Connect with us

Fake News

Dan Rather used one awful word to attack Trump that he instantly lived to regret

Published

on

Dan Rather is one of the founding fathers of fake news.

The former CBS anchorman spread liberal lies on air for years until it finally caught up with him and CBS fired Rather for using forged documents to falsely claim George W. Bush went AWOL from the Texas Air National Guard during Vietnam.

Rather has not learned a thing since his career ended in disgrace.

The former CBS anchorman – as well as other members of the Fake News Media – fell for a deceptively edited, year old video where Donald Trump spoke to reporters about the need to deport vicious MS-13 gang members that Trump called “animals.”

Twitter user Mark Elliot tweeted out a video of Trump’s comments, but falsely claimed the President savaged asylum seekers as “animals.”

Rather seized on the comments to smear Trump as “despicable.”

Rather’s attack was based on a lie.

A real journalist – especially one who had been burned by fakery before – would have taken the time to track down the video and make sure the context matched the claim made in Elliot’s tweet.

Rather did no such thing.

Instead, he pounced on comments that fit his preconceived liberal hatred of Trump and ran with an attack without even caring if it was based on a truthful interpretation of events.

We will keep you up-to-date on any new developments in this ongoing story.

Continue Reading
16 Comments

16 Comments

  1. Franco

    April 8, 2019 at 9:37 pm

    YES!!! You are so Correct!
    Chicken Lips Rather should shut his Pie-Hole!

    Rather another VERY Stupid article on your part!
    WISE UP or blow it out of your Rear Portal!!!!

  2. Statesman Patriot

    April 8, 2019 at 9:45 pm

    Dan Rather,
    You’re all mixed up!!
    Trump, like me, is a Deplorable!
    YOU and all the libtards are the Despicables!!!
    Please don’t confuse that again!!
    Thanks

  3. Maxx

    April 8, 2019 at 9:51 pm

    An earlier commenter stated “a real journalist would etc. etc. etc. Rather isn’t now or has ever been a real journalist like all MSM script readers.

  4. DENNIS WOLLEN

    April 8, 2019 at 9:59 pm

    I’m glad you named DAN RATHER in your response……

    THERE FOR A MINUTE I THOUGHT YOU WERE TALKING ABOUT CHRIS WALLACE………

  5. Radone

    April 8, 2019 at 10:39 pm

    Really, Rather. I would think that someone who list his job in disgrace would want to keep a low profile. I guess that you think by now people have forgotten. Well you are a disgrace and what you have to say is nothing, no one cares about you or your opinions. People who have disgraced themselves usually try low and hidden. Your legacy is you being a disgrace to yourself your family and to America. You are just another fake news mouth, so go back under the rock you slithered out of.

  6. WhiteFalcon

    April 8, 2019 at 11:57 pm

    That moron lost his job for being caught lying about G. W. Bush and he hasn’t learned a single thing from the experience. I guess he has just lied so long that he can’t tell the difference between lies and truth. Probably never could.

  7. william

    April 9, 2019 at 5:24 am

    Normal U.S. citizens would ‘rather’ not have to endure any opinions from the father of fake news – – Dan Rather. He has earned his zero credibility reputation and he just needs to go.

  8. MICHAEL LAGREE

    April 9, 2019 at 7:16 am

    Rathers whole life has been based on a lie. The despicable part of this is Dan Blather, known liar & scumbag. Who’s he working for now, CNN???

  9. Patsy Autry

    April 9, 2019 at 4:18 pm

    Personally, I cannot tolerate nor stand watching on tv: Dan Rather or Chris Wallace. Both are so biased, Chris Wallace had a really hard time when Hillary was losing…I cannot stand either one nor B Obama on TV, anywhere else. Off the show goes. We have too many real journalist (which these two are not) to watch such as CNN, NBC, or ANY OTHER so biased shows…Do not waste your precious time watching this garbage…so many of our youth have been brainwashed by them..and they are our next voters…they need a re-education and the colleges hopefully to get rid of the biased, liberal professors…I have a nephew, 30 years old, and I literally jumped him for his critical remarks about President Trump. He was offended, and I advised him to quit watching these biased shows, as it shows on him…he knows not of what he is speaking about, is very ill informed and believes every bit of it !!!

  10. some Dems are EVIL Liars

    April 10, 2019 at 7:07 pm

    Hey dan, let some ms13 members come after you, then tell us they are not animals Oh yeah, technically, we are animals, we coined the word humans to separate us from animals.

  11. leonard

    April 10, 2019 at 11:19 pm

    Dan why don’t you set up 4 or 5 MS-13 members in your guest house. lets see how long before yo think they are anmals.

  12. Jerry

    May 9, 2019 at 11:57 pm

    Daily, we get a little closer to civil war, Fake news will not survive the first day

  13. june Burgess

    May 10, 2019 at 12:08 am

    same thing different names

  14. Bill

    May 10, 2019 at 11:55 pm

    Rather is a phoney Bast–d as were and all before him Liberal leaning so called public sentinels of the truth. . .the real truth was even Walter Cronkite was way up Clinton’s backside and against the Bushes but none of them could challenge Reagan either !

  15. Bill Turney

    May 11, 2019 at 2:49 am

    Dan Rather, irrelevant as always.

  16. SD of AZ

    May 12, 2019 at 4:12 pm

    Rather has no credibility and as this article noted, he does absolutely no research before he opens his mouth. Another Loser propagandist who is definitely over the hill. Wrap it up Rather before you get in any deeper.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CNN

CNN’s Jake Tapper flat-out refused to correct AOC when she was caught in this outrageous lie

Published

on

Members of Congress used to be known for only lying to their constituents back home.

And the media was once known as “the arbiter of truth” and an institution of trust and respect.

But that has all changed and now CNN’s Jake Tapper flat-out refused to correct AOC when she was caught in this outrageous lie.

CNN’s Jake Tapper has gone from being considered by some as a respected, impartial journalist to just another left-wing hack who can lie and promote the Left’s with the best of them.

Tapper recently admitted that he allowed Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) to blatantly lie about President Trump during a recent interview.

AOC said during the interview, “The beds and the capacity that we need in this country. And we’re hearing it every step of the way from this administration. First, we were hearing that it’s a hoax, then we were hearing that everything was fine.”

This all stemmed from earlier false press reports claiming the President called coronavirus a hoax. The claims were quickly disproven and even corrected by most news outlets.

But clearly not by CNN.

Tapper later even admitted he knew it was a lie from AOC, but chose not to say anything.

“I thought about it, because the president did not call the virus a hoax.” Tapper said.

Tapper went further in trying to deflect from the Congresswoman’s lie by simply accusing the president of being a liar.

“I guess that’s the problem with a politician who lies so often. While I agree that Democrats are mischaracterizing what he said, what he did say was also false so it’s tough to justify taking the time for a fact check when it’s not taking a stand defining the truth,” Jake added.

So, in other words, because Tapper doesn’t like the president and personally believes Donald Trump lies often, he decided not to correct a blatant lie on his show.

This disregard for the truth is so widespread by the media now, Tapper’s decision didn’t receive much coverage.

There was a time not so long ago when ploys like this would have cost a reporter his job.

But we have moved far past that time in history.

The Trump era may go down in history as the time that journalism died its last death.

Share your thoughts about this story with Pants on Fire News in the comments below.

Continue Reading

Donald Trump

The New York Times is using the current crisis to attack Christians for this outrageous reason

Published

on

Most Americans are coming together to battle both the Chinese coronavirus and the economic fallout from forced business closings.

But the media has decided this crisis is a great time to attack the very country that first protected their freedom of the press.

And now The New York Times is using the current crisis to attack Christians for this outrageous reason.

The liberal mainstream media has been out of control for decades.

They have gone from reporting the news and providing vital information to being nothing more than a public relations company for the far Left.

Now the liberal mainstream media’s blatant disregard for truth, accuracy, and basic decency has reached new lows in the last four or five years.

It’s no wonder journalists have become among the least trusted segments of American society, joining lawyers, politicians, and infomercial spokesmen.

From CBS using fake video footage to promote an anti-Trump story on the coronavirus, to the Washington Post gleefully predicting Trump supporters would suffer the highest number of deaths from the virus, the media has reached new lows.

Now The New York Times has taken it even lower with a shocking claim that Christians are to blame for the Chinese coronavirus.

Last week, The Times published an op-ed placing the blame on the so-called “religious right” for President Trump’s supposedly delayed response to the Chinese coronavirus pandemic.

In the editorial, self-described “journalist” and author Katherine Stewart attempted to argue that the President’s “anti-science” evangelical voter base is influencing him too heavily, causing him to ignore scientists on issues like vaccines and, of course, climate change.

The op-ed was originally released with the title “The Road to Coronavirus Hell Was Paved by Evangelicals” but after massive backlash the liberal rag toned down the title to “The Religious Right’s Hostility to Science Is Crippling Our Coronavirus Response.”

Of course, both titles are vile and show the author’s (and the newspaper’s) violent bias against Christians.

Not to mention the author completely ignoring the fact that it is the Left’s anti-science views on life that have caused the slaughter of millions of children over the past few decades.

And it is the liberal anti-science views on gender that have led to the destruction of women’s sports and left thousands of scared, confused children facing mutilating surgeries.

What is most interesting about Stewart’s anti-Christian hit piece is that she focuses most of her vitriol on Christians who oppose the “Green New Deal” and other socialist attempts to take control by promoting fears of climate change.

Once again, the author ignores the fact that the same people claiming the earth will end in ten years have made those claims before.

In fact, some of these “scientists” have been predicting the end of the world since the 1970s.

And, the author conveniently leaves out the fact that as Donald Trump was first warning of the Chinese coronavirus in January, many “scientists” were claiming it couldn’t even be spread by human contact.

And when Trump placed a ban on travel from China to try and stop the spread, it was “scientists” who called him a racist and claimed a travel ban wasn’t needed.

Share your thoughts about this story with Pants on Fire News in the comments below.

Continue Reading

Donald Trump

The New York Times admitted one coronavirus error that had Trump grinning from ear to ear

Published

on

During the coronavirus outbreak the Fake News Media is not trying to inform the American people.

Instead, so-called “reporters” are seizing on the pandemic to launch another front in their war to destroy Donald Trump.

But now The New York Times admitted one coronavirus error that had Trump grinning from ear to ear.

During a March White House press briefing the President expressed his hope that the anti-malarial drug hydroxychloroquine would prove to be a game-changer as it showed promise in limited use in treating coronavirus patients.

While the evidence was anecdotal and more tests were clearly required, the President was offering the American people a ray of hope as the outbreak spread.

The New York Times – instead of reporting facts – attacked the President for falsely touting “unproven drugs.”

“At a long-winded White House briefing on Friday, President Trump enthusiastically and repeatedly promoted the promise of two long-used malaria drugs that are still unproven against the coronavirus, but being tested in clinical trials,” The Times wrote on March 20.

By April 1, The Times was singing a different tune reporting that “The malaria drug hydroxychloroquine helped to speed the recovery of a small number of patients who were mildly ill from the coronavirus, doctors in China reported this week.”

The Times also noted that the drug helped those with mild cases avoid a severe infection that could result in an ICU stay or having to go on a ventilator.

“Cough, fever and pneumonia went away faster, and the disease seemed less likely to turn severe in people who received hydroxychloroquine than in a comparison group not given the drug. The authors of the report said that the medication was promising, but that more research was needed to clarify how it might work in treating coronavirus disease and to determine the best way to use it,” The Times added.

While the study was limited there are extensive tests going on in New York with drugs and many Americans are hoping that there is more good news to be found.

Pants on Fire News will keep you up-to-date on any new developments in this ongoing story

Continue Reading

Sign Up For FREE Alerts

Loading...

Trending