion.

“Occasionally, abortion-rights supporters went too far, opposing measures that could genuinely help those who experience pregnancy loss — like birth certificates for stillbirth, a measure requested by women who wanted recognition of their stillborn child’s birth,” The authors wrote. “The abortion-rights movement did this out of a fear of a slippery slope that would undermine abortion rights; the same fear led the movement to avoid the topic of pregnancy loss or to refer to a fetus or embryo as ‘a clump of cells.’ Any concession of fetal value could be used to chip away at abortion rights, the thinking went.”

As the paper noted, the pro-abortion movement became ghoulish in their pursuit of abortion “rights.”

But make no mistake about it, the Left now wants to go even further.

Their goal is government-funded abortions up to the point of birth for any reason whatsoever – a position that has been rejected by 81% of Americans.

Two-thirds of Americans are against abortion after the first trimester, so the core of the Democrat Party is way out of step with the American people.

The New York Times is attempting to rope in grieving women who’ve had miscarriages into the pro-abortion movement.

But it’s probably too late for Democrats to pivot back to “safe, legal, and rare.”


Katy Tur just slipped up and admitted Democrats’ true intentions with their demented abortion agenda



Talking heads in the corporate-controlled press are nothing but left-wing spin merchants.

But every once in a while, they accidentally tell the truth.

And Katy Tur just slipped up and admitted Democrats’ true intentions with their demented abortion agenda.

Democrats have been in a constant state of rage after the Supreme Court overturned Roe V. Wade.

A common argument from the pro-abortion movement is that this decision will lead to more hard-luck cases of rape, incest, and dangerous pregnancies.

But in reality, rape and incest make up an infinitesimally small percentage of abortions, and exceptions for those harrowing instances exist in most situations.

Also, abortion guidelines do not apply if the mother’s life is at risk.

Pro-abortion Democrats throw out those examples because they try to deflect from the overwhelming majority of abortions, which are chosen for economic reasons, or the couple split up, or the mother wanted the baby to be a different sex, et cetera.

And MSNBC host Katy Tur let that trust slip when she was interviewing Planned Parenthood executive Rebecca Gibron.

“And just to go back to this because I think it’s an important point, there’s the issue of abortion, deciding that you can’t handle the child, you don’t want the child, whatever the reason behind the abortion and then there’s also the issue of just care for women, the getting of the care they need to keep themselves safe and to keep their families safe,” Tur claimed. “So when we’re talking about abortion bans, how does Planned Parenthood see this especially, considering that Planned Parenthood offers a variety of services, it’s not just abortion, they offer so much more to women around the country?”

When Tur mentioned that the women “don’t want the child,” she highlighted the fact that many left-wing women use abortion as a form of birth control.

Even if pro-lifers were to grant exceptions for rape and incest, Democrats still would be advocating for no restrictions.

They want government-funded abortions up to the point of birth for any reason whatsoever, a position supported by only 19% of Americans.

“We provide a full range of reproductive health care services including birth control, well visits, sexually transmitted infection testing and treatment, gender-affirming hormone care,” Gibron responded. “So we will be here ready and able and willing to help our patients get all of the health care that they need and desire.”

Gibron didn’t mention ultrasounds because women are far more likely to keep their babies if they see images of the child in the womb, and especially if they hear a heartbeat.

Planned Parenthood is an abortion mill, so reluctant women are terrible for their business model.

Recently, puberty blockers for gender-dysphoric teens have also become another major moneymaker for the demented organization.

And the people seeking the hormone drugs don’t have to undergo any counseling – Planned Parenthood just wants their cash.

Planned Parenthood truly is a blight on society.

Continue Reading


This reporter just made the dumbest argument ever to prove abortion is somehow virtuous



Democrats have morphed into a radical party.

Moderates within the Party are slowly realizing they are standing shoulder to shoulder with extremists.

And this reporter just made the dumbest argument ever to prove abortion is somehow virtuous.

Leftists are still losing their minds over months after the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v. Wade and return the abortion issue back to the individual states.

Democrats have been indoctrinated into the nonsensical belief that killing babies is a foundational civil liberty, and the cornerstone of female empowerment.

And in order to make their case, pro-abortion zealots have attempted to tie the pro-life movement to repugnant groups.

MSNBC recently argued that the pro-life movement is rooted in white supremacy.

“Reports late last month of the arrest of a former Marine with ties to a neo-Nazi group highlight the dangerous and somewhat convoluted relationship between white extremists and the state of reproductive rights in the United States,” left-wing professor Cynthia Miller-Idriss wrote in an op-ed for MSNBC. “The man, identified as a leader of the neo-Nazi group Rapekrieg, was reportedly spearheading a mass murder of minorities and mass rape of ‘white women to increase production of white children,’ according to Rolling Stone.”

“Abortion is seen by white extremists as part of the so-called ‘white genocide’ plot, and in that sense, reproductive rights are a part of their ‘white extinction anxiety,’” she claimed. “The horrific revelations are a reminder that white supremacy, male supremacy and violent extremism go hand in hand. Minorities and white women are targets of an ideology that both seeks to reduce nonwhite populations and to increase white ones.”

This makes zero sense.

This neo-Nazi monster does not represent the pro-life movement, just as authoritarian communists who firebomb crisis pregnancy centers do not represent the pro-abortion movement.

However, people on the Right forcefully condemn neo-Nazis, while Democrats pretend left-wing violence doesn’t even exist.

Also, black and Hispanic women are far more likely to have an abortion than white women, so the author’s entire premise falls apart.

In fact, today, more black babies are aborted than are actually born in New York City.

The “progressive” movement of the early 20th century was rooted in eugenics and the abortion and sterilization of “undesirables” – aka minorities.

The Left have only recently begun to grapple with the overt racism of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger.

Miller-Idriss added that “some white supremacists call to allow free and unrestricted access to abortion for nonwhite women, while banning it for white women.”

Except this is the position of no literally one in the actual pro-life movement.

This is fear-mongering nonsense that is allowed to pass for news in the so-called “mainstream” media.

Continue Reading


Democrats’ latest attack on Ron DeSantis is so unbelievably insane your brain will melt



The Left are throwing everything but the kitchen sink at Ron DeSantis.

They understand he would be a formidable opponent for Democrats in a national election.

Now Democrats’ latest attack on Ron DeSantis is so unbelievably insane your brain will melt.

The Left’s censorship regime is escalating rapidly.

They are attempting to permanently silence any dissenting voices that counter their radical left-wing narrative.

One of those voices is Florida Republican Governor Ron DeSantis.

And the Associated Press is attempting to smear Governor DeSantis, and force Big Tech companies into increasing their censorship of conservatives at the same time.

In yet another clear example of extreme left-wing activists masquerading as so-called “journalists,” the AP targeted the Governor with a hatch job entitled, “Florida’s ‘Don’t Say Gay’ law fuels anti-LGBTQ hate online.”

First, the piece of legislation in question is Florida’s Parental Rights in Education bill, which simply prohibited public school employees in the state of Florida from discussing sexual orientation and gender identity in classrooms with students in third grade and younger.

The issue and need for the bill arose in the wake of at least two separate middle school children in Florida being “transitioned” to another gender by “educators” at their school and behind their parents’ backs.

Democrat politicians, activists, and their allies in the Fake News Media quickly slandered the legislation as the “Don’t Say Gay” bill, which is rather hilarious considering the word “gay” never even appears in the bill’s text.

In fact, a majority of Democrat voters in the state of Florida support the Parental Rights in Education bill.

Now, the AP is using their hit piece to bully social media sites into censoring so-called “hate speech.”

But, of course, in the minds of leftists, what constitutes “hate speech” is any speech the radical Left disagrees with or simply doesn’t like.

For example, Twitter recently banned the word “groomer” on the platform because it was strangely deemed an anti-LGBTQ attack.

The AP included a tweet from DeSantis Press Secretary Christina Pushaw as an example.

“If you’re against the Anti-Grooming Bill, you are probably a groomer or at least you don’t denounce the grooming,” Pushaw tweeted.

It should be easy for every human to say that it’s wrong for teachers to discuss topics like sex and sexuality with a 7-year-old without their parents’ knowing anything about it.

That is the very definition of groomer behavior.

Yet, the AP framed that totally accurate statement as some type of hateful comment.

“There are groomers of all sexual orientations and gender identities,” Pushaw rightly told the AP. “My tweets did not mention LGBTQ people at all.”

Pushaw’s salient point highlights the bizarre defense of teachers who are so eager to talk sex and radical gender ideology with young kids.

The AP piece cited a study from the Human Rights Campaign, a far-left LGBTQ activism group, linking online “hate” to nebulous acts of violence.

The Left is determined to shut down all debate and permanently silence conservatives because they know they have lost the argument.

The average American simply does not support such extremist ideas.

Continue Reading

Sign Up For FREE Alerts

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.