Connect with us

Fake News

Rachel Maddow’s career is over after she doomed herself in a major lawsuit

Published

on

Rachel Maddow is the Left’s favorite propagator or anti-Trump conspiracy theories.

She was their go-to figure during the Russia Collusion Hoax.

But now her career is over after she doomed herself in a major lawsuit.

In July, Rachel Maddow took aim at One America News Network (OAN), a much smaller news network that she despises because OAN is pro-Trump.

She went after an employee of OAN, claiming that the employee is “paid by the Russian government to produce propaganda for that government.”

Her claim was entirely false and based on an OAN staffer once doing freelance work for Russian-owned Sputnik News.  The OAN staffer at the center of Maddow’s claim was never employed by the Russian Government.

That’s why OAN hit Maddow with a $10 million lawsuit for defamation.

Now that the smear is being litigated, Maddow’s attorney just outright admitted that she regularly lies, claiming that she doesn’t always mean what she says on air as a defense.

Breitbart News reports:

“In this case, the most obsequiously pro-Trump right-wing news outlet in America really literally is paid Russian propaganda,” The Russia Hoax Queen told her audience.

“Their on-air U.S. politics reporter is paid by the Russian government to produce propaganda for that government,” Maddow said.

Maddow’s smear was based on nothing. She fabricated it out of whole cloth. Prior to being employed by OAN, an OAN staffer had done some freelance work for Sputnik News. She was not even employed by Sputnik, and she didn’t do any work for Sputnik after going to work for OAN.

And from that, Maddow tells the world OAN “really literally is paid Russian propaganda.”

It was an outrageous lie, and now Maddow’s attorney is all but admitting she lies like this all the time. In fact, his defense appears to be an announcement to the world that no one should ever take Maddow seriously.

From the San Diego Times:

“Maddow lawyer Theodore J. “Ted” Boutrous Jr. argued that the liberal host was clearly offering up her “own unique expression” of her views to capture what she saw as the “ridiculous” nature of the undisputed facts.

“Her comment, therefore, is a quintessential statement ‘of rhetorical hyperbole, incapable of being proved true or false,’” he said.’”

Maddow’s lawyer is outright admitting that she lies in his defense.

In fact, his defense is based largely on the fact that it is well known that Maddow lies, or as he describes it, engages in “rhetorical hyperbole.”

If this is the best her lawyer can come up with, she’s going to have a hard time surviving the OAN’s lawsuit.

Do you think OAN should win against Rachel Maddow?

Let us know your thoughts in the comment section below.

Continue Reading
48 Comments

48 Comments

  1. Jono

    December 10, 2019 at 7:05 am

    Another dem bully…… horrible…..

  2. WhiteFalcon

    December 11, 2019 at 1:31 am

    I hope that OAN wipes her out and that her career is OVER.

  3. Culper Ring

    December 11, 2019 at 6:15 am

    It’s doubtful that a jury would award One America News Network with the full ten million dollars alleged as damages against the network.

  4. morefamdave

    December 12, 2019 at 4:19 pm

    Come on, people. Get real. Although I have absolutely no use for Maddow, one lawsuit is not going to ruin her. I’m getting tired of these over-hyped headlines. I don’t know how many I saw during Obama’s two terms promising that “this is the end for Obama”. None delivered. Neither will this one.

  5. Irish19

    December 12, 2019 at 4:33 pm

    Absolutely. Rachael Maddog is a perfect example of why this POTUS has so aptly labeled them “fake news”. I think he’s being generous. I like better “enemy of the people”. They have been doing Russia’s work. They are the colluders and the traitors along with the dems and deep state.

  6. Irish19

    December 12, 2019 at 4:36 pm

    Never heard of such a liar and conspiracy hack get paid so much money. Those who run these fake news outlets are co conspirators to treason and should also be indicted as agents of our enemies.

  7. Steve Earle

    December 12, 2019 at 11:33 pm

    They are or this news source is. I’d like to see if a class action suit could be possible against all their broadcasters and CNN itself. Their lies have caused violent attacks on persons and property. That’s a starting place seems to me.

  8. Matt Tonning

    December 15, 2019 at 5:56 pm

    I have watched Maddow from time to time much like I watch road runner cartoons. Tis funny. But suing her for stuff that she reads off a teleprompter written by some liber lunatic in the control room. I think not. Its MSNBC needs to be sued into bankruptcy. Oh, wait they already are bankrupt. And has fewer viewers than Cspan or the shopping channels

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Fake News

Rachel Maddow just brought down impeachment with this mind-blowing interview

Published

on

Democrats thought their impeachment prayers were answered.

At the last possible moment, a surprise witness stepped forward promising a smoking gun that would destroy Donald Trump.

But that went down in flames when Rachel Maddow brought down impeachment with this mind blowing interview.

Rachel Maddow hosted indicted Rudy Giuliani associate Lev Parnas on her show for the first of a two part interview just as Democrats were transmitting articles of impeachment to the Senate.

Parnas – without citing any evidence – made claims about President Trump ordering Parnas to pressure Ukraine to announce investigations into Joe and Hunter Biden.

Trump supporters smelled a rat.

Former White House chief strategist Steve Bannon appeared on Trish Regan’s Fox News Business Channel show and stated Maddow made herself into a witness of fact.

“First off, Rachel Maddow should be a witness of fact now. She should be brought in,” Bannon declared.

Bannon went to say Republicans should subpoena all emails, texts, and phone call logs between Maddow, her producers, NBC news executives with Parnas and his lawyers and leading Democrats like Adam Schiff to see if NBC colluded with the Democrats to drop this hit piece at the most politically advantageous time.

“We ought to have all the emails and all the text messages between Schiff, between Nancy Pelosi, Phil Griffin at MSNBC News. We ought to bring the whole thing out. How did this get dropped? Why have they been working on this for so long? How did this just come about at the last second? She admitted she’s been working on this for months, and the House just got this. The Republicans didn’t even see this when the vote went down,” Bannon added. “This is now a complete farce.”

“I think there was collusion between MSNBC, Rachel Maddow, Lev Parnas’ attorneys, and the entire process,” Bannon concluded.

Behind the scenes collusion by the Democrats has been at the heart of this impeachment farce from the very start.

Adam Schiff and his staff coordinated with alleged whistleblower Eric Ciaramella to get the ball rolling.

And now Schiff and Pelosi may be in cahoots with Rachel Maddow and Lev Parnas’ lawyers to try and drop one last bombshell on the President on the eve of the impeachment trial.

Pants on Fire News will keep you up-to-date on any new developments in the ongoing stuff.

Continue Reading

CNN

One CNN reporter was furious after what this Trump ally said straight to his face

Published

on

CNN has spent every day since Trump took office trying to destroy him.

Despite their blatant bias, they still continue to claim they are a fair media outlet.

And one CNN reporter was furious after what this Trump ally said straight to his face.

With impeachment in full swing, CNN is working overtime to help the Democrats push it across the finish line, and remove President Trump.

In doing so, they are going after Republican allies of the President.

And in an ambush-style questioning, CNN reporter Manu Raju caught up with Republican Sen. Martha McSally in the Capitol building.

He caught her as she was trying to enter her office, and asked: “Senator McSally, should the Senate consider new evidence as part of the impeachment trial?”

Instead of answering the question, McSally went after Raju.

“Manu, you’re a liberal hack. I’m not talking to you,” she said, and after he tried to ask the same question, she repeated, “You’re a liberal hack.”

Unsurprisingly, Raju was furious following the exchange, and took to the airwaves to attack McSally.

Raju whined during a later appearance, claiming that McSally “lashed out” at him.

“Sen. Martha McSally, a Republican facing a difficult election race, lashed out when I asked if she would consider new evidence as part of the Senate trial,” he said.

Unsurprisingly, the entire liberal media came out to support Raju.

The Washington Post claimed it is “extremely unbecoming for a U.S. Senator to sink to this level and treat a member of the press this way for simply doing his job.”

It should also be “unbecoming” for a news publication like the Washington Post to attack a 16-year-old high school student without any evidence, but that’s exactly what the Post did to Nick Sandmann a year ago.

No matter what her answer was CNN would have spun it as a negative.

CNN President Jeff Zucker has continually made clear the entire goal of his network is to attack Trump.

He routinely bans voices he disagrees with, like Roger Stone, who is not allowed to appear on the network after he insulted one of their anchors online.

This is just further proof they are nothing more than a Fake News Network.

Do you think that CNN is fake news?

Let us know your thoughts in the comment section below.

Continue Reading

CNN

Donald Trump just shut down Jim Acosta with this one word

Published

on

Jim Acosta is the poster child of fake news over at CNN.

Acosta’s grandstanding to create viral moments is one reason the White House canceled the daily press briefing.

And now Donald Trump just shut down Jim Acosta with this one word.

At an Oval Office meeting where President Trump celebrated religious freedom, Acosta began badgering the President about his relationship with indicted Ukrainian businessman Lev Parnas.

Parnas – who was an associate of Rudy Giuliani – is now claiming everything he did in Ukraine to supposedly pressure the Ukrainian president to investigate Joe Biden was done with the full knowledge and consent of the President.

As supposed “evidence” of his relationship with President Trump Parsan released photographs that anyone would get if they attended a fundraiser.

While Acosta was heckling the President, President Trump tried to patiently explain that he never remembered having any conversations with Parnas and didn’t know him well.

Acosta refused to let the President answer and berated the President with more “questions.”

Finally, President Trump’s patience reached its end and he simply told Acosta, “quiet.”

Acosta shut right up.

Few Americans believe Acosta is an actual journalist.

Acosta never breaks any news and critics like President Trump allege he invents sources.

Millions of Americans cheered when the White House revoked Acosta’s press pass after Acosta belligerently interrupted the President’s press conference after the 2018 midterms.

Unfortunately, judges let him back on the White House grounds.

But If Acosta is going to roam the White House and act like a Democrat Party operative then the President’s supporters will be pleased to see Trump treat him as such.

Pants on Fire News will keep you up-to-date on any new developments in this ongoing story.

Continue Reading

Sign Up For FREE Alerts

Loading...

Poll of the Day

  • The failing New York Times released yet another hit piece on Justice Brett Kavanaugh re-hashing debunked smears.



    The Times failed to mention the alleged victim didn't recall the supposed "incident." In response, President Trump called for “the resignation of everybody at The New York Times involved in the Kavanaugh smear story.”

Trending