Connect with us

Fake News

Judge Andrew Napolitano’s advice to Kavanaugh could end The New York Times

Published

on

The New York Times is in hot water after being forced to retract outright lies relating to Justice Brett Kavanaugh.

Beyond simply losing credibility, the paper could end up in serious trouble.

And Judge Andrew Napolitano gave Kavanaugh advice that could end The New York Times.

During a recent “Fox & Friends” segment, network legal analyst Judge Andrew Napolitano questioned whether Justice Brett Kavanaugh could sue The New York Times.

Napolitano claims that, if The Times knowingly posted false information, as it appears they may have, then Kavanaugh has a serious case.

After all, they did publish a story detailing a new sexual misconduct allegation and then quickly retracted the most serious parts of it.

Breitbart reports:

Tuesday on Fox News Channel’s “Fox & Friends,” network legal analyst Andrew Napolitano posed the question asking if Supreme Court Associate Justice Brett Kavanaugh could sue The New York Times if an essay it published alleging he engaged in sexual misconduct was knowingly false.

Napolitano said if the circumstances were correct, he would have a case. However, he predicted it would not happen.

“Here’s an interesting one: Can Justice Kavanaugh sue The New York Times?” Napolitano said. “We know the standard is actual malice. Actual malice means did The New York Times publish something they knew was false, or did they publish it in reckless disregard to whether it was true or false? Is leaving out of the article the true statement that the victim does not recall this alleged event reckless disregard for the truth? He may actually have a case there. However, this is not going to happen. He doesn’t want to sue The New York Times. That’s going to open up pandora’s box for him.”

If Kavanaugh is able to prove they knowingly lied about him in order to push harmful allegations, it will forever tarnish The New York Times.

This entire debacle has already destroyed much of the credibility they had left.

A lawsuit could be what ultimately destroys them for good.

Should Justice Brett Kavanaugh sue The New York Times?

Let us know your thoughts in the comment section below.

Continue Reading
49 Comments

49 Comments

  1. Dennis B Anderson

    September 23, 2019 at 1:33 am

    I will think differently about our government when this no longer holds up, I DON`T RECALL, I DONT REMEMBER, YOU WILL HAVE TO GET BACK TO ME ON THAT ONE SENATOR? THIS PIECE OF WORK SHOULD BE IN THE GROUND FEEDING WORMS.

  2. B. J. Correu

    September 23, 2019 at 1:37 am

    I know he should but it would not be good for him to do so. They should be forced to retract what they wrote and put in the part they left out about the girl not remembering such an incident. The New York Times should be shut down for good. It would happen if people quit taking the paper and advertisers quit advertising,

  3. Alaska Woman

    September 23, 2019 at 6:24 am

    Blah,blah, blah ..
    Public figures are fair game.

  4. Patricia Overbey

    September 23, 2019 at 9:27 am

    Absolutely sue the NYT & THE VIEW A BUNCH OF NUTS.

  5. Joanne

    September 23, 2019 at 3:41 pm

    YES BRAD YOU ARE CORRECT IN SAYING THEY NEED TO BE SHUT DOWN. HOW TERRIBLE THAT THEY GET AWAY WITH SO MUCH FAKE NEWS!! SHUT THEM DOWN ASAP FOR GOOD!!!! THEY ALL NEED TO STOP PICKING ON BRETT. THEY ARE DRIVING THIS POOR MAN CRAZY AND IT IS NOT FAIR AT ALL.

  6. boone1

    September 23, 2019 at 5:42 pm

    Justice Brett Kavanaugh sue the pants off of the New York times.

  7. zee

    September 23, 2019 at 11:43 pm

    oh god, you’re HERE ??? lol
    Mind your manners.

  8. Fred

    September 26, 2019 at 11:06 pm

    Say Judge AN, this means That That School Child With A MAGA Cap On His Head, That The NYT On Purpose Cut That Pertinent Section Of Film Off In Reporting, Being Harrased By Some Of Those PLD Party Abusive Questionable ANTIFA Watchdogs, That A PLD Party Judge Deemed Insuficitant Evidence, Needs His 2nd Time In Front Of A Federal Judge, to make sure That The New York Times Get Up Comings, when reporting The True News Next Time And Every Time In The Future, STOP BEING BIASED!!!

  9. N

    September 29, 2019 at 10:54 pm

    DS traitors are everywhere!The evil corrupted to the core liberal demoncrat Commie Nazi’s party & minions RINOs(Lee,Moran,Murkowski,Portman,Toomey,Wicker,Blunt,Graham,Collins,Romney,Rubio,etc)they’re just as bad!Drain the rat infested Swp,Pres Trump!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CNN

CNN’s latest hire just proved Donald Trump’s worst fears true

Published

on

CNN is hiding something from the American people.

It’s a terrible secret that could affect the outcome of the 2020 election.

And CNN’s latest hire just proved Donald Trump’s worst fears true.

CNN claims it is a news network.

The President and millions of Americans say otherwise and label CNN as “fake news.”

And CNN just proved the President true when the Fake News Network hired this former New York Times journalist and CNBC correspondent as its new White House correspondent.

Harwood is a comic book villain version of every conservative’s worst nightmare of how the liberal media actually operates.

The Republican National Committee canceled a debate with NBC in 2016 because of Harwood’s outrageous and biased performance as a moderator during an October 2015 CNBC debate.

In the WikiLeaks release of John Podesta’s email there was even one email from Harwood to Podesta – who was serving as the Clinton campaign chairman – asking Podesta what questions he should ask Jeb Bush during the CNBC debate.

At the time, many in the professional political world still assumed Donald Trump’s candidacy was a joke and that Jeb Bush would be the eventual nominee.

And a supposed “journalist” like Harwood colluded with the Democrat frontrunner’s campaign to sabotage the candidate Hillary’s campaign thought would be their eventual opponent.

Harwood’s attempts at rigging debates means he will transition seamlessly into his new job at fake news CNN where then-contributor Democrat National Committee Chairwoman Donna Brazile rigged a 2016 town hall against Bernie Sanders by slipping questions to the Clinton campaign in advance.

Pants on Fire News will keep you up-to-date on any new developments in this ongoing story.

Continue Reading

Fake News

Rachel Maddow just brought down impeachment with this mind-blowing interview

Published

on

Democrats thought their impeachment prayers were answered.

At the last possible moment, a surprise witness stepped forward promising a smoking gun that would destroy Donald Trump.

But that went down in flames when Rachel Maddow brought down impeachment with this mind blowing interview.

Rachel Maddow hosted indicted Rudy Giuliani associate Lev Parnas on her show for the first of a two part interview just as Democrats were transmitting articles of impeachment to the Senate.

Parnas – without citing any evidence – made claims about President Trump ordering Parnas to pressure Ukraine to announce investigations into Joe and Hunter Biden.

Trump supporters smelled a rat.

Former White House chief strategist Steve Bannon appeared on Trish Regan’s Fox News Business Channel show and stated Maddow made herself into a witness of fact.

“First off, Rachel Maddow should be a witness of fact now. She should be brought in,” Bannon declared.

Bannon went to say Republicans should subpoena all emails, texts, and phone call logs between Maddow, her producers, NBC news executives with Parnas and his lawyers and leading Democrats like Adam Schiff to see if NBC colluded with the Democrats to drop this hit piece at the most politically advantageous time.

“We ought to have all the emails and all the text messages between Schiff, between Nancy Pelosi, Phil Griffin at MSNBC News. We ought to bring the whole thing out. How did this get dropped? Why have they been working on this for so long? How did this just come about at the last second? She admitted she’s been working on this for months, and the House just got this. The Republicans didn’t even see this when the vote went down,” Bannon added. “This is now a complete farce.”

“I think there was collusion between MSNBC, Rachel Maddow, Lev Parnas’ attorneys, and the entire process,” Bannon concluded.

Behind the scenes collusion by the Democrats has been at the heart of this impeachment farce from the very start.

Adam Schiff and his staff coordinated with alleged whistleblower Eric Ciaramella to get the ball rolling.

And now Schiff and Pelosi may be in cahoots with Rachel Maddow and Lev Parnas’ lawyers to try and drop one last bombshell on the President on the eve of the impeachment trial.

Pants on Fire News will keep you up-to-date on any new developments in the ongoing stuff.

Continue Reading

CNN

One CNN reporter was furious after what this Trump ally said straight to his face

Published

on

CNN has spent every day since Trump took office trying to destroy him.

Despite their blatant bias, they still continue to claim they are a fair media outlet.

And one CNN reporter was furious after what this Trump ally said straight to his face.

With impeachment in full swing, CNN is working overtime to help the Democrats push it across the finish line, and remove President Trump.

In doing so, they are going after Republican allies of the President.

And in an ambush-style questioning, CNN reporter Manu Raju caught up with Republican Sen. Martha McSally in the Capitol building.

He caught her as she was trying to enter her office, and asked: “Senator McSally, should the Senate consider new evidence as part of the impeachment trial?”

Instead of answering the question, McSally went after Raju.

“Manu, you’re a liberal hack. I’m not talking to you,” she said, and after he tried to ask the same question, she repeated, “You’re a liberal hack.”

Unsurprisingly, Raju was furious following the exchange, and took to the airwaves to attack McSally.

Raju whined during a later appearance, claiming that McSally “lashed out” at him.

“Sen. Martha McSally, a Republican facing a difficult election race, lashed out when I asked if she would consider new evidence as part of the Senate trial,” he said.

Unsurprisingly, the entire liberal media came out to support Raju.

The Washington Post claimed it is “extremely unbecoming for a U.S. Senator to sink to this level and treat a member of the press this way for simply doing his job.”

It should also be “unbecoming” for a news publication like the Washington Post to attack a 16-year-old high school student without any evidence, but that’s exactly what the Post did to Nick Sandmann a year ago.

No matter what her answer was CNN would have spun it as a negative.

CNN President Jeff Zucker has continually made clear the entire goal of his network is to attack Trump.

He routinely bans voices he disagrees with, like Roger Stone, who is not allowed to appear on the network after he insulted one of their anchors online.

This is just further proof they are nothing more than a Fake News Network.

Do you think that CNN is fake news?

Let us know your thoughts in the comment section below.

Continue Reading

Sign Up For FREE Alerts

Loading...

Poll of the Day

  • The failing New York Times released yet another hit piece on Justice Brett Kavanaugh re-hashing debunked smears.



    The Times failed to mention the alleged victim didn't recall the supposed "incident." In response, President Trump called for “the resignation of everybody at The New York Times involved in the Kavanaugh smear story.”

Trending