Connect with us


The New York Times cover-up of this Joe Biden sex scandal just blew up in their faces



Joe Biden’s Presidential campaign was thrown in turmoil by credible allegations of sexual assault.

Biden’s allies in the Fake News Media tried to shield him from any fallout.

But The New York Times cover-up of this Joe Biden sex scandal just blew up in their faces.

Former Biden staffer Tara Reade stepped forward with credible allegations that in 1993 then Senator Biden sexually assaulted her by shoving his hand up her skirt and “digitally raping her” with his fingers.

The Fake News Media refused to cover this story or mention Reade’s name until The New York Times dropped their supposedly “deep dive” into the allegations.

This story was a mess from the get go with The New York Times.

The Times reported that:

Soon after Ms. Reade made the new allegation, in a podcast interview released on March 25, The Times began reporting on her account and seeking corroboration through interviews, documents and other sources. The Times interviewed Ms. Reade on multiple days over hours, as well as those she told about Mr. Biden’s behavior and other friends. The Times has also interviewed lawyers who spoke to Ms. Reade about her allegation; nearly two dozen people who worked with Mr. Biden during the early 1990s, including many who worked with Ms. Reade; and the other seven women who criticized Mr. Biden last year, to discuss their experiences with him.

No other allegation about sexual assault surfaced in the course of reporting, nor did any former Biden staff members corroborate any details of Ms. Reade’s allegation. The Times found no pattern of sexual misconduct by Mr. Biden, beyond the hugs, kisses and touching that women previously said made them uncomfortable.

The Times later deleted the sentence, “The Times found no pattern of sexual misconduct by Mr. Biden, beyond the hugs, kisses and touching that women previously said made them uncomfortable” after they realized that The Times had in fact confirmed a pattern of Joe Biden committing acts of sexual harassment in the form of unwanted kissing, touching, and hugging.

In addition, The Times also deleted a tweet containing the sentence “The Times found no pattern of sexual misconduct by Mr. Biden, beyond the hugs, kisses and touching that women previously said made them uncomfortable.”

These deletions only served to bring more attention to Reade’s allegations and caused them to go viral on social media.

If The Times thought they were helping Biden with this story or stealth edits they were sorely mistaken.

Pants on Fire News will keep you up-to-date on any new developments in this ongoing story.

Continue Reading


  1. Nancy Alexander

    April 13, 2020 at 8:57 pm

    Well this is what we want!! Someone who is sexy – just like trumpy!!! Yeah, go Joe. You can surely beat trumpy at his own game!!

  2. Nancy Alexander

    April 13, 2020 at 9:06 pm

    It simply doesn’t matter any more to the American people. trumpy, Rudy, and many other folks even all those evangelical christians, don’t care any more about presidential sex lives. We are looking for more substantial things like: Medicare for all; environmental protections against climate change; freedom for women to be in charge of their own bodies (not old white men); acceptance and respect for the LBGTQ community; protection of all our national parks; voter protection so we can all count as we vote. Let’s hear from other people who agree.

  3. Vasu Murti

    April 14, 2020 at 12:36 am

    Conservative Christian Matt Walsh blogged about Trump in 2016:

    “He’s a serial adulterer who abandoned his family (twice) to shack up with younger women. His ex-wife once alleged that he ripped out chunks of her hair and violated her. We don’t even need to get into alleged ties to the mob or financial scams or his confession that he bribes politicians. He can’t speak semi-coherently about the Bible, he has no understanding of basic Christian teaching, he thinks Christianity does not require us to ask for forgiveness, and our relationship with Christ can be measured using polling data, but does he otherwise carry himself as anything resembling a Christian?

    “I see a guy who lies constantly and blatantly. I see a man who changes his positions and his principles at the drop of a hat. I see a deeply immature man who insults people on Twitter but lacks the courage to face them in person. I see someone who fashions himself ‘politically incorrect’ but is really just a cruel and bitter old man who thinks it’s funny to mock the disabled. I see a man with no honor who launches vulgar attacks on women and then lies about what he said. I see a phony who brazenly exploits the fears of the American public. I see a guy whose recklessness and greed drives his businesses into bankruptcy, and I see a guy who tries to silence journalists when they report on it. I see a guy who jazzes up the crowd at campaign rallies by bragging about his money and threatening to throw protesters out into the cold without their coats. And so on.”

    Conservative Christian pastor Max Lucado similarly commented on Trump in 2016:

    “He ridiculed a war hero. He made mockery of a reporter’s menstrual cycle. He made fun of a disabled reporter. He referred to the former first lady, Barbara Bush as ‘mommy,’ and belittled Jeb Bush for bringing her on the campaign trail. He routinely calls people ‘stupid,’ ‘loser,’ and ‘dummy.’”

    And the pastor wasn’t done there. He continued, “Such insensitivities wouldn’t even be acceptable even for a middle school student body election. But for the Oval Office? And to do so while brandishing a Bible and boasting of his Christian faith? I’m bewildered, both by his behavior and the public’s support of it.”

  4. Tammie Pobiedzinski

    April 14, 2020 at 3:17 pm

    Trump 2020 when we give the house back to Trump we will show you some investigations. Better find your safe space now

  5. h8aliar

    April 14, 2020 at 3:37 pm

    Joe the Penetrator Biden is well on his way to the presidency. Go Penetrator, go.

  6. Spike

    April 14, 2020 at 4:52 pm

    I simply don’t believe all of these “belated” sorts of accusations against males who have a spot light on themselves. If true, there would have been no excuse for not at least reporting it at the time, even if his position protected him from consequences. On the other hand, I note in comments here that nobody addresses this case as I’m sure they went right after the even more unbelievable accusations against Kavanaugh, but instead start talking about similar accusations against Trump! Is their inference that if Trump did do any of the acts he’s been accused of, it’s alright if Biden did, as well? It’s all a disgusting attitude!

  7. Butchy

    April 14, 2020 at 5:42 pm


  8. Truckman

    April 14, 2020 at 6:18 pm

    so pitiful nancy it’s alright that Biden assaulted women and also bragged about how he blackmailed a country for family gain and has not ever done anything positive for this country Whereas Trump has not been accused of anything except by Democrat politicians who don’t like it that he won the election and that Trump has not accepted his pay but has giving it away to some part of the Gov. that needed it and has been put thru the mill by the media. and all he has done is the best he can for the people of this country if it had not been for the quick action of his this nation would be in a lot worse condition than it is in grow up

  9. Connie

    April 14, 2020 at 6:50 pm

    I agree with you, Truckman. I voted for Donald Trump in 2016 because I wanted constitutionalists on the Supreme Court. Everything else he has done for our country has been an unexpected bonus. I did not defend his past personal behavior. As for his non Oval Office behavior today….I am all for it. I am sick and tired of the attacks and investigations. It takes a bully to be able to stand up to bullies. Imagine how much more he could have done for Americans if he hadn’t been constantly distracted! Donald Trump’s sexual improprieties are for he and his current wife to deal with. Joe Biden’s sexual improprieties are for he and his current wife to deal with. To have anyone excuse one while demonizing the other is nothing more than politicizing the situation; so do not try to take the moral high ground on this. And while I’m on comparisons…Donald Trump made his millions on business dealings both within America and abroad. Joe Biden made his millions….well, just how did you make your millions, Joe…both within America and abroad. All you Joe supporters….be careful again with that higher moral ground. You’re pretty darn close to the cliff!

  10. Jay

    April 14, 2020 at 7:31 pm

    I’ve read that, a coward dies a million deaths, a brave man dies but one. How many deaths have the owners of Pants on fire died? Not a question, just a thought, as I expect this post to go the same place that the lase two have.

  11. Deana Wells

    April 14, 2020 at 7:39 pm

    I agree with most that Joe Biden is NOT the answer to the Democrats nominee. Why else would Obama take sooo long to endorse him? He worked with him for 8 long years and I am positive he knows just how ignorant Joe Biden is! He has and is riding on Obama’s coattails but needs to realize he is NOT Obama! All of you nonbelievers, please reference different clips if Joe Biden in the White House and after touching women and little girls, breathing in their hair and all the while the littl girls and big girls are cringing. One mother is behind her daughter, watching this going on and is clearly mortified. He is a dirty old man. I am sure we will be hearing from T. Reade in the near future….remember Kavanaugh and all that BS? If he WAS guilty that’s a whole different ballgame, but he WAS NOT. People get a grip, Biden is just a pawn. Let’s see who he names as a running mate….there will be your answer and the plan for the future!

  12. hart isaacs

    April 16, 2020 at 4:21 pm

    A bust of Walter Williams, founder of MU’s School of Journalism, was dedicated Sunday. (Photo courtesy of Sabra Tull Meyer)
    The Journalist’s Creed was written by the first dean of the Missouri School of Journalism, Walter Williams. More than one century later, his declaration remains one of the clearest statements of the principles, values and standards of journalists throughout the world. Plaques bearing the creed are on display at the School, the National Press Club in Washington, D.C. (since 1958), and many other locations around the world.
    I believe in the profession of journalism.
    I believe that the public journal is a public trust; that all connected with it are, to the full measure of their responsibility, trustees for the public; that acceptance of a lesser service than the public service is betrayal of this trust.
    I believe that clear thinking and clear statement, accuracy and fairness are fundamental to good journalism.
    I believe that a journalist should write only what he holds in his heart to be true.
    I believe that suppression of the news, for any consideration other than the welfare of society, is indefensible.
    I believe that no one should write as a journalist what he would not say as a gentleman; that bribery by one’s own pocketbook is as much to be avoided as bribery by the pocketbook of another; that individual responsibility may not be escaped by pleading another’s instructions or another’s dividends.
    I believe that advertising, news and editorial columns should alike serve the best interests of readers; that a single standard of helpful truth and cleanness should prevail for all; that the supreme test of good journalism is the measure of its public service.
    I believe that the journalism which succeeds best – and best deserves success – fears God and honors Man; is stoutly independent, unmoved by pride of opinion or greed of power, constructive, tolerant but never careless, self-controlled, patient, always respectful of its readers but always unafraid, is quickly indignant at injustice; is unswayed by the appeal of privilege or the clamor of the mob; seeks to give every man a chance and, as far as law and honest wage and recognition of human brotherhood can make it so, an equal chance; is profoundly patriotic while sincerely promoting international good will and cementing world-comradeship; is a journalism of humanity, of and for today’s world.


  13. Tony Winters

    April 16, 2020 at 10:11 pm

    Well if the NYT says thta it didn’t happen then it just didn’t happen, after all they wouldn’t lie just to help Job, touchy-feely Biden, right?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez announced one plan to take Fox News off the air



Democrats are about to take total control of power in Washington, D.C.

How they intend to wield that authority has all hell breaking loose.

And Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez announced one plan to take Fox News off the air.

Liberals were victorious in the 2020 election in large part by controlling the flow of information to voters.

Social media companies censored negative stories about Joe Biden such as the bombshell report about the contents of Hunter Biden’s laptop.

Fake news outlets like CNN refused to cover the story falsely claiming it was Russian disinformation.

The tactic worked to perfection as voters did not have all the information necessary about Joe Biden to make an informed decision and Biden won the election based on the false picture Biden’s supporters in the press painted for the public.

Now Democrats intend to double down by creating government commissions to regulate the flow of “misinformation.”

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez announced the idea on a live stream.

“Several members of Congress, in some of my discussions, have brought up ‘media literacy,’ because that is a part of what happened here,” Ocasio-Cortez stated. “We’re going to need to figure out how we rein in our media environment, so that you can’t just spew disinformation and misinformation.”

“It’s one thing to have differing opinions,” said Ocasio-Cortez, “But it’s another thing entirely to just say things that are false. So that’s something we’re looking into.”

To Democrats in office and in the media “misinformation” now means any fact that contradicts the leftwing narrative and should thus be banned.

Ocasio-Cortez’s new Stalinist style news media truth commission is how Democrats will take social media censorship to the next level.

Her dream is to have government become the arbiter of truth and say any stories the Democrats don’t like is now “misinformation” and the outlets that published it should be sanctioned.

The number-one target for this effort is Fox News as Fox is the only so-called “mainstream” media outlet that doesn’t 100 percent operate as a Super PAC for the Democrat Party.

Pants on Fire News will keep you up-to-date on any new developments in this ongoing story.

Continue Reading


Big Tech is going after one conservative with despicable slander



The Democrat Media Complex flexed its muscle to propel Joe Biden to an election victory.

Countless outlets propped up Biden while relentlessly attacking right-wingers.

Now Big Tech is going after one conservative with despicable slander.

Canadian political commentator, author, and documentary filmmaker Lauren Southern – who’s described herself as a “conservatarian” – is being hammered by Big Tech.

She’s currently in a battle with the online encyclopedia website Wikipedia over numerous falsehoods in her bio, which has been locked from editing.

Southern submitted a defamation claim that the site has supposedly taken under advisement.

Libelous information on a Wikipedia page can have serious consequences.

For public figures, a Wiki page will likely be the first thing someone reads about them.

Southern’s page is littered with accusations of being “far-right” and “borderline white nationalist” without evidence or context.

According to Southern, the false accusations nearly cost her an interview with a subject for her upcoming documentary “Crossfire,” which analyzes different perspectives on the political strife that plagued 2020.

Leftists like to pretend that Wikipedia is entirely objective, but site co-founder Larry Sanger strongly disagrees.

He’s since left the site and wrote a blog post entitled “Wikipedia Is Badly Biased.”

Sanger cited several examples including one on the issue of abortion.

He wrote, “Wikipedia can be counted on to cover not just political figures, but political issues as well from a liberal-left point of view. No conservative would write, in an abortion article, ‘When properly done, abortion is one of the safest procedures in medicine,’ a claim that is questionable on its face, considering what an invasive, psychologically distressing, and sometimes lengthy procedure it can be even when done according to modern medical practices.”

If Southern is successful in getting her page edited, that will help fight back against Wikipedia’s black box editing standards.

The politicization of Wikipedia is just one plank used by the Democrat Media Complex to control the dissemination of information.

Pants on Fire Official Polling

Continue Reading


Donald Trump left jaws on the ground with this defense of one Fox News host



Bartiromo and Pompeo

Donald Trump has been feuding with Fox News ever since Election Night.

There are reports the President wants payback for Fox’s leftward drift.

But Donald Trump left jaws on the ground with this defense of one Fox News host.

This week, both the Los Angeles Times and the Washington Post published hit pieces attacking Fox News host Maria Bartiromo for her November interview with President Trump.

Fake news reporters were outraged that Bartiromo let the President make his case about voter fraud while pledging to perform her duties as a journalist and investigate the President’s claims.

In today’s media landscape, anyone who doesn’t scream in the President’s face that he is fascist liar one step of short of becoming the next Adolph Hitler is described as sycophant.

Bartiromo pushed back on both pieces claiming that her interview style as a journalist – and she was one of the top Wall Street reporters on TV for many years – was to let her subject have their say and let the audience decide.

After the smear stories ran in two of the house organs for the Democrat Party, President Trump defended Bartiromo on social media.

“Maria’s show and ratings are better than ever. They are trying to shame her into not telling the truth. Her audience would be gone, and she is far too smart for that. Rigged Election!” the President wrote.

Bartiromo thanked the President and blasted the fake news media as liars who spent three years peddling Russian collusion conspiracy theories.

“Thank you Mr @POTUS @realDonaldTrump still no honesty from this group about all the misinformation they sold to readers for 3 years. We will continue reporting & seeking truth,” Bartiromo responded.

In her interviews with The Times and The Post, Bartiromo said she was not a Trump defender, but fairly reporting on the Trump administration meant covering the fact that the Obama administration and the FBI colluded to frame President Trump as being a Russian spy as well as the fact that the fake news media went willingly along for the ride.

Pants on Fire News will keep you up-to-date on any new developments in this ongoing story.

Continue Reading

Sign Up For FREE Alerts

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.