Connect with us

Culture

Don Lemon demanded imposing this punishment for refusing the coronavirus vaccine

Published

on

CNN is pressuring governments and businesses to force Americans to take the coronavirus vaccine.

But no one thought the network’s on-air talent would cross this line.

And Don Lemon demanded imposing this punishment for refusing the coronavirus vaccine.

On Thursday night, Don Lemon pushed the CNN agenda of punishing Americans who don’t take the coronavirus vaccine.

Lemon pushed the false claim that everyone was at risk if the government didn’t mandate Americans “get the jab.”

“I don’t know if we can get this under control. We had the opportunity. None of this had to happen. Children didn’t have to get sick. If we didn’t let the virus to mutate and this variant to catch on, we could have had this under control. We were well on our way, and the only people you can blame, the only people you can blame — this isn’t shaming— the unvaccinated. The unvaccinated people have put us in the position we’re in now. And it is not a good place,” Lemon began.

In fact, data shows children are not at high risk of adverse outcomes from the coronavirus, and the virus had already mutated into the delta variant before the vaccine was widely available to all Americans.

Instead, Lemon raged that – in fact – freedom is slavery and that the real meaning of freedom was submitting to forced vaccinations.

Lemon demanded that any American who refused to take the coronavirus vaccine should be confined to a form of corporation-induced house arrest as they should be denied entry to every business in America.

“You have to be more direct. More concerted effort to say get vaccinated. You’re not just killing yourself. You’re going to kill other people. That’s what you have to start telling people. If you don’t get vaccinated, you can’t come into this office or this place of business. If you don’t get vaccinated, you can’t come into this gym. If you don’t get vaccinated, you can’t get on to this airplane. That has nothing to do with freedom. It has nothing to do with liberty. You don’t have the freedom and the liberty to put other people in jeopardy. You don’t have that. You have to drive the speed limit. You have to obey the rules,” Lemon fumed.

Medical decisions in America have always been personal choices.

But it’s clear that many in the media want to exploit the coronavirus pandemic to take that right away from Americans.

Pants on Fire News will keep you up-to-date on any new developments in this ongoing story.

Culture

One CEO is finally smacking Democrats over the head with the truth about modern leftists

Published

on

It’s jaw-dropping the way Democrats have allowed themselves to be hoodwinked.

They are letting leftists drive the party off a cliff. 

Now one major media company CEO is finally smacking Democrats over the head with the truth about modern leftists. 

The only thing more shocking than what leftists are up to these days is the way they’ve hijacked an entire political movement. 

In one of the most shocking—and inexplicable—political reversals in history fascists have completely taken over the political left. 

A movement that was pushing the boundaries of free speech and decency a few decades ago is now doing its level best to silence all of us. 

Ironically, the media industry which was built on shock value is now participating in its own destruction. 

Most major players are allowing leftists to call the shots—no matter how illogical or damaging.  

But one massive company’s CEO is breaking rank to tell the truth. 

Netflix CEO Ted Sarandos is fighting back as two major comedians come under fire from LGBTW activists. 

“I think it’s very important to the American culture generally to have free expression,” he told the New York Times.

If leftists get their own way, the entertainment business won’t have any actual content to broadcast. 

“We’re programming for a lot of diverse people who have different opinions and different tastes and different styles, and yet we’re not making everything for everybody,” Sarandos said. “We want something for everybody, but everything’s not going to be for everybody.”

Sarandos made waves at Netflix when he sent out a memo reinforcing the company’s commitment to free speech. 

He said it’s shocking that his biggest supporters focused on free speech are conservatives. 

“It used to be a very liberal issue, so it’s an interesting time that we live in,” he said. “I always said if we censor in the US, how are we going to defend our content in the Middle East?”

Sarandos is spot on. 

Back in 1981, MTV aired “Video Killed the Radio Star” pushing society to free speech in radical new ways. 

Nearly 41 years later, leftists have become mask Nazis obsessed with policing every word that comes out of anyone’s mouth.

No doubt, most conservatives would much rather be arguing about some expletive used on television rather than discovering that middle schoolers are being charged with sexual harassment for uttering the wrong pronoun. 

What most media company leaders seem to be missing is that the current leftist regime is working toward causing American media businesses to implode. 

Netflix is already experiencing this as radical activists throw everything they have at destroying the network’s most popular comedian, David Chappelle.

The crazed campaign to get rid of him along with fellow comedian Ricky Gervais is only the beginning of a survival battle every media company will ultimately end up embroiled in as cancel culture sweeps through to reshape the industry. 

Pants on Fire News will keep you up-to-date on any developments to this ongoing story.

Continue Reading

Culture

An iconic magazine shows its true colors by cutting Melania Trump out of history

Published

on

Fashion magazines are basically high school cliques all grown up. 

Editors wield vast amounts of power and reshape culture to suit their every whim. 

Now, an iconic magazine is showing its true colors by cutting Melania Trump out of history. 

The subtle, yet ferocious jabs sent Trump’s way continue long after her husband left office. 

When the New York City elite gathered for the Met Gala recently, Jill Biden was front and center being honored as first lady and invited to give a speech before the event at the opening of a Vogue art exhibit. 

And bystanders were quick to note that a pre-Met Gala speech was yet another honor leftist elites were careful to avoid extending to Melania Trump. 

As She Knows put it, “it was clear that the ongoing snub of former First Lady Melania Trump was still in full effect.”

Michelle Obama also enjoyed the honor of opening an exhibit ahead of New York City’s most important social event back in 2014. 

But Melania apparently isn’t part of the grown-up version of the mean-girls clique. 

Of course, it wasn’t always that way. 

Back in 2005, Melania was featured on Vogue’s cover in what was advertised as an “exclusive” scoop on Donald Trump’s new bride. 

That was before her husband stormed Washington, D.C. and started draining The Swamp. 

Now, the former model turned first lady is persona non-grata. 

The magazine’s “First Ladies in Vogue” feature conveniently cut Melania out of high fashion history.

“According to longtime Vogue staffer and former friend Stephanie Winston Wolkoff in her tell-all book Melania and Me: The Rise and Fall of My Friendship With the First LadyMelania was offered a feature interview, but there was no ‘guarantee that Melania would appear on the cover,’ she wrote. That may sound unfair to Trump fans, but not every First Lady was given the cover of the magazine,” She Knows reported. 

Want to guess who did make the cover? Predictably, Jill Biden, Michelle Obama, and Hillary Clinton all made the cut. 

Meanwhile, neither Laura Bush or Barbara Bush were given front cover real estate.

The partisan politics at play are obvious when you’re looking for them.

However, we can guess most of Vogue’s readers aren’t political scientists, but rather women looking for social signaling cues to help them gain acceptance in society. 

The magazine’s snub of Republican women—especially a woman who has refused to go against her husband’s conservative take like Barbara and Laura Bush had a tendency to do—speaks loudly of what will and won’t be tolerated in society. 

Pants on Fire News will keep you up-to-date on any developments to this ongoing story.

Continue Reading

Culture

The Pulitzer Prize is about to get one ridiculous “woke” makeover

Published

on

Radical leftism is spreading.

Fringe theories that were stranded in academia have escaped and infested the media.

Now, the Pulitzer Prize is about to get one ridiculous “woke” makeover.

The Democrats have been infiltrated by the radical Left.

Activists on the fringes have either purged moderate liberals from left-leaning power centers or cudgeled them into compliance.

Now, the radicals want control of the Pulitzer Prize.

The cult of DIE (diversity, inclusivity, and equity) has become a core belief on the Left.

So it’s no surprise that DIE has come for the establishment’s shiniest journalism prize.

Myriad leftist groups have called for news organizations to participate in a diversity survey conducted by the News Leaders Association (NLA).

The groups wrote a letter to Marjorie Miller, Administrator of the Pulitzer Prizes, that read, “We are appealing to The Pulitzer Prizes to help us improve the diversity and transparency in the news industry. On Tuesday, April 12, Nieman Lab reported that there was ‘crushing resistance’ by news organizations to participate in an annual diversity survey by the News Leaders Association. The group planned to have 2,500 organizations participate and in the end only 303 completed this important survey. That is unacceptable.”

This is the radicalistic playbook that has been effective for 50 years: attack an institution (particularly a liberal one) as bigoted in some fashion until it gives concessions.

The groups’ big ask is for diversity to be considered in awarding a Pulitzer Prize.

The letter continued, “We are asking your organization to promote this survey and reporting of demographic data by adding the following criteria to your selection process for Pulitzer Prizes in Journalism: In order to qualify for an award, organizations must provide proof of participation in the most recent general survey/census by the News Leaders Association or another industry reporting system that shares data publicly, effective 2024 (i.e., they must participate in this year’s data collection to be eligible for awards/funding in 2024).”

Hollywood already caved in this regard.

The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences announced that soon films must meet diversity criteria in order to be considered for a Best Picture Oscar.

The Pulitzer Prize will have no choice but to meet the demands of the radical Left.

If not today, one day soon.

Liberals are defenseless against attacks from their left flank.

This tactic is how the radicals took over the Democratic Party.

Pants on Fire Official Polling

Continue Reading

Sign Up For FREE Alerts

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Trending