Connect with us

Censorship

The New York Times just proved their complete subservience to the Democrat Party

Published

on

The media is a part of the left-wing Democrat machine.

Conservatives have long known the mainstream media is little more than the public relations arm of the Democrat Party.

But The New York Times just proved their complete subservience to the Democrat Party and showed Americans just how far they will go to bend the knee.

If there was any question left in any rational Americans’ minds that the media is nothing more than a tool for the Democrat Party, The New York Times’ recent rare display of honesty settles the issue.

In a recent article The New York Times blasted Democrats for blocking the Coronavirus Economic Stimulus bill in a stunningly honest headline that read, “Democrats Block Action on $1.8 Trillion Stimulus.”

This headline was in response to Senate Democrats voting en bloc to kill the compromise Chinese coronavirus legislation after a deal had been worked out, all because Nancy Pelosi and the radical Left wanted more pork and leftist policy goals included.

The list of items Pelosi and her socialist cohorts wanted included things like mandatory diversity on boards of directors, bailing out the Post Office, money for Planned Parenthood, and a list of union boss power grabs.

Because everyone knows you can’t fight disease without killing babies and promoting diversity by force.

And, it seemed, even the liberal New York Times understood how radical and egregious it was.

Of course, this headline couldn’t stand, not if The Times wanted to remain in the good graces of the socialist billionaires who run the Democrat Party.

In fact, it was not going to stand.

The Times quickly changed their headline to read, “Democrats Block Action on Stimulus Plan, Seeking Worker Protections.”

But even that change wasn’t good enough for their socialist Democrat overlords, so they changed it again.

This time it read, “Partisan Divide Threatens Deal on Rescue Bill.”

The amazing headline transformation seemed complete. It looked like the Democrats and their deep-pocketed socialist donors like George Soros were finally satisfied with this third iteration of the headline.

Of course, it made no difference to them that the first headline was the most factual and newsworthy of the three.

Nor did it matter to The Times, their editorial board, or their Democrat overlords how ridiculous and blatantly obvious this change looked to the average American.

Share your thoughts about this story with Pants on Fire News in the comments below.

Continue Reading
24 Comments

24 Comments

  1. ROSE

    March 28, 2020 at 5:44 pm

    EVER ONE KNOWS THAT NANCY IS A PAIN IN THE A$$ TO AMERICA.AND THE NYT IS ALMOST AS BAD.PRESIDENT TRUMP IS TRYING HIS BEST TO TAKE OF AMERICA.AND DOING A GREAT JOB,REGARDLESS WHAT HIS ENEMIES HAS TO SAY,SO BACK OFF,IF YOU CAN’T THINK OF GOOD THING TO SAY ABOUT PRESIDENT TRUMP AND AMERICA.JUST KEEP YOUR MOUTH SHUT AND STOP THE HATE AND JEALOUSY TOWARDS EVER ONE.

  2. americawakeupnow

    March 28, 2020 at 10:21 pm

    Search: “Doctor blows whistle on Coronavirus patents” and he has proof!!!

  3. Skydog

    March 28, 2020 at 11:21 pm

    The fake news media has crossed so many lines. They think they are so smart but show themselves to be Communist, baby killing, money and power is what they love. The fake newsies are doing everything that they can to usurp our duly elected president who actually cares for the welfare of HIS people and wants the common people who work and die for these worthless traitors.

  4. Henry Meyer

    March 28, 2020 at 11:26 pm

    I agree with You ROSE a 1000 percent
    Hank [email protected]

  5. Ron Fillmore

    March 29, 2020 at 2:16 am

    This is a new revelation? Anyone with 2 active brain cells should know by now the NYT and the MSM are the propaganda arm of the Demo-rat Party!

  6. TERRY MCFARLAND

    March 29, 2020 at 2:18 am

    EVERYONE KNOWS NOT TO PAY ATTENTION TO THE NYT…WELL ANY OF THE MAIN STREAM MEDIA…

  7. Steven Muller

    March 29, 2020 at 2:35 am

    I don’t see any information on the 600 billion that the Secretary of Treasury will be authorized to give away to his favorite corporate billionaires without accountability. This was the main sticking point between the initial negotiations. The New York Times certainly is aware of this but decided not to use it in their article, was it because letting the original Republican plan of another trickle-down scam for the corporate wealthy would have enhanced the pockets of the New York Times and not the jobless people of the country? I agree with the ignorance of the Pelosi demands and she needs to be shown the door, but this being said does not excuse the missing CHARACTER & ETHICS of this current president.

  8. Pat

    March 29, 2020 at 2:52 am

    The media and the Democrats have gotten so comfortable in their own skin that they will be shocked soon when they all get arrested. I am going to laugh so hard when that happens.

  9. Janice E Prescott

    March 29, 2020 at 3:01 am

    Yep Pat laughing so hard seeing them in their cute little black and white striped suits. I just wish it would come out. We have been promised for a long time it was coming, but when. They need to do it now. The NYT has been the IDIOT of newspapers for a very long time. Why does anybody subscribe to it????? drop those and it would go under.

  10. Janice E Prescott

    March 29, 2020 at 3:02 am

    IDIOTS, IDIOTS, IDIOTS THERE ARE NO OTHER WORDS FOR THEM.

  11. George Bailey

    March 29, 2020 at 3:53 am

    To Steve, if you don’t keep the corporations working, where will the jobs be for people to go back to??

  12. Alan

    March 29, 2020 at 4:11 am

    Mainstreet media shoulds be reporting facts.stop being bias for the dem party and sending out fake news .its dangerous NY believed the crap.

  13. Public_Citizen

    March 29, 2020 at 4:18 am

    NYT, CNN, MSNBC could all be permanently bankrupted in a month for Campaign Finance Violations for not declaring their ~In Kind~ contributions of positive reporting of Demoncrat Candidates and Negative Reporting of Republicans.
    Unfortunately, The Swamp will never do it.

  14. Ginger

    March 29, 2020 at 4:22 am

    Since most people with common sense don’t read the NYT, it doesn’t really matter what title they use, everything they print is fake news.

  15. Mikey

    March 29, 2020 at 12:58 pm

    Listening to main stream media is like listening to Hollywood’s take on things. Americans want to hear the facts and make up their own minds. We have the same issues in our education system. Teachers are now like Hollywood and main stream media ….. it’s an attempt at brainwashing … and just from my own point of view it is somewhat successful.
    We have a real problem brewing in this country … we must hold the media to just reporting the facts. We must shut the big mouths of Hollywood and most of all we need to replaced biased bigoted teachers.

  16. Barto

    March 29, 2020 at 2:15 pm

    The NEW YAWK TIMES was one of the first that most people with a grain of COMMON SENSE, decided that they were just an “ARM” of the Liberal Democrat Party……is this instance where they first reported on the Democrats and Nancy Pelosi’s “Hold up” of the Coronavirus “STIMULUS PACKAGE”, they must have gotten a direct call from QUEEN NANCY and thus they changed their headline to favor why the DEMS were holding up the passage of this BILL…how PATHETIC they are cannot be put in decent language!

  17. mrp

    March 29, 2020 at 2:38 pm

    Just as Rome burned while Nero fiddles, the Dems impeached our amazing president while the virus was infecting millions. When this is over, they MUST be held accountable.

  18. Steve D

    March 29, 2020 at 2:41 pm

    Precisely why I subscribe to the Epoch TImes

  19. William OHalloran

    March 29, 2020 at 2:51 pm

    The above article is a complete politicization of the facts. Politics is politics and some of the provisions of the bill submitted by both sides were self serving “pork.” The New York times reported factually as to the issues. Eventually compromises were made as they should be and the bill passed. The bill was held up because provisions in the bill by both parties were unacceptable. These were removed and the bill passed. The problem now is that the President is threatening to not comply with certain provisions of the bill which threaten his financial interests. Get the facts and try to get a hold on your emotions which allow you to believe what ever makes you feel good.

  20. The Iceman

    March 29, 2020 at 4:56 pm

    Why would any conservative ever subscribe to or purchase a single copy of the NY Times.

  21. Alan W.

    March 29, 2020 at 8:38 pm

    I have never read the New York Times and likely never will. So I couldn’t care less what they say. Quite frankly, I wouldn’t even use a copy to the Times to cover the bottom of my bird cage.

  22. Still Hate A0L

    March 30, 2020 at 2:06 am

    This will not impact those who have been trained to HATE TRUMP!

  23. Lee

    March 31, 2020 at 4:08 am

    The New York Times knew about it while it happened but refused to report about the extermination of millions of Jews during the Holocaust at the urging of a Democrat president – FDR. The reason being keeping away from the Germans that the allies knew what was happening, fearing Germany would make changes that would have made defeating them more difficult. Except the survivors from Aushwitz said they were watching American planes flying over head close enough to see the smokestacks from the incinerating rooms and praying they would do something to save them. FDR and the New York Times could have saved at least 2 million Jews but chose not to. That alone is reason enough to redirect the Jewish vote away from the Democrats.

  24. Lee

    March 31, 2020 at 4:18 am

    NYTimes owned by a Jewish family, still is, and FDR would qualify as war criminals. Just like Soros, whose family changed their name during WWll, hiding being Jewish, enabling the teenage George to work for the Nazis turning in Jews before they could flee. Another Democrat supporter with blood on his hands.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Censorship

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez announced one plan to take Fox News off the air

Published

on

Democrats are about to take total control of power in Washington, D.C.

How they intend to wield that authority has all hell breaking loose.

And Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez announced one plan to take Fox News off the air.

Liberals were victorious in the 2020 election in large part by controlling the flow of information to voters.

Social media companies censored negative stories about Joe Biden such as the bombshell report about the contents of Hunter Biden’s laptop.

Fake news outlets like CNN refused to cover the story falsely claiming it was Russian disinformation.

The tactic worked to perfection as voters did not have all the information necessary about Joe Biden to make an informed decision and Biden won the election based on the false picture Biden’s supporters in the press painted for the public.

Now Democrats intend to double down by creating government commissions to regulate the flow of “misinformation.”

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez announced the idea on a live stream.

“Several members of Congress, in some of my discussions, have brought up ‘media literacy,’ because that is a part of what happened here,” Ocasio-Cortez stated. “We’re going to need to figure out how we rein in our media environment, so that you can’t just spew disinformation and misinformation.”

“It’s one thing to have differing opinions,” said Ocasio-Cortez, “But it’s another thing entirely to just say things that are false. So that’s something we’re looking into.”

To Democrats in office and in the media “misinformation” now means any fact that contradicts the leftwing narrative and should thus be banned.

Ocasio-Cortez’s new Stalinist style news media truth commission is how Democrats will take social media censorship to the next level.

Her dream is to have government become the arbiter of truth and say any stories the Democrats don’t like is now “misinformation” and the outlets that published it should be sanctioned.

The number-one target for this effort is Fox News as Fox is the only so-called “mainstream” media outlet that doesn’t 100 percent operate as a Super PAC for the Democrat Party.

Pants on Fire News will keep you up-to-date on any new developments in this ongoing story.

Continue Reading

Censorship

Big Tech is going after one conservative with despicable slander

Published

on

The Democrat Media Complex flexed its muscle to propel Joe Biden to an election victory.

Countless outlets propped up Biden while relentlessly attacking right-wingers.

Now Big Tech is going after one conservative with despicable slander.

Canadian political commentator, author, and documentary filmmaker Lauren Southern – who’s described herself as a “conservatarian” – is being hammered by Big Tech.

She’s currently in a battle with the online encyclopedia website Wikipedia over numerous falsehoods in her bio, which has been locked from editing.

Southern submitted a defamation claim that the site has supposedly taken under advisement.

Libelous information on a Wikipedia page can have serious consequences.

For public figures, a Wiki page will likely be the first thing someone reads about them.

Southern’s page is littered with accusations of being “far-right” and “borderline white nationalist” without evidence or context.

According to Southern, the false accusations nearly cost her an interview with a subject for her upcoming documentary “Crossfire,” which analyzes different perspectives on the political strife that plagued 2020.

Leftists like to pretend that Wikipedia is entirely objective, but site co-founder Larry Sanger strongly disagrees.

He’s since left the site and wrote a blog post entitled “Wikipedia Is Badly Biased.”

Sanger cited several examples including one on the issue of abortion.

He wrote, “Wikipedia can be counted on to cover not just political figures, but political issues as well from a liberal-left point of view. No conservative would write, in an abortion article, ‘When properly done, abortion is one of the safest procedures in medicine,’ a claim that is questionable on its face, considering what an invasive, psychologically distressing, and sometimes lengthy procedure it can be even when done according to modern medical practices.”

If Southern is successful in getting her page edited, that will help fight back against Wikipedia’s black box editing standards.

The politicization of Wikipedia is just one plank used by the Democrat Media Complex to control the dissemination of information.

Pants on Fire Official Polling

Continue Reading

Censorship

Donald Trump left jaws on the ground with this defense of one Fox News host

Published

on

Bartiromo and Pompeo

Donald Trump has been feuding with Fox News ever since Election Night.

There are reports the President wants payback for Fox’s leftward drift.

But Donald Trump left jaws on the ground with this defense of one Fox News host.

This week, both the Los Angeles Times and the Washington Post published hit pieces attacking Fox News host Maria Bartiromo for her November interview with President Trump.

Fake news reporters were outraged that Bartiromo let the President make his case about voter fraud while pledging to perform her duties as a journalist and investigate the President’s claims.

In today’s media landscape, anyone who doesn’t scream in the President’s face that he is fascist liar one step of short of becoming the next Adolph Hitler is described as sycophant.

Bartiromo pushed back on both pieces claiming that her interview style as a journalist – and she was one of the top Wall Street reporters on TV for many years – was to let her subject have their say and let the audience decide.

After the smear stories ran in two of the house organs for the Democrat Party, President Trump defended Bartiromo on social media.

“Maria’s show and ratings are better than ever. They are trying to shame her into not telling the truth. Her audience would be gone, and she is far too smart for that. Rigged Election!” the President wrote.

Bartiromo thanked the President and blasted the fake news media as liars who spent three years peddling Russian collusion conspiracy theories.

“Thank you Mr @POTUS @realDonaldTrump still no honesty from this group about all the misinformation they sold to readers for 3 years. We will continue reporting & seeking truth,” Bartiromo responded.

In her interviews with The Times and The Post, Bartiromo said she was not a Trump defender, but fairly reporting on the Trump administration meant covering the fact that the Obama administration and the FBI colluded to frame President Trump as being a Russian spy as well as the fact that the fake news media went willingly along for the ride.

Pants on Fire News will keep you up-to-date on any new developments in this ongoing story.

Continue Reading

Sign Up For FREE Alerts

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Trending