Connect with us

The New York Times

Pulitzer Prize-winning reporter made a jaw-dropping confession about January 6



The Democrats have been desperate for a bogeyman to attack ever since Donald Trump left office.

They’ve been milking the specter of the Capitol Hill riot for all it’s worth.

But one Pulitzer Prize-winning reporter made a jaw-dropping confession about January 6.

Democrats and their Fake News Media allies have been using January 6 as a pretext to vanquish Donald Trump and all of his supporters.

Nancy Pelosi’s House January 6 Select Committee turned out to be a dud as most Americans simply didn’t care.

And New York Times National Security Correspondent Matthew Rosenberg said as much on candid camera.

An investigative journalist for Project Veritas recorded Rosenberg essentially saying that the Democrats and their Fake News Media allies went overboard in their coverage of January 6.

Rosenberg said, “It was, like, me and two other colleagues who were there [January 6] outside and we were just having fun! […] I know I’m supposed to be traumatized, but, like, all these colleagues who were in the [Capitol] building and are, like, ‘Oh, my God. It was so scary!’ I’m, like, ‘F*ck off!’”

But that’s not what Democrats and Never-Trumpers were saying publicly.

Some even had the gall to say that January 6 was worse than 9/11 and Pearl Harbor.

Rosenberg continued, “I’m, like, come on. It’s not the kind place I can tell someone to man up, but I kind of want to be, like, ‘Dude, come on. You were not in any danger . . . These f*cking little dweebs who keep going on about their trauma. Shut the f*ck up. They’re f*cking b*tches.”

Yet the Times and other outlets tried to sell the public on the idea that American democracy was seconds away from being usurped by a vegan in a buffalo horn helmet.

Rosenberg also shot down the notion that the riot was a coordinated insurrection, explaining, “They were making too big a deal. They were making this an organized thing that it wasn’t.”

The only aspect that seemed coordinated was the mysterious agent provocateur Ray Epps who was seen the day before urging people to go “into the Capitol,” but the crowd responded by calling him a “fed.”

On the topic of federal agents at the Capitol, Rosenberg said, “There were a ton of FBI informants amongst the people who attacked the Capitol.”

That presence of informants was reported by The Times, but Democrats have studiously avoided expounding on that topic.

The bottom line is that even the Democrats know January 6 was an oversold media crisis, the last of many during Donald Trump’s Presidency.

Pants on Fire Official Polling


Paul Krugman said something so outrageous about Black Lives Matter your eyes will roll out of your head



The so-called mainstream media have incinerated their credibility.

They can no longer rein in the radicalism of the extremist Left.

Now, Paul Krugman said something so outrageous about Black Lives Matter your eyes will roll out of your head.

Democrats are attempting to gaslight the American people.

Democrats and their corporate-controlled media allies want everyone to believe that it’s the Right that has gone crazy, not the Left.

And New York Times “economist” Paul Krugman wrote a mind-numbing defense of the Left’s extremism.

“How many Republicans believe that President Biden and other leading Democrats are left-wing radicals, indeed Marxists?” Krugman randomly asked. “Relatedly, I’d like to know how many Republicans believe that Black Lives Matter demonstrators looted and burned large parts of America’s major cities.”

First, Krugman is playing a game with the qualifier “leading” Democrats.

That allows him to weasel out of defending open Democratic Socialists like Senator Bernie Sanders, The Squad — Congresswomen Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY), Ilhan Omar (D-MN), Rashida Tlaib (R-MI), and Ayanna Pressley (D-MA), — Congressman Jamaal Bowman (D-NY), and Congressman Mondaire Jones (D-NY) to name a few.

Being closely affiliated with the Democratic Socialists of America certainly makes them definitionally “Marxist.”

Also, the co-founders of Black Lives Matter self-identify as “trained Marxists.”

And on the issue of BLM, Krugman threw in “large parts” of major cities to get around the months of carnage Americans witnessed in the summer of 2020.

The entire nation saw the “fiery but mostly peaceful” rioting and looting that took place in Democrat-controlled cities firsthand.

“The protests were, in fact, overwhelmingly peaceful,” Krugman claimed. “Yes, there was some arson and looting, with total property damage typically estimated at $1 billion to $2 billion. That may sound like a lot, but America is a big country, so it needs to be put in perspective.”

This is a jaw-dropping justification for the damage that was incurred.

Worse yet, it’s not even close to being accurate.

Those are just the insurance claims that were filed, as many small businesses were uninsured or only partially insured.

The actual damage was significantly higher, and Krugman ignores the economic impact of businesses being closed temporarily, or even permanently thanks to left-wing outrage mobs.

Parts of some inner cities still have not recovered from the 1960s riots.

Krugman gets paid handsomely by The New York Times to be perpetually wrong about the economy.

Most recently, he was forced to pen a piece in which he admitted “I was wrong about inflation.”

Now, he’s extending his wrongness to the culture at-large.

This is why the American people have lost so much trust in the corporate-controlled media.

They are clearly lying in order to defend the Democrat establishment.

Pants on Fire Official Polling

Continue Reading

The New York Times

The New York Times is attempting to scare Democrats to the polls with one threat after the Supreme Court’s landmark decision



The Democrats are losing ground in the midterms.

They need something to get voters to the polls.

And the New York Times is attempting to scare Democrats to the polls with one threat after the Supreme’s landmark decision.

Ever since the Supreme Court’s Dobbs decision that overturned Roe v. Wade, Democrats have been in panic mode.

The abortion issue was kicked back to the individual states, but the Left is still pretending as if we just teleported back to 1637.

And they’re attempting to broaden their arguments over the abortion issue in order to rally voters to the polls.

That’s why The New York Times is now suggesting that gay marriage, and even interracial marriage, are on the chopping block.

The Times also tried to tie same-sex marriage to drag shows aimed at children.

“In Arizona, Kari Lake, a candidate for Governor endorsed by Donald J. Trump, affirmed in a June 29 debate her support for a bill barring children from drag shows — the latest target of supercharged rhetoric on the right,” The New York Times claimed.

The Left’s defense of stripteases aimed at children is despicable.

Their paranoia around marriage arose from Justice Clarence Thomas’s concurring opinion in the Dobbs decision, in which he said that the Court should look at the faulty substantive due process reasoning in Obergefell v. Hodges, which enshrined gay marriage as a nationwide institution.

First, Justice Samuel Alito said that the Dobbs decision only affected abortion, and there is no political will to undo Obergefell, even though the legal reasoning was shaky, which was Thomas’s point.

And there is no basis for interracial marriage to be undone, yet Democrats are pushing that narrative.

“The dominoes have started to fall, and they won’t just stop at one,” Michigan Democrat Attorney General Dana Nessel said, before adding, “People should see the connection between reproductive rights, L.G.B.T.Q. rights, women’s rights, interracial marriage — these things are all connected legally.”

However, Loving v. Virginia, the case that struck down anti-miscegenation laws, was an equal protection case under civil rights legislation, not substantive due process.

But Democrats need something to strike fear in the hearts of voters.

Unfortunately for them, they don’t even realize how unreasonable they sound.

For instance, The Times piece tried to fearmonger about actions Republican legislatures were taking, and none of it sounded ghastly in the way that the Left intended.

“Louisiana became the 18th state, all with G.O.P.-led legislatures, to ban transgender students from playing on sports teams that match their gender identity,” The Times bemoaned. “Laws to prohibit transitioning medical treatments to people under 18, such as puberty blockers, hormones and surgeries — which advocates call gender-affirming care — have been enacted by four states.”

“And after Gov. Ron DeSantis of Florida signed a law in March banning classroom discussion of sexual orientation and gender identity in early grades, more than a dozen other states moved to imitate it,” they continued in horror.

Even a majority of Florida Democrats agreed with Governor DeSantis on the Parental Rights in Education bill, which is a clear sign that the leftist radicals are out of touch.

Pants on Fire Official Polling

Continue Reading

The New York Times

In an extreme “pants on fire” moment a New York Times writer’s trousers are still smoldering



The New York Times is a propaganda machine for Joe Biden and anyone else on the leftist fringe.

And the words one writer just shoved in Donald Trump’s mouth will leave you smoking mad.

It’s an extreme “pants on fire” moment — and this New York Times writer’s trousers are definitely still smoldering.  

As the January 6 committee’s narrative begins to collapse, the corporate-controlled media’s spin is kicking into overdrive. 

They’re so desperate to vanquish former President Donald Trump from the political scene that they’ve resorted to all kinds of tricks in addition to blatant lying. 

Recently, so-called “journalist” Luke Broadwater penned a story for The New York Times that has old-time hard news journalists spinning in their graves. 

Most of what you needed to know about the article featuring a Democrat who is on the January 6 committee was contained in the headline: “Raskin Brings Expertise on Right-Wing Extremism to January 6 Inquiry.”

If you believe Broadwater, the Maryland Democrat is an avenging angel uncovering “the role of domestic extremists” in the January 6 riot in a “five-year effort to crush a dangerous movement.” 

But as it turns out, Raskin has been a know-it-all busybody for some time now. 

And The New York Times is desperate to convince Americans they care enough to stay awake through the January 6 Committee’s rambling attempts to frame President Trump as the ultimate political boss bad guy. 

“Now, with millions of Americans expected to tune in, Mr. Raskin — along with Representative Stephanie Murphy, Democrat of Florida — is set to take a leading role in a hearing that promises to dig deeply into how far-right groups helped to orchestrate and carry out the Jan. 6 assault at the Capitol — and how they were brought together, incited and empowered by President Donald J. Trump,” Broadwater wrote. 

The writer then took a brief reprieve from accusing Donald Trump of things he didn’t do before literally putting words in the former President’s mouth. 

While waxing eloquent about Raskin’s role as a left-wing hero, Broadwater dropped in a whopper big enough to make Pinocchio’s nose grow an extra three feet by claiming that Donald Trump called white supremacists in Charlottesville, Virginia “very fine people.”

Of course, that never happened.

But Democrats are so desperate they’re willing to completely abandon the truth. 

And media hacks like Broadwater are more than happy to help keep the lies flowing to accomplish their own political agendas. 

Pants on Fire News will keep you up-to-date on any developments to this ongoing story.

Continue Reading

Sign Up For FREE Alerts

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.