Connect with us

Featured

Megyn Kelly Revealed The Stunning Reason Why She Pulled Her Kids Out Of New York Schools

Published

on

K-12 educators are poisoning children’s minds.

Not even fancy preparatory schools are safe.

And Megyn Kelly revealed the stunning reason why she pulled her kids out of New York schools.

Conservatives lost the universities to the Left decades ago.

Now the corporate press refuse to cover the harmful nonsense being peddled in “higher” education.

The result has been a trickle-down effect with K-12 schools and other American institutions now being infected.

Grade schools are cesspools of indoctrination.

Political commentator Megyn Kelly drove that point home during a recent interview with Outkick.

Kelly explained that she pulled her son out of a tiny Manhattan prep school because it was pushing transgender ideology on the kids.

Kelly stated:

“In my sons’ school — the one we left because of these agendas — they asked the boys, one of the best all-boys schools in the country, whether they were ‘still sure’ they were boys…Are they ‘still sure’? They asked them that weekly. Weekly, as if they had changed their minds…And none of that was disclosed to the parents…It’s one of those things you find out when your kids come home after the fact. It’s outrageous, it’s confusing, and 100%, abusive.”

Books like Irreversible Damage by Wall Street Journal contributor Abigail Shrier have discussed how much of the current transgender phenomenon is a social contagion.

That’s why it’s so dangerous for schools to constantly plant seeds in young kids’ minds about transgenderism and gender fluidity.

Kelly also revealed that her son’s school told the kids that some of them would grow up to be killer cops.

This is the type of nonsense that $30,000 a year gets well-to-do parents.

Sadly, it’s the same in all too many public schools.

But Kelly also said that friends of hers who moved to Florida were stunned to find out that their private school-educated children were behind children in Florida public schools because those kids were actually learning valuable skills instead of unhinged woke-ism.

Slowly but surely more parents are speaking out in both fancy prep schools as well as public schools.

The parents with kids in private school are more apprehensive because they desperately want their children to go to Harvard, but even they are getting fed up.

The dam will have to break eventually.

The Left cannot continue to teach this nonsense without consequence.

Pants on Fire Official Polling

Featured

A New York Times reporter is under investigation over two profane phone calls

Published

on

The New York Times is under fire.

This is a major self-inflicted wound.

And this New York Times reporter is under investigation over two profane phone calls.

On Thursday, the National Association for Gun Rights posted audio of two deranged voicemails New York Times reporter Erin Marquis left with their Great Lakes Gun Rights affiliate.

Identifying herself as a New York Times reporter, Marquis cursed the group for not demanding the government ban and outright confiscate firearms in the wake of the school shooting in suburban Detroit.

“Hi, I’m a journalist with The New York Times,” Marquis ranted. “I’m just calling to wonder, I have two questions. How do you sleep at night? Aren’t you just, like, a little bit worried that there might be a hell, and when you meet God he might send you there? The only people politicizing this seems to be you, because you’re the only people I got a f*cking press release from. Again, I am from The New York Times, and I am letting everyone in The New York Times know what kind of f*cking a**holes you are. Congrats on being a laughingstock.”

Marquis called a second time and wished death upon individuals that worked at the pro-Second Amendment grassroots group.

“You f*cking ghouls, I hope that there is a God in heaven, so he judges you when you die,” Marquis added.

New York Times spokeswoman Danielle Rhoades Ha tried to distance The Times from Marquis by emphasizing that Marquis did not work in The Times actual newsroom but for a site affiliated with The Times.

As if that made Marquis’ profane threats any better or more professional.

“We are currently reviewing this matter, which involves an employee of Wirecutter, our product recommendation site,” Ha said in a statement adding that Marquis “does not work in the The New York Times newsroom.”

Everyone knows reporters are left-wing lunatics and Marquis provided audio proof.

Pants on Fire News will keep you up-to-date on any new developments in this ongoing story.

Continue Reading

Featured

Joy Reid’s Supreme Court meltdown will leave your jaw on the ground

Published

on

MSNBC’s Joy Reid is one of the most insane hosts on all of cable TV.

Tucker Carlson mockingly refers to Reid as “the race lady.”

And now Joy Reid’s Supreme Court meltdown will leave your jaw on the ground.

The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the case of Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health.

In this case, the state of Mississippi defended its ban on abortions after 15 weeks and asked the Supreme Court to overturn Roe v. Wade.

Oral arguments made it clear that all six of the Republican appointed justices would uphold the Mississippi law and that five of the conservative appointees were willing to go further and overturn Roe v. Wade entirely.

That led to a full-on corporate-controlled media freak out as the left-wing activists in the corporate-controlled press view abortion-on-demand as the holy sacrament for modern day socialism.

MSNBC’s Joy Reid threw one of the worst temper tantrums.

Reid ranted and raved about how there are alternatives to abortion such as adoption and safe haven laws that allow parents to give up children within 48 hours.

The MSNBC host fumed that the court’s conservatives viewed saving a baby’s life as a more fundamental right than some abortionist killing it.

“Mississippi’s defense of their 15-week abortion law makes a case that’s truly bizarre, arguing that things are different than they were back in the ’70s. That ‘Today, adoption is acceptable, and on a wide scale women attain both professional success and a rich family life.’ So why can’t we just force poor women and rape victims bring fetuses to term? Can they not just leave the babies at the doorstep of a firehouse and get back to the office?” Reid fumed.

Reid hysterically shouted into the camera that pro-lifers merely want to turn women into child birthing vessels because they believe the horror of abortion mills killing 62,000,000 babies since the Roe decision needed to come to an end.

“They are making the argument that a woman is essentially a vessel whose only purpose is to give birth. And that a woman has no other value or separate rights. Her job is to carry this, this being, that is it. That’s what you are supposed to do,” Reid exclaimed.

Literally no one believes that.

But it’s become a popular fantasy on the left since the debut of the Hulu show The Handmaid’s Tale, which is about a future America turned into a theocracy where women are forced into childbirth.

Pro-life laws are about saving the lives of innocent unborn babies who have no one to speak on their behalf.

Joy Reid and other corporate-controlled media activists believe these babies are expendable clumps of cells.

And they cannot deal with the fact that their long-cherished “right” to abortion on demand may come to an end.

Pants on Fire News will keep you up-to-date on any new developments in this ongoing story.

Continue Reading

Featured

Sean Hannity surprised everyone with this reaction to CNN suspending Chris Cuomo

Published

on

CNN faced a major crisis with regards to host Chris Cuomo.

It led to a major network shakeup.

And Sean Hannity surprised everyone with this reaction to CNN suspending Chris Cuomo.

CNN executives suspended Chris Cuomo indefinitely after documents from the New York State Attorney General’s office showed that Cuomo used his relationships with other media members to acquire intelligence and dirt on some of the women who accused his brother New York Governor Andrew Cuomo of sexual harassment and assault.

On his Fox News Channel show that night, Hannity covered CNN suspending Cuomo and offered a surprising take.

Hannity began by telling viewers that he often defends people he disagrees with on the grounds they have every right to share their views without fear of cancellation of censorship.

“I’ve defended with a lot of people that I don’t like or agree with,” Hannity began before naming “Comedians, Don Imus, even people that I really don’t like that much, Bill Maher, Joy Reid, but I believe in their right to exercise their freedom of speech, it’s a right I deeply believe in.”

Hannity explained that Chris Cuomo helped his brother at the lowest point of his life and that it was understandable that Chris Cuomo wanted to help a family member in need no matter what the circumstances were.

“But it’s easy to support people when things in life are going well, it’s always easy. Chris’ brother, Andrew, was in big trouble,” Hannity stated. “Helping a brother, and a friend, in the worst moment of their life, is probably not the worst offense and he probably lied to himself even though he handled it wrong in terms of his work.”

Hannity continued stating that he believed in second chances and he expected Chris Cuomo to apologize to viewers if CNN put him back on the air, but that it was ultimately up to the audience if they would accept the apology and tolerate Cuomo as a primetime cable TV host.

“If Chris does get back on the air, I assume he will apologize,” he concluded. “I believe in second chances when sincere apologies are made, but it’s you the audience that decides if the apology is sincere.”

Pants on Fire News will keep you up-to-date on any new developments in this ongoing story.

Continue Reading

Sign Up For FREE Alerts

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Trending