Connect with us


Jon Stewart just got some sobering news about his television comeback



Jon Stewart is back after a long hiatus.

But nobody seemed to notice or care.

And Stewart just got some sobering news about his television comeback.

Former Daily Show host Jon Stewart is back after several years away from the game, but the game has apparently passed him by.

He blazed a trail for left-wing comics to host boring shows that parrot the talking points of the Democratic Party.

But now the market is oversaturated, and nobody is watching his new show The Problem with Jon Stewart.

The New York Post reported that “Jon Stewart is struggling to gain traction on his new talk show…’The Problem with Jon Stewart,’ which launched on AppleTV+ in September, appears to be a flop, as it trails far behind its competitors on broadcast and cable TV…The show’s first episode was seen by just 180,000 US homes in the first week it debuted last fall, measurement firm Samba TV said. That number dropped to 78% to 40,000 by its fifth episode, which aired in early March. Stewart’s comic rival John Oliver, meanwhile, pulled in viewership of 844,000 US homes for a March episode of his HBO show, ‘Last Week Tonight with John Oliver,’ Samba TV reported.”

The real “problem” for Stewart is that he’s competing with John Oliver, Jimmy Kimmel, Jimmy Fallon, Seth Meyers, Trevor Noah, Samantha Bee, and James Corden for the same progressive talk show lane.

Even if people were starved for left-wing comic shows, there are too many options, and they’re all saying the same thing.

For example, Stewart recently had a segment on his show called “the problem with white people” where he went on a tirade about systemic racism and oppression and all the talking points regurgitated by every other leftist over the past five years.

Stewart had on centrist political commentator Andrew Sullivan, and Stewart and his co-panelists hectored Sullivan for several minutes, portraying him as a racist.

Sullivan later wrote of the experience, “[I]t became clear that Stewart was not conducting a televised debate, but initiating a struggle session. The point of the session was not to discuss anything, but to further enforce the dogma he had pronounced. So I found myself in the equivalent of one of those workplace indoctrination seminars — in which any disagreement is regarded as a form of ‘hate’ or ‘ignorance.’ But worse: I was in a struggle session with a live mob sitting in, cheering and jeering, which Stewart led and orchestrated. For good measure, Stewart called me a racist and told me I was not ‘living in the same f*cking country as we are,’ and went on to angrily call me a ‘motherf*cker.’”

Perhaps Stewart’s lane is calling his guests MFers.

That would be somewhat of a departure from the other conveyor belt of leftist hosts.

Maybe then people would watch.

Pants on Fire Official Polling


The Fake News Media is desperately ignoring this major Biden Crime Family scandal



The Democrat Media Complex is getting bolder in the stories it neglects.

The advent of alternative media makes it harder for news organizations to avoid bombshell reports.

And the Fake News Media is desperately ignoring this major Biden Crime Family scandal.

The escapades of the Biden Crime Family have become impossible to ignore, yet the corporate-controlled press is dutifully doing just that.

Hunter Biden and his uncle, Jim Biden, have been raking in cash for years as Joe Biden “served” as a U.S. Senator, Vice President, and now, President of the United States.

And the level of corruption is simply too difficult to keep under wraps for the establishment.

During a Senate Judiciary Committee meeting, FBI Director Christopher Wray was asked about influence-peddling that goes on with family members of prominent politicians getting paid by foreign governments.

“If the FBI received information that foreign persons had evidence of improper or unlawful financial payments to elected officials or other politically-exposed persons, would that pose a national security concern?” Senator Chuck Grassley asked Wray.

Hunter Biden is currently under federal investigation by the FBI, and his exploits are well-documented, so it’s quite clear that Senator Grassley had him in mind when asking the question.

“Well, I think the kind of conduct you’re describing is typically something that very closely, through our efforts at malign foreign influence, it starts to shade into a blend of what we call malign foreign influence with potential public corruption,” Wray responded. “And it’s something we take seriously.”

The so-called mainstream media worked overtime to suppress the shady dealings of Hunter Biden in the days leading up to the 2020 Presidential election.

The New York Post’s “laptop from hell” scandal was openly suppressed by Big Tech companies, like Twitter and Facebook.

In fact, Twitter even locked The Post out of its account, and would not even allow the story to be shared via private direct messages.

And the corporate-controlled press summarily dismissed the laptop story as “Russian disinformation.”

Worse yet, 50 former senior intelligence community officials co-signed that the laptop story was “Russian disinformation,” when it obviously was not – as has now been proven.

“Republicans in both chambers of Congress have suggested that the Biden family’s business dealings could constitute a national security risk,” The Daily Caller reported. “Florida Rep. Matt Gaetz directly asked an assistant Attorney General whether or not Biden is personally a ‘national security threat,’ and a report released in 2020 by Grassley and [Wisconsin Senator Ron] Johnson found at least one Obama administration official warned that the Burisma position ‘could create the perception of a conflict of interest.’”

It’s impossible to deny that Hunter Biden collecting $83,000 per month from Ukrainian energy company Burisma for a no-show board position sure looks like “malign foreign influence.”

Continue Reading


Mika Brzezinski just said two words about Joe Biden that will make you bust a gut laughing



Joe Biden is on track to be one of the least popular Presidents ever.

Even most Democrats don’t want Biden to run for a second term.

But Mika Brzezinski just said two words about Joe Biden that will make you bust a gut laughing.

On MSNBC’s Morning Joe, Mika Brzezinski interviewed Rep. Elissa Slotkin (D-MI), and expressed shock that two Democrat members of Congress recently declared they don’t want President Joe Biden to run again.

“But I was very taken by a debate, a part of a debate between two Members of Congress running for re-election,” Brzezinski said. “They were asked a pretty simple question. And given the discussion you just had about Roe, and about women’s rights. I do know that President Biden, he speaks really eloquently about this issue and about a number of other issues.”

Saying that Joe Biden “speaks eloquently” is quite the claim.

Who can forget such eloquent statements like “You ever been to a caucus?… No you haven’t. You’re a lying dog-faced pony soldier.”

Or his most eloquent interpretation of the Declaration of Independence: “We hold these truths to be self-evident: all men and women are created, by the, you know the, you know the thing.”

But perhaps the most eloquent Joe Biden moment was when he told the epic tale of when he single-handedly defeated the infamous bad-dude “Cornpop.”

Brzezinski also claimed that President Biden has made “accomplishments on the world stage” and that Democrat support for a second term “shouldn’t even be a question.”

She even claimed that Biden has “kept potential world war at bay.”

But to Brzezinski’s dismay, many in the Democrat Party are not so keen on the geriatric Biden running for a second term.

A CNN poll recently showed that 75% of Democrat voters want someone other than Joe Biden to run in 2024.

Of course, Joe Biden will be 81-years-old in 2024.

It’s clear to anyone that isn’t a leftist partisan that his mental faculties are in decline.

Not to mention the fact that his approval rating through his first year and a half in office is lower than any other President in American history.

As much as Fake News reporters, like Mika Brzezinski, continue to shill for Joe Biden, the American people have clearly had enough.

Pants on Fire News will keep you up-to-date on any developments to this ongoing story.

Continue Reading


This radical left-wing journalist’s fantasies about a conservative’s death will make your stomach turn



Democrats are stewing in a cauldron of rage.

And they have convinced themselves that they are justified in being as nasty as possible.

Now this radical left-wing journalist’s fantasies about a conservative’s death will make your stomach turn.

The Supreme Court’s ruling in the Dobbs decision overturned Roe V. Wade, making abortion a state issue again – and Democrats have not handled it well.

Since the decision, abortion zealots have protested outside the homes of conservative Supreme Court Justices, harrassed and threatened their families in public, and firebombed crisis pregnancy centers and churches around the country.

One deranged lefist even attempted to assassinate Justice Brett Kavanaugh.

Now, a writer for the leftist rag Vox has penned a fake obituary for Justice Samuel Alito, in which he fantasizes about the Justice’s death.

“Justice Samuel Alito, who died on XXXX, was not devoid of any positive traits,” Vox’ Ian Millhiser tweeted. “He was a skilled attorney and a highly effective advocate for conservative causes… Had he spent his career as a litigator, he would almost certainly be remembered as one of the Republican Party’s leading Supreme Court practitioners… The problem is that Justice Alito was, indeed, one of the Republican Party’s leading Supreme Court advocates — but he embraced this role while he was a sitting justice.”

As expected, Millhiser was universally ripped for the ghoulish tweet, and like the coward he is, he quickly deleted it.

But the Internet never forgets.

It never even crossed Millhiser’s mind that his tweet was despicable in any way.

That’s what happens when left-wing radicals like himself have been conditioned by Democrats and their Fake News allies for decades to believe that virtually any behavior aimed toward the Right is justified and virtuous.

Neo-Marxist scholar Herbert Marcuse popularized the idea of being intolerant toward right-wing movements in a 1965 essay entitled, “Repressive Tolerance.”

He argued that leftists must not be tolerant of the “intolerant,” also known as anyone the Left disagrees with.

That idea has metastasized in the culture, and now self-proclaimed “journalists” find it totally acceptable to daydream about the death of a conservative Supreme Court Justice.

This is why culture is so vitally important.

If the culture becomes accepting of political violence, society will quickly unravel.

The Left have made the problem so much worse by arguing that speech is violence, but actual violence is not violence so long as it’s directed toward the Right.

The corporate-controlled press barely batted an eye when a would-be assassin tried to murder Justice Kavanaugh inside his family home.

If someone even tangentially connected to the Right had been arrested outside the home of Justice Sonia Sotomayor, The New York Times and others would still lead with it as a front page headline months later.

The obvious asymmetry in standards has been terrible for the country, and devastating for the reputation of the so-called “mainstream” media.

Continue Reading

Sign Up For FREE Alerts

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.