The corporate-controlled media spent years chasing down the conspiracy theory about Donald Trump colluding with the Russian government during the 2016 campaign.
That narrative finally collapsed.
And one indictment just proved Trump right about everything he said about liberal media bias.
John Durham’s indictment of former Clinton campaign attorney Michael Sussmann now means more people were charged with fabricating the Russian collusion hoax than were ever charged for colluding with Russia.
Durham alleged that Sussmann lied to the FBI about not working on behalf of a client when Sussmann met with FBI attorney James Baker in 2016 and peddled the story – one that Durham’s indictment shows Sussmann knew to be bogus – that a server in Trump Tower transmitted data back and forth with the Kremlin-affiliated Alfa bank.
Investigative journalist Glenn Greenwald wrote on his substack about how the collapse of the Alfa bank story revealed the worst practices of the corporate-controlled media, where some members purposefully told lies that were politically advantageous for Hillary Clinton and the Democrat Party.
“Spurred on by Hillary Clinton herself, the liberal sector of the corporate media used this fake claim to bolster their narrative that Trump and the Russians were secretly in cahoots. And the story of how they spread this disinformation involves not just the potential criminality outlined in this indictment of Hillary’s lawyer but, even more seriously, a rotted and deeply corrupted media,” Greenwald wrote.
Greenwald wrote that the worst actors in the corporate-controlled media – Rachel Maddow and CNN’s Natasha Bertrand – were rewarded with massive ratings or financially lucrative promotions despite repeatedly misleading their audience by spreading Russian collusion lies and disinformation.
“Journalists who lied most shamelessly and frequently in service of the CIA and DNC’s Russia-gate narrative were the ones most rewarded by the industry,” Greenwald added, linking to an April story he wrote slamming CNN for hiring Natasha Bertrand from Politico after she pushed the Russiagate story for The Atlantic.
“Bertrand produced dozens of Russia-gate articles for the site that were so unhinged that they made Rachel Maddow look sober, cautious and reliable,” Greenwald wrote.
The Russian collusion hoax was not just a black eye for America because it exposed a Deep State that tried to overthrow democracy.
These conspiracy theories about the Trump campaign colluding with Russia only festered for so long because a corrupt media gave them oxygen because so-called “journalists” hated Donald Trump so much they were willing to run with a lie if they thought it would bring down Trump.
Pants on Fire News will keep you up-to-date on any new developments in this ongoing story.
The word police at the Associated Press are now shockingly censoring one word
The Left always tries to control language.
It’s one of the only ways they can sell their radical ideas.
Now the word police at the Associated Press are shockingly censoring one word.
The horrific mass shooting in Buffalo has managed to knock abortion out of the headlines.
The Fake News Media is going all-in on the white supremacist attack in order to pin the responsibility on Republicans.
It’s an absurd argument, but the Democrats are shameless.
In fact, they’re even manipulating language.
The Associated Press Stylebook does not want the killer’s 180-page ramblings to be classified as a manifesto.
The AP wrote on Twitter, “We don’t use the term manifesto in reference to a racist diatribe. It glorifies racist hatred. Other terms such as diatribe, screed or writings can work instead.”
We don't use the term manifesto in reference to a racist diatribe. It glorifies racist hatred. Other terms such as diatribe, screed or writings can work instead.
— APStylebook (@APStylebook) May 16, 2022
However, centrist feminist Christina Hoff Sommers quickly corrected the AP.
Sommers wrote, “You are confused. Hitler’s Mein Kampf & rantings of the Unabomber are routinely referred to as “manifestos.” For example: Encyclopedia Britannica. “Mein Kampf, (German: “My Struggle”) political manifesto written by Adolf Hitler.”
You are confused. Hitler’s Mein Kampf & rantings of the Unabomber are routinely referred to as “manifestos.” For example: Encyclopedia Britannica. “Mein Kampf, (German: “My Struggle”) political manifesto written by Adolf Hitler. https://t.co/Y036sCNnpj.
— Christina Sommers (@CHSommers) May 17, 2022
Perhaps the Left don’t want to dirty up the word manifesto because of their fondness for Karl Marx’s “Communist Manifesto.”
Marx’s evil ideas have festered for nearly 200 years, eating away at society and poisoning a new generation of impressionable minds.
In fact, the Buffalo shooter wrote in his manifesto that he used to be a communist, but currently identifies as “mild-moderate authoritarian left.”
The shooter also wore the black sun insignia, a symbol sometimes used by the neo-Nazi Azov Battalion of Ukraine.
He also said that one of his main inspirations was the Christchurch shooter in New Zealand, who had trained with Azov prior to committing his despicable massacre at a mosque.
Both the Buffalo shooter and the Christchurch shooter claimed to be radical environmentalists.
All of these facts are inconvenient for the Left because they tacitly support the Azov Battalion in Ukraine, and they’re trying to blame the shooting on Fox News, even though he explicitly said in the manifesto that he hated Fox.
Democrats are trying to control the narrative, and that starts with controlling language.
Unfortunately for them, they no longer have a monopoly on the dissemination of information.
New journalistic standard proves the Democrats are complete liars on one issue
The ideas of the Left are utterly incoherent.
Yet, Democrats willfully go along with all of the crazy ideas.
And one new journalistic standard proves the Democrats are complete liars on one issue.
The Democrats are hopping mad over the abortion issue, which was rekindled after a Supreme Court leak of a draft opinion from Samuel Alito that suggests the overturning of Roe V. Wade.
The new battle over abortion has brought women’s issues front and center for the Left, but there is a glaring omission in their progressive rhetoric.
Suddenly, transgender men and nonsense terms like “birth people” are no longer part of the conversation.
The Associated Press Style Guide tried to clean up this obvious contradiction by issuing a new update.
The AP Style Guide update read, “Phrasing like pregnant people or people who seek an abortion seeks to include people who have those experiences but do not identify as women, such as some transgender men and some nonbinary people. Such phrasing should be confined to stories that specifically address the experiences of people who do not identify as women.”
In other words, it is okay to “erase” trans men and dispatch with idiotic terms like “pregnant persons” and “people who give birth.”
Democrats don’t want any distractions from their over-the-top pro-abortion zealotry.
The style guide update is a clear example of how Democrats will manipulate language in any way they can to achieve political power.
For example, in light of the 2020 Reign of Terror, the AP Style Guide suggested that outlets capitalize “black” when describing people of African descent.
The out-of-the-blue update made no sense other than to somehow contribute to the cultural “reparations” in the aftermath of George Floyd’s death.
Democrats are now trotting out the “my body, my choice” line that they abandoned during the peak of COVID hysteria when they were forcing people to take an experimental vaccine.
It’s quite stunning to witness the mental gymnastics of the Left when killing babies is at stake.
They have already renewed talks of packing the Supreme Court.
Luckily for them, Merriam Webster added a new definition of “court-packing” to dovetail with the newfangled Democrat definition of simply restoring ideological balance to the court.
That is utter nonsense.
The Democrats want the Supreme Court to remain a liberal super-legislature that will codify into law the agenda they can’t pass through Congress.
The Left have destroyed their credibility by torturing logic to such a hideous extent.
Unhinged leftist reporter says there will be no peace or safety until this happens to pro-lifers
The Left is totally out of control.
They will use just about any excuse to bring violence into their repertoire.
Now, this unhinged leftist reporter says there will be no peace or safety until this happens to all pro-lifers.
Violence is a part of who the Left is and what they do.
Violence is part of how they plan to take power, it is always part of their path to power.
And when the news broke in German-owned Politico that a leaked copy of a draft Supreme Court decision overturning Roe vs. Wade was out, violence was sure to be right behind it.
And it was.
A pro-life organization in Wisconsin was firebombed. Churches were vandalized, and at least one Supreme Court justice had to be moved to an undisclosed location due to violent protestors.
Pro-life college students who went to the steps of the Supreme Court to pray and peacefully demonstrate were attacked, spit on and shoved to the ground, and hundreds, if not thousands of threats were made by radical leftists around the country.
Including a reporter for Rewire News Group who called for “more” violence against pro-life Americans over the weekend as she celebrated the firebombing of the headquarters of a pro-life group in Wisconsin.
“More of this. May these people never know a moment of peace or safety until they rot in the ground,” Caroline Reilly wrote in a now-deleted tweet responding to a report from The New York Times about the firebombing.
Though Reilly has since removed the tweet, and in fact appears to have deleted her entire account, she didn’t do so until there was a firestorm of condemnation about her death threat against pro-lifers.
Just a few of the responses to Reilly; “Where are the police?” tweeted writer Rod Dreher, and activist Amy Kremer wondered where the response was from the FBI and the Department of Justice.
“How would they feel if the public started to Dox reporters that call for violence and arson? What if it came to their doorstep instead? People with a voice need responsibility when using it,” Republican Florida congressional candidate Vic DeGrammont wrote.
Republican strategist Matt Whitlock tagged Twitter support in his response to make sure they were aware of Reilly’s death threats (a lot of good that will do) “This feels a bit like calling for violence.”
But all the protests aside, nothing will be done to this reporter because she is on the “right side” of the political aisle for the DOJ and FBI.
Law enforcement only seeks to go after conservatives, not liberals, no matter how clear the violations.
Caroline Reilly will remain free to threaten death on even more people, let’s just hope she doesn’t actually follow through with her threats, because after all we know life means almost nothing to people like her.
Pants on Fire News will keep you up-to-date on any developments to this ongoing story.
Jen Psaki1 week ago
Jen Psaki’s new attack on Trump supporters is both embarrassing and hilarious
The View3 days ago
Joy Behar of The View issued one insane threat to a Republican congresswoman
The New York Times1 week ago
The New York Times wrote one obituary that will turn your stomach
The View2 weeks ago
Sunny Hostin of The View said something so shocking that the other women on the stage were left stunned
Politics1 week ago
Bill Maher admitted he didn’t know the truth about one Democrat talking point
Fake News Media2 weeks ago
This latest move by the The Fake News proves just how low they’ll go to protect Democrats
MSNBC5 days ago
An MSNBC host laughs off one of the most grotesque interviews ever
CNN1 week ago
CNN executives wanted to crawl under the boardroom table when they heard this embarrassing news