Cancel culture is giving rise to dangerous censorship.

Democrat Congressmen and corporate-controlled media outlets like CNN are literally trying to get Fox News removed from television.

And this top journalist’s resignation proves free speech is on dangerous ground.

Prince Harry and actress Meghan Markle have fueled media firestorms for years because of their childish behavior.

It culminated in an exasperating exclusive interview with Oprah Winfrey in which the Sussex Royals played the motherlode of all victimhood cards.

The couple complained about not having around-the-clock security provided by the British government despite the fact they renounced their titles.

The two also dropped a bombshell by accusing a member of the Royal Family of being racist.

Good Morning Britain host Piers Morgan said he didn’t believe their shocking claims in the interview, and wasn’t shy about letting people know.

Morgan walked off the set and quit in the middle of a broadcast when the program’s weatherman berated Morgan on his own show for several minutes.

Worse yet, Markle lodged a formal complaint to Ofcom (the Office of Communications for the United Kingdom) in response to Morgan’s comment.

This is deeply disturbing because unlike the FCC in America, Ofcom has sharp teeth and can have British citizens mired in serious legal trouble.

The UK does not have a constitution that guarantees freedom of speech, so people can actually go to jail for “hate speech.”

Morgan stood tall in the face of the princess’ harassment campaign and fired back:

WARNING: This clip contains flash photography.

Former Good Morning Britain presenter Piers Morgan says 'I believe in freedom of speech' as he defends comments he made about Meghan. He adds 'the damage she has done to the monarchy is enormous'.

Read more: https://t.co/7KuIYPQaUl pic.twitter.com/jHZ89Ilal4

— Sky News (@SkyNews) March 10, 2021

So far, there appears to be a lot of support in Morgan’s corner.

A petition to bring him back to Good Morning Britain gained over 200,000 signatures, and a recent UK public opinion poll showed that support for the Sussex Royals is done.

Harry’s favorability numbers were under water for the first time ever (45% to 48%; -3), and Meghan’s dropped 14 points from just over a week ago (31% to 58%; -27).

The Fake News Media successfully carried Joe Biden into the White House.

But they wanted validation for their behind-the-scenes scheming.

So TIME Magazine just shockingly admitted how corporate America stole the election from Donald Trump.

Joe Biden won the 2020 election despite many voter irregularities.

For example, thousands of ballots in Wisconsin that did not have return addresses were counted when such ballots would’ve been disqualified in the past.

But the real work to secure the election for Biden was done behind the scenes by left-wing operatives, the corporate press, and Big Tech.

Journalist Molly Ball admitted as such in a 6,000+ word piece in TIME Magazine.

She detailed how shadow organizations conspired to “fortify” the election for Biden.

Ball wrote:

“That’s why the participants want the secret history of the 2020 election told, even though it sounds like a paranoid fever dream – a well-funded cabal of powerful people, ranging across industries and ideologies, working together behind the scenes to influence perceptions, change rules and laws, steer media coverage and control the flow of information. They were not rigging the election; they were fortifying it.”

That is a truly amazing paragraph because it confirms everything Trump and other Republicans and conservatives have been saying about the corporate media and other institutions.

The article doesn’t even touch on Big Tech censoring the New York Post’s scoop about Hunter Biden’s “laptop from hell.”

Facebook spokesman Andy Stone admitted the platform slowed the dissemination of the story, and Twitter flat-out blocked it and suspended the official account for the New York Post.

Twitter users weren’t even allowed to share The Post’s link via private message.

Perhaps one of the most fascinating parts in Ball’s article highlights how leftist organizations were prepared to send their shock troops out in the streets when Trump was ahead in the polls.

The story continued:

“The conversation that followed was a difficult one, led by the activists charged with the protest strategy. ‘We wanted to be mindful of when was the right time to call for moving masses of people into the street,’ [Angela] Peoples says. As much as they were eager to mount a show of strength, mobilizing immediately could backfire and put people at risk . . . So the word went out: stand down. Protect the Results announced that it would ‘not be activating the entire national mobilization network today, but remains ready to activate if necessary.’ On Twitter, outraged progressives wondered what was going on. Why wasn’t anyone trying to stop Trump’s coup? Where were all the protests?”

This is telling because if the entire point of the project was to “fortify” the election regardless of who wins, Trump leading in the polls should not have been a reason to send out the activists.

Trump was excoriated by the Left for telling the Proud Boys to “stand back and stand by” during a debate (after he was pestered and prompted to do so) when that’s precisely what left-wing operatives did.

In their own words, leftists admit that they conspired to “fortify” the election, but in their eyes, only one result was acceptable.

The so-called “mainstream” media loves the far-left policies of Bernie Sanders.

But even that isn’t enough to get their love.

And you won’t believe the racist reason the media just turned on Bernie Sanders.

The media is constantly looking for racism.

They want you to believe that there is a white supremacist hiding behind every corner, and that they are the biggest problem in society.

It is a way to divide people over imaginary problems instead of the real problems in the world.

And at this point, their crusade to find racism is even eating their own.

The San Francisco Chronicle published an op-ed targeting socialist Sen. Bernie Sanders, stating that he manifests “white privilege, male privilege, and class privilege.”

San Francisco Unified School District high school teacher Ingrid Seyer-Ochi penned the article in response to the viral image of Sanders at the recent presidential inauguration.

The photo shows a masked Sanders sitting, arms and legs crossed, with stitched mittens on his hands, and it somehow became one of the most shared images of the inauguration.

Her op-ed is titled, “S.F. high school students get a lesson in subtle white privilege,” and argued that his picture going viral is an example of racism, as he is a white male, and doesn’t showcase the diversity on display of the inauguration.

“We saw diversity, creativity and humanity, and a nation embracing all of this and more,” she writes. “On the day of the inauguration, Bernie Sanders was barely on our radar. The next day, he was everywhere.”

She goes on to attack Sanders for getting the attention he got, not on any of his views, but simply because of his race and gender.

“And there, across all of our news and social media feeds, was Bernie: Bernie memes, Bernie sweatshirts, endless love for Bernie,” she continued, before adding:

“I puzzled and fumed as an individual as I strove to be my best possible teacher. What did I see? What did I think my students should see? A wealthy, incredibly well-educated and privileged white man, showing up for perhaps the most important ritual of the decade, in a puffy jacket and huge mittens.”

The scariest part of this entire op-ed is that the person writing it is a school teacher, and she describes how she explained this point to the high school students she teaches.