The war in Ukraine rages on after Vladimir Putin’s nightmarish invasion.
Everyone is anxious for a relatively peaceful end to the conflict.
But America’s corporate-controlled media is bizarrely invested in one narrative about the war in Ukraine.
The warmongers of both parties clearly want escalation in Ukraine, but the so-called “mainstream” media appear to be invested as well.
Fox News host Tucker Carlson has been labeled a traitor for calling for de-escalation in the war.
Russia, after all, has 6,000 nukes and a military budget ten times the size of Ukraine’s.
But “mainstream” outlets like The Atlantic seem heavily invested in the idea that Ukraine is winning the war.
sure sign Russia is winning pic.twitter.com/vx7lgLRcIl
— curtmills (@CurtMills) March 21, 2022
If Ukraine is winning, then the rallying cry should be that they must fight onward and repel the Russians.
While that may be noble, it could be a deadly proposition, especially if it’s not true.
The Atlantic wrote that “talk of stalemate obscures the dynamic quality of war. The more you succeed, the more likely you are to succeed; the more you fail, the more likely you are to continue to fail. There is no publicly available evidence of the Russians being able to regroup and resupply on a large scale; there is plenty of evidence to the contrary. If the Ukrainians continue to win, we might see more visible collapses of Russian units and perhaps mass surrenders and desertions.”
In other words, The Atlantic wants to ratchet up the conflict in order to break Russia.
The Atlantic added that the endgame “should be driven by an understanding that Putin is a very bad man indeed, but not a shy one. When he wants an off-ramp, he will let us know. Until then, the way to end the war with the minimum of human suffering is to pile on.”
Retired Colonel Douglas MacGregor, who is more of a noninterventionist, explained America’s strategy in an interview with Judge Andrew Napolitano.
When asked about Joe Biden’s strategy, MacGregor said, “I think he’s gonna listen to Tony Blinken and Victoria Nuland, who are obviously in charge of policy as far as Ukraine is concerned. And his policy is to make Ukraine suffer as long as possible on the assumption that this hurts Russia and that Russia can be bled white and that ultimately Putin can be made so unpopular that everyone wants to remove him.”
His analysis was the blunt version of The Atlantic’s flowery war propaganda.
MacGregor added, “There’s no evidence for that, by the way. I mean, we’ve had all of these unsubstantiated reports that are all traced back to the Ukrainian Ministry of Defense telling us that the Russians are losing, Russian troops are deserting, Russians are being killed in large numbers, everyone wants out, the Russian army is demoralized and so forth and so on. There’s no evidence for that. I haven’t been able to find any.”
The warmongers seem to want an endless war in Ukraine in hopes of regime change in Russia.
That is an incredibly dangerous gamble to play with a nuclear-armed country.
The word police at the Associated Press are now shockingly censoring one word
The Left always tries to control language.
It’s one of the only ways they can sell their radical ideas.
Now the word police at the Associated Press are shockingly censoring one word.
The horrific mass shooting in Buffalo has managed to knock abortion out of the headlines.
The Fake News Media is going all-in on the white supremacist attack in order to pin the responsibility on Republicans.
It’s an absurd argument, but the Democrats are shameless.
In fact, they’re even manipulating language.
The Associated Press Stylebook does not want the killer’s 180-page ramblings to be classified as a manifesto.
The AP wrote on Twitter, “We don’t use the term manifesto in reference to a racist diatribe. It glorifies racist hatred. Other terms such as diatribe, screed or writings can work instead.”
We don't use the term manifesto in reference to a racist diatribe. It glorifies racist hatred. Other terms such as diatribe, screed or writings can work instead.
— APStylebook (@APStylebook) May 16, 2022
However, centrist feminist Christina Hoff Sommers quickly corrected the AP.
Sommers wrote, “You are confused. Hitler’s Mein Kampf & rantings of the Unabomber are routinely referred to as “manifestos.” For example: Encyclopedia Britannica. “Mein Kampf, (German: “My Struggle”) political manifesto written by Adolf Hitler.”
You are confused. Hitler’s Mein Kampf & rantings of the Unabomber are routinely referred to as “manifestos.” For example: Encyclopedia Britannica. “Mein Kampf, (German: “My Struggle”) political manifesto written by Adolf Hitler. https://t.co/Y036sCNnpj.
— Christina Sommers (@CHSommers) May 17, 2022
Perhaps the Left don’t want to dirty up the word manifesto because of their fondness for Karl Marx’s “Communist Manifesto.”
Marx’s evil ideas have festered for nearly 200 years, eating away at society and poisoning a new generation of impressionable minds.
In fact, the Buffalo shooter wrote in his manifesto that he used to be a communist, but currently identifies as “mild-moderate authoritarian left.”
The shooter also wore the black sun insignia, a symbol sometimes used by the neo-Nazi Azov Battalion of Ukraine.
He also said that one of his main inspirations was the Christchurch shooter in New Zealand, who had trained with Azov prior to committing his despicable massacre at a mosque.
Both the Buffalo shooter and the Christchurch shooter claimed to be radical environmentalists.
All of these facts are inconvenient for the Left because they tacitly support the Azov Battalion in Ukraine, and they’re trying to blame the shooting on Fox News, even though he explicitly said in the manifesto that he hated Fox.
Democrats are trying to control the narrative, and that starts with controlling language.
Unfortunately for them, they no longer have a monopoly on the dissemination of information.
New journalistic standard proves the Democrats are complete liars on one issue
The ideas of the Left are utterly incoherent.
Yet, Democrats willfully go along with all of the crazy ideas.
And one new journalistic standard proves the Democrats are complete liars on one issue.
The Democrats are hopping mad over the abortion issue, which was rekindled after a Supreme Court leak of a draft opinion from Samuel Alito that suggests the overturning of Roe V. Wade.
The new battle over abortion has brought women’s issues front and center for the Left, but there is a glaring omission in their progressive rhetoric.
Suddenly, transgender men and nonsense terms like “birth people” are no longer part of the conversation.
The Associated Press Style Guide tried to clean up this obvious contradiction by issuing a new update.
The AP Style Guide update read, “Phrasing like pregnant people or people who seek an abortion seeks to include people who have those experiences but do not identify as women, such as some transgender men and some nonbinary people. Such phrasing should be confined to stories that specifically address the experiences of people who do not identify as women.”
In other words, it is okay to “erase” trans men and dispatch with idiotic terms like “pregnant persons” and “people who give birth.”
Democrats don’t want any distractions from their over-the-top pro-abortion zealotry.
The style guide update is a clear example of how Democrats will manipulate language in any way they can to achieve political power.
For example, in light of the 2020 Reign of Terror, the AP Style Guide suggested that outlets capitalize “black” when describing people of African descent.
The out-of-the-blue update made no sense other than to somehow contribute to the cultural “reparations” in the aftermath of George Floyd’s death.
Democrats are now trotting out the “my body, my choice” line that they abandoned during the peak of COVID hysteria when they were forcing people to take an experimental vaccine.
It’s quite stunning to witness the mental gymnastics of the Left when killing babies is at stake.
They have already renewed talks of packing the Supreme Court.
Luckily for them, Merriam Webster added a new definition of “court-packing” to dovetail with the newfangled Democrat definition of simply restoring ideological balance to the court.
That is utter nonsense.
The Democrats want the Supreme Court to remain a liberal super-legislature that will codify into law the agenda they can’t pass through Congress.
The Left have destroyed their credibility by torturing logic to such a hideous extent.
Unhinged leftist reporter says there will be no peace or safety until this happens to pro-lifers
The Left is totally out of control.
They will use just about any excuse to bring violence into their repertoire.
Now, this unhinged leftist reporter says there will be no peace or safety until this happens to all pro-lifers.
Violence is a part of who the Left is and what they do.
Violence is part of how they plan to take power, it is always part of their path to power.
And when the news broke in German-owned Politico that a leaked copy of a draft Supreme Court decision overturning Roe vs. Wade was out, violence was sure to be right behind it.
And it was.
A pro-life organization in Wisconsin was firebombed. Churches were vandalized, and at least one Supreme Court justice had to be moved to an undisclosed location due to violent protestors.
Pro-life college students who went to the steps of the Supreme Court to pray and peacefully demonstrate were attacked, spit on and shoved to the ground, and hundreds, if not thousands of threats were made by radical leftists around the country.
Including a reporter for Rewire News Group who called for “more” violence against pro-life Americans over the weekend as she celebrated the firebombing of the headquarters of a pro-life group in Wisconsin.
“More of this. May these people never know a moment of peace or safety until they rot in the ground,” Caroline Reilly wrote in a now-deleted tweet responding to a report from The New York Times about the firebombing.
Though Reilly has since removed the tweet, and in fact appears to have deleted her entire account, she didn’t do so until there was a firestorm of condemnation about her death threat against pro-lifers.
Just a few of the responses to Reilly; “Where are the police?” tweeted writer Rod Dreher, and activist Amy Kremer wondered where the response was from the FBI and the Department of Justice.
“How would they feel if the public started to Dox reporters that call for violence and arson? What if it came to their doorstep instead? People with a voice need responsibility when using it,” Republican Florida congressional candidate Vic DeGrammont wrote.
Republican strategist Matt Whitlock tagged Twitter support in his response to make sure they were aware of Reilly’s death threats (a lot of good that will do) “This feels a bit like calling for violence.”
But all the protests aside, nothing will be done to this reporter because she is on the “right side” of the political aisle for the DOJ and FBI.
Law enforcement only seeks to go after conservatives, not liberals, no matter how clear the violations.
Caroline Reilly will remain free to threaten death on even more people, let’s just hope she doesn’t actually follow through with her threats, because after all we know life means almost nothing to people like her.
Pants on Fire News will keep you up-to-date on any developments to this ongoing story.
Jen Psaki1 week ago
Jen Psaki’s new attack on Trump supporters is both embarrassing and hilarious
The View5 days ago
Joy Behar of The View issued one insane threat to a Republican congresswoman
The New York Times2 weeks ago
The New York Times wrote one obituary that will turn your stomach
The View2 weeks ago
Sunny Hostin of The View said something so shocking that the other women on the stage were left stunned
Politics2 weeks ago
Bill Maher admitted he didn’t know the truth about one Democrat talking point
MSNBC1 week ago
An MSNBC host laughs off one of the most grotesque interviews ever
CNN2 weeks ago
CNN executives wanted to crawl under the boardroom table when they heard this embarrassing news
Joe Biden2 weeks ago
Joe Biden’s FDA boss claims this non-health issue is the leading cause of death in the U.S.