Connect with us

Censorship

CNN made this one programming change that will leave you speechless

Published

on

Fake news CNN long ago decided it wanted war with Donald Trump.

For three years, fake news CNN did everything in its power to remove Donald Trump from office.

And now CNN made this one programming change that will leave you speechless.

At the start of the Trump Presidency, CNN employed a stable of commentators that supported the President in an effort to provide some basic fairness by presenting the view of the President and his supporters to their viewers.

That all changed as CNN cast its lot with the Democrat Party in an all-out bid to drive President Trump from office.

CNN fired pro-Trump commentators Paris Dennard, Jeffrey Lord, and Ed Martin so fake news CNN could present uniformly anti-Trump TV programming.

One of the final pro-Trump commentators on fake news CNN Steve Cortes – a member of Trump’s Hispanic advisory council – had not been on the air in the months.

Cortes told Fox News host Laura Ingraham that CNN “benched him” and allowed his contract to expire because Cortes exposed the fake news hoax CNN spread after the 2017 Charlottesville tragedy that President Trump praised white supremacists by claiming there were “very fine people on both sides” of the protest.

“For committing what was the unpardonable sin, at least in the eyes of CNN, for declawing that deception that they continued to push, they put me on the bench,” Cortes added. “They took me off the air after I did a Prager U video that got 6 million hits detailing exactly why the Charlottesville myth was a deception.”

“Stories that I was fired are incorrect,” Cortes added. “I was ‘benched’ by CNN following the Prager U video, and only appeared once on air during the last 6 months of my contract which just expired.”

The “very fine people” lie is one of the most persistent and ugly fake news hoaxes of the Trump Presidency.

In his press conference after a white supremacist killed a young woman by running over her with his car the President clearly condemned neo-Nazis and other bigots.

When the President said there were “very fine people on both sides” he was referring to Americans that traveled to Charlottesville to defend Civil War statues.

But since CNN is at war with both Donald Trump and the truth, the fake news network sidelined Cortes because Cortes exposed their lie.

Pants on Fire News will keep you up-to-date on any new developments in this ongoing story.

10 Comments

10 Comments

  1. Mike Litoris

    January 22, 2020 at 9:17 pm

    CNN sucks!

  2. david

    January 22, 2020 at 11:15 pm

    If these is a higher power; then render justice where justice is due.

  3. John King

    January 22, 2020 at 11:35 pm

    Didn’t MSNBC just come out with saying CNN puts on those favorable to Trump?!? So who’s lying here? Sounds to me like MSNBC and CNN or worthless bits of trash that need to simply DISAPPEAR!!!

  4. Pat

    January 22, 2020 at 11:37 pm

    CNN is nothing but a bucket of diarrhea! And the owners are despots of the most evil order!

  5. Bill E. Bob

    January 22, 2020 at 11:40 pm

    “CNN said Monday that three journalists, including the executive editor in charge of a new investigative unit, have resigned after the publication of a Russia-related article that was retracted,” reported CNN’s Brian Stelter. “Thomas Frank, who wrote the story in question; Eric Lichtblau, an editor in the unit; and Lex Haris, who oversaw the unit, have all left CNN.”

    “Kathy Griffin, host of CNN New Year’s Eve special lost her contract after she published a photograph in which she appeared to be holding a likeness of the President’s severed head.”

    “CNN severed ties with host Reza Aslan after he tweeted a series of vulgar posts about Mr. Trump. And another story that inaccurately predicted the congressional testimony of James B. Comey was retracted.”

    “Semi-automatic weapons-CNN apologized for a May 15, 2003, story in which CNN’s John Zarella and Broward County, Florida Sheriff Ken Jenne demonstrated the rapid firing of fully automatic firearms while covering the federal Assault Weapons Ban, due to expire the following year. The Assault Weapons Ban was concerned solely with semi-automatic firearms, not fully automatic ones, which had already been restricted by the National Firearms Act of 1934, and the subsequent 1986 Firearm Owners Protection Act.[10][11]”

    “On April 3, 2016, hundreds of supporters of Bernie Sanders protested outside of CNN Los Angeles. Sanders supporters were protesting CNN’s coverage of the 2016 United States presidential elections, specifically in regards to the lack of airtime Sanders has received. Known as Occupy CNN, protesters claimed that major media networks have intentionally blacked out Sanders’ presidential campaign in favor of giving much more airtime to candidates such as Hillary Clinton.[12]”

    “In a disastrous interview this week, CNN analyst Areva Martin accused Sirius XM and Fox Nation host David Webb of benefiting from “white privilege,” but she failed to realize that he’s black.”

    “CNN’s Brian Stelter recently said, “We don’t see CNN or the New York Times rooting for any president, whether a Democrat or Republican.”…..In October 2016, the head of the DNC and former CNN contributor Donna Brazile was caught giving Hillary Clinton debate questions she received from the network.”

    “Another example of direct support for Hillary Clinton from the globalist media network can be seen in a clip where CNN anchor Chris Cuomo says, “we couldn’t help her any more than we have.”

    “CNN once put a glowing gold filter over a video of Hillary Clinton to portray her as a glowing angel of light.”

    “The network claimed Hillary Clinton won a presidential debate, but they were called out for using a weighted survey that sampled 41 percent Democrats compared to 26 percent Republicans.”

    “CNN blatantly cut off a reporter who dared to point out how hypocritical it is for Hillary Clinton to pretend to care about the black community after her and her husband helped shape the laws that put so many minorities in prison.

    “CNN anchors Chris Cuomo and Don Lemon fraudulently made their case that the onus for the viral confrontation between the Covington Catholic high school students and Native American elder Nathan Phillips was completely on the students.”

  6. Phil Shapiro

    January 23, 2020 at 12:46 am

    I hope and pray that the two satellite TV companies (Dish and Direct TV ), have the courage, and decency to drop both CNN and MSNBC from broadcasting on their service.

  7. Darlene

    January 23, 2020 at 7:35 am

    I refuse to watch CNN and MSNBC. They are in with the democrats hating Trump and trying anything even if it’s a lie to trash him. I am so glad I KNOW there is a payday coming from the one above who will judge all and my Bible tells me no liar will enter heaven so doom is waiting for them. I can’t feel sorry for them cause they know better and I am sure they are probably laughing at my remark here but I will get the last laugh! I am for the truth and I despise liars!

  8. D.A.N.

    January 23, 2020 at 12:24 pm

    Darlene, I had to switch to PM$NBC on Nov 9, 2016 just to watch Madcow melt down. That was comedy for the night. 🙂

  9. Jesse

    January 26, 2020 at 3:09 am

    CNN is theLeader of the MORON MEDIA and TRUTH is something they know NOTHING of.

  10. Sharon Nicoll

    January 28, 2020 at 4:51 am

    CNN is corrupt, stupid, and should be abolished! Also, Pants On Fire, you should update your poll of the day! Ask about the NYT’s “leak” about — but not quoting — Bolton’s book.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Censorship

You won’t believe what The View wants to do to Tucker Carlson and Tulsi Gabbard

Published

on

The war in Ukraine has sparked a global crisis with many devastating consequences.

Worse yet, the war propaganda coming from the so-called “mainstream” media is appalling.

And you won’t believe what The View wants to do to Tucker Carlson and Tulsi Gabbard.

The Democrat Media Complex and the warmongers of both parties are itching for escalation in the war in Ukraine.

On the Left, Congressman Eric Swalwell floated the idea of expelling Russian students from the country.

Neoconservatives on the Right like Adam Kinzinger – whose Congressional district was gerrymandered out of existence by Illinois Democrats – wants a no-fly zone over Ukraine, and Senator Lindsey Graham called for someone in the Russian government to assassinate Vladimir Putin.

People who are calling for peace and don’t want to see brinkmanship with a nuclear power, and people who are pushing back against dangerous war propaganda have been labeled “collaborators,” and even “traitors.”

Such is the case with Fox News host Tucker Carlson and former Hawaii Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard.

That’s why the harpies on The View want Carlson and Gabbard investigated and arrested by the Department of Justice.

So-called “Republican” Ana Navarro, who hasn’t espoused a real conservative opinion in a decade, argued, “I think DOJ (Department of Justice) in the same way it is setting up a task force to investigate oligarchs, should look into people who are Russian propagandists and shilling for Putin.”

The establishment is so hot for war, combating propaganda and resisting American involvement is somehow tantamount to “shilling for Putin.”

Whoopi Goldberg got in on the act and said, “They used to arrest people for doing stuff like this. If they thought you were colluding with a Russian agent. If they thought you were putting out information or taking information and handing over to Russia. They used to actually investigate stuff like this.”

Goldberg’s statement is mind-blowing considering she was highly critical of the Hollywood blacklist of the past.

There were communists in the State Department, media, entertainment, and academia that were actually collaborating with the Soviet Union, and the Left believed the McCarthy Era was the worst thing that ever happened in America.

It’s impossible to oppose McCarthyism and call for Carlson and Gabbard to be investigated and arrested.

There is no way that the panelists of The View would have been on board with arresting people who opposed the Vietnam War.

Carlson, who has the top rated show in cable news, is probably the strongest anti-war voice on television.

And Gabbard, a former Army reserve officer, became persona non grata for her anti-war positions.

The ladies of The View and the Left more broadly are exposing themselves to be authoritarians.

Pants on Fire Official Polling

Continue Reading

Censorship

One journalist’s lawsuit could end Big Tech censoring conservatives

Published

on

Social media companies suppressing conservative speech is getting out of hand.

Now someone is fighting back.

And one journalist’s lawsuit could end Big Tech censoring conservatives.

Twitter banned former New York Times reporter Alex Berenson for supposedly spreading “misinformation” about the coronavirus vaccine.

Berenson’s “crime” was posting that the COVID vaccine did not stop transmission of the virus.

In Berenson’s lawsuit, the former New York Times reporter argues that his comments were objectively true.

Berenson also cites California law, which defines common carriers as a platform that “offers to the public to carry persons, property, or messages.”

This argument could prove vital as Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas hinted in an April opinion that Big Tech companies fall under the definition of a common carrier like the phone or mail company, which would limit the ability of Big Tech to censor speech.

Berenson also argued that Twitter acted as an agent of the government to censor his speech, citing Twitter banning Berenson shortly after Joe Biden called on Big Tech companies to censor “misinformation” about the coronavirus.

“The extraordinarily close nexus between the July 2021 statements by senior executive branch officials—including President Biden himself—calling for censorship by such companies and Twitter’s corresponding immediate actions against Mr. Berenson,” the lawsuit added.

There is already established case law that the government cannot pressure private companies to carry out actions that would be unconstitutional if the government performed them.

That argument – as well as the common carrier contention – lays out two legal paths for Berenson to argue his case and potentially find a receptive audience at the Supreme Court.

Conservatives waited for years for a manner in which to secure legal recourse to Big Tech’s ideologically motivated censorship.

Thanks to Berenson’s lawsuit and Big Tech’s overreach, they may have finally found a silver bullet.

Pants on Fire News will keep you up-to-date on any new developments in this ongoing story.

Continue Reading

Censorship

Big Tech is trying to censor one undeniable truth about the COVID vaccine

Published

on

Social media censorship is out of control.

Ever since the beginning of the coronavirus pandemic, Big Tech began banning users for posting true information.

And now Big Tech is trying to censor one undeniable truth about the COVID vaccine.

According to a new policy implemented by Twitter, the social media platform can now impose penalties up to a permanent suspension for posting that a vaccinated individual can spread COVID.

“When Tweets include misleading information about Covid-19, we may place a label on those tweets that includes corrective information about that claim,” Twitter’s policy reads. “We may apply labels to Tweets that contain, for example . . . false or misleading claims that people who have received the vaccine can spread or shed the virus (or symptoms, or immunity) to unvaccinated people.”

At the start of the pandemic, social media platforms banned users for posting that the virus likely escaped from a lab in Wuhan, China.

Now Twitter is threatening to ban anyone for posting truthful information about vaccinated individuals still being able to spread COVID.

Twitter’s new policy runs contrary to Centers for Disease Control guidelines that state that “risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection in fully vaccinated people cannot be completely eliminated as long as there is continued community transmission of the virus.”

In addition, Nature.com reported on a study published in October, which showed that fully vaccinated individuals possessed a lower risk of spreading COVID, but that spread was still possible and the vaccine’s protection against spread waned over time.

“The authors found that although the vaccines did offer some protection against infection and onward transmission, Delta dampened that effect. A person who was fully vaccinated and then had a ‘breakthrough’ Delta infection was almost twice as likely to pass on the virus as someone who was infected with Alpha. And that was on top of the higher risk of having a breakthrough infection caused by Delta than one caused by Alpha,” Nature.com reported.

One reason so many people do not trust either the vaccines or the authorities promising the vaccines are safe and effective is because no one allows an honest discussion of the vaccines.

Any hint that the vaccines may not be 100% perfect is labeled as misinformation, a conspiracy theory or “anti-vaxx.”

But Twitter censoring people for posting an honest fact that vaccinated people – while at lower risk – can still spread the coronavirus leaves people with the impression that elite institutions have something to hide.

Pants on Fire News will keep you up-to-date on any new developments in this ongoing story.

Continue Reading

Sign Up For FREE Alerts

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Trending