Connect with us

CBS

A former CBS hack went after one comedian who told the truth about the coronavirus

Published

on

The establishment narratives around the origins of the coronavirus are crumbling.

Even liberals are cracking jokes about the absurdity of the Wuhan wet market theory.

And a former CBS hack went after one comedian who told the truth about the coronavirus.

Former Daily Show host Jon Stewart shocked liberals when he appeared on old friend Stephen Colbert’s late night show.

Stewart pointed out that the COVID lab leak hypothesis was the most likely theory, much to the dismay of leftists.

For nearly a year, people were forbidden from discussing the possibility that a bat with coronavirus escaped from one of the very few biohazard labs in the entire world that was studying bat coronaviruses.

Such a claim warranted a social media suspension, and even permanent banning.

But now that Dr. Anthony Fauci publicly acknowledged the lab leak was possible, it’s become somewhat acceptable to speculate.

But former CBS anchor Dan Rather, who left in disgrace after presenting fake documents to attack George W. Bush in 2004, went after Stewart for his humorous rant.

Rather argued that Stewart was dangerously spreading “unreasoning.”

He took umbrage at Stewart joking that scientific experimentation run amok could be catastrophic.

Stewart’s jab was referencing the gain-of-function research that made the coronavirus deadlier.

Gain-of-function research is controversial and should be open to debate, but not according to Rather.

He wrote:

“Stewart is playing into the trope of the mad scientist at a time when we need science more than ever to solve our more pressing problems — most notably climate change. The idea that science is the biggest threat to the planet is terribly irresponsible. It gives free license to all those who say, ‘forget what we have learned, forget knowledge, forget seeing reality.’ And I fear this reasoning – or should I say ‘unreasoning’ — has not only consumed the modern Republican party but is in danger of consuming an even broader swath of the American and global public.”

This garbage is nothing more than carrying water for a corrupt establishment.

The so-called party of science now openly argues that men can become women and 2+2=5.

The establishment Left wants to shut down scientific debate, not foster it.

For example, there is not a consensus on climate change, and more specifically what should be done about it.

But the establishment is so accustomed to manufacturing consent that they cannot handle losing control of master narratives.

Pants on Fire Official Polling

CBS

CBS is ridiculously using the war in Ukraine to make the border crisis even worse

Published

on

By

The war in Ukraine has become a panacea for the Democrats and their media allies.

They’re using the deadly conflict as a way to push all of their other policy goals.

Now CBS is ridiculously using the war in Ukraine to make the border crisis even worse.

Vladimir Putin’s invasion of Ukraine has set off a seismic ripple effect across the world.

One consequence is that as many as two million war refugees have already been resettled in other countries.

And CBS used the harrowing war to promote the idea of increased migration from Central America.

In a conversation with International Rescue Committee CEO David Miliband, CBS Mornings co-host Nate Burleson asked, “David, how does this treatment compare to refugees from Syria and Afghanistan?”

Miliband responded, “In the case of the European Union, we’ve got unity now where there was disunity before. We’ve got welcomed now where there was a very divided response before. In the case of the Syrian crisis, it took three months for a million people to flee Syria. In the case of Ukraine, it’s taken a week, and we’re now up to 1.5 million.”

Co-host Gayle King belabored the point and asked, “And why do you think that is? A lot of people are starting to say, ‘Listen, when people were coming here from El Salvador, Honduras, they were not welcome. They were really — well — they were not received very well . . . When you talk about Syria and Afghanistan, too, what do you think is the difference here?”

CBS was clearly attempting to insert race into the discussion.

But one distinct difference is that people coming from Central America are economic migrants – Ukrainians are fleeing a hot war that could potentially go nuclear in the worst-case scenario.

Over 90% of the asylum cases from Mexico and Central America are denied – economic migrants are coming for a better life.

While that decision is understandable, America cannot take in everyone because billions of people around the world would die trying to get here.

Miliband responded to King by saying, “Well, it’s simple. There’s more fear of incorporating and integrating people from different races and different religions into national life. Let’s be honest about it.”

But Miliband ignores the added issue of vetting people from Afghanistan and Syria – some terrorists have slipped through the cracks by pretending to be refugees.

The Obama administration also deprioritized Syrian Christians who were attempting to flee the war-torn country.

The immigration system is broken, and the elites want to keep it that way.

Pants on Fire Official Polling

Continue Reading

CBS

A top network anchor is helping out leftists by pushing socialism and revealed one dangerous new plan in the process

Published

on

By

There’s nothing leftists love more than stirring up animosity.

Those in the news business literally make a living out of it.

Now a top network anchor is using jealousy to push socialism – with a dangerous new twist.

CBS’s Janey Pauley and Mark Whitaker are doing their level best to whip up popular support for socialism with an attack on the “top 1%.”

It’s about the oldest trick in the book for leftists to convince the masses to give them power.

Of course, once they’re in charge everyone ends up poor.

In the piece, Whitaker interviewed a professor of “philosophy and ethics” at Utrecht University in the Netherlands.

Ingrid Robeyns is the proud creator of a concept called “limitarianism” – which is nothing less than Communism 2.0 in camouflage.

It is, according to Robeyns, the idea that there’s a “moral limit to how much wealth you can accumulate.”

Severe famine, death, and deprivation due to chronic supply chain issues in communist governments has tarnished communism’s image.

But hope springs anew on college campuses forevermore along with the push to find utopia by destroying the most successful people in the world.

So, Robeyns has come up with a way to pitch the “duty not to be rich” in a way more palatable than dredging up old images of dying peasants who were promised prosperity by their communist overlords.

Instead, she’s pitching some sort of property-owning democracy where billionaires will be outlawed.

In fact, she suggests capping wealth at $10 million to $20 million in the United States.

The exact number doesn’t matter as long as it’s high enough most people won’t complain until precedent has been established to give leftist control over a small portion of the population on their journey to control all of us.

In fact, Robeyns’ “limitarianism” sounds an awful lot like China’s recent recommitment to communism as officials announced last summer the plan to regulate “excessive” wealth in the country where communist bosses have been reasserting themselves over the lives of all their citizens.

No doubt, America’s 3,000 billionaires who increased their wealth by $5 trillion last year had plenty of help from leftist politicians who printed money, manipulated markets, and sold drugs for Big Pharma like it was their job.

But giving government regulators more power won’t help Americans at the bottom of the ladder.

And deciding that some people are “too rich” won’t put money into Americans’ pockets like a good job will.

No doubt, it would create a whole new class of powerful ruling politicians who would get to pick winners and losers in the wealth game.

Pants on Fire News will keep you up-to-date on any developments to this ongoing story.

Continue Reading

CBS

CBS used one word to describe Kyle Rittenhouse that could lead to this major lawsuit

Published

on

The corporate-controlled media has been lying about Kyle Rittenhouse from the start.

So-called “journalists” attempted to frame Rittenhouse to advance their political agenda.

And CBS used one word to describe Kyle Rittenhouse that could lead to this major lawsuit.

Kyle Rittenhouse took the stand in his own defense and testified about how the Black Lives Matter rioters allegedly threatened his life and left him with no choice but to exercise his right to self-defense.

“He has asserted that he fired the shots in self-defense, testifying that one of the men, Joseph Rosenbaum, lunged at him before he pulled the trigger, and that the second man who was killed, Anthony Huber, ‘pulled away’ his firearm before he discharged it,” Mediaite reported.

A third rioter named Gaige Grosskreutz admitted that he pointed a gun at Rittenhouse before Rittenhouse allegedly shot Grosskreutz in the bicep.

Despite this testimony, CBS still attempted to smear Rittenhouse in the minds of the public, posting a Tweet claiming Rittenhouse described how he “murdered” two Black Lives Matter rioters.

“Kyle Rittenhouse testified in his murder trial yesterday, breaking down in tears as he told the jury he murdered two men at a Black Lives Matter protest last year in self-defense,” the network wrote in the misguided missive.

This Tweet is libelous and could lead to a lawsuit from Rittenhouse.

CBS knew this Tweet was false and a lie when they published it.

Rittenhouse is already suing Joe Biden for smearing him as a white supremacist in a campaign ad last fall.

The media’s conduct from the day Rittenhouse acted in self-defense has been shameful.

Reporters lied about every aspect of this event and trial in order to create a political narrative that Rittenhouse was a murderous foot soldier in Donald Trump’s white supremacist domestic terror militia.

And critics contend there needs to be a reckoning for this false coverage.

Pants on Fire News will keep you up-to-date on any new developments in this ongoing story.

Continue Reading

Sign Up For FREE Alerts

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Trending