Connect with us

Censorship

The New York Times just proved their complete subservience to the Democrat Party

Published

on

The media is a part of the left-wing Democrat machine.

Conservatives have long known the mainstream media is little more than the public relations arm of the Democrat Party.

But The New York Times just proved their complete subservience to the Democrat Party and showed Americans just how far they will go to bend the knee.

If there was any question left in any rational Americans’ minds that the media is nothing more than a tool for the Democrat Party, The New York Times’ recent rare display of honesty settles the issue.

In a recent article The New York Times blasted Democrats for blocking the Coronavirus Economic Stimulus bill in a stunningly honest headline that read, “Democrats Block Action on $1.8 Trillion Stimulus.”

This headline was in response to Senate Democrats voting en bloc to kill the compromise Chinese coronavirus legislation after a deal had been worked out, all because Nancy Pelosi and the radical Left wanted more pork and leftist policy goals included.

The list of items Pelosi and her socialist cohorts wanted included things like mandatory diversity on boards of directors, bailing out the Post Office, money for Planned Parenthood, and a list of union boss power grabs.

Because everyone knows you can’t fight disease without killing babies and promoting diversity by force.

And, it seemed, even the liberal New York Times understood how radical and egregious it was.

Of course, this headline couldn’t stand, not if The Times wanted to remain in the good graces of the socialist billionaires who run the Democrat Party.

In fact, it was not going to stand.

The Times quickly changed their headline to read, “Democrats Block Action on Stimulus Plan, Seeking Worker Protections.”

But even that change wasn’t good enough for their socialist Democrat overlords, so they changed it again.

This time it read, “Partisan Divide Threatens Deal on Rescue Bill.”

The amazing headline transformation seemed complete. It looked like the Democrats and their deep-pocketed socialist donors like George Soros were finally satisfied with this third iteration of the headline.

Of course, it made no difference to them that the first headline was the most factual and newsworthy of the three.

Nor did it matter to The Times, their editorial board, or their Democrat overlords how ridiculous and blatantly obvious this change looked to the average American.

Share your thoughts about this story with Pants on Fire News in the comments below.

24 Comments

24 Comments

  1. ROSE

    March 28, 2020 at 5:44 pm

    EVER ONE KNOWS THAT NANCY IS A PAIN IN THE A$$ TO AMERICA.AND THE NYT IS ALMOST AS BAD.PRESIDENT TRUMP IS TRYING HIS BEST TO TAKE OF AMERICA.AND DOING A GREAT JOB,REGARDLESS WHAT HIS ENEMIES HAS TO SAY,SO BACK OFF,IF YOU CAN’T THINK OF GOOD THING TO SAY ABOUT PRESIDENT TRUMP AND AMERICA.JUST KEEP YOUR MOUTH SHUT AND STOP THE HATE AND JEALOUSY TOWARDS EVER ONE.

  2. americawakeupnow

    March 28, 2020 at 10:21 pm

    Search: “Doctor blows whistle on Coronavirus patents” and he has proof!!!

  3. Skydog

    March 28, 2020 at 11:21 pm

    The fake news media has crossed so many lines. They think they are so smart but show themselves to be Communist, baby killing, money and power is what they love. The fake newsies are doing everything that they can to usurp our duly elected president who actually cares for the welfare of HIS people and wants the common people who work and die for these worthless traitors.

  4. Henry Meyer

    March 28, 2020 at 11:26 pm

    I agree with You ROSE a 1000 percent
    Hank [email protected]

  5. Ron Fillmore

    March 29, 2020 at 2:16 am

    This is a new revelation? Anyone with 2 active brain cells should know by now the NYT and the MSM are the propaganda arm of the Demo-rat Party!

  6. TERRY MCFARLAND

    March 29, 2020 at 2:18 am

    EVERYONE KNOWS NOT TO PAY ATTENTION TO THE NYT…WELL ANY OF THE MAIN STREAM MEDIA…

  7. Steven Muller

    March 29, 2020 at 2:35 am

    I don’t see any information on the 600 billion that the Secretary of Treasury will be authorized to give away to his favorite corporate billionaires without accountability. This was the main sticking point between the initial negotiations. The New York Times certainly is aware of this but decided not to use it in their article, was it because letting the original Republican plan of another trickle-down scam for the corporate wealthy would have enhanced the pockets of the New York Times and not the jobless people of the country? I agree with the ignorance of the Pelosi demands and she needs to be shown the door, but this being said does not excuse the missing CHARACTER & ETHICS of this current president.

  8. Pat

    March 29, 2020 at 2:52 am

    The media and the Democrats have gotten so comfortable in their own skin that they will be shocked soon when they all get arrested. I am going to laugh so hard when that happens.

  9. Janice E Prescott

    March 29, 2020 at 3:01 am

    Yep Pat laughing so hard seeing them in their cute little black and white striped suits. I just wish it would come out. We have been promised for a long time it was coming, but when. They need to do it now. The NYT has been the IDIOT of newspapers for a very long time. Why does anybody subscribe to it????? drop those and it would go under.

  10. Janice E Prescott

    March 29, 2020 at 3:02 am

    IDIOTS, IDIOTS, IDIOTS THERE ARE NO OTHER WORDS FOR THEM.

  11. George Bailey

    March 29, 2020 at 3:53 am

    To Steve, if you don’t keep the corporations working, where will the jobs be for people to go back to??

  12. Alan

    March 29, 2020 at 4:11 am

    Mainstreet media shoulds be reporting facts.stop being bias for the dem party and sending out fake news .its dangerous NY believed the crap.

  13. Public_Citizen

    March 29, 2020 at 4:18 am

    NYT, CNN, MSNBC could all be permanently bankrupted in a month for Campaign Finance Violations for not declaring their ~In Kind~ contributions of positive reporting of Demoncrat Candidates and Negative Reporting of Republicans.
    Unfortunately, The Swamp will never do it.

  14. Ginger

    March 29, 2020 at 4:22 am

    Since most people with common sense don’t read the NYT, it doesn’t really matter what title they use, everything they print is fake news.

  15. Mikey

    March 29, 2020 at 12:58 pm

    Listening to main stream media is like listening to Hollywood’s take on things. Americans want to hear the facts and make up their own minds. We have the same issues in our education system. Teachers are now like Hollywood and main stream media ….. it’s an attempt at brainwashing … and just from my own point of view it is somewhat successful.
    We have a real problem brewing in this country … we must hold the media to just reporting the facts. We must shut the big mouths of Hollywood and most of all we need to replaced biased bigoted teachers.

  16. Barto

    March 29, 2020 at 2:15 pm

    The NEW YAWK TIMES was one of the first that most people with a grain of COMMON SENSE, decided that they were just an “ARM” of the Liberal Democrat Party……is this instance where they first reported on the Democrats and Nancy Pelosi’s “Hold up” of the Coronavirus “STIMULUS PACKAGE”, they must have gotten a direct call from QUEEN NANCY and thus they changed their headline to favor why the DEMS were holding up the passage of this BILL…how PATHETIC they are cannot be put in decent language!

  17. mrp

    March 29, 2020 at 2:38 pm

    Just as Rome burned while Nero fiddles, the Dems impeached our amazing president while the virus was infecting millions. When this is over, they MUST be held accountable.

  18. Steve D

    March 29, 2020 at 2:41 pm

    Precisely why I subscribe to the Epoch TImes

  19. William OHalloran

    March 29, 2020 at 2:51 pm

    The above article is a complete politicization of the facts. Politics is politics and some of the provisions of the bill submitted by both sides were self serving “pork.” The New York times reported factually as to the issues. Eventually compromises were made as they should be and the bill passed. The bill was held up because provisions in the bill by both parties were unacceptable. These were removed and the bill passed. The problem now is that the President is threatening to not comply with certain provisions of the bill which threaten his financial interests. Get the facts and try to get a hold on your emotions which allow you to believe what ever makes you feel good.

  20. The Iceman

    March 29, 2020 at 4:56 pm

    Why would any conservative ever subscribe to or purchase a single copy of the NY Times.

  21. Alan W.

    March 29, 2020 at 8:38 pm

    I have never read the New York Times and likely never will. So I couldn’t care less what they say. Quite frankly, I wouldn’t even use a copy to the Times to cover the bottom of my bird cage.

  22. Still Hate A0L

    March 30, 2020 at 2:06 am

    This will not impact those who have been trained to HATE TRUMP!

  23. Lee

    March 31, 2020 at 4:08 am

    The New York Times knew about it while it happened but refused to report about the extermination of millions of Jews during the Holocaust at the urging of a Democrat president – FDR. The reason being keeping away from the Germans that the allies knew what was happening, fearing Germany would make changes that would have made defeating them more difficult. Except the survivors from Aushwitz said they were watching American planes flying over head close enough to see the smokestacks from the incinerating rooms and praying they would do something to save them. FDR and the New York Times could have saved at least 2 million Jews but chose not to. That alone is reason enough to redirect the Jewish vote away from the Democrats.

  24. Lee

    March 31, 2020 at 4:18 am

    NYTimes owned by a Jewish family, still is, and FDR would qualify as war criminals. Just like Soros, whose family changed their name during WWll, hiding being Jewish, enabling the teenage George to work for the Nazis turning in Jews before they could flee. Another Democrat supporter with blood on his hands.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Censorship

You won’t believe what The View wants to do to Tucker Carlson and Tulsi Gabbard

Published

on

The war in Ukraine has sparked a global crisis with many devastating consequences.

Worse yet, the war propaganda coming from the so-called “mainstream” media is appalling.

And you won’t believe what The View wants to do to Tucker Carlson and Tulsi Gabbard.

The Democrat Media Complex and the warmongers of both parties are itching for escalation in the war in Ukraine.

On the Left, Congressman Eric Swalwell floated the idea of expelling Russian students from the country.

Neoconservatives on the Right like Adam Kinzinger – whose Congressional district was gerrymandered out of existence by Illinois Democrats – wants a no-fly zone over Ukraine, and Senator Lindsey Graham called for someone in the Russian government to assassinate Vladimir Putin.

People who are calling for peace and don’t want to see brinkmanship with a nuclear power, and people who are pushing back against dangerous war propaganda have been labeled “collaborators,” and even “traitors.”

Such is the case with Fox News host Tucker Carlson and former Hawaii Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard.

That’s why the harpies on The View want Carlson and Gabbard investigated and arrested by the Department of Justice.

So-called “Republican” Ana Navarro, who hasn’t espoused a real conservative opinion in a decade, argued, “I think DOJ (Department of Justice) in the same way it is setting up a task force to investigate oligarchs, should look into people who are Russian propagandists and shilling for Putin.”

The establishment is so hot for war, combating propaganda and resisting American involvement is somehow tantamount to “shilling for Putin.”

Whoopi Goldberg got in on the act and said, “They used to arrest people for doing stuff like this. If they thought you were colluding with a Russian agent. If they thought you were putting out information or taking information and handing over to Russia. They used to actually investigate stuff like this.”

Goldberg’s statement is mind-blowing considering she was highly critical of the Hollywood blacklist of the past.

There were communists in the State Department, media, entertainment, and academia that were actually collaborating with the Soviet Union, and the Left believed the McCarthy Era was the worst thing that ever happened in America.

It’s impossible to oppose McCarthyism and call for Carlson and Gabbard to be investigated and arrested.

There is no way that the panelists of The View would have been on board with arresting people who opposed the Vietnam War.

Carlson, who has the top rated show in cable news, is probably the strongest anti-war voice on television.

And Gabbard, a former Army reserve officer, became persona non grata for her anti-war positions.

The ladies of The View and the Left more broadly are exposing themselves to be authoritarians.

Pants on Fire Official Polling

Continue Reading

Censorship

One journalist’s lawsuit could end Big Tech censoring conservatives

Published

on

Social media companies suppressing conservative speech is getting out of hand.

Now someone is fighting back.

And one journalist’s lawsuit could end Big Tech censoring conservatives.

Twitter banned former New York Times reporter Alex Berenson for supposedly spreading “misinformation” about the coronavirus vaccine.

Berenson’s “crime” was posting that the COVID vaccine did not stop transmission of the virus.

In Berenson’s lawsuit, the former New York Times reporter argues that his comments were objectively true.

Berenson also cites California law, which defines common carriers as a platform that “offers to the public to carry persons, property, or messages.”

This argument could prove vital as Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas hinted in an April opinion that Big Tech companies fall under the definition of a common carrier like the phone or mail company, which would limit the ability of Big Tech to censor speech.

Berenson also argued that Twitter acted as an agent of the government to censor his speech, citing Twitter banning Berenson shortly after Joe Biden called on Big Tech companies to censor “misinformation” about the coronavirus.

“The extraordinarily close nexus between the July 2021 statements by senior executive branch officials—including President Biden himself—calling for censorship by such companies and Twitter’s corresponding immediate actions against Mr. Berenson,” the lawsuit added.

There is already established case law that the government cannot pressure private companies to carry out actions that would be unconstitutional if the government performed them.

That argument – as well as the common carrier contention – lays out two legal paths for Berenson to argue his case and potentially find a receptive audience at the Supreme Court.

Conservatives waited for years for a manner in which to secure legal recourse to Big Tech’s ideologically motivated censorship.

Thanks to Berenson’s lawsuit and Big Tech’s overreach, they may have finally found a silver bullet.

Pants on Fire News will keep you up-to-date on any new developments in this ongoing story.

Continue Reading

Censorship

Big Tech is trying to censor one undeniable truth about the COVID vaccine

Published

on

Social media censorship is out of control.

Ever since the beginning of the coronavirus pandemic, Big Tech began banning users for posting true information.

And now Big Tech is trying to censor one undeniable truth about the COVID vaccine.

According to a new policy implemented by Twitter, the social media platform can now impose penalties up to a permanent suspension for posting that a vaccinated individual can spread COVID.

“When Tweets include misleading information about Covid-19, we may place a label on those tweets that includes corrective information about that claim,” Twitter’s policy reads. “We may apply labels to Tweets that contain, for example . . . false or misleading claims that people who have received the vaccine can spread or shed the virus (or symptoms, or immunity) to unvaccinated people.”

At the start of the pandemic, social media platforms banned users for posting that the virus likely escaped from a lab in Wuhan, China.

Now Twitter is threatening to ban anyone for posting truthful information about vaccinated individuals still being able to spread COVID.

Twitter’s new policy runs contrary to Centers for Disease Control guidelines that state that “risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection in fully vaccinated people cannot be completely eliminated as long as there is continued community transmission of the virus.”

In addition, Nature.com reported on a study published in October, which showed that fully vaccinated individuals possessed a lower risk of spreading COVID, but that spread was still possible and the vaccine’s protection against spread waned over time.

“The authors found that although the vaccines did offer some protection against infection and onward transmission, Delta dampened that effect. A person who was fully vaccinated and then had a ‘breakthrough’ Delta infection was almost twice as likely to pass on the virus as someone who was infected with Alpha. And that was on top of the higher risk of having a breakthrough infection caused by Delta than one caused by Alpha,” Nature.com reported.

One reason so many people do not trust either the vaccines or the authorities promising the vaccines are safe and effective is because no one allows an honest discussion of the vaccines.

Any hint that the vaccines may not be 100% perfect is labeled as misinformation, a conspiracy theory or “anti-vaxx.”

But Twitter censoring people for posting an honest fact that vaccinated people – while at lower risk – can still spread the coronavirus leaves people with the impression that elite institutions have something to hide.

Pants on Fire News will keep you up-to-date on any new developments in this ongoing story.

Continue Reading

Sign Up For FREE Alerts

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Trending