Connect with us

Uncategorized

The New York Times is now using “Russian disinformation” to take this failed lie for another spin

Published

on

Just when you think you’ve seen it all, the corporate-controlled media manages to come up with an even more ridiculous song and dance.

They’ll simply do whatever it takes to continue pushing left-wing propaganda.

And now The New York Times is now using “Russian disinformation” to take this failed lie for another spin.

Editors over at The New York Times must be incredibly bored — a natural consequence of choosing to ignore any slightly relevant news stories in favor of protecting Democrats and their sketchy associates.

Now, The New York Times is trotting out an old, worn out, already disproven lie yet again.

For some inexplicable reason, The Times recently ran a story entitled, “How Russian Trolls Helped Keep the Women’s March Out of Lock Step.”

That whole trope is an interesting choice, especially considering it’s been proven that Hillary Clinton is the main “Russian troll” spreading disinformation.

The protagonist in The Times’ article is also a bold pick – Linda Sarsour, a self-proclaimed “feminist” who is a major advocate for Sharia law, and is rumored to have tied to Hamas.

On top of that, she’s all for the left-wing “Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions” campaign targeting Israel for destruction.

But The New York Times Ellen Barry decided to do her level best to paint Sarsour as a victim of some sort of “Russian conspiracy” without even bothering to put forward any actual proof.

Following the 2017 “Women’s March” in Washington, D.C., Barry claims Sarsour was suddenly overwhelmed by “a torrent of focused grievance that targeted her.”

“Over the 18 months that followed, Russia’s troll factories and its military intelligence service put a sustained effort into discrediting the movement by circulating damning, often fabricated narratives around Ms. Sarsour, whose activism made her a lightning rod for Mr. Trump’s base and also for some of his most ardent opposition,” Barry wrote.

Of course, it never occurred to self-proclaimed “journalist” that Sarsour might have earned her detractors through her awful policy positions – not to mention the incendiary claims she’s made, like referencing “jihad” while protesting against Donald Trump’s Presidency.

In July of 2017, Sarsour addressed the Islamic Society of North America, and urged Muslims to “stand up to those who oppress our communities,” as “we are struggling against tyrants and rulers not only abroad, in the Middle East, or on the other side of the world, but here in these United States of America.”

During the same speech, she quoted Mohammed as saying, “A word of truth in front of a tyrant, ruler or leader, that is the best form of jihad.”

Can you even imagine the outcry if someone on the Right made a similar comparison with Joe Biden in office?

But as long as Trump was the target, Sarsour is not only welcome to her opinion, she’s practically a hero to the corporate-controlled media.

And now, apparently, Barry has taken it upon herself to conjure up some imaginary “Russian trolls” to turn Sarsour into a victim of something more than her own mouth.

Pants on Fire News will keep you up-to-date on any developments to this ongoing story.

Fake News

The New York Times’ infuriating excuse for one company’s exploitation of children will have you seeing red

Published

on

Donald Trump once said that the Fake News Media is the enemy of the American people.

The past six years have proven him correct.

And The New York Times’ infuriating excuse for one company’s exploitation of children will have you seeing red.

For some bizarre reason, the Left go into defense mode whenever conservatives point out obvious pedophilia and grooming behavior.

It should be easy to unite politically against pedophilia, but the Left would instead rather accuse right-wingers of being “conspiracy theorists” or “threats to democracy.”

And this is after Jeffrey Epstein died under the most mysterious of circumstances while being held in custody for sex trafficking of young girls.

The corporate-controlled press swooped in to defend fashion house Balenciaga after the company released a disgusting ad campaign featuring young kids holding teddy bears in bondage gear.

ABC News reported that the photo included “what appears to be an excerpt from the U.S. Supreme Court opinion on United States vs. Williams (2008), which upheld part of a federal child pornography law.”

Balenciaga received so much backlash, the company scrubbed its Instagram page with over 14 million followers.

Yet, The New York Times found it appropriate to provide some damage control for the company.

The Times ran a piece entitled, “When High Fashion and QAnon Collide: Two new Balenciaga campaigns ignited a firestorm that traveled from the internet to Fox News, fueled by allegations that the brand condoned child exploitation.”

The Left always mention “QAnon” when they want to diffuse allegations of pedophilia.

Again, this is after the Jeffrey Epstein saga, knowing that he ran with powerful people, like Prince Andrew and former President Bill Clinton.

Clinton was literally photographed getting a massage from one of Epstein’s girls.

“The internet is full of trolls,” The Times wrote. “Why did this controversy take off? As online criticism of the campaigns spread, the story was picked up across right-leaning media outlets, including The New York Post and the prime time Fox News show ‘Tucker Carlson Tonight.’ The show has helped to publicize and mainstream QAnon, the internet conspiracy theory that ‘a group of Satan-worshiping elites who run a child sex ring are trying to control our politics and media.’”

This is a mind-blowing response from The Times.

The paper’s angle is that conservatives fabricated the entire controversy, not that Balenciaga ran a sickening ad campaign and was forced to apologize for it.

If Democrats want to brand Republicans as the “anti-pedophile” Party, that is a label the GOP will likely gladly accept.

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

This NBC reporter tried to slam Tucker Carlson but ended up stepping on a rake

Published

on

Self-proclaimed “journalists” have a vendetta against Tucker Carlson and Fox News.

If the Left had their way, Fox News would be regulated out of existence.

And this NBC reporter tried to slam Carlson but ended up stepping on a rake.

The election of former President Donald Trump in 2016 changed the entire Fake News Media landscape.

For the first time in contemporary American politics, an outsider was able to circumvent the corporate-controlled media monopoly and get elected using social media.

Since then, the establishment elites have attempted to rein in Big Tech, and free speech in general, which is why so many journalists and politicians who have questioned the Left’s narrative have been demonized.

The Left want to brand them as “hateful,” thus justifying censorship.

And NBC News’ Kat Tenbarge did exactly that when she went after Fox News’ Tucker Carlson, and the citizen journalist behind the social media account Libs of TikTok.

On Twitter, Libs of TikTok has amassed a huge following by posting unedited clips of left-wing radicals espousing their insane beliefs in videos they uploaded to TikTok for the world to see.

Tenbarge tried to suggest that Carlson and Libs of TikTok were bringing harm to the LGBTQ community, but she ended up making a bizarre, unintended argument.

“Tucker Carlson, Libs of TikTok, etc. create a stream of content blaming trans and queer people for child grooming, but rarely or never feature actual victims of child grooming,” Tenbarge wrote. “If they did, they’d have to reckon with the fact that many survivors are queer and trans themselves. I’ve interviewed survivors of [child sexual assault] and grooming, and several of them were trans and non-binary. Even more identified as gay, bi, or pan. All of them supported LGBTQ people. Religious conservatives would hate them and damn them to hell. They don’t really care.”

Tenbarge made the common left-wing mistake of linking LGBTQ people to child grooming.

Conservatives are against pedophilia regardless of the perpetrator or victim, but the Left tries to play these power games that backfire.

Tenbarge’s argument suggests that child sexual assault victims were either groomed into an LGBTQ identity, or they were targeted by predators because of their LGBTQ identity.

Either way, she was definitely not making the point she thought she was making.

Tenbarge suggests that Republicans are somehow out to get LGBTQ people, but the group Gays Against Groomers has been a fierce critic of teachers – regardless of so-called “gender identity” – speaking to young children about sexuality and other sexually explicit subjects.

Tellingingly, the Twitter account for Gays Against Groomers was banned until Elon Musk took control of the company.

For some strange reason, the Left are defending groomers to “own” conservatives.

Continue Reading

Fake News

Elon Musk set off these so-called journalists—and the word explosion is ridiculous

Published

on

It turns out that if there’s one thing the Fake News Media can’t handle it’s freedom of speech.

When Elon Musk took over Twitter he seriously set off the corporate-controlled press.

And the word explosion is ridiculous.

The corporate-controlled media is suddenly fascinated with the inner workings of social media platform, Twitter.

From the way they’ve been ranting and raving, you’d think it was their money, not Elon Musk’s $44 billion on the line.

In fact, The New York Times is so obsessed, they recently decided to treat readers to a 2,500 word diatribe on why Elon Musk basically sucks at life, and is more or less destroying the world with his takeover of Twitter.

In an article entitled, “Two Weeks of Chaos: Inside Elon Musk’s Takeover of Twitter,” a committee of some four left-wing reporters pooled their collective indignation to unload on the world’s richest man, who recently committed the unpardonable sin of voting for a Republican.

Even though Twitter is losing a jaw-dropping $4 million per day, the self-proclaimed “journalists” focused much of their energy on the supposed trauma of employees facing job cuts — as if it’s Elon Musk’s fault that Twitter’s prior management ran the company into the ground.

“The fallout has often been excruciating, according to 36 current and former Twitter employees and people close to the company, as well as internal documents and workplace chat logs,” the writers claimed,” The New York Times’ piece read. “Some top executives were summarily fired by email. One engineering manager, upon being told to cut hundreds of workers, vomited into a trash can. Others slept in the office as they worked grueling schedules to meet Mr. Musk’s orders.”

But one particularly whiney complaint exposed how much work Musk has ahead of him if he’s ever going to clean up the deeply corrupt organization.

“Mr. Musk plans to begin making employees pay for lunch — which had been free — at the company cafeteria,” The Times’ report continued.

Twitter user Andrew Wortman shared the article and complained that Musk, “Fired ¾ of the employees. Now he’s planning to starve the rest of them. He’s failure incarnate.”

Then, @nichegamer retweeted that post suggesting that Twitter employees learn to cook.

Musk replied to that comment revealing a shocking surprise about the employees’ “free lunch” inside Twitter’s accounting books.

“Especially bizarre given that almost no one came to the office,” Musk pointed out. “Estimate cost per lunch served in past 12 months is >$400.”

The corporate-controlled press’ desperate bid to demonize Elon Musk when they never bothered to scrutinize Twitter’s inner workings in the past is almost guaranteed to have originated from the “Chief Twit’s” stated commitment to free speech.

Musk’s purchase of Twitter came after he slammed the platform in March for an algorithmic bias against conservatives.

“Given that Twitter serves as the de facto public town square, failing to adhere to free speech principles fundamentally undermines democracy,” Musk wrote at the time. “Free speech is essential to a functioning democracy.”

After making a $44 billion bid to buy Twitter, Musk nearly backed out after discovering what a dumpster fire he was about to acquire.

After plenty of legal wrangling, he ultimately ended up closing on the deal but has warned employees that if the current recession continues to deepen, the social media platform could end up going bankrupt unless drastic changes are made.

Apparently, Fake News Media outlets, like The New York Times, are feeling threatened by Elon Musk’s focus on free speech.

With an estimated total equity of only about $1.54 billion, The New York Times might want to start playing it safer before the world’s richest man decides to become their boss as well.

Pants on Fire News will keep you up-to-date on any developments to this ongoing story.

Continue Reading

Sign Up For FREE Alerts

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Trending