Connect with us

Media Bias

CNN legal analyst went live on air and attacked Kirstjen Nielsen with this vicious low blow



CNN is known as America’s leading purveyor of fake news.

They spend virtually all their air time attacking President Trump, his supporters, and those who work for him.

And this CNN legal analyst who had an affair with a 20-something year old mistress and knocked her up, attacked Kirstjen Nielsen with this vicious low blow.

It’s no secret CNN wants to destroy the life and career of anyone who even thinks about working for the 45th President of the United States, Donald J. Trump.

And that’s exactly what CNN Chief legal analyst, Jeffrey Toobin, went on air to do.

After Sunday’s news of Kirstjen Nielsen’s departure as Secretary of Homeland Security, Toobin didn’t hesitate to deal a low blow.

“Kirstjen Nielsen is a great example of what happens when you go to work for Donald Trump,” Toobin opened, adding “He’s the great reputation killer.”

This is rich coming from the man who became notorious for cheating on his wife with a young 20-something-year-old whom he got pregnant.

Toobin then tried to convince her to abort her unborn child.

Despite all this, CNN continues to trot out Toobin on a nightly basis.

Now, Toobin couldn’t help but keep twisting the knife in typical CNN fashion, as he noted Nielsen was a “reasonably admired” woman.

But after serving under Trump, for the rest of her life Toobin proclaimed, “people will look at her and think, oh, that’s the woman who put children in cages. That’s the woman who broke up families across the border. You know what? They’ll be right.”

Fake News Media outlets have heavily reported that President Trump was the one to start the policy of “caging children” and separating children from their parents.

The problem?

The policy was started under President Obama.

In fact, most pictures you see of “caged” children were from the Obama era immigration policies that included child separation.

CNN has proven they don’t actually care about the facts.

They just care about pushing their narrative to destroy the Trump presidency and anyone who supports Trump.

Trump has said he wants to have a much tougher direction on immigration which is why he requested Nielson’s resignation.

Do you think CNN has any credibility left?

Let us know your thoughts in the comments section.

Continue Reading


  1. Walt

    April 11, 2019 at 3:34 pm


  2. Joe jaxx

    April 11, 2019 at 3:41 pm

    Toobin is a fan of “low blows”! Definitely a prerequisite at CNN !

  3. J

    April 11, 2019 at 3:52 pm

    No I don’t like or watch because of the FAKE news, crude & angry people on it & they lie with every word they speak! SCUM!

  4. james ronald hunt

    April 11, 2019 at 3:58 pm

    libs continue to shoot themselves in the head . i do not know one that i would vote for . can NOT STAND THEIR STUPIDITY

  5. SRS

    April 11, 2019 at 4:11 pm


  6. angelshot9876

    April 11, 2019 at 4:34 pm

    I will never understand how public places broadcast CNN continuously. I can’t escape it when I go into public buildings that have this blaring day in and day out. Who pays for this to be the only channel to be broadcast. I will not tolerate anymore of this propaganda the COMMUNIST NEWS NETWORK spews day in and day out.

  7. Lisa K Gibson

    April 11, 2019 at 5:35 pm

    CNN has become a huge joke and their name should be the Democratic news channel. The last time I watched CNN was during the Iraqui war; it went downhill after that.

  8. Lynn

    April 11, 2019 at 6:23 pm

    Just another OVER STUFFED ASS spouting off – BEYOND PATHETIC. Too bad he spread his sperm around

  9. GCC

    April 11, 2019 at 10:15 pm

    CNN has zero credibility!!!

  10. william palmer

    April 12, 2019 at 11:06 am

    Toobin is a Hack. As legally Stupid as he is,it is inconceivable he actually went to Law School. Probably on line.

  11. Lin

    April 12, 2019 at 5:31 pm

    Any comments from this low life are just that….Low Life!
    He knows all about everything and knows Nothing!!
    He is pathetic!! As everyone at CNN are!!!

  12. Timbuktu

    April 12, 2019 at 8:30 pm

    What a silly question:

    Do you think CNN has any credibility left?


  13. Jim

    April 13, 2019 at 2:16 pm

    These ASS HOLES on CNN are COWARDS. If they had to meet you FACE to FACE, they would run like hell. Like I said, COWDARD’S!

  14. Betty Oeschger

    April 16, 2019 at 2:59 am

    let us see CNN gave an award to Acosta ?? for what ?? I learned in grade school about awards it was always to the girl whose mother was on the PTA and kiss up to the teacher although she could be one of the not so smart students. So I give no credit to awards and again proof that if you kiss up like Acosta & act like an ass oh well here is your awards for the CNN fool.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


CNN’s Jake Tapper flat-out refused to correct AOC when she was caught in this outrageous lie



Members of Congress used to be known for only lying to their constituents back home.

And the media was once known as “the arbiter of truth” and an institution of trust and respect.

But that has all changed and now CNN’s Jake Tapper flat-out refused to correct AOC when she was caught in this outrageous lie.

CNN’s Jake Tapper has gone from being considered by some as a respected, impartial journalist to just another left-wing hack who can lie and promote the Left’s with the best of them.

Tapper recently admitted that he allowed Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) to blatantly lie about President Trump during a recent interview.

AOC said during the interview, “The beds and the capacity that we need in this country. And we’re hearing it every step of the way from this administration. First, we were hearing that it’s a hoax, then we were hearing that everything was fine.”

This all stemmed from earlier false press reports claiming the President called coronavirus a hoax. The claims were quickly disproven and even corrected by most news outlets.

But clearly not by CNN.

Tapper later even admitted he knew it was a lie from AOC, but chose not to say anything.

“I thought about it, because the president did not call the virus a hoax.” Tapper said.

Tapper went further in trying to deflect from the Congresswoman’s lie by simply accusing the president of being a liar.

“I guess that’s the problem with a politician who lies so often. While I agree that Democrats are mischaracterizing what he said, what he did say was also false so it’s tough to justify taking the time for a fact check when it’s not taking a stand defining the truth,” Jake added.

So, in other words, because Tapper doesn’t like the president and personally believes Donald Trump lies often, he decided not to correct a blatant lie on his show.

This disregard for the truth is so widespread by the media now, Tapper’s decision didn’t receive much coverage.

There was a time not so long ago when ploys like this would have cost a reporter his job.

But we have moved far past that time in history.

The Trump era may go down in history as the time that journalism died its last death.

Share your thoughts about this story with Pants on Fire News in the comments below.

Continue Reading

Donald Trump

The New York Times is using the current crisis to attack Christians for this outrageous reason



Most Americans are coming together to battle both the Chinese coronavirus and the economic fallout from forced business closings.

But the media has decided this crisis is a great time to attack the very country that first protected their freedom of the press.

And now The New York Times is using the current crisis to attack Christians for this outrageous reason.

The liberal mainstream media has been out of control for decades.

They have gone from reporting the news and providing vital information to being nothing more than a public relations company for the far Left.

Now the liberal mainstream media’s blatant disregard for truth, accuracy, and basic decency has reached new lows in the last four or five years.

It’s no wonder journalists have become among the least trusted segments of American society, joining lawyers, politicians, and infomercial spokesmen.

From CBS using fake video footage to promote an anti-Trump story on the coronavirus, to the Washington Post gleefully predicting Trump supporters would suffer the highest number of deaths from the virus, the media has reached new lows.

Now The New York Times has taken it even lower with a shocking claim that Christians are to blame for the Chinese coronavirus.

Last week, The Times published an op-ed placing the blame on the so-called “religious right” for President Trump’s supposedly delayed response to the Chinese coronavirus pandemic.

In the editorial, self-described “journalist” and author Katherine Stewart attempted to argue that the President’s “anti-science” evangelical voter base is influencing him too heavily, causing him to ignore scientists on issues like vaccines and, of course, climate change.

The op-ed was originally released with the title “The Road to Coronavirus Hell Was Paved by Evangelicals” but after massive backlash the liberal rag toned down the title to “The Religious Right’s Hostility to Science Is Crippling Our Coronavirus Response.”

Of course, both titles are vile and show the author’s (and the newspaper’s) violent bias against Christians.

Not to mention the author completely ignoring the fact that it is the Left’s anti-science views on life that have caused the slaughter of millions of children over the past few decades.

And it is the liberal anti-science views on gender that have led to the destruction of women’s sports and left thousands of scared, confused children facing mutilating surgeries.

What is most interesting about Stewart’s anti-Christian hit piece is that she focuses most of her vitriol on Christians who oppose the “Green New Deal” and other socialist attempts to take control by promoting fears of climate change.

Once again, the author ignores the fact that the same people claiming the earth will end in ten years have made those claims before.

In fact, some of these “scientists” have been predicting the end of the world since the 1970s.

And, the author conveniently leaves out the fact that as Donald Trump was first warning of the Chinese coronavirus in January, many “scientists” were claiming it couldn’t even be spread by human contact.

And when Trump placed a ban on travel from China to try and stop the spread, it was “scientists” who called him a racist and claimed a travel ban wasn’t needed.

Share your thoughts about this story with Pants on Fire News in the comments below.

Continue Reading

Donald Trump

The New York Times admitted one coronavirus error that had Trump grinning from ear to ear



During the coronavirus outbreak the Fake News Media is not trying to inform the American people.

Instead, so-called “reporters” are seizing on the pandemic to launch another front in their war to destroy Donald Trump.

But now The New York Times admitted one coronavirus error that had Trump grinning from ear to ear.

During a March White House press briefing the President expressed his hope that the anti-malarial drug hydroxychloroquine would prove to be a game-changer as it showed promise in limited use in treating coronavirus patients.

While the evidence was anecdotal and more tests were clearly required, the President was offering the American people a ray of hope as the outbreak spread.

The New York Times – instead of reporting facts – attacked the President for falsely touting “unproven drugs.”

“At a long-winded White House briefing on Friday, President Trump enthusiastically and repeatedly promoted the promise of two long-used malaria drugs that are still unproven against the coronavirus, but being tested in clinical trials,” The Times wrote on March 20.

By April 1, The Times was singing a different tune reporting that “The malaria drug hydroxychloroquine helped to speed the recovery of a small number of patients who were mildly ill from the coronavirus, doctors in China reported this week.”

The Times also noted that the drug helped those with mild cases avoid a severe infection that could result in an ICU stay or having to go on a ventilator.

“Cough, fever and pneumonia went away faster, and the disease seemed less likely to turn severe in people who received hydroxychloroquine than in a comparison group not given the drug. The authors of the report said that the medication was promising, but that more research was needed to clarify how it might work in treating coronavirus disease and to determine the best way to use it,” The Times added.

While the study was limited there are extensive tests going on in New York with drugs and many Americans are hoping that there is more good news to be found.

Pants on Fire News will keep you up-to-date on any new developments in this ongoing story

Continue Reading

Sign Up For FREE Alerts