Connect with us

The New York Times

The New York Times could get hit with one damaging lawsuit they never saw coming

Published

on

The New York Times has become another institution completely hollowed out by leftists.

The “paper of record” constantly prints fake news and engages in activism instead of journalism.

Now The Times could get hit with one damaging lawsuit they never saw coming.

Project Veritas founder James O’Keefe helped crack the façade of The New York Times with his defamation lawsuit, which made it to the discovery stage.

Now other groups and individuals smeared by The Times are considering taking action.

The satirical website The Babylon Bee is considering exactly that after The Times libeled them as “misinformation under the guise of satire.”

The implication is that the Babylon Bee intentionally prints fake news and only pretends to be a satire site.

This is absurd.

Some of the Bee’s headlines include: “CDC Now Recommends Wearing A Seatbelt Even When You’re Outside Your Car,” “Playskool Releases ‘My First Knife Fight’ Playset,” and “New Law Will Require Cops To Call LeBron For Permission Before Making An Arrest.”

All of these humorous headlines are clearly satirical.

The Left treats them as “misinformation” because they successfully lampoon the “woke” insanity of leftists.

The Times would never go after the left-leaning satire site The Onion in the same way.

Some of The Onion’s headlines include: “Major Things Your Teacher Glossed Over in Sex Ed,” “Biden’s First 100 Days: Did he Keep His Campaign Promises?” and “Biden Claims It’s Unfair To Attack Administration Over U.S. Borders That Were Created By James K. Polk.”

Which site has headlines that are masquerading as news?

Despite The Bee’s reputation as a satire site, they are still not verified on Twitter even though they have close to 1 million followers.

Babylon Bee CEO Seth Dillon said during an interview:

“We are contemplating and discussing with our counsel what the next move should be . . . They put this stuff out there and if they can get it to stick, then then we have no platform remaining . . . There’s not going to be anybody who wants to host our stuff . . . It’s an effort to try and cancel us.”

Dillon is entirely correct.

The Left understands the power of satire, which is why they don’t want The Bee to exist.

Left-wing agitator Saul Alinksy outlined in Rules for Radicals that “ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.”

The Bee is incredibly effective at ridiculing the shoddy arguments of the Left, and the Left can’t stand it.

Pants on Fire Official Polling

The New York Times

The New York Times just got caught red-handed publishing this terrible lie about police

Published

on

By

The American Left has declared war on the police and their foot soldiers in the media are leading the charge.

Anti-police news outlets and reporters spread misinformation to inflame tensions and foment riots.

And now The New York Times just got caught red-handed publishing this terrible lie about police.

20 minutes after a jury announced a guilty verdict against Officer Derek Chauvin in the death of George Floyd, police in Columbus, Ohio reported an officer shot a 15-year-old black girl named Makiyah Bryant.

This horrible tragedy occurred when an officer responded to a call and saw Bryant wielding a knife and threatening another girl with the weapon.

The officer fired three times, killing Bryant.

Attorney Ben Crump, who represented the Floyd family sent out a viral tweet in the immediate aftermath of the shooting falsely claiming that Bryant was unarmed.

“As we breathed a collective sigh of relief today, a community in Columbus felt the sting of another police shooting as @ColumbusPolice killed an unarmed 15yo Black girl named Makiyah Bryant. Another child lost! Another hashtag,” Crump wrote.

Crump was not the only “blue check mark” on social media that spread misinformation about the police shooting and killing an unarmed 15-year-old black girl.

But The New York Times selectively edited Crump’s tweet in the story about the police shooting to clip out the part where Crump falsely claimed Bryant was unarmed.

This is what The Times wrote in their story:

“As we breathed a collective sigh of relief today, a community in Columbus felt the sting of another police shooting” Mr. Crump said. “Another child lost! Another hashtag.”

After a week where multiple media narratives were exposed as lies it would be a bigger shock to the public if The Times accurately reported events as opposed to misrepresenting the facts.

Pants on Fire News will keep you up-to-date on any new developments in this ongoing story.

Continue Reading

The New York Times

The New York Times got caught in a giant lie about a police officer that will have you seeing red

Published

on

By

The corporate-controlled media lies more often than they tell the truth.

It’s one reason so few Americans trust the information they receive from Fake News Media outlets.

And now the lying New York Times got caught in a giant lie about a police officer that will have you seeing red.

On Monday, the Washington, D.C. medical examiner told The Washington Post that Capitol Hill Police Officer Brian Sicknick died of natural causes after suffering two strokes the day after serving at the Capitol for the January 6 riot.

“Capitol Police officer Brian D. Sicknick suffered two strokes and died of natural causes a day after he confronted rioters at the Jan. 6 insurrection, the District’s chief medical examiner has ruled,” The Post reported the medical examiner telling the paper.

This interview closed the book on the lies the media told about Trump supporters murdering Sicknick by bashing his skull in with a fire extinguisher or killing Sicknick by causing an allergic reaction by blasting him in the face with bear spray.

“In an interview with The Washington Post, Francisco J. Diaz, the medical examiner, said the autopsy found no evidence the 42-year-old officer suffered an allergic reaction to chemical irritants, which Diaz said would have caused Sicknick’s throat to quickly seize. Diaz also said there was no evidence of internal or external injuries,” The Post reported.

After Sicknick’s death The New York Times reported that Trump supporters killed him by beating his face in with a fire extinguisher.

The content of The Times’ lie appeared in the Democrats article of impeachment against Donald Trump.

“Mr. Sicknick, 42, an officer for the Capitol Police, died on Thursday from brain injuries he sustained after Trump loyalists who overtook the complex struck him in the head with a fire extinguisher, according to two law enforcement officials,” The New York Times falsely claimed.

The media knew this story was a lie at the time as Sicknick’s family members tried to shoot down the original reports that Sicknick was murdered.

Journalists didn’t care.

The lie was more useful than the truth so members of the media falsely claimed Trump incited a murderous insurrection as part of a narrative they hoped would pressure Republicans to convict Donald Trump in the Senate impeachment trial, and tarnish the GOP going into the 2022 midterms.

Given the choice between telling the truth or pushing a politically useful lie, the media chose the lie.

Pants on Fire News will keep you up-to-date on any new developments in this ongoing story.

Continue Reading

The New York Times

The New York Times was forced to admit Democrats told a massive lie about gun control

Published

on

By

The Biden administration is determined to enact every bad policy under the sun.

Rolling back Second Amendment rights is no exception to his radical agenda.

But The New York Times was forced to admit Democrats told a massive lie about gun control.

Joe Biden and other prominent gun-grabbers love to tout the 1994 assault weapons ban as a meaningful piece of legislation, but even members of the Left begrudgingly admit that isn’t true.

New York Times writer Nicholas Kristof, a proponent of gun control, was forced to admit the bill did not save lives:

“It’s also true that while liberals loved the assault weapons ban for the 10 years it was in effect, there is no strong evidence that it saved lives — but it did turn the AR-15 into a conservative icon, so that today there appear to be more AR and AK rifles in private hands than in the United States military . . . And most crime and deaths involve handguns, not rifles.”

Democrats want to make it as difficult as possible for law-abiding citizens to get a gun, which makes them more susceptible to criminals.

Gun grabbers also ignore the deterrence of gun ownership that keeps would-be attackers and thieves at bay.

Kristof isn’t the only liberal to lament the fact gun control doesn’t work.

Data researcher Leah Libresco wrote a 2017 op-ed in The Washington Post that read:

“I researched the strictly tightened gun laws in Britain and Australia and concluded that they didn’t prove much about what America’s policy should be. Neither nation experienced drops in mass shootings or other gun related-crime that could be attributed to their buybacks and bans.”

Former NPR CEO Ken Stern did an about-face on guns when he stepped outside his liberal echo chamber and lived among conservatives for a year.

He chronicled his journey in the book Republican Like Me where he admitted to changing his mind on several contested issues, including climate change.

When honest people actually delve into the numbers, it’s difficult to maintain most Democrat positions.

Gun control is at the top of the list.

The statistics simply don’t add up for the Left.

Biden is a perfect exemplar of an ignorant Democrat spouting nonsense about guns – on more than one occasion, he suggested police officers shoot armed attackers in the leg.

Gun sales skyrocketed in 2020, and 40% of those purchases were made by first-time gun owners.

Pants on Fire Official Polling

Continue Reading

Sign Up For FREE Alerts

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Trending