Connect with us

Media Bias

CNN’s president just outright admitted a disturbing fact about their anti-Trump coverage

Published

on

Since the day Donald Trump chose to run for President, CNN declared him their enemy.

Day-in and day-out they have done nothing but attack Trump.

And CNN just outright admitted a disturbing fact about their anti-Trump coverage.

For the past two years, the media has been fawning over the Russia collusion conspiracy theory.

Not a day could go by without the media claiming a new bombshell dropped that supposedly “proved” President Trump is a Russian puppet only in office because of him colluding with the Kremlin.

As it turns out, that is Fake News, and media outlets like CNN don’t really care that it has been completely debunked by the release of the Mueller report.

But CNN President Jeff Zucker claims he is “entirely comfortable” with his network’s coverage of the Russia conspiracy theory.

Zucker went on to say they are “not investigators,” and therefore didn’t need to do any more digging into what they were talking about.

As reported by Breitbart:

CNN Worldwide president Jeff Zucker is pushing back against critics accusing the news network of being one of the chief propagators of a debunked Trump-Russia conspiracy theory after special counsel Robert Mueller cleared the president’s 2016 campaign of alleged collusion with the Kremlin.

In an interview with the New York Times, Zucker said he was “entirely comfortable” with CNN’s Trump-Russia coverage and suggested it was entirely appropriate to give near around-the-clock-coverage due to the story’s magnitude. “We are not investigators. We are journalists, and our role is to report the facts as we know them, which is exactly what we did,” the CNN chief wrote in an email. “A sitting president’s own Justice Department investigated his campaign for collusion with a hostile nation. That’s not enormous because the media says so. That’s enormous because it’s unprecedented.”

Zucker’s claim is ridiculous considering that personalities at CNN have known for a long time that the Russia collusion is a hoax.

CNN host Van Jones even told an operative for Project Veritas, using a hidden camera, that the whole Russia thing is a “nothing burger.”

Despite this, the network carried on endlessly about Russia as if there was some sort of proof backing it.

Do you think CNN was purposefully lying to discredit President Trump?

Let us know your thoughts in the comment section below.

6 Comments

6 Comments

  1. JIM

    March 29, 2019 at 4:25 pm

    Most of us saw what was going on and just switched channels, that’s why CNN is sucking hind teat.

  2. Tina Moore

    March 29, 2019 at 5:40 pm

    They are just a band of idiotic morons. Ignoring them would be more peaceful than jumping on their ranting and raving ignorant band wagon.

  3. Rose Schulz

    March 29, 2019 at 9:16 pm

    Just who does he expect to believe that explanation. They were not reporting news. They were trying to affect the outcome of an investigation that was politically motivated and never should have happened. I believe his statement that he hated Trump. The rest is baloney. Acosta is a pain in the you know what and I never watched the “fake news” They wanted to turn everyone against President Trump and how did that work out?

  4. UMCane

    March 31, 2019 at 3:18 pm

    You are 100% right Dick, in addition to Zucker being a POS, he’s a coward, running into his limo anytime he’s approached on the street for comments. He only gives “soft ball” interviews, and never to FOX. Effectively his antiTrump platform at CNN has been a complete failure, and has driven his ratings to under 15% of Cable news, dropping his advertising rates to all time lows!!
    No question about it, CNN and Zucker zuck big time!!

  5. Barbara Mikula

    April 3, 2019 at 10:57 pm

    The media, especially CNN as well as the democrats, are despicable. I will never again vote for a democrat for anything. They have completely turned me off, and I was never a straight party voter before. I prefer real news so would not waste my time on CNN.

  6. Tom

    April 7, 2019 at 5:23 pm

    I just ignore CNN and do not intentionally watch it!!!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Media Bias

The word police at the Associated Press are now shockingly censoring one word

Published

on

The Left always tries to control language.

It’s one of the only ways they can sell their radical ideas.

Now the word police at the Associated Press are shockingly censoring one word.

The horrific mass shooting in Buffalo has managed to knock abortion out of the headlines.

The Fake News Media is going all-in on the white supremacist attack in order to pin the responsibility on Republicans.

It’s an absurd argument, but the Democrats are shameless.

In fact, they’re even manipulating language.

The Associated Press Stylebook does not want the killer’s 180-page ramblings to be classified as a manifesto.

The AP wrote on Twitter, “We don’t use the term manifesto in reference to a racist diatribe. It glorifies racist hatred. Other terms such as diatribe, screed or writings can work instead.”

However, centrist feminist Christina Hoff Sommers quickly corrected the AP.

Sommers wrote, “You are confused. Hitler’s Mein Kampf & rantings of the Unabomber are routinely referred to as “manifestos.” For example: Encyclopedia  Britannica. “Mein Kampf, (German: “My Struggle”) political manifesto written by Adolf Hitler.”

Perhaps the Left don’t want to dirty up the word manifesto because of their fondness for Karl Marx’s “Communist Manifesto.”

Marx’s evil ideas have festered for nearly 200 years, eating away at society and poisoning a new generation of impressionable minds.

In fact, the Buffalo shooter wrote in his manifesto that he used to be a communist, but currently identifies as “mild-moderate authoritarian left.”

The shooter also wore the black sun insignia, a symbol sometimes used by the neo-Nazi Azov Battalion of Ukraine.

He also said that one of his main inspirations was the Christchurch shooter in New Zealand, who had trained with Azov prior to committing his despicable massacre at a mosque.

Both the Buffalo shooter and the Christchurch shooter claimed to be radical environmentalists.

All of these facts are inconvenient for the Left because they tacitly support the Azov Battalion in Ukraine, and they’re trying to blame the shooting on Fox News, even though he explicitly said in the manifesto that he hated Fox.

Democrats are trying to control the narrative, and that starts with controlling language.

Unfortunately for them, they no longer have a monopoly on the dissemination of information.

Pants on Fire Official Polling

Continue Reading

Media Bias

New journalistic standard proves the Democrats are complete liars on one issue

Published

on

The ideas of the Left are utterly incoherent.

Yet, Democrats willfully go along with all of the crazy ideas.

And one new journalistic standard proves the Democrats are complete liars on one issue.

The Democrats are hopping mad over the abortion issue, which was rekindled after a Supreme Court leak of a draft opinion from Samuel Alito that suggests the overturning of Roe V. Wade.

The new battle over abortion has brought women’s issues front and center for the Left, but there is a glaring omission in their progressive rhetoric.

Suddenly, transgender men and nonsense terms like “birth people” are no longer part of the conversation.

The Associated Press Style Guide tried to clean up this obvious contradiction by issuing a new update.

The AP Style Guide update read, “Phrasing like pregnant people or people who seek an abortion seeks to include people who have those experiences but do not identify as women, such as some transgender men and some nonbinary people. Such phrasing should be confined to stories that specifically address the experiences of people who do not identify as women.” 

In other words, it is okay to “erase” trans men and dispatch with idiotic terms like “pregnant persons” and “people who give birth.”

Democrats don’t want any distractions from their over-the-top pro-abortion zealotry.

The style guide update is a clear example of how Democrats will manipulate language in any way they can to achieve political power.

For example, in light of the 2020 Reign of Terror, the AP Style Guide suggested that outlets capitalize “black” when describing people of African descent.

The out-of-the-blue update made no sense other than to somehow contribute to the cultural “reparations” in the aftermath of George Floyd’s death.

Democrats are now trotting out the “my body, my choice” line that they abandoned during the peak of COVID hysteria when they were forcing people to take an experimental vaccine.

It’s quite stunning to witness the mental gymnastics of the Left when killing babies is at stake. 

They have already renewed talks of packing the Supreme Court.

Luckily for them, Merriam Webster added a new definition of “court-packing” to dovetail with the newfangled Democrat definition of simply restoring ideological balance to the court.

That is utter nonsense.

The Democrats want the Supreme Court to remain a liberal super-legislature that will codify into law the agenda they can’t pass through Congress.

The Left have destroyed their credibility by torturing logic to such a hideous extent.

Pants on Fire Official Polling

Continue Reading

Media Bias

Unhinged leftist reporter says there will be no peace or safety until this happens to pro-lifers

Published

on

The Left is totally out of control.

They will use just about any excuse to bring violence into their repertoire.

Now, this unhinged leftist reporter says there will be no peace or safety until this happens to all pro-lifers.

Violence is a part of who the Left is and what they do.

Violence is part of how they plan to take power, it is always part of their path to power.

And when the news broke in German-owned Politico that a leaked copy of a draft Supreme Court decision overturning Roe vs. Wade was out, violence was sure to be right behind it.

And it was.

A pro-life organization in Wisconsin was firebombed. Churches were vandalized, and at least one Supreme Court justice had to be moved to an undisclosed location due to violent protestors.

Pro-life college students who went to the steps of the Supreme Court to pray and peacefully demonstrate were attacked, spit on and shoved to the ground, and hundreds, if not thousands of threats were made by radical leftists around the country.

Including a reporter for Rewire News Group who called for “more” violence against pro-life Americans over the weekend as she celebrated the firebombing of the headquarters of a pro-life group in Wisconsin.

“More of this. May these people never know a moment of peace or safety until they rot in the ground,” Caroline Reilly wrote in a now-deleted tweet responding to a report from The New York Times about the firebombing. 

Though Reilly has since removed the tweet, and in fact appears to have deleted her entire account, she didn’t do so until there was a firestorm of condemnation about her death threat against pro-lifers.

Just a few of the responses to Reilly; “Where are the police?” tweeted writer Rod Dreher, and activist Amy Kremer wondered where the response was from the FBI and the Department of Justice. 

“How would they feel if the public started to Dox reporters that call for violence and arson? What if it came to their doorstep instead? People with a voice need responsibility when using it,” Republican Florida congressional candidate Vic DeGrammont wrote. 

Republican strategist Matt Whitlock tagged Twitter support in his response to make sure they were aware of Reilly’s death threats (a lot of good that will do) “This feels a bit like calling for violence.”

But all the protests aside, nothing will be done to this reporter because she is on the “right side” of the political aisle for the DOJ and FBI. 

Law enforcement only seeks to go after conservatives, not liberals, no matter how clear the violations.

Caroline Reilly will remain free to threaten death on even more people, let’s just hope she doesn’t actually follow through with her threats, because after all we know life means almost nothing to people like her.

Pants on Fire News will keep you up-to-date on any developments to this ongoing story.

Continue Reading

Sign Up For FREE Alerts

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Trending