Connect with us

Censorship

One big lie about Tucker Carlson could chase him off the air

Published

on

The sharks are circling around Tucker Carlson.

Liberal activists believed they found the silver bullet to getting him fired.

And this one big lie about Carlson could chase him off the air.

Media reporters eagerly awaited the ratings numbers from Carlson’s shows in the wake of Media Matters trying to get him fired for provocative comments made over a decade ago on a shock jock’s radio program.

And media watchers delighted when the first episode of Carlson’s show had the slightest down tick in viewers.

The Wrap reports:

Tucker Carlson’s show slipped a bit in demo ratings on Monday, which was the Fox News host’s first episode since Media Matters unearthed old audio of Carlson making crude remarks about women and statutory rape during radio interviews.

Last night’s program drew 2.895 million viewers, with 495,000 of those coming from the key adults 25-54 demographic. Those numbers topped all of Tucker’s cable news competition, but they’re down from his quarter-to-date averages. Versus last Monday (2.862 million) and the same night last year (2.791 million), Carlson’s latest episode ticked up in total viewers.

Journalists can spin numbers any way they want.

Carlson’s show saw a down tick of around 20,000 viewers.

In the television ratings business that is a rounding error.

But it provided Carlson’s enemies in the fake news media a talking point to spook advertisers that Carlson is losing his audience and that the remaining sponsors should jump ship.

If more advertisers flee Carlson’s show, Fox may be forced to take him off the air.

And that is the ultimate goal of this campaign.

None of the people claiming they are offended by what Carlson said are actually offended by those remarks.

What really offends them is having conservatives given a media platform.

We will keep you up to date on any new developments in this ongoing story.

The Wrap claims Tucker Carlson’s ratings dropped due to Media Matters report. Pants on Fire Rating:

Continue Reading
5 Comments

5 Comments

  1. Anderson Sherry

    March 20, 2019 at 1:29 pm

    Leave Tucker alone! Love him & he tells the truth!

  2. Barb Brown

    March 25, 2019 at 10:12 pm

    Isn’t it sad people like maddow are crazy upset because Trump is innocent …..Those IDIOTS will do and say anything to harm the President of the United States….She is just another wack job with a big mouth…EVIL lib Traitors to OUR Country…..God Bless America and our President and our CHRISTIAN beliefs..

  3. Jennifer

    April 27, 2019 at 5:57 pm

    This is a warning to Liberal Media: LEAVE TUCKER ALONE! He is a truth-teller which this Country sorely needs in order to right ourselves from the most deliberate attempt to overturn a duly elected President in the history of the United States. I lay all reasons for the venom our Nation has suffered under at the dirty feet of people just like Don Lemon. So, watch it, buster. We’re onto your schemes. You are just this short of being charged with aid and abetting the enemy (LIBERAL NEWS MEDIA) with lies to unseat the President of the United States. That’s called TREASON! Punishable by DEATH! WE LOVE OUR COUNTRY AND ITS NOBLE AND HEROIC LEADER, PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP. WATCH YOUR MOUTH, LEMONI!

  4. Angie

    April 30, 2019 at 3:38 pm

    Tucker has on so many daffy liberals, that no one wants to watch any more..

  5. Marcia Shahon

    June 17, 2019 at 3:43 pm

    I watch Tucker every night and have for a long time.
    If any of our favorite programs are fired I for one will no longer watch Fox News….

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Censorship

Fox News just took Tucker Carlson off the air and it could be for good

Published

on

By

CNN and other Democrats have been trying to get Tucker Carlson fired for years.

They have finally succeeded.

And Fox News just took Tucker Carlson off the air and it could be for good.

Liberal activists — with the help of fake news CNN — targeted Carlson for sponsor boycotts because Carlson supports Donald Trump’s immigration agenda.

To the Left that makes him a racist.

And that drumbeat picked up new momentum after Carlson explained how liberal elites used a conspiracy theory about “white supremacy” in the wake of the Dayton and El Paso shootings to distract Americans from the fact that the economic system in America was rigged in favor of the powerful and against the working class.

Carlson defended his remarks the next night, but at the end of his show announced he was taking a vacation.

The Hollywood Reporter writes:

Tucker Carlson, who abruptly announced plans for a vacation at the end of his Fox News show on Wednesday night, will not be hosting Tucker Carlson Tonight on Thursday. But he’s surely hoping the show will feature a full load of advertisements, two days after he incited a fervent online backlash with a monologue dismissing the prevalence of white supremacy.

With the country still reeling from an apparently racism-inspired shooting in Texas on Saturday, Carlson called white supremacy a “hoax” and said “it is actually not a real problem in America.” He also called it “a conspiracy theory used to divide the country and keep a hold on power.”

Carlson’s remarks were swiftly condemned amid a new call for advertisers to back away from his primetime show.

His Wednesday night show featured an advertising load (27 spots) that was in line with his previous week of shows (26 per night), though the episode leaned more heavily on so-called house ads for Fox programming, featuring nine such ads compared with an average of 5.4 for the previous week.

Bill O’Reilly also announced in 2017 he was taking a vacation amid sponsor boycotts surrounding payoffs made by Fox News to women he allegedly sexually harassed.

O’Reilly never made it back on the air and was promptly fired.

Will Tucker Carlson suffer Bill O’Reilly’s fate?

Let us know your thoughts in the comments section below.

Continue Reading

Censorship

Fox News just exposed one thing Ilhan Omar doesn’t want you to know

Published

on

By

Ilhan Omar can’t keep herself out of trouble.

The Congresswoman has been involved in more first-term scandals than likely any other political figure in history.

And things just got even worse for her with Fox News exposing one thing Ilhan Omar doesn’t want you to know.

Rep. Ilhan Omar’s political scandals range from the disgusting — like making anti-Semitic remarks so vile the former leader of the Ku Klux Klan praises her — to outright criminal.

In recent months, she was caught committing campaign finance violations, and slapped with fines for the law breaking.

But that pales into comparison to the revelation that she was violating tax law by filing joint tax returns with somebody she wasn’t married to.

And to take things to a new extreme, there is new evidence claiming the person she was married to while committing tax fraud is her brother.

Jesse Waters of Fox News brought this up, exposing the fact that the Left-wing media is completely ignoring it.

Waters said:

Big news coming from Washington this week that you won’t hear about in the mainstream media. Allegations that Minnesota Congresswoman Ilhan Omar married her brother to circumvent immigration laws. The claims have been virtually ignored as a ‘right-wing’ conspiracy, but newly released marriage licenses obtained and tax returns we got, raise a lot of questions.

Waters then brought out Tiana Lowe of the Washington Examiner to go more in-depth.

She brought up screenshots from the Facebook page of her first husband, Ahmed Elmi, referring to Omar’s daughter as his niece.

Lowe explains these screenshots, and how they seem to prove that Elmi — Omar’s first husband — is her brother:

In these screenshots, Ahmed Elmi, you know the one that people are alleging is her brother, he does refer to himself as the uncle and that like her children are his nieces. And more disconcerting, when she obtained her divorce in 2017, under penalty of perjury she said that she had no way of contacting Elmi after the summer of 2011 and that his last known whereabouts were in London. But we obtained eviction records showing that Elmi was living in Minneapolis about 2.5 miles from her home with Hirsi, a full year after summer of 2011.

These are serious allegations.

And if it were a Republican in Omar’s position, the Fake News Media would be constantly talking about it.

Do you think the mainstream media is fair in their coverage?

Let us know your thoughts in the comment section below.

Continue Reading

Censorship

The New York Times just did one thing to ban conservatives online

Published

on

By

The once-respected New York Times has become nothing more than a rag where liberal elites rip on President Trump constantly.

No matter what Trump is doing to help America, they are firmly opposed to him.

And they just took things a step further by doing one thing to ban conservatives online.

Much of President Trump’s rise took place online.

While the entire mainstream media was working overtime to claim that President Trump is a joke candidate and a racist, independent online voices were spreading the truth about him.

So naturally, the mainstream media is now targeting these voices, trying to shut them up to regain the power they once had.

The New York Times did that over the weekend with a sensational front-page article titled “The Making of a YouTube Radical – How the Site’s Algorithms Played Into the Hands of the Far Right.”

The ominous-sounding article tells the story of a young man named Caleb Cain, who was introduced to “far-right” content through the video-sharing website YouTube.

They begin the article by stating, “Caleb Cain was a college dropout looking for direction. He turned to YouTube. … Soon, he was pulled into a far-right universe, watching thousands of videos filled with conspiracy theories, misogyny and racism.”

It went on, saying he was never actually “radicalized” towards racist content:

“Mr. Cain never bought into the far right’s most extreme views, like Holocaust denial or the need for a white ethnostate, he said. Still, far-right ideology bled into his daily life. He began referring to himself as a “tradcon” — a traditional conservative, committed to old-fashioned gender norms. He dated an evangelical Christian woman, and he fought with his liberal friends.”

Further down, the article states Cain eventually changed his views after watching left-wing videos.

So, in the end, he was never actually “radicalized.”

But the insidious nature of the New York Times’ article goes into who they claim “radicalized” Cain.

On the front cover of the newspaper, it features a number of conservative thinkers.

Among them is libertarian economist Milton Friedman, conservative commentator Ben Shapiro, and clinical psychologist and New York Times bestselling author Jordan Peterson.

The insinuation is that those voices, which represent a large segment of the American population’s views, are gateways to radicalization and need to be silenced.

Already, social media platforms are shutting down conservative thinkers left and right, and it is clear that The New York Times is trying to get more of those voices shut down, until conservative viewpoints aren’t allowed at all online.

Do you think conservatives should be allowed on social media platforms?

Let us know your thoughts in the comment section below.

Continue Reading

Sign Up For FREE Alerts

Loading...

Poll of the Day

  • After giving President Trump over 90% negative coverage, the mainstream media has earned the "Fake News" label.



    CNN and MSNBC have been caught red-handed peddling Democratic Party talking points and outright hoaxes to paint Trump supporters as "racist."

Trending