Connect with us

Culture

NBC News tried to paint abortionists as victims with a disgusting take that will make you sick

Published

on

The great state of Texas is taking a stand to defend the lives of the unborn.

Under the new law, abortion is banned after six weeks, which is when a heartbeat can be detected and when the overwhelming majority of abortions take place.

And NBC News tried to paint abortionists as victims with a disgusting take that will make you sick.

In a recent article, NBC News interviewed abortionists to attack the new Texas law.

Amy Hagstrom Miller, President and CEO of Whole Woman’s Health, an abortion facility, lamented that “My staff has to say no [Editor’s note: to killing babies] all the time, which is psychologically and emotionally difficult because they are trained to see everybody, but under this law, they have to serve as agents of the state and deny people care.”

NBC News made it sound like a travesty that the number of babies being slain by abortion has been reduced and that some of these abortuaries may end up having to close their doors.

The media tries to paint these so-called “clinics” as struggling businesses, but the reality of what they do is horrific.

The fact is, the Texas law is saving lives.

In every case, abortion is the intentional taking of human life.

For as much as the Left tries to claim to be “pro-science,” they completely ignore science and ethics on this issue.

Every unborn baby, fetus, embryo has its own unique human DNA from the moment of conception.

They are small individual humans, not simply “globs of cells” or part of the mother’s body.

According to Texas Right to Life, about 150 unborn babies are being saved every day in Texas as a result of the new law.

Texas is leading the way on defending life, and more states could follow soon.

Unlike virtually every significant state level pro-life law in recent history, the courts have allowed this law to take effect pending legal challenge.

Thanks to Supreme Court Justices appointed by President Trump, pro-lifers are cautiously optimistic that we could finally see the tragic Roe v. Wade decision overturned in the near future.

Overturning Roe would empower other states to follow Texas in protecting the unborn.

Pants on Fire Official Polling

Culture

An iconic magazine shows its true colors by cutting Melania Trump out of history

Published

on

Fashion magazines are basically high school cliques all grown up. 

Editors wield vast amounts of power and reshape culture to suit their every whim. 

Now, an iconic magazine is showing its true colors by cutting Melania Trump out of history. 

The subtle, yet ferocious jabs sent Trump’s way continue long after her husband left office. 

When the New York City elite gathered for the Met Gala recently, Jill Biden was front and center being honored as first lady and invited to give a speech before the event at the opening of a Vogue art exhibit. 

And bystanders were quick to note that a pre-Met Gala speech was yet another honor leftist elites were careful to avoid extending to Melania Trump. 

As She Knows put it, “it was clear that the ongoing snub of former First Lady Melania Trump was still in full effect.”

Michelle Obama also enjoyed the honor of opening an exhibit ahead of New York City’s most important social event back in 2014. 

But Melania apparently isn’t part of the grown-up version of the mean-girls clique. 

Of course, it wasn’t always that way. 

Back in 2005, Melania was featured on Vogue’s cover in what was advertised as an “exclusive” scoop on Donald Trump’s new bride. 

That was before her husband stormed Washington, D.C. and started draining The Swamp. 

Now, the former model turned first lady is persona non-grata. 

The magazine’s “First Ladies in Vogue” feature conveniently cut Melania out of high fashion history.

“According to longtime Vogue staffer and former friend Stephanie Winston Wolkoff in her tell-all book Melania and Me: The Rise and Fall of My Friendship With the First LadyMelania was offered a feature interview, but there was no ‘guarantee that Melania would appear on the cover,’ she wrote. That may sound unfair to Trump fans, but not every First Lady was given the cover of the magazine,” She Knows reported. 

Want to guess who did make the cover? Predictably, Jill Biden, Michelle Obama, and Hillary Clinton all made the cut. 

Meanwhile, neither Laura Bush or Barbara Bush were given front cover real estate.

The partisan politics at play are obvious when you’re looking for them.

However, we can guess most of Vogue’s readers aren’t political scientists, but rather women looking for social signaling cues to help them gain acceptance in society. 

The magazine’s snub of Republican women—especially a woman who has refused to go against her husband’s conservative take like Barbara and Laura Bush had a tendency to do—speaks loudly of what will and won’t be tolerated in society. 

Pants on Fire News will keep you up-to-date on any developments to this ongoing story.

Continue Reading

Culture

The Pulitzer Prize is about to get one ridiculous “woke” makeover

Published

on

Radical leftism is spreading.

Fringe theories that were stranded in academia have escaped and infested the media.

Now, the Pulitzer Prize is about to get one ridiculous “woke” makeover.

The Democrats have been infiltrated by the radical Left.

Activists on the fringes have either purged moderate liberals from left-leaning power centers or cudgeled them into compliance.

Now, the radicals want control of the Pulitzer Prize.

The cult of DIE (diversity, inclusivity, and equity) has become a core belief on the Left.

So it’s no surprise that DIE has come for the establishment’s shiniest journalism prize.

Myriad leftist groups have called for news organizations to participate in a diversity survey conducted by the News Leaders Association (NLA).

The groups wrote a letter to Marjorie Miller, Administrator of the Pulitzer Prizes, that read, “We are appealing to The Pulitzer Prizes to help us improve the diversity and transparency in the news industry. On Tuesday, April 12, Nieman Lab reported that there was ‘crushing resistance’ by news organizations to participate in an annual diversity survey by the News Leaders Association. The group planned to have 2,500 organizations participate and in the end only 303 completed this important survey. That is unacceptable.”

This is the radicalistic playbook that has been effective for 50 years: attack an institution (particularly a liberal one) as bigoted in some fashion until it gives concessions.

The groups’ big ask is for diversity to be considered in awarding a Pulitzer Prize.

The letter continued, “We are asking your organization to promote this survey and reporting of demographic data by adding the following criteria to your selection process for Pulitzer Prizes in Journalism: In order to qualify for an award, organizations must provide proof of participation in the most recent general survey/census by the News Leaders Association or another industry reporting system that shares data publicly, effective 2024 (i.e., they must participate in this year’s data collection to be eligible for awards/funding in 2024).”

Hollywood already caved in this regard.

The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences announced that soon films must meet diversity criteria in order to be considered for a Best Picture Oscar.

The Pulitzer Prize will have no choice but to meet the demands of the radical Left.

If not today, one day soon.

Liberals are defenseless against attacks from their left flank.

This tactic is how the radicals took over the Democratic Party.

Pants on Fire Official Polling

Continue Reading

Culture

NFL legend who teamed up with Ron DeSantis just put liars in the media to shame

Published

on

Democrats are out to slander Ron DeSantis and anyone in his general vicinity.

Even people who are nonpartisan catch flak.

But one NFL legend who teamed up with DeSantis just put liars in the media to shame.

The Democrats need an archvillain, and Florida governor Ron DeSantis has been thrust into that role with Donald Trump off social media.

And anybody near DeSantis is the object of public smears and denunciations.

Hall of Famer NFL coach Tony Dungy found that out the hard way when he supported a piece of legislation proposed by DeSantis.

The Hill reported that, “Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) signed a new law on Monday that will support programs that encourage involved fatherhood in the state. HB 7065, a $70 million initiative, will provide resources for educational and mentorship programs to help children, fathers and families in the state through the Department of Juvenile Justice (DJJ) and the Department of Children and Families (DCF). DJJ will create a mentorship program to help at-risk youth through the new initiative, hosting various programs such as barbershop talks and fatherhood classes.”

Under typical circumstances, such a bill would not be controversial, but it seems that Democrats hate DeSantis more than they love government programs.

Dungy was instantly slandered by leftist journalists, but he stood his ground and pointed out that he supported a similar initiative when Barack Obama was president.

Dungy reposted an old Obama quote that read, “We know the statistics — that children who grow up without a father are five times more likely to live in poverty and commit crime; nine times more likely to drop out of schools and 20 times more likely to end up in prison.”

In addition to appearing alongside DeSantis, Dungy is a devout Christian, which ruffles the feathers of the Left.

At the press conference, Dungy said, “This is going to be tremendous and such a good help to fathers in Florida…This bill is so important. I want to thank all of the men and women that have been behind this. It is going to allow groups like All Pro Dad and people like those here today to do great things for our fathers here in Florida.”

It didn’t take long for deranged leftists to slam both Dungy and DeSantis for promoting a bill aimed at helping childhood delinquents.

Keith Olbermann, who has completely gone insane, led the charge.

When it comes to leftists, it’s more important to hate Republicans than judge the merits of a particular piece of legislation.

Pants on Fire Official Polling

Continue Reading

Sign Up For FREE Alerts

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Trending